Lensby Arxo
Скачать JSON
Вопрос Сохранённый разбор

Eine Forderung, entstanden am 15. März 2010, Klage am 2. Januar 2016: ist das Rechtsmittel nach dem BGB, dem Code civil und den UNIDROIT-Prinzipien ausgeschlossen?

Dieselben Daten, drei Texte. Das BGB lässt die regelmäßige Verjährung mit dem Schluss des Jahres eintreten. Der Code civil zählt fünf Jahre ab Kenntnis. Die Prinzipien schließen das Rechtsmittel aus, wenn die Verjährung geltend gemacht wird.

Это пояснение ассистента, а не результат расчёта. Проверяйте выводы по основаниям и источникам ниже.

Кратко

6

Выберите результат, чтобы перейти к основаниям

Fünf Jahre, BGB: die Verjährung ist am 31. Dezember 2013 eingetretenПроверка условияУстановленоВыполнение: РассчитаноЛогический вывод: УстановленоFünf Jahre, BGB: das Rechtsmittel ist ausgeschlossenПроверка условияУстановленоВыполнение: РассчитаноЛогический вывод: УстановленоFünf Jahre, Code civil: die Klage ist verjährtПроверка условияУстановленоВыполнение: РассчитаноЛогический вывод: УстановленоFünf Jahre, Code civil: das Rechtsmittel ist ausgeschlossenПроверка условияУстановленоВыполнение: РассчитаноЛогический вывод: УстановленоFünf Jahre, PICC: das Rechtsmittel ist ausgeschlossenПроверка условияУстановленоВыполнение: РассчитаноЛогический вывод: УстановленоZwei Jahre, Code civil: die Klage ist nicht verjährtПроверка условияОпровергнутоВыполнение: РассчитаноЛогический вывод: Опровергнуто

Подробный разбор

6

Проверка условия

Fünf Jahre, BGB: die Verjährung ist am 31. Dezember 2013 eingetreten

Юрисдикция DeutschlandПраво на дату 02.01.2016

Результат расчёта

Установлено

Исходные параметры

Что определяем

Tag, mit dessen Ablauf die Verjährung des Anspruchs eintritt

anspruch31 декабря 2013 г.

Исходные факты

  • Tag, an dem der Anspruch entstanden ist (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 1, § 200)

    a: atag: 15 марта 2010 г.

  • Tag, an dem der Gläubiger von den den Anspruch begründenden Umständen und der Person des Schuldners Kenntnis erlangt hat (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 2) — festgestellte Tatsache, im Fall origin adjudicated

    a: atag: 15 марта 2010 г.

  • Kein Hemmungstatbestand der §§ 203–208 festgestellt — ausdrückliche Angabe des Falls; das Fehlen einer Angabe ist keine Verneinung

    a: a

  • der Schuldner beruft sich auf die Verjährung des Leistungs- oder Nacherfüllungsanspruchs (§ 218 Abs. 1)

    a: a

  • Inhaber des Anspruchs (Gläubiger)

    a: ap: g

  • Anspruchsgegner (Schuldner)

    a: ap: s

  • diese Person des BGB tritt in der vergleichenden Kette als dieses Gesicht auf

    px
    gg
    ss

  • dieser Anspruch ist das vergleichende Streitverhältnis

    a: ac: causa

  • истец предъявляет к ответчику притязание — спорное отношение, о котором задаётся вопрос

    causa: causaactor: greus: s
Исходные данные · JSON
JSONТолько чтение
{
  "args": [
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:anspruch",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "kind": "value",
      "type": {
        "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
      },
      "value": "2013-12-31"
    }
  ],
  "facts": [
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core#anspruch_entstanden_am"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "adjudicated",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#kenntnis_erlangt_am"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#keine_hemmung"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#schuldner_beruft_sich_auf_verjaehrung"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#g",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core#anspruchsinhaber"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#s",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core#anspruchsgegner"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#g",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#persona_of"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#s",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#persona_of"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#causa_of_anspruch"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
    }
  ],
  "kind": "truth",
  "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
  "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#verjaehrung_eingetreten_am"
}
Почему такой результатПрименённые правила и условия

Путь вывода11 шагов

  1. 1

    Tag, an dem der Anspruch entstanden ist (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 1, § 200)

    a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 15 марта 2010 г.

    факт дела
  2. 2

    Für den Tag der Entstehung des Anspruchs wird der Schluss des Jahres gesucht (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 1)

    für diesen Tag wird der Schluss des Jahres gesucht (§ 199 Abs. 1): a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 15 марта 2010 г.

    абз. 199

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeGesuchtFuerEntstehung
    правило
  3. 3

    Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 9 — Ende des 9. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    31 декабря 2010 г. = month end of(add calendar period(month start of(15 марта 2010 г.), 9 calendar_month))

    абз. 199

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat09
    правило
  4. 4

    Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): der Kandidat ist der 31. Dezember, wenn sein Monat 31 Tage hat, der folgende Monat 31 Tage und der übernächste höchstens 29 — Dezember, Januar, Februar

    Schluss des Jahres, in dem der Tag liegt (§ 199 Abs. 1): der 31. Dezember desselben Jahres: a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 15 марта 2010 г.; ultimo: 31 декабря 2010 г.

    абз. 199

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeIstDezember
    правило
  5. 5

    Kein Hemmungstatbestand der §§ 203–208 festgestellt — ausdrückliche Angabe des Falls; das Fehlen einer Angabe ist keine Verneinung

    a: urn:p12:anspruch

    факт дела
  6. 6

    Tag, an dem der Gläubiger von den den Anspruch begründenden Umständen und der Person des Schuldners Kenntnis erlangt hat (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 2) — festgestellte Tatsache, im Fall origin adjudicated

    a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 15 марта 2010 г.

    • принято извне
    принято извне
  7. 7

    Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beginnt mit dem Schluss des Jahres, in dem der Anspruch entstanden ist und der Gläubiger Kenntnis erlangt hat (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 und 2) — Kenntnis nicht nach der Entstehung: Schluss des Entstehungsjahres

    Schluss des Jahres, mit dem die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beginnt (§ 199 Abs. 1): a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 31 декабря 2010 г.

    абз. 199

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#VerjaehrungsbeginnUltimoDerEntstehung
    правило
  8. 8

    Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beträgt drei Jahre (§ 195) — Jahresschritt vom Schluss des Jahres (§ 188 Abs. 2, Politik BGB_FRISTEN_KALENDER)

    31 декабря 2013 г. = add calendar period(31 декабря 2010 г., 3 calendar_year)

    абз. 195

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#RegelmaessigeVerjaehrungsfrist
    правило
  9. 9

    Ohne festgestellte Hemmung endet die Verjährungsfrist mit der regelmäßigen Frist (§§ 195, 199; § 209 greift nicht)

    Tag, mit dessen Ablauf die Verjährungsfrist unter Berücksichtigung der Hemmung endet (§ 209): a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 31 декабря 2013 г.

    абз. 209

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#VerjaehrungsfristEndeOhneHemmung
    правило
  10. 10

    Ohne Hemmung tritt die Verjährung mit dem Ende der Verjährungsfrist ein

    Tag, mit dessen Ablauf die Verjährung des Anspruchs eintritt: a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 31 декабря 2013 г.

    абз. 209

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#VerjaehrungOhneHemmung
    правило
  11. 11

    Вычисление запроса

    запрос

проверено движком: 8 · факт дела: 2 · принято извне: 1 · Полный граф: 33 узлов

Шаги сохранённого доказательства от фактов дела к ответу. Формулы показаны как записаны в норме, с подставленными значениями; страница ничего не пересчитывает.

