Lensby Arxo
Download JSON
Question Saved analysis

Показания за обе стороны, спор двух матерей, вина Валета и правило тронутой фигуры. Что делает формализованное право там, где решение принадлежит судье?

Гортинский кодекс различает два случая: односторонние показания связывают судью, и вывод идёт до конца, а показания в пользу обеих сторон или ни одной оставляют вопрос судье — ответ «не установлено» с явным запросом суждения. Тот же приём виден в споре двух матерей у Соломона, в суде над Валетом Червей, где вина принадлежит присяжным, и в правиле тронутой фигуры, где спор решает арбитр. Молчание здесь не пробел модели, а формализованная граница: акт сам передаёт вопрос человеку.

This is an assistant explanation, not a calculation result. Check the grounds and sources below.

Results

6

Condition

Односторонние показания связывают судью

Established

Query parameters · 2
claimant
urn:entity:gc:plaintiff
s
urn:entity:gc:slave
Input facts · 9

  • if they contend about a slave, saying each that it is his (slave)

    issue: issues: slave

  • the matters in contention

    issue: issue

  • saying each that it is his (slave)

    clissueparty
    claim-aissueplaintiff
    claim-bissuedefendant

  • if they contend about a slave, saying each that it is his (slave)

    a: claim-ab: claim-bissue: issue

  • a cl examined against the declarations made

    cl
    claim-a
    claim-b

  • if a witness declare it

    cl: claim-a

  • a witness declares

    witness: witnessissue: issue
Why this result? →Sources: 2

Когда показания говорят в одну сторону, судья связан, и вывод доходит до результата.

Condition

Показания за обе стороны

Judgment required

Query parameters · 2
claimant
urn:entity:gc:plaintiff
s
urn:entity:gc:slave
Input facts · 9

  • if they contend about a slave, saying each that it is his (slave)

    issue: issues: slave

  • the matters in contention

    issue: issue

  • saying each that it is his (slave)

    clissueparty
    claim-aissueplaintiff
    claim-bissuedefendant

  • if they contend about a slave, saying each that it is his (slave)

    a: claim-ab: claim-bissue: issue

  • a cl examined against the declarations made

    cl
    claim-a
    claim-b

  • if a witness declare it

    cl
    claim-a
    claim-b

Judgment requests

  • authority
    Dikastas
    Condition
    judges_finding
    request
    Arguments
    • Identifier
      claim-a
      Type
      entity_ref
    Polarity
    positive
    relation
    judges_finding
    subject
    the judge shall decide on oath in reference to the matters in contentionclaim-a
  • authority
    Dikastas
    Condition
    judges_finding
    request
    Arguments
    • Identifier
      claim-b
      Type
      entity_ref
    Polarity
    positive
    relation
    judges_finding
    subject
    the judge shall decide on oath in reference to the matters in contentionclaim-b
  • authority
    Dikastas
    Condition
    judges_finding
    request
    Arguments
    • Identifier
      defendant
      Type
      entity_ref
    Polarity
    positive
    relation
    judges_finding
    subject
    the judge shall decide on oath in reference to the matters in contentiondefendant
  • authority
    Dikastas
    Condition
    judges_finding
    request
    Arguments
    • Identifier
      issue
      Type
      entity_ref
    Polarity
    positive
    relation
    judges_finding
    subject
    the judge shall decide on oath in reference to the matters in contentionissue
  • authority
    Dikastas
    Condition
    judges_finding
    request
    Arguments
    • Identifier
      plaintiff
      Type
      entity_ref
    Polarity
    positive
    relation
    judges_finding
    subject
    the judge shall decide on oath in reference to the matters in contentionplaintiff
  • authority
    Dikastas
    Condition
    judges_finding
    request
    Arguments
    • Identifier
      slave
      Type
      entity_ref
    Polarity
    positive
    relation
    judges_finding
    subject
    the judge shall decide on oath in reference to the matters in contentionslave
  • authority
    Dikastas
    Condition
    judges_finding
    request
    Arguments
    • Identifier
      AdulteryEntrapment
      Type
      entity_ref
    Polarity
    positive
    relation
    judges_finding
    subject
    the judge shall decide on oath in reference to the matters in contentionAdulteryEntrapment
  • authority
    Dikastas
    Condition
    judges_finding
    request
    Arguments
    • Identifier
      Apetairos
      Type
      entity_ref
    Polarity
    positive
    relation
    judges_finding
    subject
    the judge shall decide on oath in reference to the matters in contentionApetairos
Why this result? →Sources: 2

Вывод останавливается и вопрос уходит судье: это записано в самом кодексе.

