Eine Forderung, entstanden am 15. März 2010, Klage am 2. Januar 2016: ist das Rechtsmittel nach dem BGB, dem Code civil und den UNIDROIT-Prinzipien ausgeschlossen?

Dieselben Daten, drei Texte. Das BGB lässt die regelmäßige Verjährung mit dem Schluss des Jahres eintreten. Der Code civil zählt fünf Jahre ab Kenntnis. Die Prinzipien schließen das Rechtsmittel aus, wenn die Verjährung geltend gemacht wird.

Dies ist eine Erläuterung des Assistenten, kein Berechnungsergebnis. Prüfen Sie die Schlussfolgerungen anhand der Begründung und der Quellen unten.

Kurzübersicht

Wählen Sie ein Ergebnis, um zu den Begründungen zu gelangen

Fünf Jahre, BGB: die Verjährung ist am 31. Dezember 2013 eingetretenBedingungsprüfungFestgestelltAusführung: BerechnetLogisches Ergebnis: Festgestellt Fünf Jahre, BGB: das Rechtsmittel ist ausgeschlossenBedingungsprüfungFestgestelltAusführung: BerechnetLogisches Ergebnis: Festgestellt Fünf Jahre, Code civil: die Klage ist verjährtBedingungsprüfungFestgestelltAusführung: BerechnetLogisches Ergebnis: Festgestellt Fünf Jahre, Code civil: das Rechtsmittel ist ausgeschlossenBedingungsprüfungFestgestelltAusführung: BerechnetLogisches Ergebnis: Festgestellt Fünf Jahre, PICC: das Rechtsmittel ist ausgeschlossenBedingungsprüfungFestgestelltAusführung: BerechnetLogisches Ergebnis: Festgestellt Zwei Jahre, Code civil: die Klage ist nicht verjährtBedingungsprüfungWiderlegtAusführung: BerechnetLogisches Ergebnis: Widerlegt

Ausführliche Auswertung

Bedingungsprüfung

Fünf Jahre, BGB: die Verjährung ist am 31. Dezember 2013 eingetreten

Rechtsordnung DeutschlandRechtsstand zum 2016-01-02

Berechnungsergebnis

Festgestellt

Eingabeparameter

Was wir ermitteln

Tag, mit dessen Ablauf die Verjährung des Anspruchs eintritt

anspruch31. Dezember 2013

Ausgangsfakten

Tag, an dem der Anspruch entstanden ist (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 1, § 200)
a: atag: 15. März 2010
Tag, an dem der Gläubiger von den den Anspruch begründenden Umständen und der Person des Schuldners Kenntnis erlangt hat (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 2) — festgestellte Tatsache, im Fall origin adjudicated
a: atag: 15. März 2010
Kein Hemmungstatbestand der §§ 203–208 festgestellt — ausdrückliche Angabe des Falls; das Fehlen einer Angabe ist keine Verneinung
a: a
der Schuldner beruft sich auf die Verjährung des Leistungs- oder Nacherfüllungsanspruchs (§ 218 Abs. 1)
a: a
Inhaber des Anspruchs (Gläubiger)
a: ap: g
Anspruchsgegner (Schuldner)
a: ap: s
diese Person des BGB tritt in der vergleichenden Kette als dieses Gesicht auf
p x
g g
s s
dieser Anspruch ist das vergleichende Streitverhältnis
a: ac: causa
der Kläger erhebt gegen den Beklagten einen Anspruch — das streitige Rechtsverhältnis, auf das sich die Frage bezieht
causa: causaactor: greus: s

p	x
g	g
s	s

Ausgangsdaten · JSON

{
  "args": [
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:anspruch",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "kind": "value",
      "type": {
        "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
      },
      "value": "2013-12-31"
    }
  ],
  "facts": [
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core#anspruch_entstanden_am"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "adjudicated",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#kenntnis_erlangt_am"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#keine_hemmung"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#schuldner_beruft_sich_auf_verjaehrung"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#g",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core#anspruchsinhaber"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#s",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core#anspruchsgegner"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#g",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#persona_of"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#s",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#persona_of"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#causa_of_anspruch"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
    }
  ],
  "kind": "truth",
  "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
  "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#verjaehrung_eingetreten_am"
}

Warum dieses ErgebnisAngewendete Regeln und Voraussetzungen

Ableitungspfad11 Schritte

1
Tag, an dem der Anspruch entstanden ist (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 1, § 200)
a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 15. März 2010
Fallfakt
2
Für den Tag der Entstehung des Anspruchs wird der Schluss des Jahres gesucht (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 1)
für diesen Tag wird der Schluss des Jahres gesucht (§ 199 Abs. 1): a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 15. März 2010
Abs. 199
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeGesuchtFuerEntstehung
Regel
3
Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 9 — Ende des 9. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages
31. Dezember 2010 = month end of(add calendar period(month start of(15. März 2010), 9 calendar_month))
Abs. 199
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat09
Regel
4
Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): der Kandidat ist der 31. Dezember, wenn sein Monat 31 Tage hat, der folgende Monat 31 Tage und der übernächste höchstens 29 — Dezember, Januar, Februar
Schluss des Jahres, in dem der Tag liegt (§ 199 Abs. 1): der 31. Dezember desselben Jahres: a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 15. März 2010; ultimo: 31. Dezember 2010
Abs. 199
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeIstDezember
Regel
5
Kein Hemmungstatbestand der §§ 203–208 festgestellt — ausdrückliche Angabe des Falls; das Fehlen einer Angabe ist keine Verneinung
a: urn:p12:anspruch
Fallfakt
6
Tag, an dem der Gläubiger von den den Anspruch begründenden Umständen und der Person des Schuldners Kenntnis erlangt hat (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 2) — festgestellte Tatsache, im Fall origin adjudicated
a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 15. März 2010
- extern übernommen
extern übernommen
7
Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beginnt mit dem Schluss des Jahres, in dem der Anspruch entstanden ist und der Gläubiger Kenntnis erlangt hat (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 und 2) — Kenntnis nicht nach der Entstehung: Schluss des Entstehungsjahres
Schluss des Jahres, mit dem die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beginnt (§ 199 Abs. 1): a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 31. Dezember 2010
Abs. 199
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#VerjaehrungsbeginnUltimoDerEntstehung
Regel
8
Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beträgt drei Jahre (§ 195) — Jahresschritt vom Schluss des Jahres (§ 188 Abs. 2, Politik BGB_FRISTEN_KALENDER)
31. Dezember 2013 = add calendar period(31. Dezember 2010, 3 calendar_year)
Abs. 195
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#RegelmaessigeVerjaehrungsfrist
Regel
9
Ohne festgestellte Hemmung endet die Verjährungsfrist mit der regelmäßigen Frist (§§ 195, 199; § 209 greift nicht)
Tag, mit dessen Ablauf die Verjährungsfrist unter Berücksichtigung der Hemmung endet (§ 209): a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 31. Dezember 2013
Abs. 209
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#VerjaehrungsfristEndeOhneHemmung
Regel
10
Ohne Hemmung tritt die Verjährung mit dem Ende der Verjährungsfrist ein
Tag, mit dessen Ablauf die Verjährung des Anspruchs eintritt: a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 31. Dezember 2013
Abs. 209
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#VerjaehrungOhneHemmung
Regel
11
Abfrageauswertung
Abfrage

von der Engine geprüft: 8 · Fallfakt: 2 · extern übernommen: 1 · Vollständiger Graph: 33 Knoten

Schritte des gespeicherten Beweises von den Fallfakten zur Antwort. Die Formeln werden so gezeigt, wie sie in der Norm stehen, mit eingesetzten Werten; die Seite berechnet nichts neu.

Grundlage dieser Antwort

Regeln aus dem gespeicherten Beweisweg dieser Antwort.

de.bgb.fristen

Für den Tag der Entstehung des Anspruchs wird der Schluss des Jahres gesucht (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 1)
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeGesuchtFuerEntstehung
Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): der Kandidat ist der 31. Dezember, wenn sein Monat 31 Tage hat, der folgende Monat 31 Tage und der übernächste höchstens 29 — Dezember, Januar, Februar
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeIstDezember
Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 9 — Ende des 9. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat09
Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beträgt drei Jahre (§ 195) — Jahresschritt vom Schluss des Jahres (§ 188 Abs. 2, Politik BGB_FRISTEN_KALENDER)
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#RegelmaessigeVerjaehrungsfrist
Ohne Hemmung tritt die Verjährung mit dem Ende der Verjährungsfrist ein
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#VerjaehrungOhneHemmung
Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beginnt mit dem Schluss des Jahres, in dem der Anspruch entstanden ist und der Gläubiger Kenntnis erlangt hat (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 und 2) — Kenntnis nicht nach der Entstehung: Schluss des Entstehungsjahres
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#VerjaehrungsbeginnUltimoDerEntstehung
Ohne festgestellte Hemmung endet die Verjährungsfrist mit der regelmäßigen Frist (§§ 195, 199; § 209 greift nicht)
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#VerjaehrungsfristEndeOhneHemmung

Weitere Regeln der Berechnung14

Angewendet in der Gesamtberechnung, aber nicht Teil des Beweiswegs dieser Antwort.

de.bgb.fristen

Für den Tag der Kenntniserlangung wird der Schluss des Jahres gesucht (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 2)
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeGesuchtFuerKenntnis
Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 0 — Ende des 0. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat00
Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 1 — Ende des 1. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat01
Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 2 — Ende des 2. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat02
Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 3 — Ende des 3. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat03
Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 4 — Ende des 4. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat04
Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 5 — Ende des 5. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat05
Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 6 — Ende des 6. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat06
Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 7 — Ende des 7. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat07
Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 8 — Ende des 8. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat08
Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 10 — Ende des 10. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat10
Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 11 — Ende des 11. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat11
Nach Eintritt der Verjährung ist der Schuldner berechtigt, die Leistung zu verweigern (§ 214 Abs. 1)
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#Leistungsverweigerungsrecht214

de.bgb.ius_privatum

Nach Eintritt der Verjährung ist der Schuldner berechtigt, die Leistung zu verweigern
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#EinredeExcludit

Anmerkungen · 4

Ausführungsstörungen und Hinweise

HinweisEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31
редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_EN на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 81 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)
Betroffene Knoten
- Article 5.2.3. The conferment of rights in the beneficiary includes the right to invoke a clause in the contract which excludes or limits the liability of the beneficiary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryMayInvokeClause
- Articles 5.2.1 and 5.2.2. The parties may confer a right on a third party who must be identifiable with adequate certainty by the contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryRightExists
- Article 5.1.4(2). To the extent that an obligation involves a duty of best efforts, that party is bound to make such efforts as would be made by a reasonable person of the same kind urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BestEffortsDutyPerformed
- Article 1.9(1). The parties are bound by any usage to which they have agreed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByAgreedUsage
- Article 1.9(1). The parties are bound by practices which they have established between themselves urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByEstablishedPractice
- Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage
- Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage/unless/0
- Article 5.3.3(1). A party who prevented fulfilment contrary to good faith may not rely on the non-fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnPreventedCondition
- Article 5.3.3(2). A party who brought about fulfilment contrary to good faith may not rely on the fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnProcuredCondition
- Article 4.3. In applying Articles 4.1 and 4.2, regard shall be had to all the circumstances, including those listed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CircumstanceToBeRegarded
- Article 1.11. Where a party has more than one place of business the relevant one is that which has the closest relationship to the contract and its performance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ClosestPlaceIsRelevant
- Article 4.1(2) (opening words). Where the common intention can be established, the reasonable-persons reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CommonIntentionDisplacesReasonablePersons
- Article 1.12(2). The computed last day does not stand where it is a holiday at the place of performance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ComputedLastDayYieldsToHoliday
- Article 4.6. If contract terms supplied by one party are unclear, an interpretation against that party is preferred urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContraProferentem
- Article 1.3. A contract validly entered into is binding upon the parties urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContractIsBinding
- Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#Cooperate
- Article 5.2.4. The promisor may assert against the beneficiary all defences which the promisor could assert against the promisee urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DefencesAgainstBeneficiary
- Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective
- Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective/unless/0
- Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyOfGoodFaith
- Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToCooperate
- Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRights
- Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRightsBreached
- Article 5.1.1. The contractual obligations of the parties may be express urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ExpressIsContractual
- Article 5.1.5. In determining the extent to which an obligation involves a duty of best efforts or a duty to achieve a specific result, regard shall be had to the listed factors urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FactorDeterminesKindOfDuty
- Article 1.1. The parties are free to enter into a contract and to determine its content urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FreedomOfContract
- Article 1.6(2). Issues within the scope of these Principles but not expressly settled by them are as far as possible to be settled in accordance with their underlying general principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GapSettledByUnderlyingPrinciples
- Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaith
- Article 1.7(2). The parties may not exclude or limit the duty of good faith and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaithCannotBeExcluded
- Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted
- Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted/unless/0
- Article 5.1.2(c). Implied obligations stem from good faith and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromGoodFaith
- Article 5.1.2(a). Implied obligations stem from the nature and purpose of the contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromNatureAndPurpose
- Article 5.1.2(b). Implied obligations stem from practices established between the parties and usages urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromPracticesAndUsages
- Article 5.1.2(d). Implied obligations stem from reasonableness urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromReasonableness
- Article 5.1.1. The contractual obligations of the parties may be implied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedIsContractual
- Article 1.8. A party cannot act inconsistently with an understanding it has caused the other party to have and upon which that other party reasonably has acted in reliance to its detriment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InconsistentBehaviourBarred
- Article 4.2(2) (opening words). Where the intention was known to the other party, the reasonable-person reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#IntentionDisplacesReasonablePerson
- Article 4.1(1). A contract shall be interpreted according to the common intention of the parties urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByCommonIntention
- Article 4.1(2). If the common intention cannot be established, the contract shall be interpreted according to the meaning reasonable persons of the same kind would give it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByReasonablePersons
- Article 1.4. Nothing in these Principles restricts the application of mandatory rules urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MandatoryRulesUnrestricted
- Article 5.1.7(2). Where the price is to be determined by one party and that determination is manifestly unreasonable, a reasonable price shall be substituted notwithstanding any contract term to the contrary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ManifestlyUnreasonableDeterminationReplaced
- Preamble. These Principles may be applied when the parties have agreed that their contract be governed by general principles of law, the lex mercatoria or the like urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyOnChoiceOfGeneralPrinciples
- Preamble. These Principles may be applied when the parties have not chosen any law to govern their contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyWhereNoLawChosen
- Preamble. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement domestic law urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretDomesticLaw
- Preamble. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement international uniform law instruments urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretUniformLaw
- Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated as otherwise provided in these Principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationAsProvided
- Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated by agreement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByAgreement
- Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated in accordance with its terms urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByTerms
- Article 1.2. Nothing in these Principles requires a contract to be made in or evidenced by a particular form urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoFormRequired
- Article 1.10(2)-(3). A notice is effective when it reaches the person to whom it is given urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoticeEffectiveOnReceipt
- Article 4.7. In case of discrepancy between equally authoritative versions there is a preference for the interpretation according to the original version urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#OriginalVersionPreferred
- Article 1.12(1). Official holidays or non-business days occurring during the period are included in calculating it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodEndsOn
- Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday
- Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday/unless/0
- Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PreserveRights
- Article 5.1.7(1). Where a contract does not fix the price, the parties are considered to have made reference to the price generally charged in comparable circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceByMarket
- Article 5.1.7(1). If no such price is available, a reasonable price applies urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceReasonableWhereNoMarket
- Preamble. These Principles shall be applied when the parties have agreed that their contract be governed by them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PrinciplesGovernByAgreement
- Article 5.1.6. Where the quality of performance is neither fixed by nor determinable from the contract, a party is bound to render a performance of a quality that is reasonable and not less than average in the circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#QualityWhereNotFixed
- Articles 4.4 and 4.5. Terms are to be read in the light of the whole contract and so as to give effect to all of them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReadingConformsToCanons
- Article 5.1.9(1). An obligee may release its right by agreement with the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReleaseByAgreement
- Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone
- Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone/unless/0
- Article 5.2.6. The beneficiary may renounce a right conferred on it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RenunciationEndsBeneficiaryRight
- Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract
- Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract/unless/0
- Article 5.3.5. On fulfilment of a resolutive condition the rules on restitution apply with appropriate adaptations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RestitutionOnResolutiveCondition
- Article 5.1.4(1). To the extent that an obligation involves a duty to achieve a specific result, that party is bound to achieve that result urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResultDutyPerformed
- Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance
- Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance/unless/0
- Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant
- Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant/unless/0
- Article 4.2(1). Statements and other conduct shall be interpreted according to the party's intention if the other party knew or could not have been unaware of it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByIntention
- Article 4.2(2). If the preceding paragraph is not applicable, statements shall be interpreted according to the meaning a reasonable person would give them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByReasonablePerson
- Article 4.8(1). Where the parties have not agreed with respect to an important term, a term which is appropriate in the circumstances shall be supplied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SupplyOmittedTerm
- Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect
- Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect/unless/0
- Article 5.1.8. A contract for an indefinite period may be terminated by either party by giving notice a reasonable time in advance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#TerminationOfIndefiniteContract
- Article 5.1.7(2). A manifestly unreasonable determination does not stand as the applicable price urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#UnreasonableDeterminationDisplaced
- Article 5.3.1. A contract or a contractual obligation may be made conditional upon the occurrence of a future uncertain event urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ValidCondition
Details
```
{
 "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_EN",
 "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
 "since": null,
 "state": "not_yet",
 "status": null
}
```
HinweisEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31
редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_FR на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 79 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)
Betroffene Knoten
- Article 5.2.3. The conferment of rights in the beneficiary includes the right to invoke a clause in the contract which excludes or limits the liability of the beneficiary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryMayInvokeClause
- Article 5.1.4(2). To the extent that an obligation involves a duty of best efforts, that party is bound to make such efforts as would be made by a reasonable person of the same kind urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BestEffortsDutyPerformed
- Article 1.9(1). The parties are bound by any usage to which they have agreed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByAgreedUsage
- Article 1.9(1). The parties are bound by practices which they have established between themselves urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByEstablishedPractice
- Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage
- Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage/unless/0
- Article 5.3.3(1). A party who prevented fulfilment contrary to good faith may not rely on the non-fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnPreventedCondition
- Article 5.3.3(2). A party who brought about fulfilment contrary to good faith may not rely on the fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnProcuredCondition
- Article 4.3. In applying Articles 4.1 and 4.2, regard shall be had to all the circumstances, including those listed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CircumstanceToBeRegarded
- Article 1.11. Where a party has more than one place of business the relevant one is that which has the closest relationship to the contract and its performance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ClosestPlaceIsRelevant
- Article 4.1(2) (opening words). Where the common intention can be established, the reasonable-persons reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CommonIntentionDisplacesReasonablePersons
- Article 1.12(2). The computed last day does not stand where it is a holiday at the place of performance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ComputedLastDayYieldsToHoliday
- Article 4.6. If contract terms supplied by one party are unclear, an interpretation against that party is preferred urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContraProferentem
- Article 1.3. A contract validly entered into is binding upon the parties urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContractIsBinding
- Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#Cooperate
- Article 5.2.4. The promisor may assert against the beneficiary all defences which the promisor could assert against the promisee urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DefencesAgainstBeneficiary
- Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective
- Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective/unless/0
- Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyOfGoodFaith
- Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToCooperate
- Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRights
- Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRightsBreached
- Article 5.1.1. The contractual obligations of the parties may be express urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ExpressIsContractual
- Article 5.1.5. In determining the extent to which an obligation involves a duty of best efforts or a duty to achieve a specific result, regard shall be had to the listed factors urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FactorDeterminesKindOfDuty
- Article 1.1. The parties are free to enter into a contract and to determine its content urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FreedomOfContract
- Article 1.6(2). Issues within the scope of these Principles but not expressly settled by them are as far as possible to be settled in accordance with their underlying general principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GapSettledByUnderlyingPrinciples
- Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaith
- Article 1.7(2). The parties may not exclude or limit the duty of good faith and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaithCannotBeExcluded
- Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted
- Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted/unless/0
- Article 5.1.2(c). Implied obligations stem from good faith and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromGoodFaith
- Article 5.1.2(a). Implied obligations stem from the nature and purpose of the contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromNatureAndPurpose
- Article 5.1.2(b). Implied obligations stem from practices established between the parties and usages urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromPracticesAndUsages
- Article 5.1.2(d). Implied obligations stem from reasonableness urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromReasonableness
- Article 5.1.1. The contractual obligations of the parties may be implied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedIsContractual
- Article 1.8. A party cannot act inconsistently with an understanding it has caused the other party to have and upon which that other party reasonably has acted in reliance to its detriment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InconsistentBehaviourBarred
- Article 4.2(2) (opening words). Where the intention was known to the other party, the reasonable-person reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#IntentionDisplacesReasonablePerson
- Article 4.1(1). A contract shall be interpreted according to the common intention of the parties urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByCommonIntention
- Article 4.1(2). If the common intention cannot be established, the contract shall be interpreted according to the meaning reasonable persons of the same kind would give it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByReasonablePersons
- Article 1.4. Nothing in these Principles restricts the application of mandatory rules urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MandatoryRulesUnrestricted
- Article 5.1.7(2). Where the price is to be determined by one party and that determination is manifestly unreasonable, a reasonable price shall be substituted notwithstanding any contract term to the contrary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ManifestlyUnreasonableDeterminationReplaced
- Preamble. These Principles may be applied when the parties have agreed that their contract be governed by general principles of law, the lex mercatoria or the like urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyOnChoiceOfGeneralPrinciples
- Preamble. These Principles may be applied when the parties have not chosen any law to govern their contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyWhereNoLawChosen
- Preamble. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement domestic law urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretDomesticLaw
- Preamble. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement international uniform law instruments urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretUniformLaw
- Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated as otherwise provided in these Principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationAsProvided
- Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated by agreement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByAgreement
- Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated in accordance with its terms urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByTerms
- Article 1.2. Nothing in these Principles requires a contract to be made in or evidenced by a particular form urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoFormRequired
- Article 1.10(2)-(3). A notice is effective when it reaches the person to whom it is given urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoticeEffectiveOnReceipt
- Article 4.7. In case of discrepancy between equally authoritative versions there is a preference for the interpretation according to the original version urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#OriginalVersionPreferred
- Article 1.12(1). Official holidays or non-business days occurring during the period are included in calculating it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodEndsOn
- Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday
- Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday/unless/0
- Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PreserveRights
- Article 5.1.7(1). Where a contract does not fix the price, the parties are considered to have made reference to the price generally charged in comparable circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceByMarket
- Article 5.1.7(1). If no such price is available, a reasonable price applies urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceReasonableWhereNoMarket
- Preamble. These Principles shall be applied when the parties have agreed that their contract be governed by them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PrinciplesGovernByAgreement
- Article 5.1.6. Where the quality of performance is neither fixed by nor determinable from the contract, a party is bound to render a performance of a quality that is reasonable and not less than average in the circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#QualityWhereNotFixed
- Article 5.1.9(1). An obligee may release its right by agreement with the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReleaseByAgreement
- Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone
- Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone/unless/0
- Article 5.2.6. The beneficiary may renounce a right conferred on it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RenunciationEndsBeneficiaryRight
- Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract
- Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract/unless/0
- Article 5.3.5. On fulfilment of a resolutive condition the rules on restitution apply with appropriate adaptations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RestitutionOnResolutiveCondition
- Article 5.1.4(1). To the extent that an obligation involves a duty to achieve a specific result, that party is bound to achieve that result urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResultDutyPerformed
- Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance
- Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance/unless/0
- Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant
- Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant/unless/0
- Article 4.2(1). Statements and other conduct shall be interpreted according to the party's intention if the other party knew or could not have been unaware of it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByIntention
- Article 4.2(2). If the preceding paragraph is not applicable, statements shall be interpreted according to the meaning a reasonable person would give them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByReasonablePerson
- Article 4.8(1). Where the parties have not agreed with respect to an important term, a term which is appropriate in the circumstances shall be supplied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SupplyOmittedTerm
- Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect
- Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect/unless/0
- Article 5.1.8. A contract for an indefinite period may be terminated by either party by giving notice a reasonable time in advance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#TerminationOfIndefiniteContract
- Article 5.1.7(2). A manifestly unreasonable determination does not stand as the applicable price urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#UnreasonableDeterminationDisplaced
- Article 5.3.1. A contract or a contractual obligation may be made conditional upon the occurrence of a future uncertain event urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ValidCondition
Details
```
{
 "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_FR",
 "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
 "since": null,
 "state": "not_yet",
 "status": null
}
```
HinweisEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31
редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_EN на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 26 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)
Betroffene Knoten
- Article 10.4(1). Where the obligor acknowledges the right before the expiration of the general limitation period, a new general limitation period begins on the day after the acknowledgement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AcknowledgementStartsNewGeneralPeriod
- Article 10.6(1). In the absence of provisions determining the exact date of commencement, arbitral proceedings are deemed to commence on the date on which the request reaches the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ArbitrationCommencesOnRequest
- Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration
- Article 10.1(2). This Chapter does not govern the time within which a party must give notice or perform any act other than the institution of legal proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ChapterDoesNotGovernNoticeTime
- Article 10.9(1). The expiration of the limitation period does not extinguish the right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight
- Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted
- Article 10.9(2). Once the obligor has asserted expiry, the barred exercise is a comparative remedium_exclusum urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit
- Article 10.3(a). The parties may not shorten the general limitation period to less than one year urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodFloorOfOneYear
- Article 10.2(1). The general limitation period is three years beginning on the day after the day the obligee knows or ought to know the facts as a result of which the right can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodOfThreeYears
- Article 10.1(1). The exercise of rights governed by the Principles is barred by the expiration of a limitation period according to the rules of this Chapter urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#LimitationGovernsExerciseOfRights
- Article 10.3(c). The parties may not extend the maximum limitation period to more than fifteen years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodCeilingOfFifteenYears
- Article 10.4(2). The maximum limitation period does not begin to run again, but may be exceeded by the beginning of a new general limitation period urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodDoesNotRestart
- Article 10.3(b). The parties may not shorten the maximum limitation period to less than four years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodFloorOfFourYears
- Article 10.2(2). In any event, the maximum limitation period is ten years beginning on the day after the day the right can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodOfTenYears
- Article 10.11. Where there has been performance in order to discharge an obligation, there is no right of restitution merely because the limitation period has expired urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#NoRestitutionAfterExpiration
- Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration
- Article 10.3. The parties may modify the limitation periods urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PartiesMayModifyPeriods
- Article 10.9(3). A right may still be relied on as a defence even though the expiration of the limitation period for that right has been asserted urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#RightStillAvailableAsDefence
- Article 10.10. The obligee may exercise the right of set-off until the obligor has asserted the expiration of the limitation period urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SetOffUntilExpirationAsserted
- Article 10.7. Articles 10.5 and 10.6 apply with appropriate modifications to proceedings whereby the parties request a third person to assist them in reaching an amicable settlement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByAmicableSettlementProceedings
- Article 10.6(1). The running of the limitation period is suspended when the obligee performs an act recognised by the law of the arbitral tribunal as asserting its right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByArbitralAct
- Article 10.5(1)(c). The running of the limitation period is suspended where the obligee has asserted its rights in proceedings for dissolution of the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByDissolutionClaim
- Article 10.8(1). Where the obligee has been prevented by an impediment beyond its control, the general limitation period is suspended so as not to expire before one year after the impediment has ceased to exist urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByImpediment
- Article 10.8(2). Where the impediment consists of the incapacity or death of a party, suspension ceases when a representative or successor has been appointed; the additional one-year period applies accordingly urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByIncapacityEndsOnAppointment
- Article 10.5(1)(b). The running of the limitation period is suspended where the obligee has asserted its rights in the insolvency proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByInsolvencyClaim
- Article 10.5(1)(a). The running of the limitation period is suspended when the obligee performs an act recognised by the law of the court as asserting its right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByJudicialAct
Details
```
{
 "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_EN",
 "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
 "since": null,
 "state": "not_yet",
 "status": null
}
```
HinweisEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31
редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_FR на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 26 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)
Betroffene Knoten
- Article 10.4(1). Where the obligor acknowledges the right before the expiration of the general limitation period, a new general limitation period begins on the day after the acknowledgement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AcknowledgementStartsNewGeneralPeriod
- Article 10.6(1). In the absence of provisions determining the exact date of commencement, arbitral proceedings are deemed to commence on the date on which the request reaches the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ArbitrationCommencesOnRequest
- Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration
- Article 10.1(2). This Chapter does not govern the time within which a party must give notice or perform any act other than the institution of legal proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ChapterDoesNotGovernNoticeTime
- Article 10.9(1). The expiration of the limitation period does not extinguish the right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight
- Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted
- Article 10.9(2). Once the obligor has asserted expiry, the barred exercise is a comparative remedium_exclusum urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit
- Article 10.3(a). The parties may not shorten the general limitation period to less than one year urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodFloorOfOneYear
- Article 10.2(1). The general limitation period is three years beginning on the day after the day the obligee knows or ought to know the facts as a result of which the right can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodOfThreeYears
- Article 10.1(1). The exercise of rights governed by the Principles is barred by the expiration of a limitation period according to the rules of this Chapter urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#LimitationGovernsExerciseOfRights
- Article 10.3(c). The parties may not extend the maximum limitation period to more than fifteen years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodCeilingOfFifteenYears
- Article 10.4(2). The maximum limitation period does not begin to run again, but may be exceeded by the beginning of a new general limitation period urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodDoesNotRestart
- Article 10.3(b). The parties may not shorten the maximum limitation period to less than four years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodFloorOfFourYears
- Article 10.2(2). In any event, the maximum limitation period is ten years beginning on the day after the day the right can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodOfTenYears
- Article 10.11. Where there has been performance in order to discharge an obligation, there is no right of restitution merely because the limitation period has expired urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#NoRestitutionAfterExpiration
- Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration
- Article 10.3. The parties may modify the limitation periods urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PartiesMayModifyPeriods
- Article 10.9(3). A right may still be relied on as a defence even though the expiration of the limitation period for that right has been asserted urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#RightStillAvailableAsDefence
- Article 10.10. The obligee may exercise the right of set-off until the obligor has asserted the expiration of the limitation period urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SetOffUntilExpirationAsserted
- Article 10.7. Articles 10.5 and 10.6 apply with appropriate modifications to proceedings whereby the parties request a third person to assist them in reaching an amicable settlement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByAmicableSettlementProceedings
- Article 10.6(1). The running of the limitation period is suspended when the obligee performs an act recognised by the law of the arbitral tribunal as asserting its right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByArbitralAct
- Article 10.5(1)(c). The running of the limitation period is suspended where the obligee has asserted its rights in proceedings for dissolution of the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByDissolutionClaim
- Article 10.8(1). Where the obligee has been prevented by an impediment beyond its control, the general limitation period is suspended so as not to expire before one year after the impediment has ceased to exist urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByImpediment
- Article 10.8(2). Where the impediment consists of the incapacity or death of a party, suspension ceases when a representative or successor has been appointed; the additional one-year period applies accordingly urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByIncapacityEndsOnAppointment
- Article 10.5(1)(b). The running of the limitation period is suspended where the obligee has asserted its rights in the insolvency proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByInsolvencyClaim
- Article 10.5(1)(a). The running of the limitation period is suspended when the obligee performs an act recognised by the law of the court as asserting its right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByJudicialAct
Details
```
{
 "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_FR",
 "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
 "since": null,
 "state": "not_yet",
 "status": null
}
```

Wie von der Engine erfasst: Code, Schweregrad und Meldungstext mit §-Verweisen; die Reihenfolge folgt dem Ausführungsdokument.