Основание этого ответа

Правила из сохранённой цепочки доказательства ответа.

de.bgb.fristen

  • Für den Tag der Entstehung des Anspruchs wird der Schluss des Jahres gesucht (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 1)

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeGesuchtFuerEntstehung

  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): der Kandidat ist der 31. Dezember, wenn sein Monat 31 Tage hat, der folgende Monat 31 Tage und der übernächste höchstens 29 — Dezember, Januar, Februar

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeIstDezember

  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 9 — Ende des 9. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat09

  • Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beträgt drei Jahre (§ 195) — Jahresschritt vom Schluss des Jahres (§ 188 Abs. 2, Politik BGB_FRISTEN_KALENDER)

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#RegelmaessigeVerjaehrungsfrist

  • Ohne Hemmung tritt die Verjährung mit dem Ende der Verjährungsfrist ein

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#VerjaehrungOhneHemmung

  • Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beginnt mit dem Schluss des Jahres, in dem der Anspruch entstanden ist und der Gläubiger Kenntnis erlangt hat (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 und 2) — Kenntnis nicht nach der Entstehung: Schluss des Entstehungsjahres

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#VerjaehrungsbeginnUltimoDerEntstehung

  • Ohne festgestellte Hemmung endet die Verjährungsfrist mit der regelmäßigen Frist (§§ 195, 199; § 209 greift nicht)

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#VerjaehrungsfristEndeOhneHemmung
Другие правила расчёта14

Применены в общем расчёте, но не входят в цепочку доказательства этого ответа.

de.bgb.fristen

  • Für den Tag der Kenntniserlangung wird der Schluss des Jahres gesucht (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 2)

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeGesuchtFuerKenntnis

  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 0 — Ende des 0. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat00

  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 1 — Ende des 1. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat01

  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 2 — Ende des 2. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat02

  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 3 — Ende des 3. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat03

  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 4 — Ende des 4. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat04

  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 5 — Ende des 5. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat05

  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 6 — Ende des 6. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat06

  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 7 — Ende des 7. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat07

  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 8 — Ende des 8. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat08

  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 10 — Ende des 10. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat10

  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 11 — Ende des 11. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat11

  • Nach Eintritt der Verjährung ist der Schuldner berechtigt, die Leistung zu verweigern (§ 214 Abs. 1)

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#Leistungsverweigerungsrecht214
de.bgb.ius_privatum

  • Nach Eintritt der Verjährung ist der Schuldner berechtigt, die Leistung zu verweigern

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#EinredeExcludit
Замечания · 4
Отказы и замечания исполнения
  1. справкаEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31

    редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_EN на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 81 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)

    Задетые узлы
    • Статья 5.2.3. The conferment of правоs in выгодоприобретатель includes the право to invoke a оговорка in договор which excludes or limits the ответственность of выгодоприобретатель urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryMayInvokeClause
    • Статьи 5.2.1 and 5.2.2. Стороны may confer a право on a третье лицо who must be identifiable with adequate certainty by договор urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryRightExists
    • Статья 5.1.4(2). To the extent that an обязательство involves a обязанность of максимальные усилия, that party связан to make such efforts as would be made by a разумное лицо of the same kind urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BestEffortsDutyPerformed
    • Статья 1.9(1). Стороны связаны by any обычай to which they have agreed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByAgreedUsage
    • Статья 1.9(1). Стороны связаны by практики which they have established between themselves urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByEstablishedPractice
    • Статья 1.9(2). Стороны связаны by a обычай widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, кроме случаев, когда где its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage
    • Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage/unless/0
    • Статья 5.3.3(1). Сторона who prevented fulfilment contrary to добросовестность не вправе rely on the non-fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnPreventedCondition
    • Статья 5.3.3(2). Сторона who brought about fulfilment contrary to добросовестность не вправе rely on the fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnProcuredCondition
    • Статья 4.3. In applying Статьи 4.1 and 4.2, regard shall be had to all the circumstances, включая those listed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CircumstanceToBeRegarded
    • Статья 1.11. Where сторона has more than one коммерческое предприятие the relevant one is that which has the closest relationship to договор and its исполнение urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ClosestPlaceIsRelevant
    • Статья 4.1(2) (opening words). Where the common intention can be established, the reasonable-persons reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CommonIntentionDisplacesReasonablePersons
    • Статья 1.12(2). The computed last day does not stand где it is a holiday at the place of исполнение urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ComputedLastDayYieldsToHoliday
    • Статья 4.6. If договор terms supplied by one party are unclear, an interpretation against that party is preferred urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContraProferentem
    • Статья 1.3. A договор validly entered into is binding upon стороны urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContractIsBinding
    • Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#Cooperate
    • Статья 5.2.4. The promisor may assert against выгодоприобретатель all defences which the promisor could assert against the promisee urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DefencesAgainstBeneficiary
    • Статья 1.5. Стороны may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, кроме случаев, когда as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective
    • Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective/unless/0
    • Статья 1.7(1). Each party must act в соответствии с добросовестность and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyOfGoodFaith
    • Статья 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party когда such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the исполнение of that party's обязательствоs urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToCooperate
    • Статья 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, сторона не вправе, contrary to добросовестность, act so as to prejudice the other party's правоs in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRights
    • Статья 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, сторона не вправе, contrary to добросовестность, act so as to prejudice the other party's правоs in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRightsBreached
    • Статья 5.1.1. The договорual обязательствоs of стороны may be express urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ExpressIsContractual
    • Статья 5.1.5. In determining the extent to which an обязательство involves a обязанность of максимальные усилия or a обязанность to achieve a specific result, regard shall be had to the listed factors urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FactorDeterminesKindOfDuty
    • Статья 1.1. Стороны are free to enter into договор and to determine its content urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FreedomOfContract
    • Статья 1.6(2). Issues within the scope of these Principles but not expressly settled by them are as far as possible to be settled в соответствии с their underlying general principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GapSettledByUnderlyingPrinciples
    • Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaith
    • Статья 1.7(2). Стороны не вправе exclude or limit the обязанность of добросовестность and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaithCannotBeExcluded
    • Статья 5.1.9(2). An оферта to release a право gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if должник does not reject it без задержки urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted
    • Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted/unless/0
    • Статья 5.1.2(c). Implied обязательствоs stem from добросовестность and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromGoodFaith
    • Статья 5.1.2(a). Implied обязательствоs stem from the nature and purpose of договор urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromNatureAndPurpose
    • Статья 5.1.2(b). Implied обязательствоs stem from практики established between стороны and обычаи urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromPracticesAndUsages
    • Статья 5.1.2(d). Implied обязательствоs stem from reasonableness urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromReasonableness
    • Статья 5.1.1. The договорual обязательствоs of стороны may be implied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedIsContractual
    • Статья 1.8. Сторона cannot act inconsistently with an understanding it has caused the other party to have and upon which that other party reasonably has acted in reliance to its detriment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InconsistentBehaviourBarred
    • Статья 4.2(2) (opening words). Where the intention was known to the other party, the reasonable-person reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#IntentionDisplacesReasonablePerson
    • Статья 4.1(1). A договор shall be interpreted according to the common intention of стороны urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByCommonIntention
    • Статья 4.1(2). If the common intention cannot be established, договор shall be interpreted according to the meaning разумное лицоs of the same kind would give it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByReasonablePersons
    • Статья 1.4. Nothing in these Principles restricts the application of mandatory rules urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MandatoryRulesUnrestricted
    • Статья 5.1.7(2). Where the price is to be determined by one party and that deрасторжение is manifestly unreasonable, a reasonable price shall be substituted notwithstanding any договор term to the contrary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ManifestlyUnreasonableDeterminationReplaced
    • Преамбула. These Principles may be applied когда стороны have agreed that their договор be governed by general principles of law, the lex mercatoria or the like urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyOnChoiceOfGeneralPrinciples
    • Преамбула. These Principles may be applied когда стороны have not chosen any law to govern their договор urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyWhereNoLawChosen
    • Преамбула. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement domestic law urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretDomesticLaw
    • Преамбула. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement international uniform law instruments urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretUniformLaw
    • Статья 1.3. The договор can be modified or terminated as otherwise provided in these Principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationAsProvided
    • Статья 1.3. The договор can be modified or terminated по соглашению urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByAgreement
    • Статья 1.3. The договор can be modified or terminated в соответствии с its terms urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByTerms
    • Статья 1.2. Nothing in these Principles requires договор to be made in or evidenced by a particular form urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoFormRequired
    • Статья 1.10(2)-(3). A notice is effective когда it reaches the person to whom it is given urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoticeEffectiveOnReceipt
    • Статья 4.7. In case of discrepancy between equally authoritative versions there is a preference for the interpretation according to the original version urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#OriginalVersionPreferred
    • Статья 1.12(1). Official holidays or non-business days occurring during the period are included in calculating it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodEndsOn
    • Статья 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the коммерческое предприятие of сторона to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday
    • Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday/unless/0
    • Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PreserveRights
    • Статья 5.1.7(1). Where договор does not fix the price, стороны are considered to have made reference to the price generally charged in comparable circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceByMarket
    • Статья 5.1.7(1). If no such price is available, a reasonable price applies urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceReasonableWhereNoMarket
    • Преамбула. These Principles shall be applied когда стороны have agreed that their договор be governed by them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PrinciplesGovernByAgreement
    • Статья 5.1.6. Where the quality of исполнение is neither fixed by nor determinable from договор, сторона связан to render a исполнение of a quality that is reasonable and not less than average in the circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#QualityWhereNotFixed
    • Статьи 4.4 and 4.5. Terms are to be read in the light of the whole договор and so as to give effect to all of them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReadingConformsToCanons
    • Статья 5.1.9(1). An obligee may release its право по соглашению with должник urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReleaseByAgreement
    • Статья 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the коммерческое предприятие of сторона setting the time, если только the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone
    • Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone/unless/0
    • Статья 5.2.6. The beneficiary may renounce a право conferred on it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RenunciationEndsBeneficiaryRight
    • Статья 5.3.2(b). The relevant договор or договорual обязательство comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract
    • Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract/unless/0
    • Статья 5.3.5. On fulfilment of a resolutive condition the rules on restitution apply with appropriate adaptations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RestitutionOnResolutiveCondition
    • Статья 5.1.4(1). To the extent that an обязательство involves a обязанность to achieve a specific result, that party связан to achieve that result urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResultDutyPerformed
    • Статья 5.2.5. Стороны may modify or revoke the правоs conferred until выгодоприобретатель has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance
    • Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance/unless/0
    • Статья 1.11. Where сторона has a single коммерческое предприятие that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant
    • Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant/unless/0
    • Статья 4.2(1). Statements and other conduct shall be interpreted according to сторона's intention if the other party knew or could not have been unaware of it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByIntention
    • Статья 4.2(2). If the preceding пункт is not applicable, statements shall be interpreted according to the meaning a разумное лицо would give them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByReasonablePerson
    • Статья 4.8(1). Where стороны have not agreed в отношении an important term, a term which is appropriate in the circumstances shall be supplied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SupplyOmittedTerm
    • Статья 5.3.2(a). The relevant договор or договорual обязательство takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect
    • Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect/unless/0
    • Статья 5.1.8. A договор for an indefinite period may be terminated by either party by giving notice a разумный срок in advance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#TerminationOfIndefiniteContract
    • Статья 5.1.7(2). A manifestly unreasonable deрасторжение does not stand as the applicable price urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#UnreasonableDeterminationDisplaced
    • Статья 5.3.1. A договор or договорual обязательство may be made conditional upon the occurrence of a future uncertain event urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ValidCondition
    Подробности
    {
 "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_EN",
 "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
 "since": null,
 "state": "not_yet",
 "status": null
}
  2. справкаEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31

    редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_FR на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 79 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)

    Задетые узлы
    • Статья 5.2.3. The conferment of правоs in выгодоприобретатель includes the право to invoke a оговорка in договор which excludes or limits the ответственность of выгодоприобретатель urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryMayInvokeClause
    • Статья 5.1.4(2). To the extent that an обязательство involves a обязанность of максимальные усилия, that party связан to make such efforts as would be made by a разумное лицо of the same kind urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BestEffortsDutyPerformed
    • Статья 1.9(1). Стороны связаны by any обычай to which they have agreed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByAgreedUsage
    • Статья 1.9(1). Стороны связаны by практики which they have established between themselves urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByEstablishedPractice
    • Статья 1.9(2). Стороны связаны by a обычай widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, кроме случаев, когда где its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage
    • Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage/unless/0
    • Статья 5.3.3(1). Сторона who prevented fulfilment contrary to добросовестность не вправе rely on the non-fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnPreventedCondition
    • Статья 5.3.3(2). Сторона who brought about fulfilment contrary to добросовестность не вправе rely on the fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnProcuredCondition
    • Статья 4.3. In applying Статьи 4.1 and 4.2, regard shall be had to all the circumstances, включая those listed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CircumstanceToBeRegarded
    • Статья 1.11. Where сторона has more than one коммерческое предприятие the relevant one is that which has the closest relationship to договор and its исполнение urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ClosestPlaceIsRelevant
    • Статья 4.1(2) (opening words). Where the common intention can be established, the reasonable-persons reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CommonIntentionDisplacesReasonablePersons
    • Статья 1.12(2). The computed last day does not stand где it is a holiday at the place of исполнение urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ComputedLastDayYieldsToHoliday
    • Статья 4.6. If договор terms supplied by one party are unclear, an interpretation against that party is preferred urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContraProferentem
    • Статья 1.3. A договор validly entered into is binding upon стороны urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContractIsBinding
    • Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#Cooperate
    • Статья 5.2.4. The promisor may assert against выгодоприобретатель all defences which the promisor could assert against the promisee urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DefencesAgainstBeneficiary
    • Статья 1.5. Стороны may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, кроме случаев, когда as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective
    • Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective/unless/0
    • Статья 1.7(1). Each party must act в соответствии с добросовестность and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyOfGoodFaith
    • Статья 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party когда such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the исполнение of that party's обязательствоs urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToCooperate
    • Статья 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, сторона не вправе, contrary to добросовестность, act so as to prejudice the other party's правоs in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRights
    • Статья 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, сторона не вправе, contrary to добросовестность, act so as to prejudice the other party's правоs in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRightsBreached
    • Статья 5.1.1. The договорual обязательствоs of стороны may be express urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ExpressIsContractual
    • Статья 5.1.5. In determining the extent to which an обязательство involves a обязанность of максимальные усилия or a обязанность to achieve a specific result, regard shall be had to the listed factors urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FactorDeterminesKindOfDuty
    • Статья 1.1. Стороны are free to enter into договор and to determine its content urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FreedomOfContract
    • Статья 1.6(2). Issues within the scope of these Principles but not expressly settled by them are as far as possible to be settled в соответствии с their underlying general principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GapSettledByUnderlyingPrinciples
    • Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaith
    • Статья 1.7(2). Стороны не вправе exclude or limit the обязанность of добросовестность and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaithCannotBeExcluded
    • Статья 5.1.9(2). An оферта to release a право gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if должник does not reject it без задержки urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted
    • Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted/unless/0
    • Статья 5.1.2(c). Implied обязательствоs stem from добросовестность and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromGoodFaith
    • Статья 5.1.2(a). Implied обязательствоs stem from the nature and purpose of договор urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromNatureAndPurpose
    • Статья 5.1.2(b). Implied обязательствоs stem from практики established between стороны and обычаи urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromPracticesAndUsages
    • Статья 5.1.2(d). Implied обязательствоs stem from reasonableness urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromReasonableness
    • Статья 5.1.1. The договорual обязательствоs of стороны may be implied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedIsContractual
    • Статья 1.8. Сторона cannot act inconsistently with an understanding it has caused the other party to have and upon which that other party reasonably has acted in reliance to its detriment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InconsistentBehaviourBarred
    • Статья 4.2(2) (opening words). Where the intention was known to the other party, the reasonable-person reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#IntentionDisplacesReasonablePerson
    • Статья 4.1(1). A договор shall be interpreted according to the common intention of стороны urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByCommonIntention
    • Статья 4.1(2). If the common intention cannot be established, договор shall be interpreted according to the meaning разумное лицоs of the same kind would give it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByReasonablePersons
    • Статья 1.4. Nothing in these Principles restricts the application of mandatory rules urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MandatoryRulesUnrestricted
    • Статья 5.1.7(2). Where the price is to be determined by one party and that deрасторжение is manifestly unreasonable, a reasonable price shall be substituted notwithstanding any договор term to the contrary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ManifestlyUnreasonableDeterminationReplaced
    • Преамбула. These Principles may be applied когда стороны have agreed that their договор be governed by general principles of law, the lex mercatoria or the like urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyOnChoiceOfGeneralPrinciples
    • Преамбула. These Principles may be applied когда стороны have not chosen any law to govern their договор urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyWhereNoLawChosen
    • Преамбула. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement domestic law urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretDomesticLaw
    • Преамбула. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement international uniform law instruments urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretUniformLaw
    • Статья 1.3. The договор can be modified or terminated as otherwise provided in these Principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationAsProvided
    • Статья 1.3. The договор can be modified or terminated по соглашению urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByAgreement
    • Статья 1.3. The договор can be modified or terminated в соответствии с its terms urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByTerms
    • Статья 1.2. Nothing in these Principles requires договор to be made in or evidenced by a particular form urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoFormRequired
    • Статья 1.10(2)-(3). A notice is effective когда it reaches the person to whom it is given urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoticeEffectiveOnReceipt
    • Статья 4.7. In case of discrepancy between equally authoritative versions there is a preference for the interpretation according to the original version urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#OriginalVersionPreferred
    • Статья 1.12(1). Official holidays or non-business days occurring during the period are included in calculating it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodEndsOn
    • Статья 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the коммерческое предприятие of сторона to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday
    • Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday/unless/0
    • Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PreserveRights
    • Статья 5.1.7(1). Where договор does not fix the price, стороны are considered to have made reference to the price generally charged in comparable circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceByMarket
    • Статья 5.1.7(1). If no such price is available, a reasonable price applies urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceReasonableWhereNoMarket
    • Преамбула. These Principles shall be applied когда стороны have agreed that their договор be governed by them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PrinciplesGovernByAgreement
    • Статья 5.1.6. Where the quality of исполнение is neither fixed by nor determinable from договор, сторона связан to render a исполнение of a quality that is reasonable and not less than average in the circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#QualityWhereNotFixed
    • Статья 5.1.9(1). An obligee may release its право по соглашению with должник urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReleaseByAgreement
    • Статья 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the коммерческое предприятие of сторона setting the time, если только the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone
    • Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone/unless/0
    • Статья 5.2.6. The beneficiary may renounce a право conferred on it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RenunciationEndsBeneficiaryRight
    • Статья 5.3.2(b). The relevant договор or договорual обязательство comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract
    • Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract/unless/0
    • Статья 5.3.5. On fulfilment of a resolutive condition the rules on restitution apply with appropriate adaptations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RestitutionOnResolutiveCondition
    • Статья 5.1.4(1). To the extent that an обязательство involves a обязанность to achieve a specific result, that party связан to achieve that result urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResultDutyPerformed
    • Статья 5.2.5. Стороны may modify or revoke the правоs conferred until выгодоприобретатель has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance
    • Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance/unless/0
    • Статья 1.11. Where сторона has a single коммерческое предприятие that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant
    • Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant/unless/0
    • Статья 4.2(1). Statements and other conduct shall be interpreted according to сторона's intention if the other party knew or could not have been unaware of it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByIntention
    • Статья 4.2(2). If the preceding пункт is not applicable, statements shall be interpreted according to the meaning a разумное лицо would give them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByReasonablePerson
    • Статья 4.8(1). Where стороны have not agreed в отношении an important term, a term which is appropriate in the circumstances shall be supplied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SupplyOmittedTerm
    • Статья 5.3.2(a). The relevant договор or договорual обязательство takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect
    • Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect/unless/0
    • Статья 5.1.8. A договор for an indefinite period may be terminated by either party by giving notice a разумный срок in advance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#TerminationOfIndefiniteContract
    • Статья 5.1.7(2). A manifestly unreasonable deрасторжение does not stand as the applicable price urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#UnreasonableDeterminationDisplaced
    • Статья 5.3.1. A договор or договорual обязательство may be made conditional upon the occurrence of a future uncertain event urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ValidCondition
    Подробности
    {
 "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_FR",
 "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
 "since": null,
 "state": "not_yet",
 "status": null
}
  3. справкаEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31

    редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_EN на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 26 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)

    Задетые узлы
    • Статья 10.4(1). Where должник acknowledges the право before the expiration of the general срок исковой давности, a new general срок исковой давности begins on the day after the acknowledgement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AcknowledgementStartsNewGeneralPeriod
    • Статья 10.6(1). In the absence of provisions determining the exact date of commencement, arbitral proceedings are deemed to commence on the date on which the request reaches должник urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ArbitrationCommencesOnRequest
    • Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration
    • Статья 10.1(2). This Chapter does not govern the time within which сторона must give notice or perform any act other than the institution of legal proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ChapterDoesNotGovernNoticeTime
    • Статья 10.9(1). The expiration of the срок исковой давности does not extinguish the право urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight
    • Статья 10.9(2). For the expiration of the срок исковой давности to have effect, должник must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted
    • Article 10.9(2). Once the obligor has asserted expiry, the barred exercise is a comparative remedium_exclusum urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit
    • Статья 10.3(a). Стороны не вправе shorten the general срок исковой давности to less than one year urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodFloorOfOneYear
    • Статья 10.2(1). The general срок исковой давности is three years beginning on the day after the day кредитор knows or ought to know the facts as a result of which the право can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodOfThreeYears
    • Статья 10.1(1). The exercise of правоs governed by Принципы is barred by the expiration of a срок исковой давности according to the rules of this Chapter urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#LimitationGovernsExerciseOfRights
    • Статья 10.3(c). Стороны не вправе extend the maximum срок исковой давности to more than fifteen years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodCeilingOfFifteenYears
    • Статья 10.4(2). The maximum срок исковой давности does not begin to run again, but may be exceeded by the beginning of a new general срок исковой давности urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodDoesNotRestart
    • Статья 10.3(b). Стороны не вправе shorten the maximum срок исковой давности to less than four years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodFloorOfFourYears
    • Статья 10.2(2). In any event, the maximum срок исковой давности is ten years beginning on the day after the day the право can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodOfTenYears
    • Статья 10.11. Where there has been исполнение in order to discharge an обязательство, there is no право of restitution merely because the срок исковой давности has expired urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#NoRestitutionAfterExpiration
    • Статья 10.9(2). For the expiration of the срок исковой давности to have effect, должник must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration
    • Статья 10.3. Стороны may modify the срок исковой давностиs urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PartiesMayModifyPeriods
    • Статья 10.9(3). A право may still be relied on as a defence even though the expiration of the срок исковой давности for that право has been asserted urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#RightStillAvailableAsDefence
    • Статья 10.10. The obligee may exercise the право of зачёт until должник has asserted the expiration of the срок исковой давности urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SetOffUntilExpirationAsserted
    • Статья 10.7. Статьи 10.5 and 10.6 apply with appropriate modifications to proceedings гдеby стороны request a third person to assist them in reaching an amicable settlement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByAmicableSettlementProceedings
    • Статья 10.6(1). The running of the срок исковой давности is suspended когда кредитор performs an act recognised by the law of the arbitral tribunal as asserting its право urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByArbitralAct
    • Статья 10.5(1)(c). The running of the срок исковой давности is suspended где кредитор has asserted its правоs in proceedings for dissolution of должник urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByDissolutionClaim
    • Статья 10.8(1). Where кредитор has been prevented by an impediment beyond its control, the general срок исковой давности is suspended so as not to expire before one year after the impediment has ceased to exist urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByImpediment
    • Статья 10.8(2). Where the impediment consists of the incapacity or death of сторона, suspension ceases когда a representative or successor has been appointed; the additional one-year period applies accordingly urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByIncapacityEndsOnAppointment
    • Статья 10.5(1)(b). The running of the срок исковой давности is suspended где кредитор has asserted its правоs in the insolvency proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByInsolvencyClaim
    • Статья 10.5(1)(a). The running of the срок исковой давности is suspended когда кредитор performs an act recognised by the law of суд as asserting its право urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByJudicialAct
    Подробности
    {
 "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_EN",
 "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
 "since": null,
 "state": "not_yet",
 "status": null
}
  4. справкаEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31

    редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_FR на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 26 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)