Condition

Судья решает по присяге

Established

Query parameters · 1
issue
urn:entity:gc:issue
Input facts · 9

  • if they contend about a slave, saying each that it is his (slave)

    issue: issues: slave

  • the matters in contention

    issue: issue

  • saying each that it is his (slave)

    clissueparty
    claim-aissueplaintiff
    claim-bissuedefendant

  • if they contend about a slave, saying each that it is his (slave)

    a: claim-ab: claim-bissue: issue

  • a cl examined against the declarations made

    cl
    claim-a
    claim-b

  • if a witness declare it

    cl
    claim-a
    claim-b
Why this result? →Sources: 2

Где способ доказывания не предписан, решает присяга и усмотрение судьи.

Condition

Спор двух матерей

Judgment required

Query parameters · 2
w
TheFirstWoman
c
TheLivingChild

Judgment requests

  • authority
    KingSolomon
    Condition
    mother_of
    request
    Arguments
    • Identifier
      TheFirstWoman
      Type
      entity_ref
    • Identifier
      TheLivingChild
      Type
      entity_ref
    Polarity
    positive
    relation
    mother_of
    subject
    she is the mother thereof — for the king to judgeTheFirstWoman, TheLivingChild
Why this result? →Sources: 1

Обе стороны утверждают одно и то же: разрешение спора требует суждения.

Condition

Вина Валета — дело присяжных

Judgment required

Query parameters · 2
p
KNAVE
t
urn:case:eng:carroll:trial
Input facts · 3

  • trial: the proceeding against the accused

    instance: trial

    Subject shared by the facts below

  • urn:eng:carroll:clir:alice-trial#TrialOfTheKnave__procedure_instance

  • the court has assembled for the trial

  • the herald has read the accusation

Judgment requests

  • authority
    IurataDuodecim
    Condition
    veredictum_de_reo
    request
    Arguments
    • Identifier
      Knave
      Type
      entity_ref
    • Identifier
      trial
      Type
      entity_ref
    Polarity
    positive
    relation
    veredictum_de_reo
    subject
    consider your verdict — the jury to find upon the accusedKnave, trial
Why this result? →Sources: 7

Приговор до вердикта невозможен: вина остаётся вопросом присяжных.

Condition

Правило тронутой фигуры

Judgment required

Query parameters · 2
who
urn:fide:white:t
piece
urn:fide:king:t
Input facts · 4

  • the player takes part in the game

    game: twho: t

  • the player has the move

    game: twho: t

  • the piece belongs to the player

    who: tpiece: t

  • the piece can be moved

    piece: t

Judgment requests

  • authority
    FIDEArbiter
    Condition
    piece_touched_intentionally
    request
    Arguments
    • Identifier
      t
      Type
      entity_ref
    • Identifier
      t
      Type
      entity_ref
    Polarity
    positive
    relation
    piece_touched_intentionally
    subject
    the player having the move touched the piece with the intention of moving or capturingt, t
Why this result? →Sources: 1

Намерение игрока устанавливает арбитр, и правило прямо на это указывает.

How to cite

The snapshot is immutable: the SHA-256 of the downloadable JSON pins it, so no access date is needed.

Citation
“Показания за обе стороны, спор двух матерей, вина Валета и правило тронутой фигуры. Что делает формализованное право там, где решение принадлежит судье?”. Arxo Lens, as of 2026-09-06. https://lens.arxo.io/a/a_uPxQIpd-uocSUdw6BtLrFZr_. Snapshot SHA-256: 1ff217be05b24917f09d34ad4f7aaf06d60f590524ce810f67d09e8a6a4d6de6.
BibTeX
@misc{arxo-lens-a_uPxQIpd-uocS,
  title = {Показания за обе стороны, спор двух матерей, вина Валета и правило тронутой фигуры. Что делает формализованное право там, где решение принадлежит судье?},
  howpublished = {Arxo Lens},
  url = {https://lens.arxo.io/a/a_uPxQIpd-uocSUdw6BtLrFZr_},
  note = {as of 2026-09-06; SHA-256 1ff217be05b24917f09d34ad4f7aaf06d60f590524ce810f67d09e8a6a4d6de6}
}
Embed code

The card shows the result and links to the full analysis; it sets no cookies.

<iframe src="https://lens.arxo.io/embed/a_uPxQIpd-uocSUdw6BtLrFZr_?lang=en" width="100%" height="390" loading="lazy" title="Where the law stops and hands the decision to a human — Arxo Lens" style="border:0"></iframe>

Anonymous visit statistics, no cookies.