Beweisgraph

Beweisgraph · 8 Ebene

Beweisknoten: 33 · assertion 10, rule_application 21, candidate_closure 1, query_evaluation 1

Dieser Block ist für die Inline-Ansicht zu groß. Er ist vollständig und ungekürzt im JSON des Dokuments enthalten.

JSON herunterladen ↓

Kennungen von Kalender und Beweis

Beweisverweis: case/FuenfJahre_BGB/query/bgb-2013-12-31

Ursprüngliche Begründung · JSON

Dieser Block ist für die Inline-Ansicht zu groß. Er ist vollständig und ungekürzt im JSON des Dokuments enthalten.

JSON herunterladen ↓

QuellenAuszüge: 4

paragraph/195

§ 195 Regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beträgt drei Jahre.

Ausgangsdaten · JSON

{
  "contentHash": "sha256:53e15660089df268ecd95ba8fdcc0d8e73cba45a9e68c5cc802f87a60f03db9b",
  "edition": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_KONSOLIDIERT",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_P195",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 195 Regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "paragraph/195",
  "package": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:3a37767ed679ef6124cbd5c7272a5a798618598a194829b5a5ad5b10c1cfe898",
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 195 Regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist\nDie regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beträgt drei Jahre.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

paragraph/199

§ 199 Beginn der regelmäßigen Verjährungsfrist und Verjährungshöchstfristen (1) Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beginnt, soweit nicht ein anderer Verjährungsbeginn bestimmt ist, mit dem Schluss des Jahres, in dem 1. der Anspruch entstanden ist und 2. der Gläubiger von den den Anspruch begründenden Umständen und der Person des Schuldners Kenntnis erlangt oder ohne grobe Fahrlässigkeit erlangen müsste. (2) Schadensersatzansprüche, die auf der Verletzung des Lebens, des Körpers, der Gesundheit oder der Freiheit beruhen, verjähren ohne Rücksicht auf ihre Entstehung und die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in 30 Jahren von der Begehung der Handlung, der Pflichtverletzung oder dem sonstigen, den Schaden auslösenden Ereignis an. (3) Sonstige Schadensersatzansprüche verjähren 1. ohne Rücksicht auf die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in zehn Jahren von ihrer Entstehung an und 2. ohne Rücksicht auf ihre Entstehung und die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in 30 Jahren von der Begehung der Handlung, der Pflichtverletzung oder dem sonstigen, den Schaden auslösenden Ereignis an. Maßgeblich ist die früher endende Frist. (3a) Ansprüche, die auf einem Erbfall beruhen oder deren Geltendmachung die Kenntnis einer Verfügung von Todes wegen voraussetzt, verjähren ohne Rücksicht auf die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in 30 Jahren von der Entstehung des Anspruchs an. (4) Andere Ansprüche als die nach den Absätzen 2 bis 3a verjähren ohne Rücksicht auf die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in zehn Jahren von ihrer Entstehung an. (5) Geht der Anspruch auf ein Unterlassen, so tritt an die Stelle der Entstehung die Zuwiderhandlung.

Ausgangsdaten · JSON

{
  "contentHash": "sha256:dbc2b5bc4ee946d17bb8636b8d724e0168033a99dc35c94f5c6eb2b53f2b838c",
  "edition": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_KONSOLIDIERT",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_P199",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 199 Beginn der regelmäßigen Verjährungsfrist und Verjährungshöchstfristen"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "paragraph/199",
  "package": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:2916e6a9e86d21f331739cafd8a135c863d9e0bf3087e8a13fb6c60d7f2df4da",
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 199 Beginn der regelmäßigen Verjährungsfrist und Verjährungshöchstfristen\n(1) Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beginnt, soweit nicht ein anderer Verjährungsbeginn bestimmt ist, mit dem Schluss des Jahres, in dem 1. der Anspruch entstanden ist und\n2. der Gläubiger von den den Anspruch begründenden Umständen und der Person des Schuldners Kenntnis erlangt oder ohne grobe Fahrlässigkeit erlangen müsste.\n(2) Schadensersatzansprüche, die auf der Verletzung des Lebens, des Körpers, der Gesundheit oder der Freiheit beruhen, verjähren ohne Rücksicht auf ihre Entstehung und die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in 30 Jahren von der Begehung der Handlung, der Pflichtverletzung oder dem sonstigen, den Schaden auslösenden Ereignis an.\n(3) Sonstige Schadensersatzansprüche verjähren 1. ohne Rücksicht auf die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in zehn Jahren von ihrer Entstehung an und\n2. ohne Rücksicht auf ihre Entstehung und die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in 30 Jahren von der Begehung der Handlung, der Pflichtverletzung oder dem sonstigen, den Schaden auslösenden Ereignis an.\nMaßgeblich ist die früher endende Frist.\n(3a) Ansprüche, die auf einem Erbfall beruhen oder deren Geltendmachung die Kenntnis einer Verfügung von Todes wegen voraussetzt, verjähren ohne Rücksicht auf die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in 30 Jahren von der Entstehung des Anspruchs an.\n(4) Andere Ansprüche als die nach den Absätzen 2 bis 3a verjähren ohne Rücksicht auf die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in zehn Jahren von ihrer Entstehung an.\n(5) Geht der Anspruch auf ein Unterlassen, so tritt an die Stelle der Entstehung die Zuwiderhandlung.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

paragraph/209

§ 209 Wirkung der Hemmung Der Zeitraum, während dessen die Verjährung gehemmt ist, wird in die Verjährungsfrist nicht eingerechnet.

Ausgangsdaten · JSON

{
  "contentHash": "sha256:9d3c1967977b0f7d0bb0d9a7d89228d863b64a3cc4a8d54a9f351d8c9205188c",
  "edition": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_KONSOLIDIERT",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_P209",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 209 Wirkung der Hemmung"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "paragraph/209",
  "package": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:d3a5349ff97577ebae64e94327f4d26341f8d6fbce09a12c6615b96f59d9b9be",
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 209 Wirkung der Hemmung\nDer Zeitraum, während dessen die Verjährung gehemmt ist, wird in die Verjährungsfrist nicht eingerechnet.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

paragraph/214

§ 214 Wirkung der Verjährung (1) Nach Eintritt der Verjährung ist der Schuldner berechtigt, die Leistung zu verweigern. (2) Das zur Befriedigung eines verjährten Anspruchs Geleistete kann nicht zurückgefordert werden, auch wenn in Unkenntnis der Verjährung geleistet worden ist. Das Gleiche gilt von einem vertragsmäßigen Anerkenntnis sowie einer Sicherheitsleistung des Schuldners.

Ausgangsdaten · JSON

{
  "contentHash": "sha256:12d652436994db82ae2d39189be9bf31cdc979290895389a4620639b3f937994",
  "edition": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_KONSOLIDIERT",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_P214",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 214 Wirkung der Verjährung"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "paragraph/214",
  "package": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:1f3cff3f6a0d4efb9796bd6eff87447e953e444a38ba0121caedb177cf59002e",
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 214 Wirkung der Verjährung\n(1) Nach Eintritt der Verjährung ist der Schuldner berechtigt, die Leistung zu verweigern.\n(2) Das zur Befriedigung eines verjährten Anspruchs Geleistete kann nicht zurückgefordert werden, auch wenn in Unkenntnis der Verjährung geleistet worden ist. Das Gleiche gilt von einem vertragsmäßigen Anerkenntnis sowie einer Sicherheitsleistung des Schuldners.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Pakete im Snapshot

de.bgb.core
de.bgb.fristen
de.bgb.ius_privatum
doctrine.ius_privatum
fr.code_civil
unidroit.picc
unidroit.picc_limitation

Technische DatenVollständige Antwort, Parameter und Prüfsummen

Berechnungsstatus: COMPUTED

Vollständige Antwort der Engine

Fünf Jahre, BGB: die Verjährung ist am 31. Dezember 2013 eingetreten

Vollständiges Maschinenergebnis · JSON

Dieser Block ist für die Inline-Ansicht zu groß. Er ist vollständig und ungekürzt im JSON des Dokuments enthalten.

JSON herunterladen ↓

Ausführung · JSON

Dieser Block ist für die Inline-Ansicht zu groß. Er ist vollständig und ungekürzt im JSON des Dokuments enthalten.

JSON herunterladen ↓

Metadaten der Anzeige

Dieser Block ist für die Inline-Ansicht zu groß. Er ist vollständig und ungekürzt im JSON des Dokuments enthalten.

JSON herunterladen ↓

JSON · Berechnungen, Quellen und genaue Daten

{
  "acts": [
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:a6813604c35567e7c586d334efbf524d08f3467170c4b732cfb15809cacf4ff4",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core",
      "package": "de.bgb.core"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:998148eaeeed28f1565811474ee7beb7eacc616c5681ed9638edc976512a9884",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
      "package": "de.bgb.fristen"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:86a5a00db16e32187223ceeec6748eb7d42d18b7c370c8b15ac64d2f3f655ff7",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum",
      "package": "de.bgb.ius_privatum"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:7202de5de49a8a9d12837bc19cb7008ba2d1a68dbcc0134e0afccf1440a6d5ed",
      "namespace": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum",
      "package": "doctrine.ius_privatum"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:ad41d027ba92c38ca5eecc1d16097d0bbc8c5a74946fc1a6397c6dadac61158f",
      "namespace": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
      "package": "fr.code_civil"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:719bfd408eed92ad497ba071482354d4ad32b81ef9f41c6654f224416c19e603",
      "namespace": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc",
      "package": "unidroit.picc"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:b311d0d422a1079f71113320bd818236f7b09507c7dd960bdafceb91285497d9",
      "namespace": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "package": "unidroit.picc_limitation"
    }
  ],
  "caseHash": "sha256:46016aa963d29cfc446a35c6a945630088a81b841001fff20f3772522d11579f",
  "jurisdiction": "Deutschland",
  "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
  "mode": "audit",
  "programHash": "sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e",
  "resultHash": "sha256:b3bbea0a38c7e961187d2faf46be42d341419cff3cf8fa9f8d6d5820e5728a99",
  "timezone": "Europe/Berlin"
}

evaluation SHA-256: sha256:db2c9aab40d8baf3e7fe3441de35432d2b2b178582562fa1a485b3ed756817bf

Ausgangsdaten · JSON

{
  "args": [
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:anspruch",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "kind": "value",
      "type": {
        "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
      },
      "value": "2013-12-31"
    }
  ],
  "facts": [
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core#anspruch_entstanden_am"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "adjudicated",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#kenntnis_erlangt_am"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#keine_hemmung"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#schuldner_beruft_sich_auf_verjaehrung"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#g",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core#anspruchsinhaber"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#s",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core#anspruchsgegner"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#g",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#persona_of"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#s",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#persona_of"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#causa_of_anspruch"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
    }
  ],
  "kind": "truth",
  "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
  "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#verjaehrung_eingetreten_am"
}

Bedingungsprüfung

Fünf Jahre, BGB: das Rechtsmittel ist ausgeschlossen

Rechtsordnung DeutschlandRechtsstand zum 2016-01-02

Berechnungsergebnis

Festgestellt

Eingabeparameter

Was wir ermitteln

der Rechtsbehelf ist ausgeschlossen: durch Einrede, Klagekonsumtion, Verjährung oder die Immunität des Beklagten

gscausa

Ausgangsfakten

Tag, an dem der Anspruch entstanden ist (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 1, § 200)
a: atag: 15. März 2010
Tag, an dem der Gläubiger von den den Anspruch begründenden Umständen und der Person des Schuldners Kenntnis erlangt hat (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 2) — festgestellte Tatsache, im Fall origin adjudicated
a: atag: 15. März 2010
Kein Hemmungstatbestand der §§ 203–208 festgestellt — ausdrückliche Angabe des Falls; das Fehlen einer Angabe ist keine Verneinung
a: a
der Schuldner beruft sich auf die Verjährung des Leistungs- oder Nacherfüllungsanspruchs (§ 218 Abs. 1)
a: a
Inhaber des Anspruchs (Gläubiger)
a: ap: g
Anspruchsgegner (Schuldner)
a: ap: s
diese Person des BGB tritt in der vergleichenden Kette als dieses Gesicht auf
p x
g g
s s
dieser Anspruch ist das vergleichende Streitverhältnis
a: ac: causa
der Kläger erhebt gegen den Beklagten einen Anspruch — das streitige Rechtsverhältnis, auf das sich die Frage bezieht
causa: causaactor: greus: s

p	x
g	g
s	s

Ausgangsdaten · JSON

{
  "args": [
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:causa",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    }
  ],
  "facts": [
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core#anspruch_entstanden_am"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "adjudicated",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#kenntnis_erlangt_am"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#keine_hemmung"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#schuldner_beruft_sich_auf_verjaehrung"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#g",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core#anspruchsinhaber"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#s",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core#anspruchsgegner"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#g",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#persona_of"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#s",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#persona_of"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#causa_of_anspruch"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
    }
  ],
  "kind": "truth",
  "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
  "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"
}

Warum dieses ErgebnisAngewendete Regeln und Voraussetzungen

Ableitungspfad20 Schritte

1
dieser Anspruch ist das vergleichende Streitverhältnis
a: urn:p12:anspruch; c: urn:p12:causa
Fallfakt
2
der Schuldner beruft sich auf die Verjährung des Leistungs- oder Nacherfüllungsanspruchs (§ 218 Abs. 1)
a: urn:p12:anspruch
Fallfakt
3
Tag, an dem der Anspruch entstanden ist (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 1, § 200)
a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 15. März 2010
Fallfakt
4
Für den Tag der Entstehung des Anspruchs wird der Schluss des Jahres gesucht (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 1)
für diesen Tag wird der Schluss des Jahres gesucht (§ 199 Abs. 1): a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 15. März 2010
Abs. 199
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeGesuchtFuerEntstehung
Regel
5
Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 9 — Ende des 9. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages
31. Dezember 2010 = month end of(add calendar period(month start of(15. März 2010), 9 calendar_month))
Abs. 199
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat09
Regel
6
Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): der Kandidat ist der 31. Dezember, wenn sein Monat 31 Tage hat, der folgende Monat 31 Tage und der übernächste höchstens 29 — Dezember, Januar, Februar
Schluss des Jahres, in dem der Tag liegt (§ 199 Abs. 1): der 31. Dezember desselben Jahres: a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 15. März 2010; ultimo: 31. Dezember 2010
Abs. 199
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeIstDezember
Regel
7
Anspruchsgegner (Schuldner)
a: urn:p12:anspruch; p: urn:p12:person:s
Fallfakt
8
Inhaber des Anspruchs (Gläubiger)
a: urn:p12:anspruch; p: urn:p12:person:g
Fallfakt
9
Kein Hemmungstatbestand der §§ 203–208 festgestellt — ausdrückliche Angabe des Falls; das Fehlen einer Angabe ist keine Verneinung
a: urn:p12:anspruch
Fallfakt
10
Tag, an dem der Gläubiger von den den Anspruch begründenden Umständen und der Person des Schuldners Kenntnis erlangt hat (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 2) — festgestellte Tatsache, im Fall origin adjudicated
a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 15. März 2010
- extern übernommen
extern übernommen
11
Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beginnt mit dem Schluss des Jahres, in dem der Anspruch entstanden ist und der Gläubiger Kenntnis erlangt hat (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 und 2) — Kenntnis nicht nach der Entstehung: Schluss des Entstehungsjahres
Schluss des Jahres, mit dem die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beginnt (§ 199 Abs. 1): a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 31. Dezember 2010
Abs. 199
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#VerjaehrungsbeginnUltimoDerEntstehung
Regel
12
Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beträgt drei Jahre (§ 195) — Jahresschritt vom Schluss des Jahres (§ 188 Abs. 2, Politik BGB_FRISTEN_KALENDER)
31. Dezember 2013 = add calendar period(31. Dezember 2010, 3 calendar_year)
Abs. 195
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#RegelmaessigeVerjaehrungsfrist
Regel
13
Ohne festgestellte Hemmung endet die Verjährungsfrist mit der regelmäßigen Frist (§§ 195, 199; § 209 greift nicht)
Tag, mit dessen Ablauf die Verjährungsfrist unter Berücksichtigung der Hemmung endet (§ 209): a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 31. Dezember 2013
Abs. 209
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#VerjaehrungsfristEndeOhneHemmung
Regel
14
Ohne Hemmung tritt die Verjährung mit dem Ende der Verjährungsfrist ein
Tag, mit dessen Ablauf die Verjährung des Anspruchs eintritt: a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 31. Dezember 2013
Abs. 209
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#VerjaehrungOhneHemmung
Regel
15
Nach Eintritt der Verjährung ist der Schuldner berechtigt, die Leistung zu verweigern (§ 214 Abs. 1)
der Schuldner ist berechtigt, die Leistung zu verweigern (§ 214 Abs. 1): a: urn:p12:anspruch
Abs. 214
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#Leistungsverweigerungsrecht214
Regel
16
diese Person des BGB tritt in der vergleichenden Kette als dieses Gesicht auf
p: urn:p12:person:g; x: urn:p12:persona:g
Fallfakt
17
diese Person des BGB tritt in der vergleichenden Kette als dieses Gesicht auf
p: urn:p12:person:s; x: urn:p12:persona:s
Fallfakt
18
der Kläger erhebt gegen den Beklagten einen Anspruch — das streitige Rechtsverhältnis, auf das sich die Frage bezieht
causa: urn:p12:causa; actor: urn:p12:persona:g; reus: urn:p12:persona:s
Fallfakt
19
Nach Eintritt der Verjährung ist der Schuldner berechtigt, die Leistung zu verweigern
der Rechtsbehelf ist ausgeschlossen: durch Einrede, Klagekonsumtion, Verjährung oder die Immunität des Beklagten: actor: urn:p12:persona:g; reus: urn:p12:persona:s; causa: urn:p12:causa
BGB P214
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#EinredeExcludit
Regel
20
Abfrageauswertung
Abfrage

von der Engine geprüft: 10 · Fallfakt: 9 · extern übernommen: 1 · Vollständiger Graph: 33 Knoten

Schritte des gespeicherten Beweises von den Fallfakten zur Antwort. Die Formeln werden so gezeigt, wie sie in der Norm stehen, mit eingesetzten Werten; die Seite berechnet nichts neu.

Grundlage dieser Antwort

Regeln aus dem gespeicherten Beweisweg dieser Antwort.

de.bgb.fristen

Für den Tag der Entstehung des Anspruchs wird der Schluss des Jahres gesucht (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 1)
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeGesuchtFuerEntstehung
Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): der Kandidat ist der 31. Dezember, wenn sein Monat 31 Tage hat, der folgende Monat 31 Tage und der übernächste höchstens 29 — Dezember, Januar, Februar
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeIstDezember
Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 9 — Ende des 9. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat09
Nach Eintritt der Verjährung ist der Schuldner berechtigt, die Leistung zu verweigern (§ 214 Abs. 1)
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#Leistungsverweigerungsrecht214
Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beträgt drei Jahre (§ 195) — Jahresschritt vom Schluss des Jahres (§ 188 Abs. 2, Politik BGB_FRISTEN_KALENDER)
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#RegelmaessigeVerjaehrungsfrist
Ohne Hemmung tritt die Verjährung mit dem Ende der Verjährungsfrist ein
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#VerjaehrungOhneHemmung
Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beginnt mit dem Schluss des Jahres, in dem der Anspruch entstanden ist und der Gläubiger Kenntnis erlangt hat (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 und 2) — Kenntnis nicht nach der Entstehung: Schluss des Entstehungsjahres
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#VerjaehrungsbeginnUltimoDerEntstehung
Ohne festgestellte Hemmung endet die Verjährungsfrist mit der regelmäßigen Frist (§§ 195, 199; § 209 greift nicht)
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#VerjaehrungsfristEndeOhneHemmung

de.bgb.ius_privatum

Nach Eintritt der Verjährung ist der Schuldner berechtigt, die Leistung zu verweigern
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#EinredeExcludit

Weitere Regeln der Berechnung12

Angewendet in der Gesamtberechnung, aber nicht Teil des Beweiswegs dieser Antwort.

de.bgb.fristen

Für den Tag der Kenntniserlangung wird der Schluss des Jahres gesucht (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 2)
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeGesuchtFuerKenntnis
Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 0 — Ende des 0. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat00
Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 1 — Ende des 1. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat01
Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 2 — Ende des 2. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat02
Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 3 — Ende des 3. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat03
Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 4 — Ende des 4. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat04
Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 5 — Ende des 5. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat05
Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 6 — Ende des 6. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat06
Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 7 — Ende des 7. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat07
Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 8 — Ende des 8. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat08
Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 10 — Ende des 10. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat10
Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 11 — Ende des 11. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages
Kennung
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat11