    Задетые узлы
    • Статья 10.4(1). Where должник acknowledges the право before the expiration of the general срок исковой давности, a new general срок исковой давности begins on the day after the acknowledgement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AcknowledgementStartsNewGeneralPeriod
    • Статья 10.6(1). In the absence of provisions determining the exact date of commencement, arbitral proceedings are deemed to commence on the date on which the request reaches должник urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ArbitrationCommencesOnRequest
    • Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration
    • Статья 10.1(2). This Chapter does not govern the time within which сторона must give notice or perform any act other than the institution of legal proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ChapterDoesNotGovernNoticeTime
    • Статья 10.9(1). The expiration of the срок исковой давности does not extinguish the право urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight
    • Статья 10.9(2). For the expiration of the срок исковой давности to have effect, должник must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted
    • Article 10.9(2). Once the obligor has asserted expiry, the barred exercise is a comparative remedium_exclusum urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit
    • Статья 10.3(a). Стороны не вправе shorten the general срок исковой давности to less than one year urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodFloorOfOneYear
    • Статья 10.2(1). The general срок исковой давности is three years beginning on the day after the day кредитор knows or ought to know the facts as a result of which the право can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodOfThreeYears
    • Статья 10.1(1). The exercise of правоs governed by Принципы is barred by the expiration of a срок исковой давности according to the rules of this Chapter urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#LimitationGovernsExerciseOfRights
    • Статья 10.3(c). Стороны не вправе extend the maximum срок исковой давности to more than fifteen years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodCeilingOfFifteenYears
    • Статья 10.4(2). The maximum срок исковой давности does not begin to run again, but may be exceeded by the beginning of a new general срок исковой давности urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodDoesNotRestart
    • Статья 10.3(b). Стороны не вправе shorten the maximum срок исковой давности to less than four years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodFloorOfFourYears
    • Статья 10.2(2). In any event, the maximum срок исковой давности is ten years beginning on the day after the day the право can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodOfTenYears
    • Статья 10.11. Where there has been исполнение in order to discharge an обязательство, there is no право of restitution merely because the срок исковой давности has expired urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#NoRestitutionAfterExpiration
    • Статья 10.9(2). For the expiration of the срок исковой давности to have effect, должник must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration
    • Статья 10.3. Стороны may modify the срок исковой давностиs urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PartiesMayModifyPeriods
    • Статья 10.9(3). A право may still be relied on as a defence even though the expiration of the срок исковой давности for that право has been asserted urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#RightStillAvailableAsDefence
    • Статья 10.10. The obligee may exercise the право of зачёт until должник has asserted the expiration of the срок исковой давности urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SetOffUntilExpirationAsserted
    • Статья 10.7. Статьи 10.5 and 10.6 apply with appropriate modifications to proceedings гдеby стороны request a third person to assist them in reaching an amicable settlement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByAmicableSettlementProceedings
    • Статья 10.6(1). The running of the срок исковой давности is suspended когда кредитор performs an act recognised by the law of the arbitral tribunal as asserting its право urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByArbitralAct
    • Статья 10.5(1)(c). The running of the срок исковой давности is suspended где кредитор has asserted its правоs in proceedings for dissolution of должник urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByDissolutionClaim
    • Статья 10.8(1). Where кредитор has been prevented by an impediment beyond its control, the general срок исковой давности is suspended so as not to expire before one year after the impediment has ceased to exist urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByImpediment
    • Статья 10.8(2). Where the impediment consists of the incapacity or death of сторона, suspension ceases когда a representative or successor has been appointed; the additional one-year period applies accordingly urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByIncapacityEndsOnAppointment
    • Статья 10.5(1)(b). The running of the срок исковой давности is suspended где кредитор has asserted its правоs in the insolvency proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByInsolvencyClaim
    • Статья 10.5(1)(a). The running of the срок исковой давности is suspended когда кредитор performs an act recognised by the law of суд as asserting its право urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByJudicialAct
    Подробности
    {
 "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_FR",
 "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
 "since": null,
 "state": "not_yet",
 "status": null
}

Как записал движок: код, тяжесть и текст с §-ссылками; порядок — как в документе исполнения.

Граф доказательств

Граф доказательства · 8 слой
query_evaluationverjaehrung_eingetreten_amrule_applicationVerjaehrungOhneHemmungrule_applicationVerjaehrungsfristEndeOhneHemmungassertionkeine_hemmungrule_applicationRegelmaessigeVerjaehrungsfristrule_applicationVerjaehrungsbeginnUltimoDerEntstehunrule_applicationJahresendeIstDezemberassertionanspruch_entstanden_amassertionkenntnis_erlangt_amrule_applicationJahresendeKandidat09rule_applicationJahresendeGesuchtFuerEntstehung

Узлы доказательств: 33 · assertion 10, rule_application 21, candidate_closure 1, query_evaluation 1

Блок слишком большой для встроенного просмотра. Он целиком включён в JSON документа — без сокращений.

Скачать JSON ↓
Идентификаторы календаря и доказательства
Ссылка на доказательство
case/FuenfJahre_BGB/query/bgb-2013-12-31
Исходное обоснование · JSON

Блок слишком большой для встроенного просмотра. Он целиком включён в JSON документа — без сокращений.

Скачать JSON ↓
ИсточникиФрагментов: 4

paragraph/195

§ 195 Regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beträgt drei Jahre.
Исходные данные · JSON
JSONТолько чтение
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:53e15660089df268ecd95ba8fdcc0d8e73cba45a9e68c5cc802f87a60f03db9b",
  "edition": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_KONSOLIDIERT",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_P195",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 195 Regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "paragraph/195",
  "package": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:3a37767ed679ef6124cbd5c7272a5a798618598a194829b5a5ad5b10c1cfe898",
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 195 Regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist\nDie regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beträgt drei Jahre.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

paragraph/199

§ 199 Beginn der regelmäßigen Verjährungsfrist und Verjährungshöchstfristen (1) Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beginnt, soweit nicht ein anderer Verjährungsbeginn bestimmt ist, mit dem Schluss des Jahres, in dem 1. der Anspruch entstanden ist und 2. der Gläubiger von den den Anspruch begründenden Umständen und der Person des Schuldners Kenntnis erlangt oder ohne grobe Fahrlässigkeit erlangen müsste. (2) Schadensersatzansprüche, die auf der Verletzung des Lebens, des Körpers, der Gesundheit oder der Freiheit beruhen, verjähren ohne Rücksicht auf ihre Entstehung und die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in 30 Jahren von der Begehung der Handlung, der Pflichtverletzung oder dem sonstigen, den Schaden auslösenden Ereignis an. (3) Sonstige Schadensersatzansprüche verjähren 1. ohne Rücksicht auf die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in zehn Jahren von ihrer Entstehung an und 2. ohne Rücksicht auf ihre Entstehung und die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in 30 Jahren von der Begehung der Handlung, der Pflichtverletzung oder dem sonstigen, den Schaden auslösenden Ereignis an. Maßgeblich ist die früher endende Frist. (3a) Ansprüche, die auf einem Erbfall beruhen oder deren Geltendmachung die Kenntnis einer Verfügung von Todes wegen voraussetzt, verjähren ohne Rücksicht auf die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in 30 Jahren von der Entstehung des Anspruchs an. (4) Andere Ansprüche als die nach den Absätzen 2 bis 3a verjähren ohne Rücksicht auf die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in zehn Jahren von ihrer Entstehung an. (5) Geht der Anspruch auf ein Unterlassen, so tritt an die Stelle der Entstehung die Zuwiderhandlung.
Исходные данные · JSON
JSONТолько чтение
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:dbc2b5bc4ee946d17bb8636b8d724e0168033a99dc35c94f5c6eb2b53f2b838c",
  "edition": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_KONSOLIDIERT",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_P199",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 199 Beginn der regelmäßigen Verjährungsfrist und Verjährungshöchstfristen"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "paragraph/199",
  "package": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:2916e6a9e86d21f331739cafd8a135c863d9e0bf3087e8a13fb6c60d7f2df4da",
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 199 Beginn der regelmäßigen Verjährungsfrist und Verjährungshöchstfristen\n(1) Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beginnt, soweit nicht ein anderer Verjährungsbeginn bestimmt ist, mit dem Schluss des Jahres, in dem 1. der Anspruch entstanden ist und\n2. der Gläubiger von den den Anspruch begründenden Umständen und der Person des Schuldners Kenntnis erlangt oder ohne grobe Fahrlässigkeit erlangen müsste.\n(2) Schadensersatzansprüche, die auf der Verletzung des Lebens, des Körpers, der Gesundheit oder der Freiheit beruhen, verjähren ohne Rücksicht auf ihre Entstehung und die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in 30 Jahren von der Begehung der Handlung, der Pflichtverletzung oder dem sonstigen, den Schaden auslösenden Ereignis an.\n(3) Sonstige Schadensersatzansprüche verjähren 1. ohne Rücksicht auf die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in zehn Jahren von ihrer Entstehung an und\n2. ohne Rücksicht auf ihre Entstehung und die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in 30 Jahren von der Begehung der Handlung, der Pflichtverletzung oder dem sonstigen, den Schaden auslösenden Ereignis an.\nMaßgeblich ist die früher endende Frist.\n(3a) Ansprüche, die auf einem Erbfall beruhen oder deren Geltendmachung die Kenntnis einer Verfügung von Todes wegen voraussetzt, verjähren ohne Rücksicht auf die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in 30 Jahren von der Entstehung des Anspruchs an.\n(4) Andere Ansprüche als die nach den Absätzen 2 bis 3a verjähren ohne Rücksicht auf die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in zehn Jahren von ihrer Entstehung an.\n(5) Geht der Anspruch auf ein Unterlassen, so tritt an die Stelle der Entstehung die Zuwiderhandlung.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

