Lensby Arxo
Download JSON
Question Saved analysis

Nine votes in favour: is a procedural decision adopted, and does a permanent member's abstention block a non-procedural one?

Nine votes in favour. Article 27(2) adopts a procedural decision. Article 27(3) requires the concurring votes of the permanent members. A later reading adds a path; it does not erase the letter.

This is an assistant explanation, not a calculation result. Check the grounds and sources below.

Results

6

Condition

Procedural vote: the decision is adopted

Established

Query parameters · 1
d
procedural
Input facts · 11
  • Decision (of the Security Council or the General Assembly)

    d: d

    Subject shared by the facts below

  • the decision is on a procedural matter (Art. 27, para. 2)

  • the State casts a vote in favour (Art. 18, Art. 27)

    s
    france
    uk
    us
    m0
    m1
    m2
    m3
    m4
    m5
  • the State abstains (Art. 27, para. 3)

    s: soviet
Why this result? →Sources: 2

Condition

Procedural vote: paragraph 3 does not block it

Not established

Query parameters · 1
d
procedural
Input facts · 11
  • Decision (of the Security Council or the General Assembly)

    d: d

    Subject shared by the facts below

  • the decision is on a procedural matter (Art. 27, para. 2)

  • the State casts a vote in favour (Art. 18, Art. 27)

    s
    france
    uk
    us
    m0
    m1
    m2
    m3
    m4
    m5
  • the State abstains (Art. 27, para. 3)

    s: soviet
Why this result? →Sources: 2

Nine votes on a procedural matter adopt the decision. Paragraph 3 does not block it.

Condition

Letter of article 27(3): adoption is not established

Not established

Query parameters · 1
d
abstention
Input facts · 11
  • Decision (of the Security Council or the General Assembly)

    d: d

    Subject shared by the facts below

  • the decision is not on a procedural matter (Art. 27, para. 3)

  • the State casts a vote in favour (Art. 18, Art. 27)

    s
    france
    uk
    us
    m0
    m1
    m2
    m3
    m4
    m5
  • the State abstains (Art. 27, para. 3)

    s: soviet
Why this result? →Sources: 2

Condition

Letter of article 27(3): the abstention blocks

Established

Query parameters · 1
d
abstention
Input facts · 11
  • Decision (of the Security Council or the General Assembly)

    d: d

    Subject shared by the facts below

  • the decision is not on a procedural matter (Art. 27, para. 3)

  • the State casts a vote in favour (Art. 18, Art. 27)

    s
    france
    uk
    us
    m0
    m1
    m2
    m3
    m4
    m5
  • the State abstains (Art. 27, para. 3)

    s: soviet
Why this result? →Sources: 2

On the letter, a permanent member's abstention is not a concurring vote. The decision is not adopted, and the missing vote blocks.

Condition

Practice: the decision is adopted

Established

Query parameters · 1
d
abstention
Input facts · 11
  • Decision (of the Security Council or the General Assembly)

    d: d

    Subject shared by the facts below

  • the decision is not on a procedural matter (Art. 27, para. 3)

  • the State casts a vote in favour (Art. 18, Art. 27)

    s
    france
    uk
    us
    m0
    m1
    m2
    m3
    m4
    m5
  • the State abstains (Art. 27, para. 3)

    s: soviet
Why this result? →Sources: 2

Condition

Practice: the letter still blocks

Established

Query parameters · 1
d
abstention
Input facts · 11
  • Decision (of the Security Council or the General Assembly)

    d: d

    Subject shared by the facts below

  • the decision is not on a procedural matter (Art. 27, para. 3)

  • the State casts a vote in favour (Art. 18, Art. 27)

    s
    france
    uk
    us
    m0
    m1
    m2
    m3
    m4
    m5
  • the State abstains (Art. 27, para. 3)

    s: soviet
Why this result? →Sources: 2

Practice adds a path on which the same abstention does not prevent adoption. The blocking path of the letter remains.

How to cite

The snapshot is immutable: the SHA-256 of the downloadable JSON pins it, so no access date is needed.

Citation
“Nine votes in favour: is a procedural decision adopted, and does a permanent member's abstention block a non-procedural one?”. Arxo Lens, as of 2026-01-01. https://lens.arxo.io/a/b_4d9759faec96015b5e642c35fa06e07df99e87c53fb34114fcc7c538d90b5530. Snapshot SHA-256: 4d9759faec96015b5e642c35fa06e07df99e87c53fb34114fcc7c538d90b5530.
BibTeX
@misc{arxo-lens-b_4d9759faec96,
  title = {Nine votes in favour: is a procedural decision adopted, and does a permanent member's abstention block a non-procedural one?},
  howpublished = {Arxo Lens},
  url = {https://lens.arxo.io/a/b_4d9759faec96015b5e642c35fa06e07df99e87c53fb34114fcc7c538d90b5530},
  note = {as of 2026-01-01; SHA-256 4d9759faec96015b5e642c35fa06e07df99e87c53fb34114fcc7c538d90b5530}
}
Embed code

The card shows the result and links to the full analysis; it sets no cookies.

<iframe src="https://lens.arxo.io/embed/b_4d9759faec96015b5e642c35fa06e07df99e87c53fb34114fcc7c538d90b5530?lang=en" width="100%" height="390" loading="lazy" title="Same vote, two answers — Arxo Lens" style="border:0"></iframe>

Anonymous visit statistics, no cookies.