Anmerkungen · 4

Ausführungsstörungen und Hinweise

HinweisEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31
редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_EN на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 81 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)
Betroffene Knoten
- Article 5.2.3. The conferment of rights in the beneficiary includes the right to invoke a clause in the contract which excludes or limits the liability of the beneficiary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryMayInvokeClause
- Articles 5.2.1 and 5.2.2. The parties may confer a right on a third party who must be identifiable with adequate certainty by the contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryRightExists
- Article 5.1.4(2). To the extent that an obligation involves a duty of best efforts, that party is bound to make such efforts as would be made by a reasonable person of the same kind urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BestEffortsDutyPerformed
- Article 1.9(1). The parties are bound by any usage to which they have agreed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByAgreedUsage
- Article 1.9(1). The parties are bound by practices which they have established between themselves urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByEstablishedPractice
- Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage
- Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage/unless/0
- Article 5.3.3(1). A party who prevented fulfilment contrary to good faith may not rely on the non-fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnPreventedCondition
- Article 5.3.3(2). A party who brought about fulfilment contrary to good faith may not rely on the fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnProcuredCondition
- Article 4.3. In applying Articles 4.1 and 4.2, regard shall be had to all the circumstances, including those listed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CircumstanceToBeRegarded
- Article 1.11. Where a party has more than one place of business the relevant one is that which has the closest relationship to the contract and its performance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ClosestPlaceIsRelevant
- Article 4.1(2) (opening words). Where the common intention can be established, the reasonable-persons reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CommonIntentionDisplacesReasonablePersons
- Article 1.12(2). The computed last day does not stand where it is a holiday at the place of performance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ComputedLastDayYieldsToHoliday
- Article 4.6. If contract terms supplied by one party are unclear, an interpretation against that party is preferred urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContraProferentem
- Article 1.3. A contract validly entered into is binding upon the parties urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContractIsBinding
- Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#Cooperate
- Article 5.2.4. The promisor may assert against the beneficiary all defences which the promisor could assert against the promisee urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DefencesAgainstBeneficiary
- Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective
- Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective/unless/0
- Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyOfGoodFaith
- Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToCooperate
- Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRights
- Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRightsBreached
- Article 5.1.1. The contractual obligations of the parties may be express urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ExpressIsContractual
- Article 5.1.5. In determining the extent to which an obligation involves a duty of best efforts or a duty to achieve a specific result, regard shall be had to the listed factors urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FactorDeterminesKindOfDuty
- Article 1.1. The parties are free to enter into a contract and to determine its content urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FreedomOfContract
- Article 1.6(2). Issues within the scope of these Principles but not expressly settled by them are as far as possible to be settled in accordance with their underlying general principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GapSettledByUnderlyingPrinciples
- Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaith
- Article 1.7(2). The parties may not exclude or limit the duty of good faith and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaithCannotBeExcluded
- Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted
- Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted/unless/0
- Article 5.1.2(c). Implied obligations stem from good faith and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromGoodFaith
- Article 5.1.2(a). Implied obligations stem from the nature and purpose of the contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromNatureAndPurpose
- Article 5.1.2(b). Implied obligations stem from practices established between the parties and usages urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromPracticesAndUsages
- Article 5.1.2(d). Implied obligations stem from reasonableness urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromReasonableness
- Article 5.1.1. The contractual obligations of the parties may be implied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedIsContractual
- Article 1.8. A party cannot act inconsistently with an understanding it has caused the other party to have and upon which that other party reasonably has acted in reliance to its detriment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InconsistentBehaviourBarred
- Article 4.2(2) (opening words). Where the intention was known to the other party, the reasonable-person reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#IntentionDisplacesReasonablePerson
- Article 4.1(1). A contract shall be interpreted according to the common intention of the parties urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByCommonIntention
- Article 4.1(2). If the common intention cannot be established, the contract shall be interpreted according to the meaning reasonable persons of the same kind would give it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByReasonablePersons
- Article 1.4. Nothing in these Principles restricts the application of mandatory rules urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MandatoryRulesUnrestricted
- Article 5.1.7(2). Where the price is to be determined by one party and that determination is manifestly unreasonable, a reasonable price shall be substituted notwithstanding any contract term to the contrary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ManifestlyUnreasonableDeterminationReplaced
- Preamble. These Principles may be applied when the parties have agreed that their contract be governed by general principles of law, the lex mercatoria or the like urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyOnChoiceOfGeneralPrinciples
- Preamble. These Principles may be applied when the parties have not chosen any law to govern their contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyWhereNoLawChosen
- Preamble. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement domestic law urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretDomesticLaw
- Preamble. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement international uniform law instruments urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretUniformLaw
- Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated as otherwise provided in these Principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationAsProvided
- Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated by agreement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByAgreement
- Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated in accordance with its terms urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByTerms
- Article 1.2. Nothing in these Principles requires a contract to be made in or evidenced by a particular form urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoFormRequired
- Article 1.10(2)-(3). A notice is effective when it reaches the person to whom it is given urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoticeEffectiveOnReceipt
- Article 4.7. In case of discrepancy between equally authoritative versions there is a preference for the interpretation according to the original version urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#OriginalVersionPreferred
- Article 1.12(1). Official holidays or non-business days occurring during the period are included in calculating it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodEndsOn
- Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday
- Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday/unless/0
- Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PreserveRights
- Article 5.1.7(1). Where a contract does not fix the price, the parties are considered to have made reference to the price generally charged in comparable circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceByMarket
- Article 5.1.7(1). If no such price is available, a reasonable price applies urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceReasonableWhereNoMarket
- Preamble. These Principles shall be applied when the parties have agreed that their contract be governed by them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PrinciplesGovernByAgreement
- Article 5.1.6. Where the quality of performance is neither fixed by nor determinable from the contract, a party is bound to render a performance of a quality that is reasonable and not less than average in the circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#QualityWhereNotFixed
- Articles 4.4 and 4.5. Terms are to be read in the light of the whole contract and so as to give effect to all of them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReadingConformsToCanons
- Article 5.1.9(1). An obligee may release its right by agreement with the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReleaseByAgreement
- Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone
- Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone/unless/0
- Article 5.2.6. The beneficiary may renounce a right conferred on it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RenunciationEndsBeneficiaryRight
- Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract
- Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract/unless/0
- Article 5.3.5. On fulfilment of a resolutive condition the rules on restitution apply with appropriate adaptations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RestitutionOnResolutiveCondition
- Article 5.1.4(1). To the extent that an obligation involves a duty to achieve a specific result, that party is bound to achieve that result urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResultDutyPerformed
- Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance
- Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance/unless/0
- Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant
- Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant/unless/0
- Article 4.2(1). Statements and other conduct shall be interpreted according to the party's intention if the other party knew or could not have been unaware of it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByIntention
- Article 4.2(2). If the preceding paragraph is not applicable, statements shall be interpreted according to the meaning a reasonable person would give them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByReasonablePerson
- Article 4.8(1). Where the parties have not agreed with respect to an important term, a term which is appropriate in the circumstances shall be supplied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SupplyOmittedTerm
- Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect
- Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect/unless/0
- Article 5.1.8. A contract for an indefinite period may be terminated by either party by giving notice a reasonable time in advance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#TerminationOfIndefiniteContract
- Article 5.1.7(2). A manifestly unreasonable determination does not stand as the applicable price urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#UnreasonableDeterminationDisplaced
- Article 5.3.1. A contract or a contractual obligation may be made conditional upon the occurrence of a future uncertain event urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ValidCondition
Details
```
{
 "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_EN",
 "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
 "since": null,
 "state": "not_yet",
 "status": null
}
```
HinweisEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31
редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_FR на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 79 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)
Betroffene Knoten
- Article 5.2.3. The conferment of rights in the beneficiary includes the right to invoke a clause in the contract which excludes or limits the liability of the beneficiary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryMayInvokeClause
- Article 5.1.4(2). To the extent that an obligation involves a duty of best efforts, that party is bound to make such efforts as would be made by a reasonable person of the same kind urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BestEffortsDutyPerformed
- Article 1.9(1). The parties are bound by any usage to which they have agreed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByAgreedUsage
- Article 1.9(1). The parties are bound by practices which they have established between themselves urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByEstablishedPractice
- Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage
- Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage/unless/0
- Article 5.3.3(1). A party who prevented fulfilment contrary to good faith may not rely on the non-fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnPreventedCondition
- Article 5.3.3(2). A party who brought about fulfilment contrary to good faith may not rely on the fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnProcuredCondition
- Article 4.3. In applying Articles 4.1 and 4.2, regard shall be had to all the circumstances, including those listed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CircumstanceToBeRegarded
- Article 1.11. Where a party has more than one place of business the relevant one is that which has the closest relationship to the contract and its performance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ClosestPlaceIsRelevant
- Article 4.1(2) (opening words). Where the common intention can be established, the reasonable-persons reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CommonIntentionDisplacesReasonablePersons
- Article 1.12(2). The computed last day does not stand where it is a holiday at the place of performance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ComputedLastDayYieldsToHoliday
- Article 4.6. If contract terms supplied by one party are unclear, an interpretation against that party is preferred urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContraProferentem
- Article 1.3. A contract validly entered into is binding upon the parties urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContractIsBinding
- Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#Cooperate
- Article 5.2.4. The promisor may assert against the beneficiary all defences which the promisor could assert against the promisee urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DefencesAgainstBeneficiary
- Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective
- Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective/unless/0
- Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyOfGoodFaith
- Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToCooperate
- Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRights
- Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRightsBreached
- Article 5.1.1. The contractual obligations of the parties may be express urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ExpressIsContractual
- Article 5.1.5. In determining the extent to which an obligation involves a duty of best efforts or a duty to achieve a specific result, regard shall be had to the listed factors urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FactorDeterminesKindOfDuty
- Article 1.1. The parties are free to enter into a contract and to determine its content urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FreedomOfContract
- Article 1.6(2). Issues within the scope of these Principles but not expressly settled by them are as far as possible to be settled in accordance with their underlying general principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GapSettledByUnderlyingPrinciples
- Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaith
- Article 1.7(2). The parties may not exclude or limit the duty of good faith and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaithCannotBeExcluded
- Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted
- Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted/unless/0
- Article 5.1.2(c). Implied obligations stem from good faith and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromGoodFaith
- Article 5.1.2(a). Implied obligations stem from the nature and purpose of the contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromNatureAndPurpose
- Article 5.1.2(b). Implied obligations stem from practices established between the parties and usages urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromPracticesAndUsages
- Article 5.1.2(d). Implied obligations stem from reasonableness urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromReasonableness
- Article 5.1.1. The contractual obligations of the parties may be implied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedIsContractual
- Article 1.8. A party cannot act inconsistently with an understanding it has caused the other party to have and upon which that other party reasonably has acted in reliance to its detriment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InconsistentBehaviourBarred
- Article 4.2(2) (opening words). Where the intention was known to the other party, the reasonable-person reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#IntentionDisplacesReasonablePerson
- Article 4.1(1). A contract shall be interpreted according to the common intention of the parties urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByCommonIntention
- Article 4.1(2). If the common intention cannot be established, the contract shall be interpreted according to the meaning reasonable persons of the same kind would give it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByReasonablePersons
- Article 1.4. Nothing in these Principles restricts the application of mandatory rules urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MandatoryRulesUnrestricted
- Article 5.1.7(2). Where the price is to be determined by one party and that determination is manifestly unreasonable, a reasonable price shall be substituted notwithstanding any contract term to the contrary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ManifestlyUnreasonableDeterminationReplaced
- Preamble. These Principles may be applied when the parties have agreed that their contract be governed by general principles of law, the lex mercatoria or the like urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyOnChoiceOfGeneralPrinciples
- Preamble. These Principles may be applied when the parties have not chosen any law to govern their contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyWhereNoLawChosen
- Preamble. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement domestic law urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretDomesticLaw
- Preamble. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement international uniform law instruments urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretUniformLaw
- Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated as otherwise provided in these Principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationAsProvided
- Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated by agreement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByAgreement
- Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated in accordance with its terms urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByTerms
- Article 1.2. Nothing in these Principles requires a contract to be made in or evidenced by a particular form urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoFormRequired
- Article 1.10(2)-(3). A notice is effective when it reaches the person to whom it is given urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoticeEffectiveOnReceipt
- Article 4.7. In case of discrepancy between equally authoritative versions there is a preference for the interpretation according to the original version urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#OriginalVersionPreferred
- Article 1.12(1). Official holidays or non-business days occurring during the period are included in calculating it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodEndsOn
- Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday
- Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday/unless/0
- Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PreserveRights
- Article 5.1.7(1). Where a contract does not fix the price, the parties are considered to have made reference to the price generally charged in comparable circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceByMarket
- Article 5.1.7(1). If no such price is available, a reasonable price applies urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceReasonableWhereNoMarket
- Preamble. These Principles shall be applied when the parties have agreed that their contract be governed by them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PrinciplesGovernByAgreement
- Article 5.1.6. Where the quality of performance is neither fixed by nor determinable from the contract, a party is bound to render a performance of a quality that is reasonable and not less than average in the circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#QualityWhereNotFixed
- Article 5.1.9(1). An obligee may release its right by agreement with the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReleaseByAgreement
- Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone
- Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone/unless/0
- Article 5.2.6. The beneficiary may renounce a right conferred on it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RenunciationEndsBeneficiaryRight
- Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract
- Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract/unless/0
- Article 5.3.5. On fulfilment of a resolutive condition the rules on restitution apply with appropriate adaptations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RestitutionOnResolutiveCondition
- Article 5.1.4(1). To the extent that an obligation involves a duty to achieve a specific result, that party is bound to achieve that result urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResultDutyPerformed
- Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance
- Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance/unless/0
- Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant
- Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant/unless/0
- Article 4.2(1). Statements and other conduct shall be interpreted according to the party's intention if the other party knew or could not have been unaware of it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByIntention
- Article 4.2(2). If the preceding paragraph is not applicable, statements shall be interpreted according to the meaning a reasonable person would give them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByReasonablePerson
- Article 4.8(1). Where the parties have not agreed with respect to an important term, a term which is appropriate in the circumstances shall be supplied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SupplyOmittedTerm
- Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect
- Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect/unless/0
- Article 5.1.8. A contract for an indefinite period may be terminated by either party by giving notice a reasonable time in advance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#TerminationOfIndefiniteContract
- Article 5.1.7(2). A manifestly unreasonable determination does not stand as the applicable price urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#UnreasonableDeterminationDisplaced
- Article 5.3.1. A contract or a contractual obligation may be made conditional upon the occurrence of a future uncertain event urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ValidCondition
Details
```
{
 "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_FR",
 "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
 "since": null,
 "state": "not_yet",
 "status": null
}
```
HinweisEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31
редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_EN на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 26 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)
Betroffene Knoten
- Article 10.4(1). Where the obligor acknowledges the right before the expiration of the general limitation period, a new general limitation period begins on the day after the acknowledgement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AcknowledgementStartsNewGeneralPeriod
- Article 10.6(1). In the absence of provisions determining the exact date of commencement, arbitral proceedings are deemed to commence on the date on which the request reaches the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ArbitrationCommencesOnRequest
- Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration
- Article 10.1(2). This Chapter does not govern the time within which a party must give notice or perform any act other than the institution of legal proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ChapterDoesNotGovernNoticeTime
- Article 10.9(1). The expiration of the limitation period does not extinguish the right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight
- Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted
- Article 10.9(2). Once the obligor has asserted expiry, the barred exercise is a comparative remedium_exclusum urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit
- Article 10.3(a). The parties may not shorten the general limitation period to less than one year urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodFloorOfOneYear
- Article 10.2(1). The general limitation period is three years beginning on the day after the day the obligee knows or ought to know the facts as a result of which the right can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodOfThreeYears
- Article 10.1(1). The exercise of rights governed by the Principles is barred by the expiration of a limitation period according to the rules of this Chapter urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#LimitationGovernsExerciseOfRights
- Article 10.3(c). The parties may not extend the maximum limitation period to more than fifteen years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodCeilingOfFifteenYears
- Article 10.4(2). The maximum limitation period does not begin to run again, but may be exceeded by the beginning of a new general limitation period urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodDoesNotRestart
- Article 10.3(b). The parties may not shorten the maximum limitation period to less than four years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodFloorOfFourYears
- Article 10.2(2). In any event, the maximum limitation period is ten years beginning on the day after the day the right can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodOfTenYears
- Article 10.11. Where there has been performance in order to discharge an obligation, there is no right of restitution merely because the limitation period has expired urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#NoRestitutionAfterExpiration
- Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration
- Article 10.3. The parties may modify the limitation periods urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PartiesMayModifyPeriods
- Article 10.9(3). A right may still be relied on as a defence even though the expiration of the limitation period for that right has been asserted urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#RightStillAvailableAsDefence
- Article 10.10. The obligee may exercise the right of set-off until the obligor has asserted the expiration of the limitation period urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SetOffUntilExpirationAsserted
- Article 10.7. Articles 10.5 and 10.6 apply with appropriate modifications to proceedings whereby the parties request a third person to assist them in reaching an amicable settlement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByAmicableSettlementProceedings
- Article 10.6(1). The running of the limitation period is suspended when the obligee performs an act recognised by the law of the arbitral tribunal as asserting its right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByArbitralAct
- Article 10.5(1)(c). The running of the limitation period is suspended where the obligee has asserted its rights in proceedings for dissolution of the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByDissolutionClaim
- Article 10.8(1). Where the obligee has been prevented by an impediment beyond its control, the general limitation period is suspended so as not to expire before one year after the impediment has ceased to exist urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByImpediment
- Article 10.8(2). Where the impediment consists of the incapacity or death of a party, suspension ceases when a representative or successor has been appointed; the additional one-year period applies accordingly urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByIncapacityEndsOnAppointment
- Article 10.5(1)(b). The running of the limitation period is suspended where the obligee has asserted its rights in the insolvency proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByInsolvencyClaim
- Article 10.5(1)(a). The running of the limitation period is suspended when the obligee performs an act recognised by the law of the court as asserting its right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByJudicialAct
Details
```
{
 "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_EN",
 "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
 "since": null,
 "state": "not_yet",
 "status": null
}
```
HinweisEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31
редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_FR на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 26 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)
Betroffene Knoten
- Article 10.4(1). Where the obligor acknowledges the right before the expiration of the general limitation period, a new general limitation period begins on the day after the acknowledgement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AcknowledgementStartsNewGeneralPeriod
- Article 10.6(1). In the absence of provisions determining the exact date of commencement, arbitral proceedings are deemed to commence on the date on which the request reaches the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ArbitrationCommencesOnRequest
- Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration
- Article 10.1(2). This Chapter does not govern the time within which a party must give notice or perform any act other than the institution of legal proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ChapterDoesNotGovernNoticeTime
- Article 10.9(1). The expiration of the limitation period does not extinguish the right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight
- Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted
- Article 10.9(2). Once the obligor has asserted expiry, the barred exercise is a comparative remedium_exclusum urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit
- Article 10.3(a). The parties may not shorten the general limitation period to less than one year urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodFloorOfOneYear
- Article 10.2(1). The general limitation period is three years beginning on the day after the day the obligee knows or ought to know the facts as a result of which the right can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodOfThreeYears
- Article 10.1(1). The exercise of rights governed by the Principles is barred by the expiration of a limitation period according to the rules of this Chapter urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#LimitationGovernsExerciseOfRights
- Article 10.3(c). The parties may not extend the maximum limitation period to more than fifteen years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodCeilingOfFifteenYears
- Article 10.4(2). The maximum limitation period does not begin to run again, but may be exceeded by the beginning of a new general limitation period urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodDoesNotRestart
- Article 10.3(b). The parties may not shorten the maximum limitation period to less than four years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodFloorOfFourYears
- Article 10.2(2). In any event, the maximum limitation period is ten years beginning on the day after the day the right can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodOfTenYears
- Article 10.11. Where there has been performance in order to discharge an obligation, there is no right of restitution merely because the limitation period has expired urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#NoRestitutionAfterExpiration
- Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration
- Article 10.3. The parties may modify the limitation periods urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PartiesMayModifyPeriods
- Article 10.9(3). A right may still be relied on as a defence even though the expiration of the limitation period for that right has been asserted urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#RightStillAvailableAsDefence
- Article 10.10. The obligee may exercise the right of set-off until the obligor has asserted the expiration of the limitation period urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SetOffUntilExpirationAsserted
- Article 10.7. Articles 10.5 and 10.6 apply with appropriate modifications to proceedings whereby the parties request a third person to assist them in reaching an amicable settlement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByAmicableSettlementProceedings
- Article 10.6(1). The running of the limitation period is suspended when the obligee performs an act recognised by the law of the arbitral tribunal as asserting its right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByArbitralAct
- Article 10.5(1)(c). The running of the limitation period is suspended where the obligee has asserted its rights in proceedings for dissolution of the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByDissolutionClaim
- Article 10.8(1). Where the obligee has been prevented by an impediment beyond its control, the general limitation period is suspended so as not to expire before one year after the impediment has ceased to exist urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByImpediment
- Article 10.8(2). Where the impediment consists of the incapacity or death of a party, suspension ceases when a representative or successor has been appointed; the additional one-year period applies accordingly urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByIncapacityEndsOnAppointment
- Article 10.5(1)(b). The running of the limitation period is suspended where the obligee has asserted its rights in the insolvency proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByInsolvencyClaim
- Article 10.5(1)(a). The running of the limitation period is suspended when the obligee performs an act recognised by the law of the court as asserting its right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByJudicialAct
Details
```
{
 "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_FR",
 "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
 "since": null,
 "state": "not_yet",
 "status": null
}
```

Wie von der Engine erfasst: Code, Schweregrad und Meldungstext mit §-Verweisen; die Reihenfolge folgt dem Ausführungsdokument.

Beweisgraph

Beweisgraph · 10 Ebene

Beweisknoten: 33 · assertion 10, rule_application 21, candidate_closure 1, query_evaluation 1

Dieser Block ist für die Inline-Ansicht zu groß. Er ist vollständig und ungekürzt im JSON des Dokuments enthalten.

JSON herunterladen ↓

Kennungen von Kalender und Beweis

Beweisverweis: case/FuenfJahre_BGB/query/remedium-exclusum

Ursprüngliche Begründung · JSON

Dieser Block ist für die Inline-Ansicht zu groß. Er ist vollständig und ungekürzt im JSON des Dokuments enthalten.

JSON herunterladen ↓

QuellenAuszüge: 4

paragraph/195

§ 195 Regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beträgt drei Jahre.

Ausgangsdaten · JSON

{
  "contentHash": "sha256:53e15660089df268ecd95ba8fdcc0d8e73cba45a9e68c5cc802f87a60f03db9b",
  "edition": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_KONSOLIDIERT",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_P195",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 195 Regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "paragraph/195",
  "package": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:3a37767ed679ef6124cbd5c7272a5a798618598a194829b5a5ad5b10c1cfe898",
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 195 Regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist\nDie regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beträgt drei Jahre.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

paragraph/199

§ 199 Beginn der regelmäßigen Verjährungsfrist und Verjährungshöchstfristen (1) Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beginnt, soweit nicht ein anderer Verjährungsbeginn bestimmt ist, mit dem Schluss des Jahres, in dem 1. der Anspruch entstanden ist und 2. der Gläubiger von den den Anspruch begründenden Umständen und der Person des Schuldners Kenntnis erlangt oder ohne grobe Fahrlässigkeit erlangen müsste. (2) Schadensersatzansprüche, die auf der Verletzung des Lebens, des Körpers, der Gesundheit oder der Freiheit beruhen, verjähren ohne Rücksicht auf ihre Entstehung und die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in 30 Jahren von der Begehung der Handlung, der Pflichtverletzung oder dem sonstigen, den Schaden auslösenden Ereignis an. (3) Sonstige Schadensersatzansprüche verjähren 1. ohne Rücksicht auf die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in zehn Jahren von ihrer Entstehung an und 2. ohne Rücksicht auf ihre Entstehung und die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in 30 Jahren von der Begehung der Handlung, der Pflichtverletzung oder dem sonstigen, den Schaden auslösenden Ereignis an. Maßgeblich ist die früher endende Frist. (3a) Ansprüche, die auf einem Erbfall beruhen oder deren Geltendmachung die Kenntnis einer Verfügung von Todes wegen voraussetzt, verjähren ohne Rücksicht auf die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in 30 Jahren von der Entstehung des Anspruchs an. (4) Andere Ansprüche als die nach den Absätzen 2 bis 3a verjähren ohne Rücksicht auf die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in zehn Jahren von ihrer Entstehung an. (5) Geht der Anspruch auf ein Unterlassen, so tritt an die Stelle der Entstehung die Zuwiderhandlung.

Ausgangsdaten · JSON

{
  "contentHash": "sha256:dbc2b5bc4ee946d17bb8636b8d724e0168033a99dc35c94f5c6eb2b53f2b838c",
  "edition": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_KONSOLIDIERT",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_P199",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 199 Beginn der regelmäßigen Verjährungsfrist und Verjährungshöchstfristen"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "paragraph/199",
  "package": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:2916e6a9e86d21f331739cafd8a135c863d9e0bf3087e8a13fb6c60d7f2df4da",
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 199 Beginn der regelmäßigen Verjährungsfrist und Verjährungshöchstfristen\n(1) Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beginnt, soweit nicht ein anderer Verjährungsbeginn bestimmt ist, mit dem Schluss des Jahres, in dem 1. der Anspruch entstanden ist und\n2. der Gläubiger von den den Anspruch begründenden Umständen und der Person des Schuldners Kenntnis erlangt oder ohne grobe Fahrlässigkeit erlangen müsste.\n(2) Schadensersatzansprüche, die auf der Verletzung des Lebens, des Körpers, der Gesundheit oder der Freiheit beruhen, verjähren ohne Rücksicht auf ihre Entstehung und die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in 30 Jahren von der Begehung der Handlung, der Pflichtverletzung oder dem sonstigen, den Schaden auslösenden Ereignis an.\n(3) Sonstige Schadensersatzansprüche verjähren 1. ohne Rücksicht auf die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in zehn Jahren von ihrer Entstehung an und\n2. ohne Rücksicht auf ihre Entstehung und die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in 30 Jahren von der Begehung der Handlung, der Pflichtverletzung oder dem sonstigen, den Schaden auslösenden Ereignis an.\nMaßgeblich ist die früher endende Frist.\n(3a) Ansprüche, die auf einem Erbfall beruhen oder deren Geltendmachung die Kenntnis einer Verfügung von Todes wegen voraussetzt, verjähren ohne Rücksicht auf die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in 30 Jahren von der Entstehung des Anspruchs an.\n(4) Andere Ansprüche als die nach den Absätzen 2 bis 3a verjähren ohne Rücksicht auf die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in zehn Jahren von ihrer Entstehung an.\n(5) Geht der Anspruch auf ein Unterlassen, so tritt an die Stelle der Entstehung die Zuwiderhandlung.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

paragraph/209

§ 209 Wirkung der Hemmung Der Zeitraum, während dessen die Verjährung gehemmt ist, wird in die Verjährungsfrist nicht eingerechnet.

Ausgangsdaten · JSON

{
  "contentHash": "sha256:9d3c1967977b0f7d0bb0d9a7d89228d863b64a3cc4a8d54a9f351d8c9205188c",
  "edition": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_KONSOLIDIERT",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_P209",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 209 Wirkung der Hemmung"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "paragraph/209",
  "package": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:d3a5349ff97577ebae64e94327f4d26341f8d6fbce09a12c6615b96f59d9b9be",
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 209 Wirkung der Hemmung\nDer Zeitraum, während dessen die Verjährung gehemmt ist, wird in die Verjährungsfrist nicht eingerechnet.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

paragraph/214

§ 214 Wirkung der Verjährung (1) Nach Eintritt der Verjährung ist der Schuldner berechtigt, die Leistung zu verweigern. (2) Das zur Befriedigung eines verjährten Anspruchs Geleistete kann nicht zurückgefordert werden, auch wenn in Unkenntnis der Verjährung geleistet worden ist. Das Gleiche gilt von einem vertragsmäßigen Anerkenntnis sowie einer Sicherheitsleistung des Schuldners.

Ausgangsdaten · JSON

{
  "contentHash": "sha256:12d652436994db82ae2d39189be9bf31cdc979290895389a4620639b3f937994",
  "edition": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_KONSOLIDIERT",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_P214",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 214 Wirkung der Verjährung"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "paragraph/214",
  "package": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:1f3cff3f6a0d4efb9796bd6eff87447e953e444a38ba0121caedb177cf59002e",
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 214 Wirkung der Verjährung\n(1) Nach Eintritt der Verjährung ist der Schuldner berechtigt, die Leistung zu verweigern.\n(2) Das zur Befriedigung eines verjährten Anspruchs Geleistete kann nicht zurückgefordert werden, auch wenn in Unkenntnis der Verjährung geleistet worden ist. Das Gleiche gilt von einem vertragsmäßigen Anerkenntnis sowie einer Sicherheitsleistung des Schuldners.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Pakete im Snapshot

de.bgb.core
de.bgb.fristen
de.bgb.ius_privatum
doctrine.ius_privatum
fr.code_civil
unidroit.picc
unidroit.picc_limitation

Technische DatenVollständige Antwort, Parameter und Prüfsummen

Berechnungsstatus: COMPUTED

Vollständige Antwort der Engine

Fünf Jahre, BGB: das Rechtsmittel ist ausgeschlossen

Vollständiges Maschinenergebnis · JSON

Dieser Block ist für die Inline-Ansicht zu groß. Er ist vollständig und ungekürzt im JSON des Dokuments enthalten.

JSON herunterladen ↓

Ausführung · JSON

Dieser Block ist für die Inline-Ansicht zu groß. Er ist vollständig und ungekürzt im JSON des Dokuments enthalten.

JSON herunterladen ↓

Metadaten der Anzeige

Dieser Block ist für die Inline-Ansicht zu groß. Er ist vollständig und ungekürzt im JSON des Dokuments enthalten.

JSON herunterladen ↓

JSON · Berechnungen, Quellen und genaue Daten

{
  "acts": [
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:a6813604c35567e7c586d334efbf524d08f3467170c4b732cfb15809cacf4ff4",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core",
      "package": "de.bgb.core"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:998148eaeeed28f1565811474ee7beb7eacc616c5681ed9638edc976512a9884",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
      "package": "de.bgb.fristen"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:86a5a00db16e32187223ceeec6748eb7d42d18b7c370c8b15ac64d2f3f655ff7",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum",
      "package": "de.bgb.ius_privatum"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:7202de5de49a8a9d12837bc19cb7008ba2d1a68dbcc0134e0afccf1440a6d5ed",
      "namespace": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum",
      "package": "doctrine.ius_privatum"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:ad41d027ba92c38ca5eecc1d16097d0bbc8c5a74946fc1a6397c6dadac61158f",
      "namespace": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
      "package": "fr.code_civil"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:719bfd408eed92ad497ba071482354d4ad32b81ef9f41c6654f224416c19e603",
      "namespace": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc",
      "package": "unidroit.picc"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:b311d0d422a1079f71113320bd818236f7b09507c7dd960bdafceb91285497d9",
      "namespace": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "package": "unidroit.picc_limitation"
    }
  ],
  "caseHash": "sha256:46016aa963d29cfc446a35c6a945630088a81b841001fff20f3772522d11579f",
  "jurisdiction": "Deutschland",
  "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
  "mode": "audit",
  "programHash": "sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e",
  "resultHash": "sha256:3b8c31a7d40225f7dc8d028edbb4ba6636cb6413c662d58b3d87d109175fd196",
  "timezone": "Europe/Berlin"
}

evaluation SHA-256: sha256:1525ffc0f486d03fad6ab7b8a3160e766825ca1f8503179d41d4f5ec448585cd

Ausgangsdaten · JSON

{
  "args": [
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:causa",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    }
  ],
  "facts": [
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core#anspruch_entstanden_am"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "adjudicated",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#kenntnis_erlangt_am"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#keine_hemmung"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#schuldner_beruft_sich_auf_verjaehrung"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#g",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core#anspruchsinhaber"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#s",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core#anspruchsgegner"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#g",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#persona_of"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#s",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#persona_of"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#causa_of_anspruch"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
    }
  ],
  "kind": "truth",
  "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
  "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"
}

Nach fünf Jahren ist die deutsche Verjährung am 31. Dezember 2013 eingetreten, und das Rechtsmittel ist ausgeschlossen.

Fünf Jahre, BGB: die Verjährung ist am 31. Dezember 2013 eingetreten

Bedingungsprüfung

Fünf Jahre, Code civil: die Klage ist verjährt

Rechtsordnung DeutschlandRechtsstand zum 2016-01-02

Berechnungsergebnis

Festgestellt

Eingabeparameter

Was wir ermitteln

action prescrite à cette date

causa2. Januar 2016

Ausgangsfakten

créance exigible depuis ce jour
causa: causajour: 15. März 2010
le titulaire a connu les faits lui permettant d'exercer son droit ce jour
causa: causajour: 15. März 2010
action introduite ce jour
causa: causajour: 2. Januar 2016
prescription non interrompue et non suspendue
causa: causa
der Kläger erhebt gegen den Beklagten einen Anspruch — das streitige Rechtsverhältnis, auf das sich die Frage bezieht
causa: causaactor: greus: s

Ausgangsdaten · JSON

{
  "args": [
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:causa",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "kind": "value",
      "type": {
        "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
      },
      "value": "2016-01-02"
    }
  ],
  "facts": [
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#creance_exigible_depuis"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#titulaire_connait_les_faits_le"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2016-01-02"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#action_introduite_le"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#prescription_non_interrompue"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
    }
  ],
  "kind": "truth",
  "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
  "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#action_prescrite_le"
}

Warum dieses ErgebnisAngewendete Regeln und Voraussetzungen

Ableitungspfad8 Schritte

1
action introduite ce jour
causa: urn:p12:causa; jour: 2. Januar 2016
Fallfakt
2
le titulaire a connu les faits lui permettant d'exercer son droit ce jour
causa: urn:p12:causa; jour: 15. März 2010
Fallfakt
3
créance exigible depuis ce jour
causa: urn:p12:causa; jour: 15. März 2010
Fallfakt
4
cinq ans à compter du jour où le titulaire a connu les faits
point de départ du délai quinquennal: causa: urn:p12:causa; jour: 15. März 2010
Art. 2224
Kennung
urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#PointDepartConnaissanceReelle
Regel
5
prescription non interrompue et non suspendue
causa: urn:p12:causa
Fallfakt
6
délai de cinq ans, compté par jours
15. März 2015 = add calendar period(15. März 2010, 5 calendar_year)
Art. 2224, Art. 2228, Art. 2229
Kennung
urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#EcheanceCinqAns
Regel
7
la prescription est acquise lorsque le dernier jour du terme est accompli
action prescrite à cette date: causa: urn:p12:causa; jour: 2. Januar 2016
Art. 2219, Art. 2229
Kennung
urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#ActionPrescriteApresEcheance
Regel
8
Abfrageauswertung
Abfrage

von der Engine geprüft: 4 · Fallfakt: 4 · Vollständiger Graph: 12 Knoten

Schritte des gespeicherten Beweises von den Fallfakten zur Antwort. Die Formeln werden so gezeigt, wie sie in der Norm stehen, mit eingesetzten Werten; die Seite berechnet nichts neu.