paragraph/209

§ 209 Wirkung der Hemmung Der Zeitraum, während dessen die Verjährung gehemmt ist, wird in die Verjährungsfrist nicht eingerechnet.
Исходные данные · JSON
JSONТолько чтение
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:9d3c1967977b0f7d0bb0d9a7d89228d863b64a3cc4a8d54a9f351d8c9205188c",
  "edition": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_KONSOLIDIERT",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_P209",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 209 Wirkung der Hemmung"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "paragraph/209",
  "package": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:d3a5349ff97577ebae64e94327f4d26341f8d6fbce09a12c6615b96f59d9b9be",
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 209 Wirkung der Hemmung\nDer Zeitraum, während dessen die Verjährung gehemmt ist, wird in die Verjährungsfrist nicht eingerechnet.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

paragraph/214

§ 214 Wirkung der Verjährung (1) Nach Eintritt der Verjährung ist der Schuldner berechtigt, die Leistung zu verweigern. (2) Das zur Befriedigung eines verjährten Anspruchs Geleistete kann nicht zurückgefordert werden, auch wenn in Unkenntnis der Verjährung geleistet worden ist. Das Gleiche gilt von einem vertragsmäßigen Anerkenntnis sowie einer Sicherheitsleistung des Schuldners.
Исходные данные · JSON
JSONТолько чтение
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:12d652436994db82ae2d39189be9bf31cdc979290895389a4620639b3f937994",
  "edition": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_KONSOLIDIERT",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_P214",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 214 Wirkung der Verjährung"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "paragraph/214",
  "package": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:1f3cff3f6a0d4efb9796bd6eff87447e953e444a38ba0121caedb177cf59002e",
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 214 Wirkung der Verjährung\n(1) Nach Eintritt der Verjährung ist der Schuldner berechtigt, die Leistung zu verweigern.\n(2) Das zur Befriedigung eines verjährten Anspruchs Geleistete kann nicht zurückgefordert werden, auch wenn in Unkenntnis der Verjährung geleistet worden ist. Das Gleiche gilt von einem vertragsmäßigen Anerkenntnis sowie einer Sicherheitsleistung des Schuldners.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Пакеты в снимке

  • de.bgb.core
  • de.bgb.fristen
  • de.bgb.ius_privatum
  • doctrine.ius_privatum
  • fr.code_civil
  • unidroit.picc
  • unidroit.picc_limitation
Технические данныеПолный ответ, параметры и контрольные суммы
Статус расчёта
COMPUTED
Полный ответ движка
Fünf Jahre, BGB: die Verjährung ist am 31. Dezember 2013 eingetreten

Полный машинный результат · JSON

Блок слишком большой для встроенного просмотра. Он целиком включён в JSON документа — без сокращений.

Скачать JSON ↓

Исполнение · JSON

Блок слишком большой для встроенного просмотра. Он целиком включён в JSON документа — без сокращений.

Скачать JSON ↓

Метаданные отображения

Блок слишком большой для встроенного просмотра. Он целиком включён в JSON документа — без сокращений.

Скачать JSON ↓

JSON · расчёты, источники и точные данные

JSONТолько чтение
{
  "acts": [
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:a6813604c35567e7c586d334efbf524d08f3467170c4b732cfb15809cacf4ff4",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core",
      "package": "de.bgb.core"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:998148eaeeed28f1565811474ee7beb7eacc616c5681ed9638edc976512a9884",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
      "package": "de.bgb.fristen"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:86a5a00db16e32187223ceeec6748eb7d42d18b7c370c8b15ac64d2f3f655ff7",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum",
      "package": "de.bgb.ius_privatum"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:7202de5de49a8a9d12837bc19cb7008ba2d1a68dbcc0134e0afccf1440a6d5ed",
      "namespace": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum",
      "package": "doctrine.ius_privatum"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:ad41d027ba92c38ca5eecc1d16097d0bbc8c5a74946fc1a6397c6dadac61158f",
      "namespace": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
      "package": "fr.code_civil"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:719bfd408eed92ad497ba071482354d4ad32b81ef9f41c6654f224416c19e603",
      "namespace": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc",
      "package": "unidroit.picc"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:b311d0d422a1079f71113320bd818236f7b09507c7dd960bdafceb91285497d9",
      "namespace": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "package": "unidroit.picc_limitation"
    }
  ],
  "caseHash": "sha256:46016aa963d29cfc446a35c6a945630088a81b841001fff20f3772522d11579f",
  "jurisdiction": "Deutschland",
  "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
  "mode": "audit",
  "programHash": "sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e",
  "resultHash": "sha256:b3bbea0a38c7e961187d2faf46be42d341419cff3cf8fa9f8d6d5820e5728a99",
  "timezone": "Europe/Berlin"
}
evaluation SHA-256
sha256:db2c9aab40d8baf3e7fe3441de35432d2b2b178582562fa1a485b3ed756817bf
Исходные данные · JSON
JSONТолько чтение
{
  "args": [
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:anspruch",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "kind": "value",
      "type": {
        "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
      },
      "value": "2013-12-31"
    }
  ],
  "facts": [
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core#anspruch_entstanden_am"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "adjudicated",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#kenntnis_erlangt_am"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#keine_hemmung"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#schuldner_beruft_sich_auf_verjaehrung"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#g",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core#anspruchsinhaber"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#s",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core#anspruchsgegner"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#g",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#persona_of"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#s",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#persona_of"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#causa_of_anspruch"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
    }
  ],
  "kind": "truth",
  "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
  "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#verjaehrung_eingetreten_am"
}

Проверка условия

Fünf Jahre, BGB: das Rechtsmittel ist ausgeschlossen

Юрисдикция DeutschlandПраво на дату 02.01.2016

Результат расчёта

Установлено

Исходные параметры

Что определяем

средство защиты отнято: возражением, погашением тяжбой, давностью, иммунитетом ответчика

gscausa

Исходные факты

  • Tag, an dem der Anspruch entstanden ist (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 1, § 200)

    a: atag: 15 марта 2010 г.

  • Tag, an dem der Gläubiger von den den Anspruch begründenden Umständen und der Person des Schuldners Kenntnis erlangt hat (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 2) — festgestellte Tatsache, im Fall origin adjudicated

    a: atag: 15 марта 2010 г.

  • Kein Hemmungstatbestand der §§ 203–208 festgestellt — ausdrückliche Angabe des Falls; das Fehlen einer Angabe ist keine Verneinung

    a: a

  • der Schuldner beruft sich auf die Verjährung des Leistungs- oder Nacherfüllungsanspruchs (§ 218 Abs. 1)

    a: a

  • Inhaber des Anspruchs (Gläubiger)

    a: ap: g

  • Anspruchsgegner (Schuldner)

    a: ap: s

  • diese Person des BGB tritt in der vergleichenden Kette als dieses Gesicht auf

    px
    gg
    ss

  • dieser Anspruch ist das vergleichende Streitverhältnis

    a: ac: causa

  • истец предъявляет к ответчику притязание — спорное отношение, о котором задаётся вопрос

    causa: causaactor: greus: s
Исходные данные · JSON
JSONТолько чтение
{
  "args": [
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:causa",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    }
  ],
  "facts": [
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core#anspruch_entstanden_am"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "adjudicated",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#kenntnis_erlangt_am"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#keine_hemmung"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#schuldner_beruft_sich_auf_verjaehrung"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#g",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core#anspruchsinhaber"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#s",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core#anspruchsgegner"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#g",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#persona_of"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#s",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#persona_of"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#causa_of_anspruch"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
    }
  ],
  "kind": "truth",
  "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
  "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"
}
Почему такой результатПрименённые правила и условия

Путь вывода20 шагов

  1. 1

    dieser Anspruch ist das vergleichende Streitverhältnis

    a: urn:p12:anspruch; c: urn:p12:causa

    факт дела
  2. 2

    der Schuldner beruft sich auf die Verjährung des Leistungs- oder Nacherfüllungsanspruchs (§ 218 Abs. 1)

    a: urn:p12:anspruch

    факт дела
  3. 3

    Tag, an dem der Anspruch entstanden ist (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 1, § 200)

    a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 15 марта 2010 г.

    факт дела
  4. 4

    Für den Tag der Entstehung des Anspruchs wird der Schluss des Jahres gesucht (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 1)

    für diesen Tag wird der Schluss des Jahres gesucht (§ 199 Abs. 1): a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 15 марта 2010 г.

    абз. 199

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeGesuchtFuerEntstehung
    правило
  5. 5

    Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 9 — Ende des 9. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    31 декабря 2010 г. = month end of(add calendar period(month start of(15 марта 2010 г.), 9 calendar_month))

    абз. 199

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat09
    правило
  6. 6

    Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): der Kandidat ist der 31. Dezember, wenn sein Monat 31 Tage hat, der folgende Monat 31 Tage und der übernächste höchstens 29 — Dezember, Januar, Februar

    Schluss des Jahres, in dem der Tag liegt (§ 199 Abs. 1): der 31. Dezember desselben Jahres: a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 15 марта 2010 г.; ultimo: 31 декабря 2010 г.

    абз. 199

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeIstDezember
    правило
  7. 7

    Anspruchsgegner (Schuldner)

    a: urn:p12:anspruch; p: urn:p12:person:s

    факт дела
  8. 8

    Inhaber des Anspruchs (Gläubiger)

    a: urn:p12:anspruch; p: urn:p12:person:g

    факт дела
  9. 9

    Kein Hemmungstatbestand der §§ 203–208 festgestellt — ausdrückliche Angabe des Falls; das Fehlen einer Angabe ist keine Verneinung

    a: urn:p12:anspruch

    факт дела
  10. 10

    Tag, an dem der Gläubiger von den den Anspruch begründenden Umständen und der Person des Schuldners Kenntnis erlangt hat (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 2) — festgestellte Tatsache, im Fall origin adjudicated

    a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 15 марта 2010 г.

    • принято извне
    принято извне
  11. 11

    Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beginnt mit dem Schluss des Jahres, in dem der Anspruch entstanden ist und der Gläubiger Kenntnis erlangt hat (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 und 2) — Kenntnis nicht nach der Entstehung: Schluss des Entstehungsjahres

    Schluss des Jahres, mit dem die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beginnt (§ 199 Abs. 1): a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 31 декабря 2010 г.

    абз. 199

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#VerjaehrungsbeginnUltimoDerEntstehung
    правило
  12. 12

    Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beträgt drei Jahre (§ 195) — Jahresschritt vom Schluss des Jahres (§ 188 Abs. 2, Politik BGB_FRISTEN_KALENDER)

    31 декабря 2013 г. = add calendar period(31 декабря 2010 г., 3 calendar_year)

    абз. 195

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#RegelmaessigeVerjaehrungsfrist
    правило
  13. 13

    Ohne festgestellte Hemmung endet die Verjährungsfrist mit der regelmäßigen Frist (§§ 195, 199; § 209 greift nicht)

    Tag, mit dessen Ablauf die Verjährungsfrist unter Berücksichtigung der Hemmung endet (§ 209): a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 31 декабря 2013 г.

    абз. 209

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#VerjaehrungsfristEndeOhneHemmung
    правило
  14. 14

    Ohne Hemmung tritt die Verjährung mit dem Ende der Verjährungsfrist ein

    Tag, mit dessen Ablauf die Verjährung des Anspruchs eintritt: a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 31 декабря 2013 г.

    абз. 209

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#VerjaehrungOhneHemmung
    правило
  15. 15

    Nach Eintritt der Verjährung ist der Schuldner berechtigt, die Leistung zu verweigern (§ 214 Abs. 1)

    der Schuldner ist berechtigt, die Leistung zu verweigern (§ 214 Abs. 1): a: urn:p12:anspruch

    абз. 214

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#Leistungsverweigerungsrecht214
    правило
  16. 16

    diese Person des BGB tritt in der vergleichenden Kette als dieses Gesicht auf

    p: urn:p12:person:g; x: urn:p12:persona:g

    факт дела
  17. 17

    diese Person des BGB tritt in der vergleichenden Kette als dieses Gesicht auf

    p: urn:p12:person:s; x: urn:p12:persona:s

    факт дела
  18. 18

    истец предъявляет к ответчику притязание — спорное отношение, о котором задаётся вопрос

    causa: urn:p12:causa; actor: urn:p12:persona:g; reus: urn:p12:persona:s

    факт дела
  19. 19

    Nach Eintritt der Verjährung ist der Schuldner berechtigt, die Leistung zu verweigern

    средство защиты отнято: возражением, погашением тяжбой, давностью, иммунитетом ответчика: actor: urn:p12:persona:g; reus: urn:p12:persona:s; causa: urn:p12:causa

    BGB P214

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#EinredeExcludit
    правило
  20. 20

    Вычисление запроса

    запрос

проверено движком: 10 · факт дела: 9 · принято извне: 1 · Полный граф: 33 узлов

Шаги сохранённого доказательства от фактов дела к ответу. Формулы показаны как записаны в норме, с подставленными значениями; страница ничего не пересчитывает.

Основание этого ответа

Правила из сохранённой цепочки доказательства ответа.

de.bgb.fristen

  • Für den Tag der Entstehung des Anspruchs wird der Schluss des Jahres gesucht (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 1)

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeGesuchtFuerEntstehung

  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): der Kandidat ist der 31. Dezember, wenn sein Monat 31 Tage hat, der folgende Monat 31 Tage und der übernächste höchstens 29 — Dezember, Januar, Februar

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeIstDezember

  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 9 — Ende des 9. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat09

  • Nach Eintritt der Verjährung ist der Schuldner berechtigt, die Leistung zu verweigern (§ 214 Abs. 1)

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#Leistungsverweigerungsrecht214

  • Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beträgt drei Jahre (§ 195) — Jahresschritt vom Schluss des Jahres (§ 188 Abs. 2, Politik BGB_FRISTEN_KALENDER)

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#RegelmaessigeVerjaehrungsfrist

  • Ohne Hemmung tritt die Verjährung mit dem Ende der Verjährungsfrist ein

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#VerjaehrungOhneHemmung

  • Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beginnt mit dem Schluss des Jahres, in dem der Anspruch entstanden ist und der Gläubiger Kenntnis erlangt hat (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 und 2) — Kenntnis nicht nach der Entstehung: Schluss des Entstehungsjahres

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#VerjaehrungsbeginnUltimoDerEntstehung

  • Ohne festgestellte Hemmung endet die Verjährungsfrist mit der regelmäßigen Frist (§§ 195, 199; § 209 greift nicht)

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#VerjaehrungsfristEndeOhneHemmung
de.bgb.ius_privatum

  • Nach Eintritt der Verjährung ist der Schuldner berechtigt, die Leistung zu verweigern

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#EinredeExcludit
Другие правила расчёта12