Grundlage dieser Antwort

Regeln aus dem gespeicherten Beweisweg dieser Antwort.

fr.code_civil

la prescription est acquise lorsque le dernier jour du terme est accompli
Kennung
urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#ActionPrescriteApresEcheance
délai de cinq ans, compté par jours
Kennung
urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#EcheanceCinqAns
cinq ans à compter du jour où le titulaire a connu les faits
Kennung
urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#PointDepartConnaissanceReelle

Weitere Regeln der Berechnung3

Angewendet in der Gesamtberechnung, aber nicht Teil des Beweiswegs dieser Antwort.

fr.code_civil

Article 2232, alinéa 2. Hors butoir opposable, l'échéance après plancher est la date applicable
Kennung
urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#DateApplicableSansButoirOpposable
Sans médiation, conciliation ni mesure d'instruction, l'échéance du délai n'est pas relevée
Kennung
urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#EcheanceApresPlancherSansMinimale
la prescription extinctive éteint le droit par l'inaction de son titulaire
Kennung
urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#PrescriptionExcludit

Anmerkungen · 4

Ausführungsstörungen und Hinweise

HinweisEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31
редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_EN на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 81 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)
Betroffene Knoten
- Article 5.2.3. The conferment of rights in the beneficiary includes the right to invoke a clause in the contract which excludes or limits the liability of the beneficiary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryMayInvokeClause
- Articles 5.2.1 and 5.2.2. The parties may confer a right on a third party who must be identifiable with adequate certainty by the contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryRightExists
- Article 5.1.4(2). To the extent that an obligation involves a duty of best efforts, that party is bound to make such efforts as would be made by a reasonable person of the same kind urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BestEffortsDutyPerformed
- Article 1.9(1). The parties are bound by any usage to which they have agreed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByAgreedUsage
- Article 1.9(1). The parties are bound by practices which they have established between themselves urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByEstablishedPractice
- Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage
- Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage/unless/0
- Article 5.3.3(1). A party who prevented fulfilment contrary to good faith may not rely on the non-fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnPreventedCondition
- Article 5.3.3(2). A party who brought about fulfilment contrary to good faith may not rely on the fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnProcuredCondition
- Article 4.3. In applying Articles 4.1 and 4.2, regard shall be had to all the circumstances, including those listed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CircumstanceToBeRegarded
- Article 1.11. Where a party has more than one place of business the relevant one is that which has the closest relationship to the contract and its performance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ClosestPlaceIsRelevant
- Article 4.1(2) (opening words). Where the common intention can be established, the reasonable-persons reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CommonIntentionDisplacesReasonablePersons
- Article 1.12(2). The computed last day does not stand where it is a holiday at the place of performance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ComputedLastDayYieldsToHoliday
- Article 4.6. If contract terms supplied by one party are unclear, an interpretation against that party is preferred urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContraProferentem
- Article 1.3. A contract validly entered into is binding upon the parties urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContractIsBinding
- Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#Cooperate
- Article 5.2.4. The promisor may assert against the beneficiary all defences which the promisor could assert against the promisee urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DefencesAgainstBeneficiary
- Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective
- Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective/unless/0
- Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyOfGoodFaith
- Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToCooperate
- Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRights
- Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRightsBreached
- Article 5.1.1. The contractual obligations of the parties may be express urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ExpressIsContractual
- Article 5.1.5. In determining the extent to which an obligation involves a duty of best efforts or a duty to achieve a specific result, regard shall be had to the listed factors urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FactorDeterminesKindOfDuty
- Article 1.1. The parties are free to enter into a contract and to determine its content urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FreedomOfContract
- Article 1.6(2). Issues within the scope of these Principles but not expressly settled by them are as far as possible to be settled in accordance with their underlying general principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GapSettledByUnderlyingPrinciples
- Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaith
- Article 1.7(2). The parties may not exclude or limit the duty of good faith and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaithCannotBeExcluded
- Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted
- Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted/unless/0
- Article 5.1.2(c). Implied obligations stem from good faith and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromGoodFaith
- Article 5.1.2(a). Implied obligations stem from the nature and purpose of the contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromNatureAndPurpose
- Article 5.1.2(b). Implied obligations stem from practices established between the parties and usages urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromPracticesAndUsages
- Article 5.1.2(d). Implied obligations stem from reasonableness urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromReasonableness
- Article 5.1.1. The contractual obligations of the parties may be implied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedIsContractual
- Article 1.8. A party cannot act inconsistently with an understanding it has caused the other party to have and upon which that other party reasonably has acted in reliance to its detriment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InconsistentBehaviourBarred
- Article 4.2(2) (opening words). Where the intention was known to the other party, the reasonable-person reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#IntentionDisplacesReasonablePerson
- Article 4.1(1). A contract shall be interpreted according to the common intention of the parties urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByCommonIntention
- Article 4.1(2). If the common intention cannot be established, the contract shall be interpreted according to the meaning reasonable persons of the same kind would give it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByReasonablePersons
- Article 1.4. Nothing in these Principles restricts the application of mandatory rules urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MandatoryRulesUnrestricted
- Article 5.1.7(2). Where the price is to be determined by one party and that determination is manifestly unreasonable, a reasonable price shall be substituted notwithstanding any contract term to the contrary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ManifestlyUnreasonableDeterminationReplaced
- Preamble. These Principles may be applied when the parties have agreed that their contract be governed by general principles of law, the lex mercatoria or the like urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyOnChoiceOfGeneralPrinciples
- Preamble. These Principles may be applied when the parties have not chosen any law to govern their contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyWhereNoLawChosen
- Preamble. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement domestic law urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretDomesticLaw
- Preamble. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement international uniform law instruments urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretUniformLaw
- Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated as otherwise provided in these Principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationAsProvided
- Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated by agreement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByAgreement
- Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated in accordance with its terms urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByTerms
- Article 1.2. Nothing in these Principles requires a contract to be made in or evidenced by a particular form urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoFormRequired
- Article 1.10(2)-(3). A notice is effective when it reaches the person to whom it is given urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoticeEffectiveOnReceipt
- Article 4.7. In case of discrepancy between equally authoritative versions there is a preference for the interpretation according to the original version urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#OriginalVersionPreferred
- Article 1.12(1). Official holidays or non-business days occurring during the period are included in calculating it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodEndsOn
- Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday
- Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday/unless/0
- Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PreserveRights
- Article 5.1.7(1). Where a contract does not fix the price, the parties are considered to have made reference to the price generally charged in comparable circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceByMarket
- Article 5.1.7(1). If no such price is available, a reasonable price applies urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceReasonableWhereNoMarket
- Preamble. These Principles shall be applied when the parties have agreed that their contract be governed by them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PrinciplesGovernByAgreement
- Article 5.1.6. Where the quality of performance is neither fixed by nor determinable from the contract, a party is bound to render a performance of a quality that is reasonable and not less than average in the circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#QualityWhereNotFixed
- Articles 4.4 and 4.5. Terms are to be read in the light of the whole contract and so as to give effect to all of them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReadingConformsToCanons
- Article 5.1.9(1). An obligee may release its right by agreement with the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReleaseByAgreement
- Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone
- Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone/unless/0
- Article 5.2.6. The beneficiary may renounce a right conferred on it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RenunciationEndsBeneficiaryRight
- Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract
- Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract/unless/0
- Article 5.3.5. On fulfilment of a resolutive condition the rules on restitution apply with appropriate adaptations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RestitutionOnResolutiveCondition
- Article 5.1.4(1). To the extent that an obligation involves a duty to achieve a specific result, that party is bound to achieve that result urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResultDutyPerformed
- Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance
- Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance/unless/0
- Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant
- Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant/unless/0
- Article 4.2(1). Statements and other conduct shall be interpreted according to the party's intention if the other party knew or could not have been unaware of it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByIntention
- Article 4.2(2). If the preceding paragraph is not applicable, statements shall be interpreted according to the meaning a reasonable person would give them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByReasonablePerson
- Article 4.8(1). Where the parties have not agreed with respect to an important term, a term which is appropriate in the circumstances shall be supplied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SupplyOmittedTerm
- Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect
- Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect/unless/0
- Article 5.1.8. A contract for an indefinite period may be terminated by either party by giving notice a reasonable time in advance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#TerminationOfIndefiniteContract
- Article 5.1.7(2). A manifestly unreasonable determination does not stand as the applicable price urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#UnreasonableDeterminationDisplaced
- Article 5.3.1. A contract or a contractual obligation may be made conditional upon the occurrence of a future uncertain event urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ValidCondition
Details
```
{
 "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_EN",
 "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
 "since": null,
 "state": "not_yet",
 "status": null
}
```
HinweisEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31
редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_FR на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 79 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)
Betroffene Knoten
- Article 5.2.3. The conferment of rights in the beneficiary includes the right to invoke a clause in the contract which excludes or limits the liability of the beneficiary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryMayInvokeClause
- Article 5.1.4(2). To the extent that an obligation involves a duty of best efforts, that party is bound to make such efforts as would be made by a reasonable person of the same kind urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BestEffortsDutyPerformed
- Article 1.9(1). The parties are bound by any usage to which they have agreed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByAgreedUsage
- Article 1.9(1). The parties are bound by practices which they have established between themselves urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByEstablishedPractice
- Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage
- Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage/unless/0
- Article 5.3.3(1). A party who prevented fulfilment contrary to good faith may not rely on the non-fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnPreventedCondition
- Article 5.3.3(2). A party who brought about fulfilment contrary to good faith may not rely on the fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnProcuredCondition
- Article 4.3. In applying Articles 4.1 and 4.2, regard shall be had to all the circumstances, including those listed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CircumstanceToBeRegarded
- Article 1.11. Where a party has more than one place of business the relevant one is that which has the closest relationship to the contract and its performance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ClosestPlaceIsRelevant
- Article 4.1(2) (opening words). Where the common intention can be established, the reasonable-persons reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CommonIntentionDisplacesReasonablePersons
- Article 1.12(2). The computed last day does not stand where it is a holiday at the place of performance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ComputedLastDayYieldsToHoliday
- Article 4.6. If contract terms supplied by one party are unclear, an interpretation against that party is preferred urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContraProferentem
- Article 1.3. A contract validly entered into is binding upon the parties urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContractIsBinding
- Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#Cooperate
- Article 5.2.4. The promisor may assert against the beneficiary all defences which the promisor could assert against the promisee urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DefencesAgainstBeneficiary
- Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective
- Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective/unless/0
- Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyOfGoodFaith
- Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToCooperate
- Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRights
- Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRightsBreached
- Article 5.1.1. The contractual obligations of the parties may be express urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ExpressIsContractual
- Article 5.1.5. In determining the extent to which an obligation involves a duty of best efforts or a duty to achieve a specific result, regard shall be had to the listed factors urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FactorDeterminesKindOfDuty
- Article 1.1. The parties are free to enter into a contract and to determine its content urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FreedomOfContract
- Article 1.6(2). Issues within the scope of these Principles but not expressly settled by them are as far as possible to be settled in accordance with their underlying general principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GapSettledByUnderlyingPrinciples
- Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaith
- Article 1.7(2). The parties may not exclude or limit the duty of good faith and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaithCannotBeExcluded
- Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted
- Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted/unless/0
- Article 5.1.2(c). Implied obligations stem from good faith and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromGoodFaith
- Article 5.1.2(a). Implied obligations stem from the nature and purpose of the contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromNatureAndPurpose
- Article 5.1.2(b). Implied obligations stem from practices established between the parties and usages urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromPracticesAndUsages
- Article 5.1.2(d). Implied obligations stem from reasonableness urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromReasonableness
- Article 5.1.1. The contractual obligations of the parties may be implied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedIsContractual
- Article 1.8. A party cannot act inconsistently with an understanding it has caused the other party to have and upon which that other party reasonably has acted in reliance to its detriment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InconsistentBehaviourBarred
- Article 4.2(2) (opening words). Where the intention was known to the other party, the reasonable-person reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#IntentionDisplacesReasonablePerson
- Article 4.1(1). A contract shall be interpreted according to the common intention of the parties urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByCommonIntention
- Article 4.1(2). If the common intention cannot be established, the contract shall be interpreted according to the meaning reasonable persons of the same kind would give it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByReasonablePersons
- Article 1.4. Nothing in these Principles restricts the application of mandatory rules urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MandatoryRulesUnrestricted
- Article 5.1.7(2). Where the price is to be determined by one party and that determination is manifestly unreasonable, a reasonable price shall be substituted notwithstanding any contract term to the contrary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ManifestlyUnreasonableDeterminationReplaced
- Preamble. These Principles may be applied when the parties have agreed that their contract be governed by general principles of law, the lex mercatoria or the like urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyOnChoiceOfGeneralPrinciples
- Preamble. These Principles may be applied when the parties have not chosen any law to govern their contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyWhereNoLawChosen
- Preamble. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement domestic law urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretDomesticLaw
- Preamble. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement international uniform law instruments urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretUniformLaw
- Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated as otherwise provided in these Principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationAsProvided
- Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated by agreement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByAgreement
- Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated in accordance with its terms urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByTerms
- Article 1.2. Nothing in these Principles requires a contract to be made in or evidenced by a particular form urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoFormRequired
- Article 1.10(2)-(3). A notice is effective when it reaches the person to whom it is given urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoticeEffectiveOnReceipt
- Article 4.7. In case of discrepancy between equally authoritative versions there is a preference for the interpretation according to the original version urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#OriginalVersionPreferred
- Article 1.12(1). Official holidays or non-business days occurring during the period are included in calculating it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodEndsOn
- Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday
- Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday/unless/0
- Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PreserveRights
- Article 5.1.7(1). Where a contract does not fix the price, the parties are considered to have made reference to the price generally charged in comparable circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceByMarket
- Article 5.1.7(1). If no such price is available, a reasonable price applies urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceReasonableWhereNoMarket
- Preamble. These Principles shall be applied when the parties have agreed that their contract be governed by them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PrinciplesGovernByAgreement
- Article 5.1.6. Where the quality of performance is neither fixed by nor determinable from the contract, a party is bound to render a performance of a quality that is reasonable and not less than average in the circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#QualityWhereNotFixed
- Article 5.1.9(1). An obligee may release its right by agreement with the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReleaseByAgreement
- Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone
- Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone/unless/0
- Article 5.2.6. The beneficiary may renounce a right conferred on it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RenunciationEndsBeneficiaryRight
- Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract
- Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract/unless/0
- Article 5.3.5. On fulfilment of a resolutive condition the rules on restitution apply with appropriate adaptations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RestitutionOnResolutiveCondition
- Article 5.1.4(1). To the extent that an obligation involves a duty to achieve a specific result, that party is bound to achieve that result urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResultDutyPerformed
- Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance
- Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance/unless/0
- Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant
- Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant/unless/0
- Article 4.2(1). Statements and other conduct shall be interpreted according to the party's intention if the other party knew or could not have been unaware of it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByIntention
- Article 4.2(2). If the preceding paragraph is not applicable, statements shall be interpreted according to the meaning a reasonable person would give them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByReasonablePerson
- Article 4.8(1). Where the parties have not agreed with respect to an important term, a term which is appropriate in the circumstances shall be supplied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SupplyOmittedTerm
- Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect
- Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect/unless/0
- Article 5.1.8. A contract for an indefinite period may be terminated by either party by giving notice a reasonable time in advance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#TerminationOfIndefiniteContract
- Article 5.1.7(2). A manifestly unreasonable determination does not stand as the applicable price urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#UnreasonableDeterminationDisplaced
- Article 5.3.1. A contract or a contractual obligation may be made conditional upon the occurrence of a future uncertain event urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ValidCondition
Details
```
{
 "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_FR",
 "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
 "since": null,
 "state": "not_yet",
 "status": null
}
```
HinweisEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31
редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_EN на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 26 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)
Betroffene Knoten
- Article 10.4(1). Where the obligor acknowledges the right before the expiration of the general limitation period, a new general limitation period begins on the day after the acknowledgement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AcknowledgementStartsNewGeneralPeriod
- Article 10.6(1). In the absence of provisions determining the exact date of commencement, arbitral proceedings are deemed to commence on the date on which the request reaches the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ArbitrationCommencesOnRequest
- Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration
- Article 10.1(2). This Chapter does not govern the time within which a party must give notice or perform any act other than the institution of legal proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ChapterDoesNotGovernNoticeTime
- Article 10.9(1). The expiration of the limitation period does not extinguish the right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight
- Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted
- Article 10.9(2). Once the obligor has asserted expiry, the barred exercise is a comparative remedium_exclusum urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit
- Article 10.3(a). The parties may not shorten the general limitation period to less than one year urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodFloorOfOneYear
- Article 10.2(1). The general limitation period is three years beginning on the day after the day the obligee knows or ought to know the facts as a result of which the right can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodOfThreeYears
- Article 10.1(1). The exercise of rights governed by the Principles is barred by the expiration of a limitation period according to the rules of this Chapter urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#LimitationGovernsExerciseOfRights
- Article 10.3(c). The parties may not extend the maximum limitation period to more than fifteen years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodCeilingOfFifteenYears
- Article 10.4(2). The maximum limitation period does not begin to run again, but may be exceeded by the beginning of a new general limitation period urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodDoesNotRestart
- Article 10.3(b). The parties may not shorten the maximum limitation period to less than four years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodFloorOfFourYears
- Article 10.2(2). In any event, the maximum limitation period is ten years beginning on the day after the day the right can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodOfTenYears
- Article 10.11. Where there has been performance in order to discharge an obligation, there is no right of restitution merely because the limitation period has expired urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#NoRestitutionAfterExpiration
- Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration
- Article 10.3. The parties may modify the limitation periods urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PartiesMayModifyPeriods
- Article 10.9(3). A right may still be relied on as a defence even though the expiration of the limitation period for that right has been asserted urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#RightStillAvailableAsDefence
- Article 10.10. The obligee may exercise the right of set-off until the obligor has asserted the expiration of the limitation period urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SetOffUntilExpirationAsserted
- Article 10.7. Articles 10.5 and 10.6 apply with appropriate modifications to proceedings whereby the parties request a third person to assist them in reaching an amicable settlement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByAmicableSettlementProceedings
- Article 10.6(1). The running of the limitation period is suspended when the obligee performs an act recognised by the law of the arbitral tribunal as asserting its right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByArbitralAct
- Article 10.5(1)(c). The running of the limitation period is suspended where the obligee has asserted its rights in proceedings for dissolution of the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByDissolutionClaim
- Article 10.8(1). Where the obligee has been prevented by an impediment beyond its control, the general limitation period is suspended so as not to expire before one year after the impediment has ceased to exist urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByImpediment
- Article 10.8(2). Where the impediment consists of the incapacity or death of a party, suspension ceases when a representative or successor has been appointed; the additional one-year period applies accordingly urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByIncapacityEndsOnAppointment
- Article 10.5(1)(b). The running of the limitation period is suspended where the obligee has asserted its rights in the insolvency proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByInsolvencyClaim
- Article 10.5(1)(a). The running of the limitation period is suspended when the obligee performs an act recognised by the law of the court as asserting its right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByJudicialAct
Details
```
{
 "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_EN",
 "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
 "since": null,
 "state": "not_yet",
 "status": null
}
```
HinweisEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31
редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_FR на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 26 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)
Betroffene Knoten
- Article 10.4(1). Where the obligor acknowledges the right before the expiration of the general limitation period, a new general limitation period begins on the day after the acknowledgement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AcknowledgementStartsNewGeneralPeriod
- Article 10.6(1). In the absence of provisions determining the exact date of commencement, arbitral proceedings are deemed to commence on the date on which the request reaches the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ArbitrationCommencesOnRequest
- Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration
- Article 10.1(2). This Chapter does not govern the time within which a party must give notice or perform any act other than the institution of legal proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ChapterDoesNotGovernNoticeTime
- Article 10.9(1). The expiration of the limitation period does not extinguish the right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight
- Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted
- Article 10.9(2). Once the obligor has asserted expiry, the barred exercise is a comparative remedium_exclusum urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit
- Article 10.3(a). The parties may not shorten the general limitation period to less than one year urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodFloorOfOneYear
- Article 10.2(1). The general limitation period is three years beginning on the day after the day the obligee knows or ought to know the facts as a result of which the right can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodOfThreeYears
- Article 10.1(1). The exercise of rights governed by the Principles is barred by the expiration of a limitation period according to the rules of this Chapter urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#LimitationGovernsExerciseOfRights
- Article 10.3(c). The parties may not extend the maximum limitation period to more than fifteen years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodCeilingOfFifteenYears
- Article 10.4(2). The maximum limitation period does not begin to run again, but may be exceeded by the beginning of a new general limitation period urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodDoesNotRestart
- Article 10.3(b). The parties may not shorten the maximum limitation period to less than four years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodFloorOfFourYears
- Article 10.2(2). In any event, the maximum limitation period is ten years beginning on the day after the day the right can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodOfTenYears
- Article 10.11. Where there has been performance in order to discharge an obligation, there is no right of restitution merely because the limitation period has expired urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#NoRestitutionAfterExpiration
- Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration
- Article 10.3. The parties may modify the limitation periods urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PartiesMayModifyPeriods
- Article 10.9(3). A right may still be relied on as a defence even though the expiration of the limitation period for that right has been asserted urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#RightStillAvailableAsDefence
- Article 10.10. The obligee may exercise the right of set-off until the obligor has asserted the expiration of the limitation period urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SetOffUntilExpirationAsserted
- Article 10.7. Articles 10.5 and 10.6 apply with appropriate modifications to proceedings whereby the parties request a third person to assist them in reaching an amicable settlement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByAmicableSettlementProceedings
- Article 10.6(1). The running of the limitation period is suspended when the obligee performs an act recognised by the law of the arbitral tribunal as asserting its right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByArbitralAct
- Article 10.5(1)(c). The running of the limitation period is suspended where the obligee has asserted its rights in proceedings for dissolution of the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByDissolutionClaim
- Article 10.8(1). Where the obligee has been prevented by an impediment beyond its control, the general limitation period is suspended so as not to expire before one year after the impediment has ceased to exist urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByImpediment
- Article 10.8(2). Where the impediment consists of the incapacity or death of a party, suspension ceases when a representative or successor has been appointed; the additional one-year period applies accordingly urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByIncapacityEndsOnAppointment
- Article 10.5(1)(b). The running of the limitation period is suspended where the obligee has asserted its rights in the insolvency proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByInsolvencyClaim
- Article 10.5(1)(a). The running of the limitation period is suspended when the obligee performs an act recognised by the law of the court as asserting its right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByJudicialAct
Details
```
{
 "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_FR",
 "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
 "since": null,
 "state": "not_yet",
 "status": null
}
```

Wie von der Engine erfasst: Code, Schweregrad und Meldungstext mit §-Verweisen; die Reihenfolge folgt dem Ausführungsdokument.

Beweisgraph

Beweisgraph · 5 Ebene

Beweisknoten: 12 · assertion 5, rule_application 6, query_evaluation 1

Dieser Block ist für die Inline-Ansicht zu groß. Er ist vollständig und ungekürzt im JSON des Dokuments enthalten.

JSON herunterladen ↓

Kennungen von Kalender und Beweis

Beweisverweis: case/FuenfJahre_CC/query/cc-prescrite

Ursprüngliche Begründung · JSON

Dieser Block ist für die Inline-Ansicht zu groß. Er ist vollständig und ungekürzt im JSON des Dokuments enthalten.

JSON herunterladen ↓

QuellenAuszüge: 7

Artikel 2219

Article 2219 La prescription extinctive est un mode d'extinction d'un droit résultant de l'inaction de son titulaire pendant un certain laps de temps.

Ausgangsdaten · JSON

{
  "contentHash": "sha256:6df4090af33e5e220e1ccb8dce8f8d00f5f0e141aadbd8f85537aa44bf7a63f7",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2219",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2219"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2219",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:0b7ecca0ee814319db91d174578fb164b2ac80bbd82794ff733b36bd4f55401a",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2219\nLa prescription extinctive est un mode d'extinction d'un droit résultant de l'inaction de son titulaire pendant un certain laps de temps.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Artikel 2224

Article 2224 Les actions personnelles ou mobilières se prescrivent par cinq ans à compter du jour où le titulaire d'un droit a connu ou aurait dû connaître les faits lui permettant de l'exercer.

Ausgangsdaten · JSON

{
  "contentHash": "sha256:bdab8bd64c835fd72d22b2500bf46d2189e23899c1a2355f5df83442df6121ab",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2224",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2224"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2224",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:672b74a19b0ebe429181790cbe798f0f53e22cb2eeb8706cded06dbf5a40c629",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2224\nLes actions personnelles ou mobilières se prescrivent par cinq ans à compter du jour où le titulaire d'un droit a connu ou aurait dû connaître les faits lui permettant de l'exercer.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Artikel 2228

Article 2228 La prescription se compte par jours, et non par heures.

Ausgangsdaten · JSON

{
  "contentHash": "sha256:a65f1c87050358f486df72292dbb5562439921a55708065026e1560803461b7b",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2228",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2228"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2228",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:dd06365b6b1300407fadd02ddc12c5220fd9139343f3ce91809ff20bf62588a6",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2228\nLa prescription se compte par jours, et non par heures.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Artikel 2229

Article 2229 Elle est acquise lorsque le dernier jour du terme est accompli.

Ausgangsdaten · JSON

{
  "contentHash": "sha256:43dd3aa87d9bddf34522d203c9afc34f12ce9f5292aa3748835cbccf72dfcccd",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2229",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2229"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2229",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:28578b7da1445ef66f205effb784bcc5dae77310d748b2ae6ccebd52a8ca3009",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2229\nElle est acquise lorsque le dernier jour du terme est accompli.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Artikel 2232

Article 2232 Le report du point de départ, la suspension ou l'interruption de la prescription ne peut avoir pour effet de porter le délai de la prescription extinctive au-delà de vingt ans à compter du jour de la naissance du droit. Le premier alinéa n'est pas applicable dans les cas mentionnés aux articles 2226, 2226-1, 2227, 2233 et 2236, au premier alinéa de l'article 2241 et à l'article 2244. Il ne s'applique pas non plus aux actions relatives à l'état des personnes.

Ausgangsdaten · JSON

{
  "contentHash": "sha256:d0aa882fc857d081bcada43191910d722446f91fb14fb86b7e7322957b4070c8",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2232",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2232"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2232",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:b1a33bf6d27cec1af359949222bf7220bc63bc536ae53eb79e94833b5d293e0b",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2232\nLe report du point de départ, la suspension ou l'interruption de la prescription ne peut avoir pour effet de porter le délai de la prescription extinctive au-delà de vingt ans à compter du jour de la naissance du droit.\nLe premier alinéa n'est pas applicable dans les cas mentionnés aux articles 2226, 2226-1, 2227, 2233 et 2236, au premier alinéa de l'article 2241 et à l'article 2244. Il ne s'applique pas non plus aux actions relatives à l'état des personnes.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Artikel 2238

Article 2238 La prescription est suspendue à compter du jour où, après la survenance d'un litige, les parties conviennent de recourir à la médiation ou à la conciliation ou, à défaut d'accord écrit, à compter du jour de la première réunion de médiation ou de conciliation. La prescription est également suspendue à compter de la conclusion d'une convention de procédure participative ou à compter de l'accord du débiteur constaté par l'huissier de justice pour participer à la procédure prévue à l'article L. 125-1 du code des procédures civiles d'exécution. Le délai de prescription recommence à courir, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois, à compter de la date à laquelle soit l'une des parties ou les deux, soit le médiateur ou le conciliateur déclarent que la médiation ou la conciliation est terminée. En cas de convention de procédure participative, le délai de prescription recommence à courir à compter du terme de la convention, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois. En cas d'échec de la procédure prévue au même article, le délai de prescription recommence à courir à compter de la date du refus du débiteur, constaté par l'huissier, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois.

Ausgangsdaten · JSON

{
  "contentHash": "sha256:85fb1ede52113abd61e7bcfa34017c1229badc1205a9cac686e65c4640912b6f",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2238",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2238"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2238",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:7de68d6ed845bcd95c5ca76851b7d5c42c0b755a0f7a53080cbbcbb127ac61f7",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2238\nLa prescription est suspendue à compter du jour où, après la survenance d'un litige, les parties conviennent de recourir à la médiation ou à la conciliation ou, à défaut d'accord écrit, à compter du jour de la première réunion de médiation ou de conciliation. La prescription est également suspendue à compter de la conclusion d'une convention de procédure participative ou à compter de l'accord du débiteur constaté par l'huissier de justice pour participer à la procédure prévue à l'article L. 125-1 du code des procédures civiles d'exécution.\nLe délai de prescription recommence à courir, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois, à compter de la date à laquelle soit l'une des parties ou les deux, soit le médiateur ou le conciliateur déclarent que la médiation ou la conciliation est terminée. En cas de convention de procédure participative, le délai de prescription recommence à courir à compter du terme de la convention, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois. En cas d'échec de la procédure prévue au même article, le délai de prescription recommence à courir à compter de la date du refus du débiteur, constaté par l'huissier, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Artikel 2239

Article 2239 La prescription est également suspendue lorsque le juge fait droit à une demande de mesure d'instruction présentée avant tout procès. Le délai de prescription recommence à courir, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois, à compter du jour où la mesure a été exécutée.

Ausgangsdaten · JSON

{
  "contentHash": "sha256:16731a698eded878eaa02339d6b1fd92b7299d446eab076502a9c24717cfd0cc",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2239",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2239"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2239",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:9e742ac71c8ecd1fe04db3e3bfceb323387b9b856a4882cc1429615d47e89d12",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2239\nLa prescription est également suspendue lorsque le juge fait droit à une demande de mesure d'instruction présentée avant tout procès.\nLe délai de prescription recommence à courir, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois, à compter du jour où la mesure a été exécutée.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Pakete im Snapshot

de.bgb.core
de.bgb.fristen
de.bgb.ius_privatum
doctrine.ius_privatum
fr.code_civil
unidroit.picc
unidroit.picc_limitation

Technische DatenVollständige Antwort, Parameter und Prüfsummen

Berechnungsstatus: COMPUTED

Vollständige Antwort der Engine

Fünf Jahre, Code civil: die Klage ist verjährt

Vollständiges Maschinenergebnis · JSON

Dieser Block ist für die Inline-Ansicht zu groß. Er ist vollständig und ungekürzt im JSON des Dokuments enthalten.

JSON herunterladen ↓

Ausführung · JSON

Dieser Block ist für die Inline-Ansicht zu groß. Er ist vollständig und ungekürzt im JSON des Dokuments enthalten.

JSON herunterladen ↓

Metadaten der Anzeige

Dieser Block ist für die Inline-Ansicht zu groß. Er ist vollständig und ungekürzt im JSON des Dokuments enthalten.

JSON herunterladen ↓

JSON · Berechnungen, Quellen und genaue Daten

{
  "acts": [
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:a6813604c35567e7c586d334efbf524d08f3467170c4b732cfb15809cacf4ff4",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core",
      "package": "de.bgb.core"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:998148eaeeed28f1565811474ee7beb7eacc616c5681ed9638edc976512a9884",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
      "package": "de.bgb.fristen"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:86a5a00db16e32187223ceeec6748eb7d42d18b7c370c8b15ac64d2f3f655ff7",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum",
      "package": "de.bgb.ius_privatum"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:7202de5de49a8a9d12837bc19cb7008ba2d1a68dbcc0134e0afccf1440a6d5ed",
      "namespace": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum",
      "package": "doctrine.ius_privatum"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:ad41d027ba92c38ca5eecc1d16097d0bbc8c5a74946fc1a6397c6dadac61158f",
      "namespace": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
      "package": "fr.code_civil"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:719bfd408eed92ad497ba071482354d4ad32b81ef9f41c6654f224416c19e603",
      "namespace": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc",
      "package": "unidroit.picc"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:b311d0d422a1079f71113320bd818236f7b09507c7dd960bdafceb91285497d9",
      "namespace": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "package": "unidroit.picc_limitation"
    }
  ],
  "caseHash": "sha256:1cd2738ae024892e46fd2940deb1436562d2b339b4aef7c72b99c36680f1f4bd",
  "jurisdiction": "Deutschland",
  "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
  "mode": "audit",
  "programHash": "sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e",
  "resultHash": "sha256:1b7a72c8a363f484f2c126fd9af22e345b6113d651669e8d86fd57e78bc688c0",
  "timezone": "UTC"
}

evaluation SHA-256: sha256:0bcd196ba381c52743eee0b8127c89f485d0716b5b84dec4b642c17a4313c2e3

Ausgangsdaten · JSON

{
  "args": [
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:causa",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "kind": "value",
      "type": {
        "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
      },
      "value": "2016-01-02"
    }
  ],
  "facts": [
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#creance_exigible_depuis"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#titulaire_connait_les_faits_le"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2016-01-02"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#action_introduite_le"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#prescription_non_interrompue"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
    }
  ],
  "kind": "truth",
  "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
  "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#action_prescrite_le"
}

Bedingungsprüfung

Fünf Jahre, Code civil: das Rechtsmittel ist ausgeschlossen

Rechtsordnung DeutschlandRechtsstand zum 2016-01-02

Berechnungsergebnis

Festgestellt

Eingabeparameter

Was wir ermitteln

der Rechtsbehelf ist ausgeschlossen: durch Einrede, Klagekonsumtion, Verjährung oder die Immunität des Beklagten

gscausa

Ausgangsfakten

créance exigible depuis ce jour
causa: causajour: 15. März 2010
le titulaire a connu les faits lui permettant d'exercer son droit ce jour
causa: causajour: 15. März 2010
action introduite ce jour
causa: causajour: 2. Januar 2016
prescription non interrompue et non suspendue
causa: causa
der Kläger erhebt gegen den Beklagten einen Anspruch — das streitige Rechtsverhältnis, auf das sich die Frage bezieht
causa: causaactor: greus: s

Ausgangsdaten · JSON

{
  "args": [
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:causa",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    }
  ],
  "facts": [
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#creance_exigible_depuis"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#titulaire_connait_les_faits_le"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2016-01-02"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#action_introduite_le"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#prescription_non_interrompue"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
    }
  ],
  "kind": "truth",
  "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
  "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"
}

Warum dieses ErgebnisAngewendete Regeln und Voraussetzungen

Ableitungspfad10 Schritte

1
action introduite ce jour
causa: urn:p12:causa; jour: 2. Januar 2016
Fallfakt
2
le titulaire a connu les faits lui permettant d'exercer son droit ce jour
causa: urn:p12:causa; jour: 15. März 2010
Fallfakt
3
créance exigible depuis ce jour
causa: urn:p12:causa; jour: 15. März 2010
Fallfakt
4
cinq ans à compter du jour où le titulaire a connu les faits
point de départ du délai quinquennal: causa: urn:p12:causa; jour: 15. März 2010
Art. 2224
Kennung
urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#PointDepartConnaissanceReelle
Regel
5
der Kläger erhebt gegen den Beklagten einen Anspruch — das streitige Rechtsverhältnis, auf das sich die Frage bezieht
causa: urn:p12:causa; actor: urn:p12:persona:g; reus: urn:p12:persona:s
Fallfakt
6
prescription non interrompue et non suspendue
causa: urn:p12:causa
Fallfakt
7
délai de cinq ans, compté par jours
15. März 2015 = add calendar period(15. März 2010, 5 calendar_year)
Art. 2224, Art. 2228, Art. 2229
Kennung
urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#EcheanceCinqAns
Regel
8
la prescription est acquise lorsque le dernier jour du terme est accompli
action prescrite à cette date: causa: urn:p12:causa; jour: 2. Januar 2016
Art. 2219, Art. 2229
Kennung
urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#ActionPrescriteApresEcheance
Regel
9
la prescription extinctive éteint le droit par l'inaction de son titulaire
der Rechtsbehelf ist ausgeschlossen: durch Einrede, Klagekonsumtion, Verjährung oder die Immunität des Beklagten: actor: urn:p12:persona:g; reus: urn:p12:persona:s; causa: urn:p12:causa
Art. 2219, Art. 2224
Kennung
urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#PrescriptionExcludit
Regel
10
Abfrageauswertung
Abfrage

von der Engine geprüft: 5 · Fallfakt: 5 · Vollständiger Graph: 12 Knoten

Schritte des gespeicherten Beweises von den Fallfakten zur Antwort. Die Formeln werden so gezeigt, wie sie in der Norm stehen, mit eingesetzten Werten; die Seite berechnet nichts neu.

Grundlage dieser Antwort

Regeln aus dem gespeicherten Beweisweg dieser Antwort.

fr.code_civil

la prescription est acquise lorsque le dernier jour du terme est accompli
Kennung
urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#ActionPrescriteApresEcheance
délai de cinq ans, compté par jours
Kennung
urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#EcheanceCinqAns
cinq ans à compter du jour où le titulaire a connu les faits
Kennung
urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#PointDepartConnaissanceReelle
la prescription extinctive éteint le droit par l'inaction de son titulaire
Kennung
urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#PrescriptionExcludit

Weitere Regeln der Berechnung2

Angewendet in der Gesamtberechnung, aber nicht Teil des Beweiswegs dieser Antwort.

fr.code_civil

Article 2232, alinéa 2. Hors butoir opposable, l'échéance après plancher est la date applicable
Kennung
urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#DateApplicableSansButoirOpposable
Sans médiation, conciliation ni mesure d'instruction, l'échéance du délai n'est pas relevée
Kennung
urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#EcheanceApresPlancherSansMinimale

Anmerkungen · 4

Ausführungsstörungen und Hinweise

HinweisEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31
редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_EN на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 81 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)
Betroffene Knoten
- Article 5.2.3. The conferment of rights in the beneficiary includes the right to invoke a clause in the contract which excludes or limits the liability of the beneficiary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryMayInvokeClause
- Articles 5.2.1 and 5.2.2. The parties may confer a right on a third party who must be identifiable with adequate certainty by the contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryRightExists
- Article 5.1.4(2). To the extent that an obligation involves a duty of best efforts, that party is bound to make such efforts as would be made by a reasonable person of the same kind urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BestEffortsDutyPerformed
- Article 1.9(1). The parties are bound by any usage to which they have agreed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByAgreedUsage
- Article 1.9(1). The parties are bound by practices which they have established between themselves urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByEstablishedPractice
- Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage
- Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage/unless/0
- Article 5.3.3(1). A party who prevented fulfilment contrary to good faith may not rely on the non-fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnPreventedCondition
- Article 5.3.3(2). A party who brought about fulfilment contrary to good faith may not rely on the fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnProcuredCondition
- Article 4.3. In applying Articles 4.1 and 4.2, regard shall be had to all the circumstances, including those listed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CircumstanceToBeRegarded
- Article 1.11. Where a party has more than one place of business the relevant one is that which has the closest relationship to the contract and its performance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ClosestPlaceIsRelevant
- Article 4.1(2) (opening words). Where the common intention can be established, the reasonable-persons reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CommonIntentionDisplacesReasonablePersons
- Article 1.12(2). The computed last day does not stand where it is a holiday at the place of performance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ComputedLastDayYieldsToHoliday
- Article 4.6. If contract terms supplied by one party are unclear, an interpretation against that party is preferred urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContraProferentem
- Article 1.3. A contract validly entered into is binding upon the parties urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContractIsBinding
- Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#Cooperate
- Article 5.2.4. The promisor may assert against the beneficiary all defences which the promisor could assert against the promisee urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DefencesAgainstBeneficiary
- Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective
- Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective/unless/0
- Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyOfGoodFaith
- Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToCooperate
- Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRights
- Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRightsBreached
- Article 5.1.1. The contractual obligations of the parties may be express urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ExpressIsContractual
- Article 5.1.5. In determining the extent to which an obligation involves a duty of best efforts or a duty to achieve a specific result, regard shall be had to the listed factors urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FactorDeterminesKindOfDuty
- Article 1.1. The parties are free to enter into a contract and to determine its content urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FreedomOfContract
- Article 1.6(2). Issues within the scope of these Principles but not expressly settled by them are as far as possible to be settled in accordance with their underlying general principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GapSettledByUnderlyingPrinciples
- Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaith
- Article 1.7(2). The parties may not exclude or limit the duty of good faith and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaithCannotBeExcluded
- Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted
- Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted/unless/0
- Article 5.1.2(c). Implied obligations stem from good faith and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromGoodFaith
- Article 5.1.2(a). Implied obligations stem from the nature and purpose of the contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromNatureAndPurpose
- Article 5.1.2(b). Implied obligations stem from practices established between the parties and usages urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromPracticesAndUsages
- Article 5.1.2(d). Implied obligations stem from reasonableness urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromReasonableness
- Article 5.1.1. The contractual obligations of the parties may be implied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedIsContractual
- Article 1.8. A party cannot act inconsistently with an understanding it has caused the other party to have and upon which that other party reasonably has acted in reliance to its detriment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InconsistentBehaviourBarred
- Article 4.2(2) (opening words). Where the intention was known to the other party, the reasonable-person reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#IntentionDisplacesReasonablePerson
- Article 4.1(1). A contract shall be interpreted according to the common intention of the parties urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByCommonIntention
- Article 4.1(2). If the common intention cannot be established, the contract shall be interpreted according to the meaning reasonable persons of the same kind would give it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByReasonablePersons
- Article 1.4. Nothing in these Principles restricts the application of mandatory rules urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MandatoryRulesUnrestricted
- Article 5.1.7(2). Where the price is to be determined by one party and that determination is manifestly unreasonable, a reasonable price shall be substituted notwithstanding any contract term to the contrary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ManifestlyUnreasonableDeterminationReplaced
- Preamble. These Principles may be applied when the parties have agreed that their contract be governed by general principles of law, the lex mercatoria or the like urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyOnChoiceOfGeneralPrinciples
- Preamble. These Principles may be applied when the parties have not chosen any law to govern their contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyWhereNoLawChosen
- Preamble. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement domestic law urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretDomesticLaw
- Preamble. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement international uniform law instruments urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretUniformLaw
- Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated as otherwise provided in these Principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationAsProvided
- Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated by agreement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByAgreement
- Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated in accordance with its terms urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByTerms
- Article 1.2. Nothing in these Principles requires a contract to be made in or evidenced by a particular form urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoFormRequired
- Article 1.10(2)-(3). A notice is effective when it reaches the person to whom it is given urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoticeEffectiveOnReceipt
- Article 4.7. In case of discrepancy between equally authoritative versions there is a preference for the interpretation according to the original version urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#OriginalVersionPreferred
- Article 1.12(1). Official holidays or non-business days occurring during the period are included in calculating it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodEndsOn
- Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday
- Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday/unless/0
- Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PreserveRights
- Article 5.1.7(1). Where a contract does not fix the price, the parties are considered to have made reference to the price generally charged in comparable circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceByMarket
- Article 5.1.7(1). If no such price is available, a reasonable price applies urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceReasonableWhereNoMarket
- Preamble. These Principles shall be applied when the parties have agreed that their contract be governed by them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PrinciplesGovernByAgreement
- Article 5.1.6. Where the quality of performance is neither fixed by nor determinable from the contract, a party is bound to render a performance of a quality that is reasonable and not less than average in the circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#QualityWhereNotFixed
- Articles 4.4 and 4.5. Terms are to be read in the light of the whole contract and so as to give effect to all of them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReadingConformsToCanons
- Article 5.1.9(1). An obligee may release its right by agreement with the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReleaseByAgreement
- Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone
- Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone/unless/0
- Article 5.2.6. The beneficiary may renounce a right conferred on it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RenunciationEndsBeneficiaryRight
- Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract
- Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract/unless/0
- Article 5.3.5. On fulfilment of a resolutive condition the rules on restitution apply with appropriate adaptations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RestitutionOnResolutiveCondition
- Article 5.1.4(1). To the extent that an obligation involves a duty to achieve a specific result, that party is bound to achieve that result urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResultDutyPerformed
- Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance
- Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance/unless/0
- Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant
- Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant/unless/0
- Article 4.2(1). Statements and other conduct shall be interpreted according to the party's intention if the other party knew or could not have been unaware of it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByIntention
- Article 4.2(2). If the preceding paragraph is not applicable, statements shall be interpreted according to the meaning a reasonable person would give them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByReasonablePerson
- Article 4.8(1). Where the parties have not agreed with respect to an important term, a term which is appropriate in the circumstances shall be supplied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SupplyOmittedTerm
- Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect
- Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect/unless/0
- Article 5.1.8. A contract for an indefinite period may be terminated by either party by giving notice a reasonable time in advance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#TerminationOfIndefiniteContract
- Article 5.1.7(2). A manifestly unreasonable determination does not stand as the applicable price urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#UnreasonableDeterminationDisplaced
- Article 5.3.1. A contract or a contractual obligation may be made conditional upon the occurrence of a future uncertain event urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ValidCondition
Details
```
{
 "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_EN",
 "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
 "since": null,
 "state": "not_yet",
 "status": null
}
```
HinweisEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31
редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_FR на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 79 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)
Betroffene Knoten
- Article 5.2.3. The conferment of rights in the beneficiary includes the right to invoke a clause in the contract which excludes or limits the liability of the beneficiary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryMayInvokeClause
- Article 5.1.4(2). To the extent that an obligation involves a duty of best efforts, that party is bound to make such efforts as would be made by a reasonable person of the same kind urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BestEffortsDutyPerformed
- Article 1.9(1). The parties are bound by any usage to which they have agreed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByAgreedUsage
- Article 1.9(1). The parties are bound by practices which they have established between themselves urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByEstablishedPractice
- Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage
- Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage/unless/0
- Article 5.3.3(1). A party who prevented fulfilment contrary to good faith may not rely on the non-fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnPreventedCondition
- Article 5.3.3(2). A party who brought about fulfilment contrary to good faith may not rely on the fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnProcuredCondition
- Article 4.3. In applying Articles 4.1 and 4.2, regard shall be had to all the circumstances, including those listed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CircumstanceToBeRegarded
- Article 1.11. Where a party has more than one place of business the relevant one is that which has the closest relationship to the contract and its performance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ClosestPlaceIsRelevant
- Article 4.1(2) (opening words). Where the common intention can be established, the reasonable-persons reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CommonIntentionDisplacesReasonablePersons
- Article 1.12(2). The computed last day does not stand where it is a holiday at the place of performance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ComputedLastDayYieldsToHoliday
- Article 4.6. If contract terms supplied by one party are unclear, an interpretation against that party is preferred urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContraProferentem
- Article 1.3. A contract validly entered into is binding upon the parties urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContractIsBinding
- Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#Cooperate
- Article 5.2.4. The promisor may assert against the beneficiary all defences which the promisor could assert against the promisee urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DefencesAgainstBeneficiary
- Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective
- Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective/unless/0
- Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyOfGoodFaith
- Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToCooperate
- Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRights
- Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRightsBreached
- Article 5.1.1. The contractual obligations of the parties may be express urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ExpressIsContractual
- Article 5.1.5. In determining the extent to which an obligation involves a duty of best efforts or a duty to achieve a specific result, regard shall be had to the listed factors urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FactorDeterminesKindOfDuty
- Article 1.1. The parties are free to enter into a contract and to determine its content urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FreedomOfContract
- Article 1.6(2). Issues within the scope of these Principles but not expressly settled by them are as far as possible to be settled in accordance with their underlying general principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GapSettledByUnderlyingPrinciples
- Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaith
- Article 1.7(2). The parties may not exclude or limit the duty of good faith and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaithCannotBeExcluded
- Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted
- Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted/unless/0
- Article 5.1.2(c). Implied obligations stem from good faith and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromGoodFaith
- Article 5.1.2(a). Implied obligations stem from the nature and purpose of the contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromNatureAndPurpose
- Article 5.1.2(b). Implied obligations stem from practices established between the parties and usages urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromPracticesAndUsages
- Article 5.1.2(d). Implied obligations stem from reasonableness urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromReasonableness
- Article 5.1.1. The contractual obligations of the parties may be implied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedIsContractual
- Article 1.8. A party cannot act inconsistently with an understanding it has caused the other party to have and upon which that other party reasonably has acted in reliance to its detriment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InconsistentBehaviourBarred
- Article 4.2(2) (opening words). Where the intention was known to the other party, the reasonable-person reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#IntentionDisplacesReasonablePerson
- Article 4.1(1). A contract shall be interpreted according to the common intention of the parties urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByCommonIntention
- Article 4.1(2). If the common intention cannot be established, the contract shall be interpreted according to the meaning reasonable persons of the same kind would give it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByReasonablePersons
- Article 1.4. Nothing in these Principles restricts the application of mandatory rules urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MandatoryRulesUnrestricted
- Article 5.1.7(2). Where the price is to be determined by one party and that determination is manifestly unreasonable, a reasonable price shall be substituted notwithstanding any contract term to the contrary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ManifestlyUnreasonableDeterminationReplaced
- Preamble. These Principles may be applied when the parties have agreed that their contract be governed by general principles of law, the lex mercatoria or the like urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyOnChoiceOfGeneralPrinciples
- Preamble. These Principles may be applied when the parties have not chosen any law to govern their contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyWhereNoLawChosen
- Preamble. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement domestic law urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretDomesticLaw
- Preamble. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement international uniform law instruments urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretUniformLaw
- Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated as otherwise provided in these Principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationAsProvided
- Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated by agreement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByAgreement
- Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated in accordance with its terms urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByTerms
- Article 1.2. Nothing in these Principles requires a contract to be made in or evidenced by a particular form urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoFormRequired
- Article 1.10(2)-(3). A notice is effective when it reaches the person to whom it is given urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoticeEffectiveOnReceipt
- Article 4.7. In case of discrepancy between equally authoritative versions there is a preference for the interpretation according to the original version urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#OriginalVersionPreferred
- Article 1.12(1). Official holidays or non-business days occurring during the period are included in calculating it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodEndsOn
- Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday
- Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday/unless/0
- Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PreserveRights
- Article 5.1.7(1). Where a contract does not fix the price, the parties are considered to have made reference to the price generally charged in comparable circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceByMarket
- Article 5.1.7(1). If no such price is available, a reasonable price applies urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceReasonableWhereNoMarket
- Preamble. These Principles shall be applied when the parties have agreed that their contract be governed by them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PrinciplesGovernByAgreement
- Article 5.1.6. Where the quality of performance is neither fixed by nor determinable from the contract, a party is bound to render a performance of a quality that is reasonable and not less than average in the circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#QualityWhereNotFixed
- Article 5.1.9(1). An obligee may release its right by agreement with the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReleaseByAgreement
- Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone
- Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone/unless/0
- Article 5.2.6. The beneficiary may renounce a right conferred on it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RenunciationEndsBeneficiaryRight
- Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract
- Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract/unless/0
- Article 5.3.5. On fulfilment of a resolutive condition the rules on restitution apply with appropriate adaptations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RestitutionOnResolutiveCondition
- Article 5.1.4(1). To the extent that an obligation involves a duty to achieve a specific result, that party is bound to achieve that result urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResultDutyPerformed
- Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance
- Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance/unless/0
- Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant
- Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant/unless/0
- Article 4.2(1). Statements and other conduct shall be interpreted according to the party's intention if the other party knew or could not have been unaware of it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByIntention
- Article 4.2(2). If the preceding paragraph is not applicable, statements shall be interpreted according to the meaning a reasonable person would give them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByReasonablePerson
- Article 4.8(1). Where the parties have not agreed with respect to an important term, a term which is appropriate in the circumstances shall be supplied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SupplyOmittedTerm
- Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect
- Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect/unless/0
- Article 5.1.8. A contract for an indefinite period may be terminated by either party by giving notice a reasonable time in advance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#TerminationOfIndefiniteContract
- Article 5.1.7(2). A manifestly unreasonable determination does not stand as the applicable price urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#UnreasonableDeterminationDisplaced
- Article 5.3.1. A contract or a contractual obligation may be made conditional upon the occurrence of a future uncertain event urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ValidCondition
Details
```
{
 "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_FR",
 "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
 "since": null,
 "state": "not_yet",
 "status": null
}
```
HinweisEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31
редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_EN на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 26 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)
Betroffene Knoten
- Article 10.4(1). Where the obligor acknowledges the right before the expiration of the general limitation period, a new general limitation period begins on the day after the acknowledgement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AcknowledgementStartsNewGeneralPeriod
- Article 10.6(1). In the absence of provisions determining the exact date of commencement, arbitral proceedings are deemed to commence on the date on which the request reaches the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ArbitrationCommencesOnRequest
- Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration
- Article 10.1(2). This Chapter does not govern the time within which a party must give notice or perform any act other than the institution of legal proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ChapterDoesNotGovernNoticeTime
- Article 10.9(1). The expiration of the limitation period does not extinguish the right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight
- Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted
- Article 10.9(2). Once the obligor has asserted expiry, the barred exercise is a comparative remedium_exclusum urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit
- Article 10.3(a). The parties may not shorten the general limitation period to less than one year urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodFloorOfOneYear
- Article 10.2(1). The general limitation period is three years beginning on the day after the day the obligee knows or ought to know the facts as a result of which the right can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodOfThreeYears
- Article 10.1(1). The exercise of rights governed by the Principles is barred by the expiration of a limitation period according to the rules of this Chapter urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#LimitationGovernsExerciseOfRights
- Article 10.3(c). The parties may not extend the maximum limitation period to more than fifteen years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodCeilingOfFifteenYears
- Article 10.4(2). The maximum limitation period does not begin to run again, but may be exceeded by the beginning of a new general limitation period urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodDoesNotRestart
- Article 10.3(b). The parties may not shorten the maximum limitation period to less than four years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodFloorOfFourYears
- Article 10.2(2). In any event, the maximum limitation period is ten years beginning on the day after the day the right can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodOfTenYears
- Article 10.11. Where there has been performance in order to discharge an obligation, there is no right of restitution merely because the limitation period has expired urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#NoRestitutionAfterExpiration
- Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration
- Article 10.3. The parties may modify the limitation periods urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PartiesMayModifyPeriods
- Article 10.9(3). A right may still be relied on as a defence even though the expiration of the limitation period for that right has been asserted urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#RightStillAvailableAsDefence
- Article 10.10. The obligee may exercise the right of set-off until the obligor has asserted the expiration of the limitation period urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SetOffUntilExpirationAsserted
- Article 10.7. Articles 10.5 and 10.6 apply with appropriate modifications to proceedings whereby the parties request a third person to assist them in reaching an amicable settlement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByAmicableSettlementProceedings
- Article 10.6(1). The running of the limitation period is suspended when the obligee performs an act recognised by the law of the arbitral tribunal as asserting its right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByArbitralAct
- Article 10.5(1)(c). The running of the limitation period is suspended where the obligee has asserted its rights in proceedings for dissolution of the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByDissolutionClaim
- Article 10.8(1). Where the obligee has been prevented by an impediment beyond its control, the general limitation period is suspended so as not to expire before one year after the impediment has ceased to exist urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByImpediment
- Article 10.8(2). Where the impediment consists of the incapacity or death of a party, suspension ceases when a representative or successor has been appointed; the additional one-year period applies accordingly urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByIncapacityEndsOnAppointment
- Article 10.5(1)(b). The running of the limitation period is suspended where the obligee has asserted its rights in the insolvency proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByInsolvencyClaim
- Article 10.5(1)(a). The running of the limitation period is suspended when the obligee performs an act recognised by the law of the court as asserting its right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByJudicialAct
Details
```
{
 "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_EN",
 "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
 "since": null,
 "state": "not_yet",
 "status": null
}
```
HinweisEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31
редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_FR на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 26 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)
Betroffene Knoten
- Article 10.4(1). Where the obligor acknowledges the right before the expiration of the general limitation period, a new general limitation period begins on the day after the acknowledgement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AcknowledgementStartsNewGeneralPeriod
- Article 10.6(1). In the absence of provisions determining the exact date of commencement, arbitral proceedings are deemed to commence on the date on which the request reaches the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ArbitrationCommencesOnRequest
- Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration
- Article 10.1(2). This Chapter does not govern the time within which a party must give notice or perform any act other than the institution of legal proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ChapterDoesNotGovernNoticeTime
- Article 10.9(1). The expiration of the limitation period does not extinguish the right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight
- Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted
- Article 10.9(2). Once the obligor has asserted expiry, the barred exercise is a comparative remedium_exclusum urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit
- Article 10.3(a). The parties may not shorten the general limitation period to less than one year urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodFloorOfOneYear
- Article 10.2(1). The general limitation period is three years beginning on the day after the day the obligee knows or ought to know the facts as a result of which the right can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodOfThreeYears
- Article 10.1(1). The exercise of rights governed by the Principles is barred by the expiration of a limitation period according to the rules of this Chapter urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#LimitationGovernsExerciseOfRights
- Article 10.3(c). The parties may not extend the maximum limitation period to more than fifteen years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodCeilingOfFifteenYears
- Article 10.4(2). The maximum limitation period does not begin to run again, but may be exceeded by the beginning of a new general limitation period urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodDoesNotRestart
- Article 10.3(b). The parties may not shorten the maximum limitation period to less than four years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodFloorOfFourYears
- Article 10.2(2). In any event, the maximum limitation period is ten years beginning on the day after the day the right can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodOfTenYears
- Article 10.11. Where there has been performance in order to discharge an obligation, there is no right of restitution merely because the limitation period has expired urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#NoRestitutionAfterExpiration
- Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration
- Article 10.3. The parties may modify the limitation periods urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PartiesMayModifyPeriods
- Article 10.9(3). A right may still be relied on as a defence even though the expiration of the limitation period for that right has been asserted urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#RightStillAvailableAsDefence
- Article 10.10. The obligee may exercise the right of set-off until the obligor has asserted the expiration of the limitation period urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SetOffUntilExpirationAsserted
- Article 10.7. Articles 10.5 and 10.6 apply with appropriate modifications to proceedings whereby the parties request a third person to assist them in reaching an amicable settlement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByAmicableSettlementProceedings
- Article 10.6(1). The running of the limitation period is suspended when the obligee performs an act recognised by the law of the arbitral tribunal as asserting its right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByArbitralAct
- Article 10.5(1)(c). The running of the limitation period is suspended where the obligee has asserted its rights in proceedings for dissolution of the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByDissolutionClaim
- Article 10.8(1). Where the obligee has been prevented by an impediment beyond its control, the general limitation period is suspended so as not to expire before one year after the impediment has ceased to exist urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByImpediment
- Article 10.8(2). Where the impediment consists of the incapacity or death of a party, suspension ceases when a representative or successor has been appointed; the additional one-year period applies accordingly urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByIncapacityEndsOnAppointment
- Article 10.5(1)(b). The running of the limitation period is suspended where the obligee has asserted its rights in the insolvency proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByInsolvencyClaim
- Article 10.5(1)(a). The running of the limitation period is suspended when the obligee performs an act recognised by the law of the court as asserting its right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByJudicialAct
Details
```
{
 "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_FR",
 "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
 "since": null,
 "state": "not_yet",
 "status": null
}
```

Wie von der Engine erfasst: Code, Schweregrad und Meldungstext mit §-Verweisen; die Reihenfolge folgt dem Ausführungsdokument.

Beweisgraph

Beweisgraph · 6 Ebene

Beweisknoten: 12 · assertion 5, rule_application 6, query_evaluation 1

Dieser Block ist für die Inline-Ansicht zu groß. Er ist vollständig und ungekürzt im JSON des Dokuments enthalten.

JSON herunterladen ↓

Kennungen von Kalender und Beweis

Beweisverweis: case/FuenfJahre_CC/query/remedium-exclusum

Ursprüngliche Begründung · JSON

Dieser Block ist für die Inline-Ansicht zu groß. Er ist vollständig und ungekürzt im JSON des Dokuments enthalten.

JSON herunterladen ↓

QuellenAuszüge: 7

Artikel 2219

Article 2219 La prescription extinctive est un mode d'extinction d'un droit résultant de l'inaction de son titulaire pendant un certain laps de temps.

Ausgangsdaten · JSON

{
  "contentHash": "sha256:6df4090af33e5e220e1ccb8dce8f8d00f5f0e141aadbd8f85537aa44bf7a63f7",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2219",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2219"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2219",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:0b7ecca0ee814319db91d174578fb164b2ac80bbd82794ff733b36bd4f55401a",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2219\nLa prescription extinctive est un mode d'extinction d'un droit résultant de l'inaction de son titulaire pendant un certain laps de temps.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Artikel 2224

Article 2224 Les actions personnelles ou mobilières se prescrivent par cinq ans à compter du jour où le titulaire d'un droit a connu ou aurait dû connaître les faits lui permettant de l'exercer.

Ausgangsdaten · JSON

{
  "contentHash": "sha256:bdab8bd64c835fd72d22b2500bf46d2189e23899c1a2355f5df83442df6121ab",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2224",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2224"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2224",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:672b74a19b0ebe429181790cbe798f0f53e22cb2eeb8706cded06dbf5a40c629",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2224\nLes actions personnelles ou mobilières se prescrivent par cinq ans à compter du jour où le titulaire d'un droit a connu ou aurait dû connaître les faits lui permettant de l'exercer.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Artikel 2228

Article 2228 La prescription se compte par jours, et non par heures.

Ausgangsdaten · JSON

{
  "contentHash": "sha256:a65f1c87050358f486df72292dbb5562439921a55708065026e1560803461b7b",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2228",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2228"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2228",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:dd06365b6b1300407fadd02ddc12c5220fd9139343f3ce91809ff20bf62588a6",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2228\nLa prescription se compte par jours, et non par heures.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Artikel 2229

Article 2229 Elle est acquise lorsque le dernier jour du terme est accompli.

Ausgangsdaten · JSON

{
  "contentHash": "sha256:43dd3aa87d9bddf34522d203c9afc34f12ce9f5292aa3748835cbccf72dfcccd",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2229",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2229"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2229",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:28578b7da1445ef66f205effb784bcc5dae77310d748b2ae6ccebd52a8ca3009",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2229\nElle est acquise lorsque le dernier jour du terme est accompli.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Artikel 2232

Article 2232 Le report du point de départ, la suspension ou l'interruption de la prescription ne peut avoir pour effet de porter le délai de la prescription extinctive au-delà de vingt ans à compter du jour de la naissance du droit. Le premier alinéa n'est pas applicable dans les cas mentionnés aux articles 2226, 2226-1, 2227, 2233 et 2236, au premier alinéa de l'article 2241 et à l'article 2244. Il ne s'applique pas non plus aux actions relatives à l'état des personnes.

Ausgangsdaten · JSON

{
  "contentHash": "sha256:d0aa882fc857d081bcada43191910d722446f91fb14fb86b7e7322957b4070c8",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2232",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2232"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2232",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:b1a33bf6d27cec1af359949222bf7220bc63bc536ae53eb79e94833b5d293e0b",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2232\nLe report du point de départ, la suspension ou l'interruption de la prescription ne peut avoir pour effet de porter le délai de la prescription extinctive au-delà de vingt ans à compter du jour de la naissance du droit.\nLe premier alinéa n'est pas applicable dans les cas mentionnés aux articles 2226, 2226-1, 2227, 2233 et 2236, au premier alinéa de l'article 2241 et à l'article 2244. Il ne s'applique pas non plus aux actions relatives à l'état des personnes.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Artikel 2238

Article 2238 La prescription est suspendue à compter du jour où, après la survenance d'un litige, les parties conviennent de recourir à la médiation ou à la conciliation ou, à défaut d'accord écrit, à compter du jour de la première réunion de médiation ou de conciliation. La prescription est également suspendue à compter de la conclusion d'une convention de procédure participative ou à compter de l'accord du débiteur constaté par l'huissier de justice pour participer à la procédure prévue à l'article L. 125-1 du code des procédures civiles d'exécution. Le délai de prescription recommence à courir, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois, à compter de la date à laquelle soit l'une des parties ou les deux, soit le médiateur ou le conciliateur déclarent que la médiation ou la conciliation est terminée. En cas de convention de procédure participative, le délai de prescription recommence à courir à compter du terme de la convention, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois. En cas d'échec de la procédure prévue au même article, le délai de prescription recommence à courir à compter de la date du refus du débiteur, constaté par l'huissier, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois.

Ausgangsdaten · JSON

{
  "contentHash": "sha256:85fb1ede52113abd61e7bcfa34017c1229badc1205a9cac686e65c4640912b6f",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2238",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2238"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2238",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:7de68d6ed845bcd95c5ca76851b7d5c42c0b755a0f7a53080cbbcbb127ac61f7",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2238\nLa prescription est suspendue à compter du jour où, après la survenance d'un litige, les parties conviennent de recourir à la médiation ou à la conciliation ou, à défaut d'accord écrit, à compter du jour de la première réunion de médiation ou de conciliation. La prescription est également suspendue à compter de la conclusion d'une convention de procédure participative ou à compter de l'accord du débiteur constaté par l'huissier de justice pour participer à la procédure prévue à l'article L. 125-1 du code des procédures civiles d'exécution.\nLe délai de prescription recommence à courir, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois, à compter de la date à laquelle soit l'une des parties ou les deux, soit le médiateur ou le conciliateur déclarent que la médiation ou la conciliation est terminée. En cas de convention de procédure participative, le délai de prescription recommence à courir à compter du terme de la convention, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois. En cas d'échec de la procédure prévue au même article, le délai de prescription recommence à courir à compter de la date du refus du débiteur, constaté par l'huissier, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Artikel 2239

Article 2239 La prescription est également suspendue lorsque le juge fait droit à une demande de mesure d'instruction présentée avant tout procès. Le délai de prescription recommence à courir, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois, à compter du jour où la mesure a été exécutée.

Ausgangsdaten · JSON

{
  "contentHash": "sha256:16731a698eded878eaa02339d6b1fd92b7299d446eab076502a9c24717cfd0cc",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2239",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2239"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2239",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:9e742ac71c8ecd1fe04db3e3bfceb323387b9b856a4882cc1429615d47e89d12",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2239\nLa prescription est également suspendue lorsque le juge fait droit à une demande de mesure d'instruction présentée avant tout procès.\nLe délai de prescription recommence à courir, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois, à compter du jour où la mesure a été exécutée.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Pakete im Snapshot

de.bgb.core
de.bgb.fristen
de.bgb.ius_privatum
doctrine.ius_privatum
fr.code_civil
unidroit.picc
unidroit.picc_limitation

Technische DatenVollständige Antwort, Parameter und Prüfsummen

Berechnungsstatus: COMPUTED

Vollständige Antwort der Engine

Fünf Jahre, Code civil: das Rechtsmittel ist ausgeschlossen

Vollständiges Maschinenergebnis · JSON

Dieser Block ist für die Inline-Ansicht zu groß. Er ist vollständig und ungekürzt im JSON des Dokuments enthalten.

JSON herunterladen ↓

Ausführung · JSON

Dieser Block ist für die Inline-Ansicht zu groß. Er ist vollständig und ungekürzt im JSON des Dokuments enthalten.

JSON herunterladen ↓

Metadaten der Anzeige

Dieser Block ist für die Inline-Ansicht zu groß. Er ist vollständig und ungekürzt im JSON des Dokuments enthalten.

JSON herunterladen ↓

JSON · Berechnungen, Quellen und genaue Daten

{
  "acts": [
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:a6813604c35567e7c586d334efbf524d08f3467170c4b732cfb15809cacf4ff4",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core",
      "package": "de.bgb.core"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:998148eaeeed28f1565811474ee7beb7eacc616c5681ed9638edc976512a9884",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
      "package": "de.bgb.fristen"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:86a5a00db16e32187223ceeec6748eb7d42d18b7c370c8b15ac64d2f3f655ff7",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum",
      "package": "de.bgb.ius_privatum"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:7202de5de49a8a9d12837bc19cb7008ba2d1a68dbcc0134e0afccf1440a6d5ed",
      "namespace": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum",
      "package": "doctrine.ius_privatum"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:ad41d027ba92c38ca5eecc1d16097d0bbc8c5a74946fc1a6397c6dadac61158f",
      "namespace": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
      "package": "fr.code_civil"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:719bfd408eed92ad497ba071482354d4ad32b81ef9f41c6654f224416c19e603",
      "namespace": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc",
      "package": "unidroit.picc"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:b311d0d422a1079f71113320bd818236f7b09507c7dd960bdafceb91285497d9",
      "namespace": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "package": "unidroit.picc_limitation"
    }
  ],
  "caseHash": "sha256:1cd2738ae024892e46fd2940deb1436562d2b339b4aef7c72b99c36680f1f4bd",
  "jurisdiction": "Deutschland",
  "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
  "mode": "audit",
  "programHash": "sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e",
  "resultHash": "sha256:e7b66d5baa5e7549686900b9d08e95ca26887f3d7ee53eaf713bbc3700ff2578",
  "timezone": "UTC"
}

evaluation SHA-256: sha256:634f4470f8c92a90a0ff084228d2a8f088f1c16eb8df83ef622972cb380b4b81

Ausgangsdaten · JSON

{
  "args": [
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:causa",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    }
  ],
  "facts": [
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#creance_exigible_depuis"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#titulaire_connait_les_faits_le"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2016-01-02"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#action_introduite_le"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#prescription_non_interrompue"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
    }
  ],
  "kind": "truth",
  "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
  "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"
}

Nach dem Code civil ist die Klage verjährt, und das Rechtsmittel ist ausgeschlossen.

Fünf Jahre, Code civil: die Klage ist verjährt

Bedingungsprüfung

Fünf Jahre, PICC: das Rechtsmittel ist ausgeschlossen

Rechtsordnung DeutschlandRechtsstand zum 2016-06-01

Berechnungsergebnis

Festgestellt

Eingabeparameter

Was wir ermitteln

der Rechtsbehelf ist ausgeschlossen: durch Einrede, Klagekonsumtion, Verjährung oder die Immunität des Beklagten

gscausa

Ausgangsfakten

the right belongs to the obligee against the obligor under that contract
r: rightc: contractobligee: obligeeobligor: obligor
the limitation period for the right has expired
r: right
the obligor has asserted the expiration of the limitation period as a defence
r: right
the contracting party appears in the comparative chain as this persona
p x
obligee g
obligor s
this right is the comparative causa
r: rightc: causa
der Kläger erhebt gegen den Beklagten einen Anspruch — das streitige Rechtsverhältnis, auf das sich die Frage bezieht
causa: causaactor: greus: s

p	x
obligee	g
obligor	s

Ausgangsdaten · JSON

{
  "args": [
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:causa",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    }
  ],
  "facts": [
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:right",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:contract",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:obligee",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:obligor",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#right_of"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:right",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#limitation_expired"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:right",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#expiration_asserted_as_defence"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:obligee",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#persona_of_party"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:obligor",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#persona_of_party"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:right",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#causa_of_right"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
    }
  ],
  "kind": "truth",
  "legalTime": "2016-06-01",
  "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"
}

Warum dieses ErgebnisAngewendete Regeln und Voraussetzungen

Ableitungspfad10 Schritte

1
the obligor has asserted the expiration of the limitation period as a defence
r: urn:p12:right
Fallfakt
2
this right is the comparative causa
r: urn:p12:right; c: urn:p12:causa
Fallfakt
3
the limitation period for the right has expired
r: urn:p12:right
Fallfakt
4
Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence
the expiration of the limitation period has effect and bars the exercise of the right (article 10.9(2)): r: urn:p12:right
Art. 10_9, Art. 10_9
Kennung
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted
Regel
5
the contracting party appears in the comparative chain as this persona
p: urn:p12:obligee; x: urn:p12:persona:g
Fallfakt
6
the contracting party appears in the comparative chain as this persona
p: urn:p12:obligor; x: urn:p12:persona:s
Fallfakt
7
der Kläger erhebt gegen den Beklagten einen Anspruch — das streitige Rechtsverhältnis, auf das sich die Frage bezieht
causa: urn:p12:causa; actor: urn:p12:persona:g; reus: urn:p12:persona:s
Fallfakt
8
the right belongs to the obligee against the obligor under that contract
r: urn:p12:right; c: urn:p12:contract; obligee: urn:p12:obligee; obligor: urn:p12:obligor
Fallfakt
9
Article 10.9(2). Once the obligor has asserted expiry, the barred exercise is a comparative remedium_exclusum
der Rechtsbehelf ist ausgeschlossen: durch Einrede, Klagekonsumtion, Verjährung oder die Immunität des Beklagten: actor: urn:p12:persona:g; reus: urn:p12:persona:s; causa: urn:p12:causa
Art. 10_9, Art. 10_9
Kennung
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit
Regel
10
Abfrageauswertung
Abfrage

von der Engine geprüft: 3 · Fallfakt: 7 · Vollständiger Graph: 15 Knoten

Schritte des gespeicherten Beweises von den Fallfakten zur Antwort. Die Formeln werden so gezeigt, wie sie in der Norm stehen, mit eingesetzten Werten; die Seite berechnet nichts neu.

Grundlage dieser Antwort

Regeln aus dem gespeicherten Beweisweg dieser Antwort.

unidroit.picc_limitation

Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence
Kennung
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted
Article 10.9(2). Once the obligor has asserted expiry, the barred exercise is a comparative remedium_exclusum
Kennung
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit

Weitere Regeln der Berechnung1

Angewendet in der Gesamtberechnung, aber nicht Teil des Beweiswegs dieser Antwort.

unidroit.picc_limitation

Article 10.9(1). The expiration of the limitation period does not extinguish the right
Kennung
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight

Beweisgraph

Beweisgraph · 4 Ebene

Beweisknoten: 15 · assertion 7, rule_application 3, candidate_closure 2, norm_creation 2, query_evaluation 1

assertion · urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#asserted

attributes

assertion: asserted

conclusion

Argumente

Kennung
right
Typ
entity_ref

Typ

literal

Polarität

positive

Bedingung

expiration_asserted_as_defence

evidence

—

Kennung

asserted

Typ

assertion

Voraussetzungen

—

sourceAnchors

—

assertion · urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#causa

attributes

assertion: causa

conclusion

Argumente

Kennung
right
Typ
entity_ref
Kennung
causa
Typ
entity_ref

Typ

literal

Polarität

positive

Bedingung

causa_of_right

evidence

—

Kennung

causa

Typ

assertion

Voraussetzungen

—

sourceAnchors

—

assertion · urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#expired

attributes

assertion: expired

conclusion

Argumente

Kennung
right
Typ
entity_ref

Typ

literal

Polarität

positive

Bedingung

limitation_expired

evidence

—

Kennung

expired

Typ

assertion

Voraussetzungen

—

sourceAnchors

—

rule_application · urn:proof:apply:ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight:e72996a2c7c818667c2d5d0c4953a8cd27d6a6e1543f4123a71643aa9d0f1fd7

attributes

—

conclusion

Argumente

Kennung
right
Typ
entity_ref

Typ

literal

Polarität

positive

Bedingung

right_not_extinguished

evidence

—

Kennung

e72996a2c7c818667c2d5d0c4953a8cd27d6a6e1543f4123a71643aa9d0f1fd7

Typ

rule_application

Voraussetzungen

expired

Regel

ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight

sourceAnchors

—

substitution

Kennung: right
Typ: entity_ref

rule_application · urn:proof:apply:ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted:b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a

attributes

strength: defeasible

conclusion

Argumente

Kennung
right
Typ
entity_ref

Typ

literal

Polarität

positive

Bedingung

exercise_barred

evidence

—

Kennung

b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a

Typ

rule_application

Voraussetzungen

asserted
expired

Regel

ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted

sourceAnchors

—

substitution

Kennung: right
Typ: entity_ref

assertion · urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-ee

attributes

assertion: persona-ee

conclusion

Argumente

Kennung
obligee
Typ
entity_ref
Kennung
g
Typ
entity_ref

Typ

literal

Polarität

positive

Bedingung

persona_of_party

evidence

—

Kennung

persona-ee

Typ

assertion

Voraussetzungen

—

sourceAnchors

—

assertion · urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-or

attributes

assertion: persona-or

conclusion

Argumente

Kennung
obligor
Typ
entity_ref
Kennung
s
Typ
entity_ref

Typ

literal

Polarität

positive

Bedingung

persona_of_party

evidence

—

Kennung

persona-or

Typ

assertion

Voraussetzungen

—

sourceAnchors

—

assertion · urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#petitio

attributes

assertion: petitio

conclusion

Argumente

Kennung
causa
Typ
entity_ref
Kennung
g
Typ
entity_ref
Kennung
s
Typ
entity_ref

Typ

literal

Polarität

positive

Bedingung

petitio

evidence

—

Kennung

petitio

Typ

assertion

Voraussetzungen

—

sourceAnchors

—

assertion · urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#right

attributes

assertion: right

conclusion

Argumente

Kennung
right
Typ
entity_ref
Kennung
contract
Typ
entity_ref
Kennung
obligee
Typ
entity_ref
Kennung
obligor
Typ
entity_ref

Typ

literal

Polarität

positive

Bedingung

right_of

evidence

—

Kennung

right

Typ

assertion

Voraussetzungen

—

sourceAnchors

—

rule_application · urn:proof:apply:ExpiryExcludit:3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08

attributes

strength: defeasible

conclusion

Argumente

Kennung
g
Typ
entity_ref
Kennung
s
Typ
entity_ref
Kennung
causa
Typ
entity_ref

Typ

literal

Polarität

positive

Bedingung

remedium_exclusum

evidence

—

Kennung

3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08

Typ

rule_application

Voraussetzungen

b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a
causa
persona-ee
persona-or
petitio
right

Regel

ExpiryExcludit

sourceAnchors

—

substitution

Kennung: right
Typ: entity_ref

Kennung: contract
Typ: entity_ref

Kennung: obligee
Typ: entity_ref

Kennung: obligor
Typ: entity_ref

Kennung: g
Typ: entity_ref

Kennung: s
Typ: entity_ref

Kennung: causa
Typ: entity_ref

candidate_closure · urn:proof:closure:5c179d0511534ea8f4a0279345ef7a2b1a23bdcc26d6d1612de2857c05a880e8

attributes

allApplicableCandidateIds: b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a
conflictKey: {"args":[{"id":"urn:p12:right","kind":"entity_ref"}],"predicate":"urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#exercise_barred"}
evaluationInputSemanticHash: sha256:65ecdb8c6264f3a7a6d29f6d5192ec6abc010262def4a431ab776e2e4c296189
priorityGraphHash: sha256:6b3988214869dbb43cb853d84175aa853fdc4ae24ef2c02a3ad2ff6ee9175009
programSemanticHash: sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e
stratum: 0
survivingCandidateIds: b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a

conclusion

Argumente

Kennung
right
Typ
entity_ref

Typ

literal

Polarität

positive

Bedingung

exercise_barred

evidence

—

Kennung

5c179d0511534ea8f4a0279345ef7a2b1a23bdcc26d6d1612de2857c05a880e8

Typ

candidate_closure

Voraussetzungen

b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a

sourceAnchors

—

candidate_closure · urn:proof:closure:8638c0c81bea0030247e55a2eb549849cac9d6601dd0c7d8e6f6cd4a9fa342a6

attributes

allApplicableCandidateIds: 3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08
conflictKey: {"args":[{"id":"urn:p12:persona:g","kind":"entity_ref"},{"id":"urn:p12:persona:s","kind":"entity_ref"},{"id":"urn:p12:causa","kind":"entity_ref"}],"predicate":"urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"}
evaluationInputSemanticHash: sha256:65ecdb8c6264f3a7a6d29f6d5192ec6abc010262def4a431ab776e2e4c296189
priorityGraphHash: sha256:6b3988214869dbb43cb853d84175aa853fdc4ae24ef2c02a3ad2ff6ee9175009
programSemanticHash: sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e
stratum: 1
survivingCandidateIds: 3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08

conclusion

Argumente

Kennung
g
Typ
entity_ref
Kennung
s
Typ
entity_ref
Kennung
causa
Typ
entity_ref

Typ

literal

Polarität

positive

Bedingung

remedium_exclusum

evidence

—

Kennung

8638c0c81bea0030247e55a2eb549849cac9d6601dd0c7d8e6f6cd4a9fa342a6

Typ

candidate_closure

Voraussetzungen

3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08

sourceAnchors

—

norm_creation · urn:proof:norm:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:afdfdc38f985ee76be6696fefa043d02eab3f3028a81eda75212e7e7e40626cd

attributes

Regel: ObligorMayAssertExpiration

conclusion

position: ObligorMayAssertExpiration:0
Vorlage: AssertExpiration

evidence

—

Kennung

ObligorMayAssertExpiration:afdfdc38f985ee76be6696fefa043d02eab3f3028a81eda75212e7e7e40626cd

Typ

norm_creation

Voraussetzungen

expired
right

sourceAnchors

—

norm_creation · urn:proof:effect:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:3c6d86faa190c8fc5b60ef4e0496bd7e10151bc54b4039a0aa3ee195bfa9ddda

attributes

mechanism: power_exercise
power: ObligorMayAssertExpiration:0

conclusion

Argumente

Kennung
right
Typ
entity_ref

Typ

literal

Polarität

positive

Bedingung

exercise_barred

evidence

—

Kennung

ObligorMayAssertExpiration:3c6d86faa190c8fc5b60ef4e0496bd7e10151bc54b4039a0aa3ee195bfa9ddda

Typ

norm_creation

Voraussetzungen

asserted
expired
ObligorMayAssertExpiration:afdfdc38f985ee76be6696fefa043d02eab3f3028a81eda75212e7e7e40626cd

sourceAnchors

—

query_evaluation · urn:proof:query:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum

attributes

—

conclusion

literal

Argumente

Kennung
g
Typ
entity_ref
Kennung
s
Typ
entity_ref
Kennung
causa
Typ
entity_ref

Typ

literal

Polarität

positive

Bedingung

remedium_exclusum

truthStatus

Festgestellt

evidence

—

Kennung

case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum

Typ

query_evaluation

Voraussetzungen

3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08

sourceAnchors

—

Kennungen von Kalender und Beweis

Beweisverweis: case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum

Ursprüngliche Begründung · JSON

{
  "evaluation": {
    "conflicts": [],
    "issues": [],
    "manifest": {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:fffa79f793fdd68f8845672eeddc65b8fdf4ef6eeeaec06576dbb468caf49482",
      "calendarSnapshot": "",
      "caseHash": "sha256:65ecdb8c6264f3a7a6d29f6d5192ec6abc010262def4a431ab776e2e4c296189",
      "decisionTime": "2016-06-01T12:00:00Z",
      "evidenceSnapshotHash": "sha256:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
      "externalSnapshots": {},
      "id": "urn:manifest:oracle-1",
      "interpretations": [],
      "knowledgeTime": "2016-06-01T12:00:00Z",
      "legalTime": "2016-06-01",
      "lockfileHash": "sha256:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
      "mode": "audit",
      "policies": {},
      "programHash": "sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e",
      "resolvedEditions": {},
      "semanticHash": "sha256:364375d9d043f792e2e9617f027871552318c1e762d06c441b07692a1a57c9e5",
      "semantics": "law.core/0.2.1",
      "theoryHash": "sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e",
      "timezone": "UTC"
    },
    "positions": [
      {
        "createdBy": "urn:proof:norm:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:afdfdc38f985ee76be6696fefa043d02eab3f3028a81eda75212e7e7e40626cd",
        "holder": "urn:p12:obligor",
        "id": "urn:position:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:0",
        "manifest": "urn:manifest:oracle-1",
        "modality": "power",
        "payload": {
          "effect": {
            "after": {
              "args": [
                {
                  "id": "urn:p12:right",
                  "kind": "entity_ref"
                }
              ],
              "kind": "literal",
              "polarity": "positive",
              "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#exercise_barred"
            },
            "kind": "create"
          },
          "exercise": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "function": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#expiration_asserted_as_defence",
            "kind": "call"
          },
          "holder": {
            "id": "urn:p12:obligor",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          },
          "kind": "power",
          "over": {
            "id": "urn:p12:right",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          },
          "validWhen": {
            "formula": {
              "args": [
                {
                  "id": "urn:p12:right",
                  "kind": "entity_ref"
                }
              ],
              "kind": "literal",
              "polarity": "positive",
              "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#limitation_expired"
            },
            "kind": "status",
            "status": "established"
          }
        },
        "proof": "urn:proof:norm:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:afdfdc38f985ee76be6696fefa043d02eab3f3028a81eda75212e7e7e40626cd",
        "status": "ACTIVE",
        "statusHistory": [],
        "template": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration"
      }
    ],
    "proofGraph": {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "attributes": {
            "assertion": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#asserted"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#expiration_asserted_as_defence"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#asserted",
          "kind": "assertion",
          "premises": [],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "assertion": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#causa"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:causa",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#causa_of_right"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#causa",
          "kind": "assertion",
          "premises": [],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "assertion": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#expired"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#limitation_expired"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#expired",
          "kind": "assertion",
          "premises": [],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {},
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#right_not_extinguished"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:apply:ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight:e72996a2c7c818667c2d5d0c4953a8cd27d6a6e1543f4123a71643aa9d0f1fd7",
          "kind": "rule_application",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#expired"
          ],
          "rule": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight",
          "sourceAnchors": [],
          "substitution": {
            "v0": {
              "id": "urn:p12:right",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            }
          }
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "strength": "defeasible"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#exercise_barred"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:apply:ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted:b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a",
          "kind": "rule_application",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#asserted",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#expired"
          ],
          "rule": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted",
          "sourceAnchors": [],
          "substitution": {
            "v0": {
              "id": "urn:p12:right",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            }
          }
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "assertion": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-ee"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:obligee",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#persona_of_party"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-ee",
          "kind": "assertion",
          "premises": [],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "assertion": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-or"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:obligor",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#persona_of_party"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-or",
          "kind": "assertion",
          "premises": [],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "assertion": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#petitio"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:causa",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#petitio",
          "kind": "assertion",
          "premises": [],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "assertion": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#right"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:contract",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:obligee",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:obligor",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#right_of"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#right",
          "kind": "assertion",
          "premises": [],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "strength": "defeasible"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:causa",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:apply:ExpiryExcludit:3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08",
          "kind": "rule_application",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:apply:ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted:b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#causa",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-ee",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-or",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#petitio",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#right"
          ],
          "rule": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit",
          "sourceAnchors": [],
          "substitution": {
            "v0": {
              "id": "urn:p12:right",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            },
            "v1": {
              "id": "urn:p12:contract",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            },
            "v2": {
              "id": "urn:p12:obligee",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            },
            "v3": {
              "id": "urn:p12:obligor",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            },
            "v4": {
              "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            },
            "v5": {
              "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            },
            "v6": {
              "id": "urn:p12:causa",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            }
          }
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "allApplicableCandidateIds": [
              "urn:proof:apply:ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted:b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a"
            ],
            "conflictKey": "{\"args\":[{\"id\":\"urn:p12:right\",\"kind\":\"entity_ref\"}],\"predicate\":\"urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#exercise_barred\"}",
            "evaluationInputSemanticHash": "sha256:65ecdb8c6264f3a7a6d29f6d5192ec6abc010262def4a431ab776e2e4c296189",
            "priorityGraphHash": "sha256:6b3988214869dbb43cb853d84175aa853fdc4ae24ef2c02a3ad2ff6ee9175009",
            "programSemanticHash": "sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e",
            "stratum": 0,
            "survivingCandidateIds": [
              "urn:proof:apply:ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted:b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a"
            ]
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#exercise_barred"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:closure:5c179d0511534ea8f4a0279345ef7a2b1a23bdcc26d6d1612de2857c05a880e8",
          "kind": "candidate_closure",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:apply:ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted:b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a"
          ],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "allApplicableCandidateIds": [
              "urn:proof:apply:ExpiryExcludit:3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08"
            ],
            "conflictKey": "{\"args\":[{\"id\":\"urn:p12:persona:g\",\"kind\":\"entity_ref\"},{\"id\":\"urn:p12:persona:s\",\"kind\":\"entity_ref\"},{\"id\":\"urn:p12:causa\",\"kind\":\"entity_ref\"}],\"predicate\":\"urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum\"}",
            "evaluationInputSemanticHash": "sha256:65ecdb8c6264f3a7a6d29f6d5192ec6abc010262def4a431ab776e2e4c296189",
            "priorityGraphHash": "sha256:6b3988214869dbb43cb853d84175aa853fdc4ae24ef2c02a3ad2ff6ee9175009",
            "programSemanticHash": "sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e",
            "stratum": 1,
            "survivingCandidateIds": [
              "urn:proof:apply:ExpiryExcludit:3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08"
            ]
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:causa",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:closure:8638c0c81bea0030247e55a2eb549849cac9d6601dd0c7d8e6f6cd4a9fa342a6",
          "kind": "candidate_closure",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:apply:ExpiryExcludit:3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08"
          ],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "rule": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "position": "urn:position:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:0",
            "template": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:norm:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:afdfdc38f985ee76be6696fefa043d02eab3f3028a81eda75212e7e7e40626cd",
          "kind": "norm_creation",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#expired",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#right"
          ],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "mechanism": "power_exercise",
            "power": "urn:position:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:0"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#exercise_barred"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:effect:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:3c6d86faa190c8fc5b60ef4e0496bd7e10151bc54b4039a0aa3ee195bfa9ddda",
          "kind": "norm_creation",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#asserted",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#expired",
            "urn:proof:norm:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:afdfdc38f985ee76be6696fefa043d02eab3f3028a81eda75212e7e7e40626cd"
          ],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {},
          "conclusion": {
            "literal": {
              "args": [
                {
                  "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
                  "kind": "entity_ref"
                },
                {
                  "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
                  "kind": "entity_ref"
                },
                {
                  "id": "urn:p12:causa",
                  "kind": "entity_ref"
                }
              ],
              "kind": "literal",
              "polarity": "positive",
              "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"
            },
            "truthStatus": "TRUE_ONLY"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:query:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum",
          "kind": "query_evaluation",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:apply:ExpiryExcludit:3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08"
          ],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        }
      ],
      "proofHash": "sha256:87bde4a2cf01c341a428ac2a56c5a644c865d1dceab100f038f0900696ceeccb",
      "roots": [
        "urn:proof:query:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum"
      ]
    },
    "resultHash": "sha256:7d6420f869f194c56f0e17d6ec83188bea3ec4c0fa3c59ce44fb61219412f696",
    "results": [
      {
        "conflicts": [],
        "evaluationStatus": "COMPUTED",
        "evidence": [],
        "id": "urn:result:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum",
        "judgmentRequests": [],
        "manifest": "urn:manifest:oracle-1",
        "missingInputs": [],
        "normativeStatusSupports": [],
        "proof": "urn:proof:query:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum",
        "query": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum",
        "resultKind": "PROPOSITION",
        "sourceAnchors": [],
        "target": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum",
        "truthStatus": "TRUE_ONLY"
      }
    ],
    "schemaVersion": "law.core.evaluation/0.2"
  },
  "proofRef": "urn:proof:query:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum",
  "rulesApplied": [
    "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight",
    "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted",
    "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit"
  ]
}

QuellenAuszüge: 2

article/10_9

ARTICLE 10.9 (Effects of expiration of limitation period) The expiration of the limitation period does not extinguish the right. (2) For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence. (3) A right may still be relied on as a defence even though the expiration of the limitation period for that right has been asserted.

Ausgangsdaten · JSON

{
  "contentHash": "sha256:2cce2f0a30e87640ae26f97b896d7242eb290a76d732263621d6f082f40462a6",
  "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_EN",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_ART10_9_EN",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "locator": "article/10_9",
  "package": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:88a854749716a48eb1dce761802f51e9c586a310ee9e0377758d0973b7ecd006",
      "language": "en",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "ARTICLE 10.9\n(Effects of expiration of limitation period)\nThe expiration of the limitation period does not extinguish the right.\n(2) For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must\nassert it as a defence.\n(3) A right may still be relied on as a defence even though the expiration of the\nlimitation period for that right has been asserted."
    }
  ]
}

article/10_9

ARTICLE 10.9 (Effet de l’expiration du délai) 1) L’expiration du délai de prescription n’éteint pas le droit. 2) L’expiration du délai de prescription n’a d’effet que si le débiteur l’invoque comme moyen de défense. 3) Un droit peut toujours être invoqué comme moyen de défense, même si l’expiration du délai de prescription a été soulevée.

Ausgangsdaten · JSON

{
  "contentHash": "sha256:ce451e46bca3943b449198a0800bf504859f69a2eccaa1cc83372438137069cf",
  "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_FR",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_ART10_9_FR",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "locator": "article/10_9",
  "package": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:234d9a881e76dcd6d82c945bdbc2c3b643e0a5d6f6d9b4c2a2d8d58296ecfdcd",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "ARTICLE 10.9\n(Effet de l’expiration du délai)\n1)\nL’expiration du délai de prescription n’éteint pas le droit.\n2)\nL’expiration du délai de prescription n’a d’effet que si le débiteur l’invoque\ncomme moyen de défense.\n3)\nUn droit peut toujours être invoqué comme moyen de défense, même si\nl’expiration du délai de prescription a été soulevée."
    }
  ]
}

Pakete im Snapshot

de.bgb.core
de.bgb.fristen
de.bgb.ius_privatum
doctrine.ius_privatum
fr.code_civil
unidroit.picc
unidroit.picc_limitation

Technische DatenVollständige Antwort, Parameter und Prüfsummen

Berechnungsstatus: COMPUTED

Vollständige Antwort der Engine

Fünf Jahre, PICC: das Rechtsmittel ist ausgeschlossen

Vollständiges Maschinenergebnis · JSON

{
  "answer": {
    "evaluationStatus": "COMPUTED",
    "kind": "TRUTH",
    "missingInputs": [],
    "truthStatus": "TRUE_ONLY"
  },
  "evaluation": {
    "conflicts": [],
    "issues": [],
    "manifest": {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:fffa79f793fdd68f8845672eeddc65b8fdf4ef6eeeaec06576dbb468caf49482",
      "calendarSnapshot": "",
      "caseHash": "sha256:65ecdb8c6264f3a7a6d29f6d5192ec6abc010262def4a431ab776e2e4c296189",
      "decisionTime": "2016-06-01T12:00:00Z",
      "evidenceSnapshotHash": "sha256:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
      "externalSnapshots": {},
      "id": "urn:manifest:oracle-1",
      "interpretations": [],
      "knowledgeTime": "2016-06-01T12:00:00Z",
      "legalTime": "2016-06-01",
      "lockfileHash": "sha256:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
      "mode": "audit",
      "policies": {},
      "programHash": "sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e",
      "resolvedEditions": {},
      "semanticHash": "sha256:364375d9d043f792e2e9617f027871552318c1e762d06c441b07692a1a57c9e5",
      "semantics": "law.core/0.2.1",
      "theoryHash": "sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e",
      "timezone": "UTC"
    },
    "positions": [
      {
        "createdBy": "urn:proof:norm:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:afdfdc38f985ee76be6696fefa043d02eab3f3028a81eda75212e7e7e40626cd",
        "holder": "urn:p12:obligor",
        "id": "urn:position:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:0",
        "manifest": "urn:manifest:oracle-1",
        "modality": "power",
        "payload": {
          "effect": {
            "after": {
              "args": [
                {
                  "id": "urn:p12:right",
                  "kind": "entity_ref"
                }
              ],
              "kind": "literal",
              "polarity": "positive",
              "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#exercise_barred"
            },
            "kind": "create"
          },
          "exercise": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "function": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#expiration_asserted_as_defence",
            "kind": "call"
          },
          "holder": {
            "id": "urn:p12:obligor",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          },
          "kind": "power",
          "over": {
            "id": "urn:p12:right",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          },
          "validWhen": {
            "formula": {
              "args": [
                {
                  "id": "urn:p12:right",
                  "kind": "entity_ref"
                }
              ],
              "kind": "literal",
              "polarity": "positive",
              "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#limitation_expired"
            },
            "kind": "status",
            "status": "established"
          }
        },
        "proof": "urn:proof:norm:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:afdfdc38f985ee76be6696fefa043d02eab3f3028a81eda75212e7e7e40626cd",
        "status": "ACTIVE",
        "statusHistory": [],
        "template": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration"
      }
    ],
    "proofGraph": {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "attributes": {
            "assertion": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#asserted"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#expiration_asserted_as_defence"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#asserted",
          "kind": "assertion",
          "premises": [],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "assertion": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#causa"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:causa",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#causa_of_right"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#causa",
          "kind": "assertion",
          "premises": [],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "assertion": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#expired"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#limitation_expired"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#expired",
          "kind": "assertion",
          "premises": [],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {},
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#right_not_extinguished"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:apply:ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight:e72996a2c7c818667c2d5d0c4953a8cd27d6a6e1543f4123a71643aa9d0f1fd7",
          "kind": "rule_application",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#expired"
          ],
          "rule": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight",
          "sourceAnchors": [],
          "substitution": {
            "v0": {
              "id": "urn:p12:right",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            }
          }
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "strength": "defeasible"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#exercise_barred"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:apply:ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted:b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a",
          "kind": "rule_application",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#asserted",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#expired"
          ],
          "rule": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted",
          "sourceAnchors": [],
          "substitution": {
            "v0": {
              "id": "urn:p12:right",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            }
          }
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "assertion": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-ee"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:obligee",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#persona_of_party"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-ee",
          "kind": "assertion",
          "premises": [],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "assertion": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-or"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:obligor",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#persona_of_party"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-or",
          "kind": "assertion",
          "premises": [],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "assertion": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#petitio"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:causa",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#petitio",
          "kind": "assertion",
          "premises": [],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "assertion": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#right"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:contract",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:obligee",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:obligor",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#right_of"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#right",
          "kind": "assertion",
          "premises": [],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "strength": "defeasible"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:causa",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:apply:ExpiryExcludit:3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08",
          "kind": "rule_application",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:apply:ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted:b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#causa",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-ee",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-or",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#petitio",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#right"
          ],
          "rule": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit",
          "sourceAnchors": [],
          "substitution": {
            "v0": {
              "id": "urn:p12:right",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            },
            "v1": {
              "id": "urn:p12:contract",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            },
            "v2": {
              "id": "urn:p12:obligee",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            },
            "v3": {
              "id": "urn:p12:obligor",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            },
            "v4": {
              "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            },
            "v5": {
              "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            },
            "v6": {
              "id": "urn:p12:causa",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            }
          }
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "allApplicableCandidateIds": [
              "urn:proof:apply:ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted:b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a"
            ],
            "conflictKey": "{\"args\":[{\"id\":\"urn:p12:right\",\"kind\":\"entity_ref\"}],\"predicate\":\"urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#exercise_barred\"}",
            "evaluationInputSemanticHash": "sha256:65ecdb8c6264f3a7a6d29f6d5192ec6abc010262def4a431ab776e2e4c296189",
            "priorityGraphHash": "sha256:6b3988214869dbb43cb853d84175aa853fdc4ae24ef2c02a3ad2ff6ee9175009",
            "programSemanticHash": "sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e",
            "stratum": 0,
            "survivingCandidateIds": [
              "urn:proof:apply:ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted:b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a"
            ]
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#exercise_barred"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:closure:5c179d0511534ea8f4a0279345ef7a2b1a23bdcc26d6d1612de2857c05a880e8",
          "kind": "candidate_closure",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:apply:ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted:b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a"
          ],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "allApplicableCandidateIds": [
              "urn:proof:apply:ExpiryExcludit:3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08"
            ],
            "conflictKey": "{\"args\":[{\"id\":\"urn:p12:persona:g\",\"kind\":\"entity_ref\"},{\"id\":\"urn:p12:persona:s\",\"kind\":\"entity_ref\"},{\"id\":\"urn:p12:causa\",\"kind\":\"entity_ref\"}],\"predicate\":\"urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum\"}",
            "evaluationInputSemanticHash": "sha256:65ecdb8c6264f3a7a6d29f6d5192ec6abc010262def4a431ab776e2e4c296189",
            "priorityGraphHash": "sha256:6b3988214869dbb43cb853d84175aa853fdc4ae24ef2c02a3ad2ff6ee9175009",
            "programSemanticHash": "sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e",
            "stratum": 1,
            "survivingCandidateIds": [
              "urn:proof:apply:ExpiryExcludit:3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08"
            ]
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:causa",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:closure:8638c0c81bea0030247e55a2eb549849cac9d6601dd0c7d8e6f6cd4a9fa342a6",
          "kind": "candidate_closure",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:apply:ExpiryExcludit:3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08"
          ],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "rule": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "position": "urn:position:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:0",
            "template": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:norm:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:afdfdc38f985ee76be6696fefa043d02eab3f3028a81eda75212e7e7e40626cd",
          "kind": "norm_creation",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#expired",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#right"
          ],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "mechanism": "power_exercise",
            "power": "urn:position:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:0"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#exercise_barred"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:effect:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:3c6d86faa190c8fc5b60ef4e0496bd7e10151bc54b4039a0aa3ee195bfa9ddda",
          "kind": "norm_creation",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#asserted",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#expired",
            "urn:proof:norm:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:afdfdc38f985ee76be6696fefa043d02eab3f3028a81eda75212e7e7e40626cd"
          ],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {},
          "conclusion": {
            "literal": {
              "args": [
                {
                  "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
                  "kind": "entity_ref"
                },
                {
                  "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
                  "kind": "entity_ref"
                },
                {
                  "id": "urn:p12:causa",
                  "kind": "entity_ref"
                }
              ],
              "kind": "literal",
              "polarity": "positive",
              "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"
            },
            "truthStatus": "TRUE_ONLY"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:query:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum",
          "kind": "query_evaluation",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:apply:ExpiryExcludit:3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08"
          ],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        }
      ],
      "proofHash": "sha256:87bde4a2cf01c341a428ac2a56c5a644c865d1dceab100f038f0900696ceeccb",
      "roots": [
        "urn:proof:query:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum"
      ]
    },
    "resultHash": "sha256:7d6420f869f194c56f0e17d6ec83188bea3ec4c0fa3c59ce44fb61219412f696",
    "results": [
      {
        "conflicts": [],
        "evaluationStatus": "COMPUTED",
        "evidence": [],
        "id": "urn:result:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum",
        "judgmentRequests": [],
        "manifest": "urn:manifest:oracle-1",
        "missingInputs": [],
        "normativeStatusSupports": [],
        "proof": "urn:proof:query:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum",
        "query": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum",
        "resultKind": "PROPOSITION",
        "sourceAnchors": [],
        "target": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum",
        "truthStatus": "TRUE_ONLY"
      }
    ],
    "schemaVersion": "law.core.evaluation/0.2"
  },
  "evaluationStatus": "COMPUTED",
  "issues": [],
  "judgmentRequests": [],
  "proofRef": "urn:proof:query:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum",
  "provenance": {
    "acts": [
      {
        "artifactHash": "sha256:a6813604c35567e7c586d334efbf524d08f3467170c4b732cfb15809cacf4ff4",
        "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core",
        "package": "de.bgb.core"
      },
      {
        "artifactHash": "sha256:998148eaeeed28f1565811474ee7beb7eacc616c5681ed9638edc976512a9884",
        "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
        "package": "de.bgb.fristen"
      },
      {
        "artifactHash": "sha256:86a5a00db16e32187223ceeec6748eb7d42d18b7c370c8b15ac64d2f3f655ff7",
        "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum",
        "package": "de.bgb.ius_privatum"
      },
      {
        "artifactHash": "sha256:7202de5de49a8a9d12837bc19cb7008ba2d1a68dbcc0134e0afccf1440a6d5ed",
        "namespace": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum",
        "package": "doctrine.ius_privatum"
      },
      {
        "artifactHash": "sha256:ad41d027ba92c38ca5eecc1d16097d0bbc8c5a74946fc1a6397c6dadac61158f",
        "namespace": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
        "package": "fr.code_civil"
      },
      {
        "artifactHash": "sha256:719bfd408eed92ad497ba071482354d4ad32b81ef9f41c6654f224416c19e603",
        "namespace": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc",
        "package": "unidroit.picc"
      },
      {
        "artifactHash": "sha256:b311d0d422a1079f71113320bd818236f7b09507c7dd960bdafceb91285497d9",
        "namespace": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
        "package": "unidroit.picc_limitation"
      }
    ],
    "caseHash": "sha256:65ecdb8c6264f3a7a6d29f6d5192ec6abc010262def4a431ab776e2e4c296189",
    "jurisdiction": "Deutschland",
    "legalTime": "2016-06-01",
    "mode": "audit",
    "programHash": "sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e",
    "resultHash": "sha256:7d6420f869f194c56f0e17d6ec83188bea3ec4c0fa3c59ce44fb61219412f696",
    "timezone": "UTC"
  },
  "rulesApplied": [
    "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight",
    "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted",
    "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit"
  ]
}

Ausführung · JSON

Dieser Block ist für die Inline-Ansicht zu groß. Er ist vollständig und ungekürzt im JSON des Dokuments enthalten.

JSON herunterladen ↓

Metadaten der Anzeige

{
  "schemaVersion": "law.answers.presentation/0.1",
  "source": {
    "requestCanonicalSha256": "sha256:fc2aa17be9f80b15e3bfd4a4ebde4ce2c9f55cc7a91a330fb4f67bc07bb8fb2c"
  },
  "steps": [
    {
      "assertionOrigin": "case_input",
      "conclusion": {
        "args": [
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:right",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          }
        ],
        "kind": "literal",
        "polarity": "positive",
        "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#expiration_asserted_as_defence"
      },
      "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#asserted",
      "kind": "assertion",
      "originStatus": "available",
      "premises": [],
      "trust": "case"
    },
    {
      "assertionOrigin": "case_input",
      "conclusion": {
        "args": [
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:right",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          },
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:causa",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          }
        ],
        "kind": "literal",
        "polarity": "positive",
        "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#causa_of_right"
      },
      "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#causa",
      "kind": "assertion",
      "originStatus": "available",
      "premises": [],
      "trust": "case"
    },
    {
      "assertionOrigin": "case_input",
      "conclusion": {
        "args": [
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:right",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          }
        ],
        "kind": "literal",
        "polarity": "positive",
        "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#limitation_expired"
      },
      "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#expired",
      "kind": "assertion",
      "originStatus": "available",
      "premises": [],
      "trust": "case"
    },
    {
      "conclusion": {
        "args": [
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:right",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          }
        ],
        "kind": "literal",
        "polarity": "positive",
        "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#exercise_barred"
      },
      "head": {
        "args": [
          {
            "kind": "var",
            "var": "v0"
          }
        ],
        "kind": "literal",
        "polarity": "positive",
        "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#exercise_barred"
      },
      "id": "urn:proof:apply:ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted:b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a",
      "kind": "rule_application",
      "originStatus": "available",
      "premises": [
        "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#asserted",
        "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#expired"
      ],
      "rule": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted",
      "sourceAnchors": [
        "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_ART10_9_EN",
        "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_ART10_9_FR"
      ],
      "strength": "defeasible",
      "substitution": {
        "v0": {
          "id": "urn:p12:right",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      },
      "trust": "engine",
      "variables": [
        {
          "id": "v0",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Right"
          }
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "assertionOrigin": "case_input",
      "conclusion": {
        "args": [
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:obligee",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          },
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          }
        ],
        "kind": "literal",
        "polarity": "positive",
        "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#persona_of_party"
      },
      "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-ee",
      "kind": "assertion",
      "originStatus": "available",
      "premises": [],
      "trust": "case"
    },
    {
      "assertionOrigin": "case_input",
      "conclusion": {
        "args": [
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:obligor",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          },
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          }
        ],
        "kind": "literal",
        "polarity": "positive",
        "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#persona_of_party"
      },
      "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-or",
      "kind": "assertion",
      "originStatus": "available",
      "premises": [],
      "trust": "case"
    },
    {
      "assertionOrigin": "case_input",
      "conclusion": {
        "args": [
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:causa",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          },
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          },
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          }
        ],
        "kind": "literal",
        "polarity": "positive",
        "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
      },
      "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#petitio",
      "kind": "assertion",
      "originStatus": "available",
      "premises": [],
      "trust": "case"
    },
    {
      "assertionOrigin": "case_input",
      "conclusion": {
        "args": [
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:right",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          },
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:contract",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          },
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:obligee",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          },
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:obligor",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          }
        ],
        "kind": "literal",
        "polarity": "positive",
        "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#right_of"
      },
      "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#right",
      "kind": "assertion",
      "originStatus": "available",
      "premises": [],
      "trust": "case"
    },
    {
      "conclusion": {
        "args": [
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          },
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          },
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:causa",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          }
        ],
        "kind": "literal",
        "polarity": "positive",
        "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"
      },
      "head": {
        "args": [
          {
            "kind": "var",
            "var": "v4"
          },
          {
            "kind": "var",
            "var": "v5"
          },
          {
            "kind": "var",
            "var": "v6"
          }
        ],
        "kind": "literal",
        "polarity": "positive",
        "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"
      },
      "id": "urn:proof:apply:ExpiryExcludit:3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08",
      "kind": "rule_application",
      "originStatus": "available",
      "premises": [
        "urn:proof:apply:ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted:b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a",
        "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#causa",
        "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-ee",
        "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-or",
        "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#petitio",
        "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#right"
      ],
      "rule": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit",
      "sourceAnchors": [
        "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_ART10_9_EN",
        "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_ART10_9_FR"
      ],
      "strength": "defeasible",
      "substitution": {
        "v0": {
          "id": "urn:p12:right",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        "v1": {
          "id": "urn:p12:contract",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        "v2": {
          "id": "urn:p12:obligee",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        "v3": {
          "id": "urn:p12:obligor",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        "v4": {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        "v5": {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        "v6": {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      },
      "trust": "engine",
      "variables": [
        {
          "id": "v0",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Right"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "v1",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Contract"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "v2",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Party"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "v3",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Party"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "v4",
          "type": {
            "name": "doctrine.ius_privatum#Persona"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "v5",
          "type": {
            "name": "doctrine.ius_privatum#Persona"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "v6",
          "type": {
            "name": "doctrine.ius_privatum#Causa"
          }
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "conclusion": {
        "literal": {
          "args": [
            {
              "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            },
            {
              "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            },
            {
              "id": "urn:p12:causa",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            }
          ],
          "kind": "literal",
          "polarity": "positive",
          "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"
        },
        "truthStatus": "TRUE_ONLY"
      },
      "id": "urn:proof:query:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum",
      "kind": "query_evaluation",
      "originStatus": "available",
      "premises": [
        "urn:proof:apply:ExpiryExcludit:3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08"
      ],
      "trust": "engine"
    }
  ],
  "symbols": [
    {
      "id": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#Causa",
      "kind": "type_decl",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "ru-KZ",
          "status": "unofficial",
          "text": "притязание как основание тяжбы: договор, деликт, собственность, наследство — одно спорное отношение между двумя лицами"
        }
      ],
      "name": "Causa",
      "package": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#Persona",
      "kind": "type_decl",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "ru-KZ",
          "status": "unofficial",
          "text": "лицо частного права: истец, ответчик, собственник, должник, кредитор, наследник"
        }
      ],
      "name": "Persona",
      "package": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio",
      "kind": "symbol_decl",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "ru-KZ",
          "status": "unofficial",
          "text": "истец предъявляет к ответчику притязание — спорное отношение, о котором задаётся вопрос"
        }
      ],
      "name": "petitio",
      "package": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum",
      "parameters": [
        {
          "id": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio/arg/causa",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "causa",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#Causa"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio/arg/actor",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "actor",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#Persona"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio/arg/reus",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "reus",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#Persona"
          }
        }
      ],
      "symbolKind": "relation"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum",
      "kind": "symbol_decl",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "ru-KZ",
          "status": "unofficial",
          "text": "средство защиты отнято: возражением, погашением тяжбой, давностью, иммунитетом ответчика"
        }
      ],
      "name": "remedium_exclusum",
      "package": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum",
      "parameters": [
        {
          "id": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum/arg/actor",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "actor",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#Persona"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum/arg/reus",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "reus",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#Persona"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum/arg/causa",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "causa",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#Causa"
          }
        }
      ],
      "symbolKind": "relation"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration",
      "kind": "norm_template",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "en",
          "status": "official",
          "text": "Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence"
        }
      ],
      "package": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight",
      "kind": "rule",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "en",
          "status": "official",
          "text": "Article 10.9(1). The expiration of the limitation period does not extinguish the right"
        }
      ],
      "package": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "strength": "strict"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted",
      "kind": "rule",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "en",
          "status": "official",
          "text": "Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence"
        }
      ],
      "package": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "strength": "defeasible"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit",
      "kind": "rule",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "en",
          "status": "official",
          "text": "Article 10.9(2). Once the obligor has asserted expiry, the barred exercise is a comparative remedium_exclusum"
        }
      ],
      "package": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "strength": "defeasible"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration",
      "kind": "rule",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "en",
          "status": "official",
          "text": "Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence"
        }
      ],
      "package": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "strength": "strict"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Right",
      "kind": "type_decl",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "en",
          "status": "official",
          "text": "Right governed by the Principles"
        }
      ],
      "name": "Right",
      "package": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#causa_of_right",
      "kind": "symbol_decl",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "en",
          "status": "official",
          "text": "this right is the comparative causa"
        }
      ],
      "name": "causa_of_right",
      "package": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "parameters": [
        {
          "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#causa_of_right/arg/r",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "r",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Right"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#causa_of_right/arg/c",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "c",
          "type": {
            "name": "doctrine.ius_privatum#Causa"
          }
        }
      ],
      "symbolKind": "relation"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#exercise_barred",
      "kind": "symbol_decl",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "en",
          "status": "official",
          "text": "the expiration of the limitation period has effect and bars the exercise of the right (article 10.9(2))"
        }
      ],
      "name": "exercise_barred",
      "package": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "parameters": [
        {
          "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#exercise_barred/arg/r",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "r",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Right"
          }
        }
      ],
      "symbolKind": "relation"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#expiration_asserted_as_defence",
      "kind": "symbol_decl",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "en",
          "status": "official",
          "text": "the obligor has asserted the expiration of the limitation period as a defence"
        }
      ],
      "name": "expiration_asserted_as_defence",
      "package": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "parameters": [
        {
          "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#expiration_asserted_as_defence/arg/r",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "r",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Right"
          }
        }
      ],
      "symbolKind": "relation"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#limitation_expired",
      "kind": "symbol_decl",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "en",
          "status": "official",
          "text": "the limitation period for the right has expired"
        }
      ],
      "name": "limitation_expired",
      "package": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "parameters": [
        {
          "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#limitation_expired/arg/r",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "r",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Right"
          }
        }
      ],
      "symbolKind": "relation"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#persona_of_party",
      "kind": "symbol_decl",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "en",
          "status": "official",
          "text": "the contracting party appears in the comparative chain as this persona"
        }
      ],
      "name": "persona_of_party",
      "package": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "parameters": [
        {
          "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#persona_of_party/arg/p",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "p",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Party"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#persona_of_party/arg/x",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "x",
          "type": {
            "name": "doctrine.ius_privatum#Persona"
          }
        }
      ],
      "symbolKind": "relation"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#right_not_extinguished",
      "kind": "symbol_decl",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "en",
          "status": "official",
          "text": "the expiration of the limitation period does not extinguish the right (article 10.9(1))"
        }
      ],
      "name": "right_not_extinguished",
      "package": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "parameters": [
        {
          "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#right_not_extinguished/arg/r",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "r",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Right"
          }
        }
      ],
      "symbolKind": "relation"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#right_of",
      "kind": "symbol_decl",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "en",
          "status": "official",
          "text": "the right belongs to the obligee against the obligor under that contract"
        }
      ],
      "name": "right_of",
      "package": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "parameters": [
        {
          "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#right_of/arg/r",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "r",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Right"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#right_of/arg/c",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "c",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Contract"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#right_of/arg/obligee",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "obligee",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Party"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#right_of/arg/obligor",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "obligor",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Party"
          }
        }
      ],
      "symbolKind": "relation"
    }
  ]
}

JSON · Berechnungen, Quellen und genaue Daten

{
  "acts": [
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:a6813604c35567e7c586d334efbf524d08f3467170c4b732cfb15809cacf4ff4",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core",
      "package": "de.bgb.core"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:998148eaeeed28f1565811474ee7beb7eacc616c5681ed9638edc976512a9884",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
      "package": "de.bgb.fristen"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:86a5a00db16e32187223ceeec6748eb7d42d18b7c370c8b15ac64d2f3f655ff7",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum",
      "package": "de.bgb.ius_privatum"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:7202de5de49a8a9d12837bc19cb7008ba2d1a68dbcc0134e0afccf1440a6d5ed",
      "namespace": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum",
      "package": "doctrine.ius_privatum"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:ad41d027ba92c38ca5eecc1d16097d0bbc8c5a74946fc1a6397c6dadac61158f",
      "namespace": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
      "package": "fr.code_civil"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:719bfd408eed92ad497ba071482354d4ad32b81ef9f41c6654f224416c19e603",
      "namespace": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc",
      "package": "unidroit.picc"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:b311d0d422a1079f71113320bd818236f7b09507c7dd960bdafceb91285497d9",
      "namespace": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "package": "unidroit.picc_limitation"
    }
  ],
  "caseHash": "sha256:65ecdb8c6264f3a7a6d29f6d5192ec6abc010262def4a431ab776e2e4c296189",
  "jurisdiction": "Deutschland",
  "legalTime": "2016-06-01",
  "mode": "audit",
  "programHash": "sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e",
  "resultHash": "sha256:7d6420f869f194c56f0e17d6ec83188bea3ec4c0fa3c59ce44fb61219412f696",
  "timezone": "UTC"
}

evaluation SHA-256: sha256:364f99c2cdf1eaceb1c94636c5bf963ae4cce12a3771b5658761828599ca07a3

Ausgangsdaten · JSON

{
  "args": [
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:causa",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    }
  ],
  "facts": [
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:right",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:contract",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:obligee",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:obligor",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#right_of"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:right",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#limitation_expired"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:right",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#expiration_asserted_as_defence"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:obligee",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#persona_of_party"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:obligor",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#persona_of_party"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:right",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#causa_of_right"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
    }
  ],
  "kind": "truth",
  "legalTime": "2016-06-01",
  "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"
}

Nach den Prinzipien ist das Rechtsmittel ausgeschlossen, weil die Verjährung geltend gemacht ist.

Bedingungsprüfung

Zwei Jahre, Code civil: die Klage ist nicht verjährt

Rechtsordnung DeutschlandRechtsstand zum 2016-01-02

Berechnungsergebnis

Widerlegt

Eingabeparameter

Was wir ermitteln

action prescrite à cette date

causa2. Januar 2016

Ausgangsfakten

créance exigible depuis ce jour
causa: causajour: 15. März 2014
le titulaire a connu les faits lui permettant d'exercer son droit ce jour
causa: causajour: 15. März 2014
action introduite ce jour
causa: causajour: 2. Januar 2016
prescription non interrompue et non suspendue
causa: causa
der Kläger erhebt gegen den Beklagten einen Anspruch — das streitige Rechtsverhältnis, auf das sich die Frage bezieht
causa: causaactor: greus: s

Ausgangsdaten · JSON

{
  "args": [
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:causa",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "kind": "value",
      "type": {
        "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
      },
      "value": "2016-01-02"
    }
  ],
  "facts": [
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2014-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#creance_exigible_depuis"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2014-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#titulaire_connait_les_faits_le"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2016-01-02"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#action_introduite_le"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#prescription_non_interrompue"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
    }
  ],
  "kind": "truth",
  "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
  "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#action_prescrite_le"
}

Warum dieses ErgebnisAngewendete Regeln und Voraussetzungen

Ableitungspfad8 Schritte

1
action introduite ce jour
causa: urn:p12:causa; jour: 2. Januar 2016
Fallfakt
2
le titulaire a connu les faits lui permettant d'exercer son droit ce jour
causa: urn:p12:causa; jour: 15. März 2014
Fallfakt
3
créance exigible depuis ce jour
causa: urn:p12:causa; jour: 15. März 2014
Fallfakt
4
cinq ans à compter du jour où le titulaire a connu les faits
point de départ du délai quinquennal: causa: urn:p12:causa; jour: 15. März 2014
Art. 2224
Kennung
urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#PointDepartConnaissanceReelle
Regel
5
prescription non interrompue et non suspendue
causa: urn:p12:causa
Fallfakt
6
délai de cinq ans, compté par jours
15. März 2019 = add calendar period(15. März 2014, 5 calendar_year)
Art. 2224, Art. 2228, Art. 2229
Kennung
urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#EcheanceCinqAns
Regel
7
le dernier jour du terme n'est pas encore accompli
nicht action prescrite à cette date: causa: urn:p12:causa; jour: 2. Januar 2016
Art. 2219, Art. 2229
Kennung
urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#ActionNonPrescriteAvantOuAEcheance
Regel
8
Abfrageauswertung
Abfrage

von der Engine geprüft: 4 · Fallfakt: 4 · Vollständiger Graph: 10 Knoten

Schritte des gespeicherten Beweises von den Fallfakten zur Antwort. Die Formeln werden so gezeigt, wie sie in der Norm stehen, mit eingesetzten Werten; die Seite berechnet nichts neu.

Grundlage dieser Antwort

Regeln aus dem gespeicherten Beweisweg dieser Antwort.

fr.code_civil

le dernier jour du terme n'est pas encore accompli
Kennung
urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#ActionNonPrescriteAvantOuAEcheance
délai de cinq ans, compté par jours
Kennung
urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#EcheanceCinqAns
cinq ans à compter du jour où le titulaire a connu les faits
Kennung
urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#PointDepartConnaissanceReelle

Weitere Regeln der Berechnung2

Angewendet in der Gesamtberechnung, aber nicht Teil des Beweiswegs dieser Antwort.

fr.code_civil

Article 2232, alinéa 2. Hors butoir opposable, l'échéance après plancher est la date applicable
Kennung
urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#DateApplicableSansButoirOpposable
Sans médiation, conciliation ni mesure d'instruction, l'échéance du délai n'est pas relevée
Kennung
urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#EcheanceApresPlancherSansMinimale

Anmerkungen · 4

Ausführungsstörungen und Hinweise

HinweisEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31
редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_EN на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 81 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)
Betroffene Knoten
- Article 5.2.3. The conferment of rights in the beneficiary includes the right to invoke a clause in the contract which excludes or limits the liability of the beneficiary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryMayInvokeClause
- Articles 5.2.1 and 5.2.2. The parties may confer a right on a third party who must be identifiable with adequate certainty by the contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryRightExists
- Article 5.1.4(2). To the extent that an obligation involves a duty of best efforts, that party is bound to make such efforts as would be made by a reasonable person of the same kind urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BestEffortsDutyPerformed
- Article 1.9(1). The parties are bound by any usage to which they have agreed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByAgreedUsage
- Article 1.9(1). The parties are bound by practices which they have established between themselves urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByEstablishedPractice
- Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage
- Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage/unless/0
- Article 5.3.3(1). A party who prevented fulfilment contrary to good faith may not rely on the non-fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnPreventedCondition
- Article 5.3.3(2). A party who brought about fulfilment contrary to good faith may not rely on the fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnProcuredCondition
- Article 4.3. In applying Articles 4.1 and 4.2, regard shall be had to all the circumstances, including those listed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CircumstanceToBeRegarded
- Article 1.11. Where a party has more than one place of business the relevant one is that which has the closest relationship to the contract and its performance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ClosestPlaceIsRelevant
- Article 4.1(2) (opening words). Where the common intention can be established, the reasonable-persons reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CommonIntentionDisplacesReasonablePersons
- Article 1.12(2). The computed last day does not stand where it is a holiday at the place of performance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ComputedLastDayYieldsToHoliday
- Article 4.6. If contract terms supplied by one party are unclear, an interpretation against that party is preferred urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContraProferentem
- Article 1.3. A contract validly entered into is binding upon the parties urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContractIsBinding
- Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#Cooperate
- Article 5.2.4. The promisor may assert against the beneficiary all defences which the promisor could assert against the promisee urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DefencesAgainstBeneficiary
- Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective
- Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective/unless/0
- Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyOfGoodFaith
- Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToCooperate
- Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRights
- Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRightsBreached
- Article 5.1.1. The contractual obligations of the parties may be express urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ExpressIsContractual
- Article 5.1.5. In determining the extent to which an obligation involves a duty of best efforts or a duty to achieve a specific result, regard shall be had to the listed factors urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FactorDeterminesKindOfDuty
- Article 1.1. The parties are free to enter into a contract and to determine its content urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FreedomOfContract
- Article 1.6(2). Issues within the scope of these Principles but not expressly settled by them are as far as possible to be settled in accordance with their underlying general principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GapSettledByUnderlyingPrinciples
- Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaith
- Article 1.7(2). The parties may not exclude or limit the duty of good faith and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaithCannotBeExcluded
- Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted
- Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted/unless/0
- Article 5.1.2(c). Implied obligations stem from good faith and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromGoodFaith
- Article 5.1.2(a). Implied obligations stem from the nature and purpose of the contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromNatureAndPurpose
- Article 5.1.2(b). Implied obligations stem from practices established between the parties and usages urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromPracticesAndUsages
- Article 5.1.2(d). Implied obligations stem from reasonableness urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromReasonableness
- Article 5.1.1. The contractual obligations of the parties may be implied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedIsContractual
- Article 1.8. A party cannot act inconsistently with an understanding it has caused the other party to have and upon which that other party reasonably has acted in reliance to its detriment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InconsistentBehaviourBarred
- Article 4.2(2) (opening words). Where the intention was known to the other party, the reasonable-person reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#IntentionDisplacesReasonablePerson
- Article 4.1(1). A contract shall be interpreted according to the common intention of the parties urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByCommonIntention
- Article 4.1(2). If the common intention cannot be established, the contract shall be interpreted according to the meaning reasonable persons of the same kind would give it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByReasonablePersons
- Article 1.4. Nothing in these Principles restricts the application of mandatory rules urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MandatoryRulesUnrestricted
- Article 5.1.7(2). Where the price is to be determined by one party and that determination is manifestly unreasonable, a reasonable price shall be substituted notwithstanding any contract term to the contrary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ManifestlyUnreasonableDeterminationReplaced
- Preamble. These Principles may be applied when the parties have agreed that their contract be governed by general principles of law, the lex mercatoria or the like urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyOnChoiceOfGeneralPrinciples
- Preamble. These Principles may be applied when the parties have not chosen any law to govern their contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyWhereNoLawChosen
- Preamble. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement domestic law urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretDomesticLaw
- Preamble. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement international uniform law instruments urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretUniformLaw
- Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated as otherwise provided in these Principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationAsProvided
- Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated by agreement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByAgreement
- Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated in accordance with its terms urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByTerms
- Article 1.2. Nothing in these Principles requires a contract to be made in or evidenced by a particular form urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoFormRequired
- Article 1.10(2)-(3). A notice is effective when it reaches the person to whom it is given urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoticeEffectiveOnReceipt
- Article 4.7. In case of discrepancy between equally authoritative versions there is a preference for the interpretation according to the original version urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#OriginalVersionPreferred
- Article 1.12(1). Official holidays or non-business days occurring during the period are included in calculating it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodEndsOn
- Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday
- Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday/unless/0
- Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PreserveRights
- Article 5.1.7(1). Where a contract does not fix the price, the parties are considered to have made reference to the price generally charged in comparable circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceByMarket
- Article 5.1.7(1). If no such price is available, a reasonable price applies urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceReasonableWhereNoMarket
- Preamble. These Principles shall be applied when the parties have agreed that their contract be governed by them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PrinciplesGovernByAgreement
- Article 5.1.6. Where the quality of performance is neither fixed by nor determinable from the contract, a party is bound to render a performance of a quality that is reasonable and not less than average in the circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#QualityWhereNotFixed
- Articles 4.4 and 4.5. Terms are to be read in the light of the whole contract and so as to give effect to all of them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReadingConformsToCanons
- Article 5.1.9(1). An obligee may release its right by agreement with the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReleaseByAgreement
- Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone
- Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone/unless/0
- Article 5.2.6. The beneficiary may renounce a right conferred on it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RenunciationEndsBeneficiaryRight
- Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract
- Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract/unless/0
- Article 5.3.5. On fulfilment of a resolutive condition the rules on restitution apply with appropriate adaptations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RestitutionOnResolutiveCondition
- Article 5.1.4(1). To the extent that an obligation involves a duty to achieve a specific result, that party is bound to achieve that result urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResultDutyPerformed
- Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance
- Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance/unless/0
- Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant
- Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant/unless/0
- Article 4.2(1). Statements and other conduct shall be interpreted according to the party's intention if the other party knew or could not have been unaware of it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByIntention
- Article 4.2(2). If the preceding paragraph is not applicable, statements shall be interpreted according to the meaning a reasonable person would give them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByReasonablePerson
- Article 4.8(1). Where the parties have not agreed with respect to an important term, a term which is appropriate in the circumstances shall be supplied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SupplyOmittedTerm
- Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect
- Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect/unless/0
- Article 5.1.8. A contract for an indefinite period may be terminated by either party by giving notice a reasonable time in advance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#TerminationOfIndefiniteContract
- Article 5.1.7(2). A manifestly unreasonable determination does not stand as the applicable price urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#UnreasonableDeterminationDisplaced
- Article 5.3.1. A contract or a contractual obligation may be made conditional upon the occurrence of a future uncertain event urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ValidCondition
Details
```
{
 "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_EN",
 "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
 "since": null,
 "state": "not_yet",
 "status": null
}
```
HinweisEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31
редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_FR на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 79 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)
Betroffene Knoten
- Article 5.2.3. The conferment of rights in the beneficiary includes the right to invoke a clause in the contract which excludes or limits the liability of the beneficiary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryMayInvokeClause
- Article 5.1.4(2). To the extent that an obligation involves a duty of best efforts, that party is bound to make such efforts as would be made by a reasonable person of the same kind urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BestEffortsDutyPerformed
- Article 1.9(1). The parties are bound by any usage to which they have agreed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByAgreedUsage
- Article 1.9(1). The parties are bound by practices which they have established between themselves urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByEstablishedPractice
- Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage
- Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage/unless/0
- Article 5.3.3(1). A party who prevented fulfilment contrary to good faith may not rely on the non-fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnPreventedCondition
- Article 5.3.3(2). A party who brought about fulfilment contrary to good faith may not rely on the fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnProcuredCondition
- Article 4.3. In applying Articles 4.1 and 4.2, regard shall be had to all the circumstances, including those listed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CircumstanceToBeRegarded
- Article 1.11. Where a party has more than one place of business the relevant one is that which has the closest relationship to the contract and its performance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ClosestPlaceIsRelevant
- Article 4.1(2) (opening words). Where the common intention can be established, the reasonable-persons reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CommonIntentionDisplacesReasonablePersons
- Article 1.12(2). The computed last day does not stand where it is a holiday at the place of performance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ComputedLastDayYieldsToHoliday
- Article 4.6. If contract terms supplied by one party are unclear, an interpretation against that party is preferred urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContraProferentem
- Article 1.3. A contract validly entered into is binding upon the parties urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContractIsBinding
- Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#Cooperate
- Article 5.2.4. The promisor may assert against the beneficiary all defences which the promisor could assert against the promisee urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DefencesAgainstBeneficiary
- Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective
- Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective/unless/0
- Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyOfGoodFaith
- Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToCooperate
- Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRights
- Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRightsBreached
- Article 5.1.1. The contractual obligations of the parties may be express urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ExpressIsContractual
- Article 5.1.5. In determining the extent to which an obligation involves a duty of best efforts or a duty to achieve a specific result, regard shall be had to the listed factors urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FactorDeterminesKindOfDuty
- Article 1.1. The parties are free to enter into a contract and to determine its content urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FreedomOfContract
- Article 1.6(2). Issues within the scope of these Principles but not expressly settled by them are as far as possible to be settled in accordance with their underlying general principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GapSettledByUnderlyingPrinciples
- Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaith
- Article 1.7(2). The parties may not exclude or limit the duty of good faith and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaithCannotBeExcluded
- Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted
- Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted/unless/0
- Article 5.1.2(c). Implied obligations stem from good faith and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromGoodFaith
- Article 5.1.2(a). Implied obligations stem from the nature and purpose of the contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromNatureAndPurpose
- Article 5.1.2(b). Implied obligations stem from practices established between the parties and usages urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromPracticesAndUsages
- Article 5.1.2(d). Implied obligations stem from reasonableness urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromReasonableness
- Article 5.1.1. The contractual obligations of the parties may be implied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedIsContractual
- Article 1.8. A party cannot act inconsistently with an understanding it has caused the other party to have and upon which that other party reasonably has acted in reliance to its detriment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InconsistentBehaviourBarred
- Article 4.2(2) (opening words). Where the intention was known to the other party, the reasonable-person reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#IntentionDisplacesReasonablePerson
- Article 4.1(1). A contract shall be interpreted according to the common intention of the parties urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByCommonIntention
- Article 4.1(2). If the common intention cannot be established, the contract shall be interpreted according to the meaning reasonable persons of the same kind would give it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByReasonablePersons
- Article 1.4. Nothing in these Principles restricts the application of mandatory rules urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MandatoryRulesUnrestricted
- Article 5.1.7(2). Where the price is to be determined by one party and that determination is manifestly unreasonable, a reasonable price shall be substituted notwithstanding any contract term to the contrary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ManifestlyUnreasonableDeterminationReplaced
- Preamble. These Principles may be applied when the parties have agreed that their contract be governed by general principles of law, the lex mercatoria or the like urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyOnChoiceOfGeneralPrinciples
- Preamble. These Principles may be applied when the parties have not chosen any law to govern their contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyWhereNoLawChosen
- Preamble. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement domestic law urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretDomesticLaw
- Preamble. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement international uniform law instruments urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretUniformLaw
- Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated as otherwise provided in these Principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationAsProvided
- Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated by agreement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByAgreement
- Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated in accordance with its terms urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByTerms
- Article 1.2. Nothing in these Principles requires a contract to be made in or evidenced by a particular form urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoFormRequired
- Article 1.10(2)-(3). A notice is effective when it reaches the person to whom it is given urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoticeEffectiveOnReceipt
- Article 4.7. In case of discrepancy between equally authoritative versions there is a preference for the interpretation according to the original version urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#OriginalVersionPreferred
- Article 1.12(1). Official holidays or non-business days occurring during the period are included in calculating it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodEndsOn
- Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday
- Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday/unless/0
- Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PreserveRights
- Article 5.1.7(1). Where a contract does not fix the price, the parties are considered to have made reference to the price generally charged in comparable circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceByMarket
- Article 5.1.7(1). If no such price is available, a reasonable price applies urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceReasonableWhereNoMarket
- Preamble. These Principles shall be applied when the parties have agreed that their contract be governed by them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PrinciplesGovernByAgreement
- Article 5.1.6. Where the quality of performance is neither fixed by nor determinable from the contract, a party is bound to render a performance of a quality that is reasonable and not less than average in the circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#QualityWhereNotFixed
- Article 5.1.9(1). An obligee may release its right by agreement with the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReleaseByAgreement
- Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone
- Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone/unless/0
- Article 5.2.6. The beneficiary may renounce a right conferred on it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RenunciationEndsBeneficiaryRight
- Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract
- Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract/unless/0
- Article 5.3.5. On fulfilment of a resolutive condition the rules on restitution apply with appropriate adaptations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RestitutionOnResolutiveCondition
- Article 5.1.4(1). To the extent that an obligation involves a duty to achieve a specific result, that party is bound to achieve that result urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResultDutyPerformed
- Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance
- Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance/unless/0
- Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant
- Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant/unless/0
- Article 4.2(1). Statements and other conduct shall be interpreted according to the party's intention if the other party knew or could not have been unaware of it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByIntention
- Article 4.2(2). If the preceding paragraph is not applicable, statements shall be interpreted according to the meaning a reasonable person would give them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByReasonablePerson
- Article 4.8(1). Where the parties have not agreed with respect to an important term, a term which is appropriate in the circumstances shall be supplied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SupplyOmittedTerm
- Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect
- Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect/unless/0
- Article 5.1.8. A contract for an indefinite period may be terminated by either party by giving notice a reasonable time in advance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#TerminationOfIndefiniteContract
- Article 5.1.7(2). A manifestly unreasonable determination does not stand as the applicable price urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#UnreasonableDeterminationDisplaced
- Article 5.3.1. A contract or a contractual obligation may be made conditional upon the occurrence of a future uncertain event urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ValidCondition
Details
```
{
 "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_FR",
 "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
 "since": null,
 "state": "not_yet",
 "status": null
}
```
HinweisEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31
редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_EN на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 26 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)
Betroffene Knoten
- Article 10.4(1). Where the obligor acknowledges the right before the expiration of the general limitation period, a new general limitation period begins on the day after the acknowledgement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AcknowledgementStartsNewGeneralPeriod
- Article 10.6(1). In the absence of provisions determining the exact date of commencement, arbitral proceedings are deemed to commence on the date on which the request reaches the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ArbitrationCommencesOnRequest
- Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration
- Article 10.1(2). This Chapter does not govern the time within which a party must give notice or perform any act other than the institution of legal proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ChapterDoesNotGovernNoticeTime
- Article 10.9(1). The expiration of the limitation period does not extinguish the right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight
- Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted
- Article 10.9(2). Once the obligor has asserted expiry, the barred exercise is a comparative remedium_exclusum urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit
- Article 10.3(a). The parties may not shorten the general limitation period to less than one year urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodFloorOfOneYear
- Article 10.2(1). The general limitation period is three years beginning on the day after the day the obligee knows or ought to know the facts as a result of which the right can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodOfThreeYears
- Article 10.1(1). The exercise of rights governed by the Principles is barred by the expiration of a limitation period according to the rules of this Chapter urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#LimitationGovernsExerciseOfRights
- Article 10.3(c). The parties may not extend the maximum limitation period to more than fifteen years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodCeilingOfFifteenYears
- Article 10.4(2). The maximum limitation period does not begin to run again, but may be exceeded by the beginning of a new general limitation period urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodDoesNotRestart
- Article 10.3(b). The parties may not shorten the maximum limitation period to less than four years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodFloorOfFourYears
- Article 10.2(2). In any event, the maximum limitation period is ten years beginning on the day after the day the right can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodOfTenYears
- Article 10.11. Where there has been performance in order to discharge an obligation, there is no right of restitution merely because the limitation period has expired urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#NoRestitutionAfterExpiration
- Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration
- Article 10.3. The parties may modify the limitation periods urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PartiesMayModifyPeriods
- Article 10.9(3). A right may still be relied on as a defence even though the expiration of the limitation period for that right has been asserted urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#RightStillAvailableAsDefence
- Article 10.10. The obligee may exercise the right of set-off until the obligor has asserted the expiration of the limitation period urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SetOffUntilExpirationAsserted
- Article 10.7. Articles 10.5 and 10.6 apply with appropriate modifications to proceedings whereby the parties request a third person to assist them in reaching an amicable settlement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByAmicableSettlementProceedings
- Article 10.6(1). The running of the limitation period is suspended when the obligee performs an act recognised by the law of the arbitral tribunal as asserting its right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByArbitralAct
- Article 10.5(1)(c). The running of the limitation period is suspended where the obligee has asserted its rights in proceedings for dissolution of the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByDissolutionClaim
- Article 10.8(1). Where the obligee has been prevented by an impediment beyond its control, the general limitation period is suspended so as not to expire before one year after the impediment has ceased to exist urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByImpediment
- Article 10.8(2). Where the impediment consists of the incapacity or death of a party, suspension ceases when a representative or successor has been appointed; the additional one-year period applies accordingly urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByIncapacityEndsOnAppointment
- Article 10.5(1)(b). The running of the limitation period is suspended where the obligee has asserted its rights in the insolvency proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByInsolvencyClaim
- Article 10.5(1)(a). The running of the limitation period is suspended when the obligee performs an act recognised by the law of the court as asserting its right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByJudicialAct
Details
```
{
 "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_EN",
 "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
 "since": null,
 "state": "not_yet",
 "status": null
}
```
HinweisEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31
редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_FR на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 26 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)
Betroffene Knoten
- Article 10.4(1). Where the obligor acknowledges the right before the expiration of the general limitation period, a new general limitation period begins on the day after the acknowledgement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AcknowledgementStartsNewGeneralPeriod
- Article 10.6(1). In the absence of provisions determining the exact date of commencement, arbitral proceedings are deemed to commence on the date on which the request reaches the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ArbitrationCommencesOnRequest
- Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration
- Article 10.1(2). This Chapter does not govern the time within which a party must give notice or perform any act other than the institution of legal proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ChapterDoesNotGovernNoticeTime
- Article 10.9(1). The expiration of the limitation period does not extinguish the right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight
- Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted
- Article 10.9(2). Once the obligor has asserted expiry, the barred exercise is a comparative remedium_exclusum urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit
- Article 10.3(a). The parties may not shorten the general limitation period to less than one year urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodFloorOfOneYear
- Article 10.2(1). The general limitation period is three years beginning on the day after the day the obligee knows or ought to know the facts as a result of which the right can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodOfThreeYears
- Article 10.1(1). The exercise of rights governed by the Principles is barred by the expiration of a limitation period according to the rules of this Chapter urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#LimitationGovernsExerciseOfRights
- Article 10.3(c). The parties may not extend the maximum limitation period to more than fifteen years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodCeilingOfFifteenYears
- Article 10.4(2). The maximum limitation period does not begin to run again, but may be exceeded by the beginning of a new general limitation period urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodDoesNotRestart
- Article 10.3(b). The parties may not shorten the maximum limitation period to less than four years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodFloorOfFourYears
- Article 10.2(2). In any event, the maximum limitation period is ten years beginning on the day after the day the right can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodOfTenYears
- Article 10.11. Where there has been performance in order to discharge an obligation, there is no right of restitution merely because the limitation period has expired urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#NoRestitutionAfterExpiration
- Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration
- Article 10.3. The parties may modify the limitation periods urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PartiesMayModifyPeriods
- Article 10.9(3). A right may still be relied on as a defence even though the expiration of the limitation period for that right has been asserted urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#RightStillAvailableAsDefence
- Article 10.10. The obligee may exercise the right of set-off until the obligor has asserted the expiration of the limitation period urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SetOffUntilExpirationAsserted
- Article 10.7. Articles 10.5 and 10.6 apply with appropriate modifications to proceedings whereby the parties request a third person to assist them in reaching an amicable settlement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByAmicableSettlementProceedings
- Article 10.6(1). The running of the limitation period is suspended when the obligee performs an act recognised by the law of the arbitral tribunal as asserting its right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByArbitralAct
- Article 10.5(1)(c). The running of the limitation period is suspended where the obligee has asserted its rights in proceedings for dissolution of the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByDissolutionClaim
- Article 10.8(1). Where the obligee has been prevented by an impediment beyond its control, the general limitation period is suspended so as not to expire before one year after the impediment has ceased to exist urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByImpediment
- Article 10.8(2). Where the impediment consists of the incapacity or death of a party, suspension ceases when a representative or successor has been appointed; the additional one-year period applies accordingly urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByIncapacityEndsOnAppointment
- Article 10.5(1)(b). The running of the limitation period is suspended where the obligee has asserted its rights in the insolvency proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByInsolvencyClaim
- Article 10.5(1)(a). The running of the limitation period is suspended when the obligee performs an act recognised by the law of the court as asserting its right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByJudicialAct
Details
```
{
 "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_FR",
 "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
 "since": null,
 "state": "not_yet",
 "status": null
}
```

Wie von der Engine erfasst: Code, Schweregrad und Meldungstext mit §-Verweisen; die Reihenfolge folgt dem Ausführungsdokument.

Beweisgraph

Beweisgraph · 5 Ebene

Beweisknoten: 10 · assertion 4, rule_application 5, query_evaluation 1

Dieser Block ist für die Inline-Ansicht zu groß. Er ist vollständig und ungekürzt im JSON des Dokuments enthalten.

JSON herunterladen ↓

Kennungen von Kalender und Beweis

Beweisverweis: case/ZweiJahre_CC/query/cc-prescrite

Ursprüngliche Begründung · JSON

Dieser Block ist für die Inline-Ansicht zu groß. Er ist vollständig und ungekürzt im JSON des Dokuments enthalten.

JSON herunterladen ↓

QuellenAuszüge: 7

Artikel 2219

Article 2219 La prescription extinctive est un mode d'extinction d'un droit résultant de l'inaction de son titulaire pendant un certain laps de temps.

Ausgangsdaten · JSON

{
  "contentHash": "sha256:6df4090af33e5e220e1ccb8dce8f8d00f5f0e141aadbd8f85537aa44bf7a63f7",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2219",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2219"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2219",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:0b7ecca0ee814319db91d174578fb164b2ac80bbd82794ff733b36bd4f55401a",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2219\nLa prescription extinctive est un mode d'extinction d'un droit résultant de l'inaction de son titulaire pendant un certain laps de temps.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Artikel 2224

Article 2224 Les actions personnelles ou mobilières se prescrivent par cinq ans à compter du jour où le titulaire d'un droit a connu ou aurait dû connaître les faits lui permettant de l'exercer.

Ausgangsdaten · JSON

{
  "contentHash": "sha256:bdab8bd64c835fd72d22b2500bf46d2189e23899c1a2355f5df83442df6121ab",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2224",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2224"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2224",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:672b74a19b0ebe429181790cbe798f0f53e22cb2eeb8706cded06dbf5a40c629",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2224\nLes actions personnelles ou mobilières se prescrivent par cinq ans à compter du jour où le titulaire d'un droit a connu ou aurait dû connaître les faits lui permettant de l'exercer.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Artikel 2228

Article 2228 La prescription se compte par jours, et non par heures.

Ausgangsdaten · JSON

{
  "contentHash": "sha256:a65f1c87050358f486df72292dbb5562439921a55708065026e1560803461b7b",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2228",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2228"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2228",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:dd06365b6b1300407fadd02ddc12c5220fd9139343f3ce91809ff20bf62588a6",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2228\nLa prescription se compte par jours, et non par heures.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Artikel 2229

Article 2229 Elle est acquise lorsque le dernier jour du terme est accompli.

Ausgangsdaten · JSON

{
  "contentHash": "sha256:43dd3aa87d9bddf34522d203c9afc34f12ce9f5292aa3748835cbccf72dfcccd",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2229",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2229"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2229",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:28578b7da1445ef66f205effb784bcc5dae77310d748b2ae6ccebd52a8ca3009",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2229\nElle est acquise lorsque le dernier jour du terme est accompli.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Artikel 2232

Article 2232 Le report du point de départ, la suspension ou l'interruption de la prescription ne peut avoir pour effet de porter le délai de la prescription extinctive au-delà de vingt ans à compter du jour de la naissance du droit. Le premier alinéa n'est pas applicable dans les cas mentionnés aux articles 2226, 2226-1, 2227, 2233 et 2236, au premier alinéa de l'article 2241 et à l'article 2244. Il ne s'applique pas non plus aux actions relatives à l'état des personnes.

Ausgangsdaten · JSON

{
  "contentHash": "sha256:d0aa882fc857d081bcada43191910d722446f91fb14fb86b7e7322957b4070c8",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2232",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2232"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2232",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:b1a33bf6d27cec1af359949222bf7220bc63bc536ae53eb79e94833b5d293e0b",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2232\nLe report du point de départ, la suspension ou l'interruption de la prescription ne peut avoir pour effet de porter le délai de la prescription extinctive au-delà de vingt ans à compter du jour de la naissance du droit.\nLe premier alinéa n'est pas applicable dans les cas mentionnés aux articles 2226, 2226-1, 2227, 2233 et 2236, au premier alinéa de l'article 2241 et à l'article 2244. Il ne s'applique pas non plus aux actions relatives à l'état des personnes.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Artikel 2238

Article 2238 La prescription est suspendue à compter du jour où, après la survenance d'un litige, les parties conviennent de recourir à la médiation ou à la conciliation ou, à défaut d'accord écrit, à compter du jour de la première réunion de médiation ou de conciliation. La prescription est également suspendue à compter de la conclusion d'une convention de procédure participative ou à compter de l'accord du débiteur constaté par l'huissier de justice pour participer à la procédure prévue à l'article L. 125-1 du code des procédures civiles d'exécution. Le délai de prescription recommence à courir, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois, à compter de la date à laquelle soit l'une des parties ou les deux, soit le médiateur ou le conciliateur déclarent que la médiation ou la conciliation est terminée. En cas de convention de procédure participative, le délai de prescription recommence à courir à compter du terme de la convention, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois. En cas d'échec de la procédure prévue au même article, le délai de prescription recommence à courir à compter de la date du refus du débiteur, constaté par l'huissier, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois.

Ausgangsdaten · JSON

{
  "contentHash": "sha256:85fb1ede52113abd61e7bcfa34017c1229badc1205a9cac686e65c4640912b6f",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2238",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2238"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2238",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:7de68d6ed845bcd95c5ca76851b7d5c42c0b755a0f7a53080cbbcbb127ac61f7",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2238\nLa prescription est suspendue à compter du jour où, après la survenance d'un litige, les parties conviennent de recourir à la médiation ou à la conciliation ou, à défaut d'accord écrit, à compter du jour de la première réunion de médiation ou de conciliation. La prescription est également suspendue à compter de la conclusion d'une convention de procédure participative ou à compter de l'accord du débiteur constaté par l'huissier de justice pour participer à la procédure prévue à l'article L. 125-1 du code des procédures civiles d'exécution.\nLe délai de prescription recommence à courir, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois, à compter de la date à laquelle soit l'une des parties ou les deux, soit le médiateur ou le conciliateur déclarent que la médiation ou la conciliation est terminée. En cas de convention de procédure participative, le délai de prescription recommence à courir à compter du terme de la convention, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois. En cas d'échec de la procédure prévue au même article, le délai de prescription recommence à courir à compter de la date du refus du débiteur, constaté par l'huissier, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Artikel 2239

Article 2239 La prescription est également suspendue lorsque le juge fait droit à une demande de mesure d'instruction présentée avant tout procès. Le délai de prescription recommence à courir, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois, à compter du jour où la mesure a été exécutée.

Ausgangsdaten · JSON

{
  "contentHash": "sha256:16731a698eded878eaa02339d6b1fd92b7299d446eab076502a9c24717cfd0cc",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2239",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2239"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2239",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:9e742ac71c8ecd1fe04db3e3bfceb323387b9b856a4882cc1429615d47e89d12",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2239\nLa prescription est également suspendue lorsque le juge fait droit à une demande de mesure d'instruction présentée avant tout procès.\nLe délai de prescription recommence à courir, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois, à compter du jour où la mesure a été exécutée.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Pakete im Snapshot

de.bgb.core
de.bgb.fristen
de.bgb.ius_privatum
doctrine.ius_privatum
fr.code_civil
unidroit.picc
unidroit.picc_limitation

Technische DatenVollständige Antwort, Parameter und Prüfsummen

Berechnungsstatus: COMPUTED

Vollständige Antwort der Engine

Zwei Jahre, Code civil: die Klage ist nicht verjährt

Vollständiges Maschinenergebnis · JSON

Dieser Block ist für die Inline-Ansicht zu groß. Er ist vollständig und ungekürzt im JSON des Dokuments enthalten.

JSON herunterladen ↓

Ausführung · JSON

Dieser Block ist für die Inline-Ansicht zu groß. Er ist vollständig und ungekürzt im JSON des Dokuments enthalten.

JSON herunterladen ↓

Metadaten der Anzeige

Dieser Block ist für die Inline-Ansicht zu groß. Er ist vollständig und ungekürzt im JSON des Dokuments enthalten.

JSON herunterladen ↓

JSON · Berechnungen, Quellen und genaue Daten

{
  "acts": [
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:a6813604c35567e7c586d334efbf524d08f3467170c4b732cfb15809cacf4ff4",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core",
      "package": "de.bgb.core"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:998148eaeeed28f1565811474ee7beb7eacc616c5681ed9638edc976512a9884",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
      "package": "de.bgb.fristen"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:86a5a00db16e32187223ceeec6748eb7d42d18b7c370c8b15ac64d2f3f655ff7",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum",
      "package": "de.bgb.ius_privatum"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:7202de5de49a8a9d12837bc19cb7008ba2d1a68dbcc0134e0afccf1440a6d5ed",
      "namespace": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum",
      "package": "doctrine.ius_privatum"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:ad41d027ba92c38ca5eecc1d16097d0bbc8c5a74946fc1a6397c6dadac61158f",
      "namespace": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
      "package": "fr.code_civil"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:719bfd408eed92ad497ba071482354d4ad32b81ef9f41c6654f224416c19e603",
      "namespace": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc",
      "package": "unidroit.picc"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:b311d0d422a1079f71113320bd818236f7b09507c7dd960bdafceb91285497d9",
      "namespace": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "package": "unidroit.picc_limitation"
    }
  ],
  "caseHash": "sha256:44bf9c77a11b9a491773aa06437c96080852a6c99f75cc4ccda4a8f795f7136d",
  "jurisdiction": "Deutschland",
  "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
  "mode": "audit",
  "programHash": "sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e",
  "resultHash": "sha256:79d9c0afff9713df79f5881d566513daec0a4a1f6e06ab171f810b8ff37a4e50",
  "timezone": "UTC"
}

evaluation SHA-256: sha256:979f29a3c2372b19165a5ab12148f78b5fae75b6d3c81fd38678391bd2d21300

Ausgangsdaten · JSON

{
  "args": [
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:causa",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "kind": "value",
      "type": {
        "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
      },
      "value": "2016-01-02"
    }
  ],
  "facts": [
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2014-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#creance_exigible_depuis"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2014-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#titulaire_connait_les_faits_le"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2016-01-02"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#action_introduite_le"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#prescription_non_interrompue"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
    }
  ],
  "kind": "truth",
  "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
  "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#action_prescrite_le"
}

Nach zwei Jahren ist die französische Klage noch nicht verjährt.

Zitieren

Der Snapshot ist unveränderlich: Der SHA-256 des herunterladbaren JSON fixiert ihn, ein Abrufdatum ist daher nicht nötig.

Zitat

„Eine Forderung, entstanden am 15. März 2010, Klage am 2. Januar 2016: ist das Rechtsmittel nach dem BGB, dem Code civil und den UNIDROIT-Prinzipien ausgeschlossen?“. Arxo Lens. https://lens.arxo.io/a/b_53bf8ccac0d621cc2507b1b9b4a53c448203f6b570111d248dba3bf7de49c48a. SHA-256 des Snapshots: 53bf8ccac0d621cc2507b1b9b4a53c448203f6b570111d248dba3bf7de49c48a.

BibTeX

@misc{arxo-lens-b_53bf8ccac0d6,
  title = {Eine Forderung, entstanden am 15. März 2010, Klage am 2. Januar 2016: ist das Rechtsmittel nach dem BGB, dem Code civil und den UNIDROIT-Prinzipien ausgeschlossen?},
  howpublished = {Arxo Lens},
  url = {https://lens.arxo.io/a/b_53bf8ccac0d621cc2507b1b9b4a53c448203f6b570111d248dba3bf7de49c48a},
  note = {SHA-256 53bf8ccac0d621cc2507b1b9b4a53c448203f6b570111d248dba3bf7de49c48a}
}

Einbettungscode

Die Karte zeigt das Ergebnis und verlinkt auf die vollständige Analyse; sie setzt keine Cookies.

<iframe src="https://lens.arxo.io/embed/b_53bf8ccac0d621cc2507b1b9b4a53c448203f6b570111d248dba3bf7de49c48a?lang=de" width="100%" height="390" loading="lazy" title="Eine Forderung, entstanden am 15. — Arxo Lens" style="border:0"></iframe>

Anonyme Besuchsstatistik, ohne Cookies.