Применены в общем расчёте, но не входят в цепочку доказательства этого ответа.

de.bgb.fristen

  • Für den Tag der Kenntniserlangung wird der Schluss des Jahres gesucht (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 2)

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeGesuchtFuerKenntnis

  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 0 — Ende des 0. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat00

  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 1 — Ende des 1. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat01

  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 2 — Ende des 2. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat02

  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 3 — Ende des 3. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat03

  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 4 — Ende des 4. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat04

  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 5 — Ende des 5. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat05

  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 6 — Ende des 6. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat06

  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 7 — Ende des 7. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat07

  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 8 — Ende des 8. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat08

  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 10 — Ende des 10. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat10

  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 11 — Ende des 11. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Идентификатор
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat11
Замечания · 4
Отказы и замечания исполнения
  1. справкаEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31

    редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_EN на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 81 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)

    Задетые узлы
    • Статья 5.2.3. The conferment of правоs in выгодоприобретатель includes the право to invoke a оговорка in договор which excludes or limits the ответственность of выгодоприобретатель urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryMayInvokeClause
    • Статьи 5.2.1 and 5.2.2. Стороны may confer a право on a третье лицо who must be identifiable with adequate certainty by договор urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryRightExists
    • Статья 5.1.4(2). To the extent that an обязательство involves a обязанность of максимальные усилия, that party связан to make such efforts as would be made by a разумное лицо of the same kind urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BestEffortsDutyPerformed
    • Статья 1.9(1). Стороны связаны by any обычай to which they have agreed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByAgreedUsage
    • Статья 1.9(1). Стороны связаны by практики which they have established between themselves urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByEstablishedPractice
    • Статья 1.9(2). Стороны связаны by a обычай widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, кроме случаев, когда где its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage
    • Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage/unless/0
    • Статья 5.3.3(1). Сторона who prevented fulfilment contrary to добросовестность не вправе rely on the non-fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnPreventedCondition
    • Статья 5.3.3(2). Сторона who brought about fulfilment contrary to добросовестность не вправе rely on the fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnProcuredCondition
    • Статья 4.3. In applying Статьи 4.1 and 4.2, regard shall be had to all the circumstances, включая those listed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CircumstanceToBeRegarded
    • Статья 1.11. Where сторона has more than one коммерческое предприятие the relevant one is that which has the closest relationship to договор and its исполнение urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ClosestPlaceIsRelevant
    • Статья 4.1(2) (opening words). Where the common intention can be established, the reasonable-persons reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CommonIntentionDisplacesReasonablePersons
    • Статья 1.12(2). The computed last day does not stand где it is a holiday at the place of исполнение urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ComputedLastDayYieldsToHoliday
    • Статья 4.6. If договор terms supplied by one party are unclear, an interpretation against that party is preferred urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContraProferentem
    • Статья 1.3. A договор validly entered into is binding upon стороны urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContractIsBinding
    • Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#Cooperate
    • Статья 5.2.4. The promisor may assert against выгодоприобретатель all defences which the promisor could assert against the promisee urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DefencesAgainstBeneficiary
    • Статья 1.5. Стороны may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, кроме случаев, когда as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective
    • Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective/unless/0
    • Статья 1.7(1). Each party must act в соответствии с добросовестность and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyOfGoodFaith
    • Статья 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party когда such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the исполнение of that party's обязательствоs urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToCooperate
    • Статья 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, сторона не вправе, contrary to добросовестность, act so as to prejudice the other party's правоs in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRights
    • Статья 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, сторона не вправе, contrary to добросовестность, act so as to prejudice the other party's правоs in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRightsBreached
    • Статья 5.1.1. The договорual обязательствоs of стороны may be express urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ExpressIsContractual
    • Статья 5.1.5. In determining the extent to which an обязательство involves a обязанность of максимальные усилия or a обязанность to achieve a specific result, regard shall be had to the listed factors urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FactorDeterminesKindOfDuty
    • Статья 1.1. Стороны are free to enter into договор and to determine its content urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FreedomOfContract
    • Статья 1.6(2). Issues within the scope of these Principles but not expressly settled by them are as far as possible to be settled в соответствии с their underlying general principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GapSettledByUnderlyingPrinciples
    • Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaith
    • Статья 1.7(2). Стороны не вправе exclude or limit the обязанность of добросовестность and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaithCannotBeExcluded
    • Статья 5.1.9(2). An оферта to release a право gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if должник does not reject it без задержки urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted
    • Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted/unless/0
    • Статья 5.1.2(c). Implied обязательствоs stem from добросовестность and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromGoodFaith
    • Статья 5.1.2(a). Implied обязательствоs stem from the nature and purpose of договор urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromNatureAndPurpose
    • Статья 5.1.2(b). Implied обязательствоs stem from практики established between стороны and обычаи urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromPracticesAndUsages
    • Статья 5.1.2(d). Implied обязательствоs stem from reasonableness urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromReasonableness
    • Статья 5.1.1. The договорual обязательствоs of стороны may be implied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedIsContractual
    • Статья 1.8. Сторона cannot act inconsistently with an understanding it has caused the other party to have and upon which that other party reasonably has acted in reliance to its detriment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InconsistentBehaviourBarred
    • Статья 4.2(2) (opening words). Where the intention was known to the other party, the reasonable-person reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#IntentionDisplacesReasonablePerson
    • Статья 4.1(1). A договор shall be interpreted according to the common intention of стороны urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByCommonIntention
    • Статья 4.1(2). If the common intention cannot be established, договор shall be interpreted according to the meaning разумное лицоs of the same kind would give it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByReasonablePersons
    • Статья 1.4. Nothing in these Principles restricts the application of mandatory rules urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MandatoryRulesUnrestricted
    • Статья 5.1.7(2). Where the price is to be determined by one party and that deрасторжение is manifestly unreasonable, a reasonable price shall be substituted notwithstanding any договор term to the contrary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ManifestlyUnreasonableDeterminationReplaced
    • Преамбула. These Principles may be applied когда стороны have agreed that their договор be governed by general principles of law, the lex mercatoria or the like urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyOnChoiceOfGeneralPrinciples
    • Преамбула. These Principles may be applied когда стороны have not chosen any law to govern their договор urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyWhereNoLawChosen
    • Преамбула. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement domestic law urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretDomesticLaw
    • Преамбула. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement international uniform law instruments urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretUniformLaw
    • Статья 1.3. The договор can be modified or terminated as otherwise provided in these Principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationAsProvided
    • Статья 1.3. The договор can be modified or terminated по соглашению urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByAgreement
    • Статья 1.3. The договор can be modified or terminated в соответствии с its terms urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByTerms
    • Статья 1.2. Nothing in these Principles requires договор to be made in or evidenced by a particular form urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoFormRequired
    • Статья 1.10(2)-(3). A notice is effective когда it reaches the person to whom it is given urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoticeEffectiveOnReceipt
    • Статья 4.7. In case of discrepancy between equally authoritative versions there is a preference for the interpretation according to the original version urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#OriginalVersionPreferred
    • Статья 1.12(1). Official holidays or non-business days occurring during the period are included in calculating it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodEndsOn
    • Статья 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the коммерческое предприятие of сторона to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday
    • Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday/unless/0
    • Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PreserveRights
    • Статья 5.1.7(1). Where договор does not fix the price, стороны are considered to have made reference to the price generally charged in comparable circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceByMarket
    • Статья 5.1.7(1). If no such price is available, a reasonable price applies urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceReasonableWhereNoMarket
    • Преамбула. These Principles shall be applied когда стороны have agreed that their договор be governed by them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PrinciplesGovernByAgreement
    • Статья 5.1.6. Where the quality of исполнение is neither fixed by nor determinable from договор, сторона связан to render a исполнение of a quality that is reasonable and not less than average in the circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#QualityWhereNotFixed
    • Статьи 4.4 and 4.5. Terms are to be read in the light of the whole договор and so as to give effect to all of them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReadingConformsToCanons
    • Статья 5.1.9(1). An obligee may release its право по соглашению with должник urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReleaseByAgreement
    • Статья 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the коммерческое предприятие of сторона setting the time, если только the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone
    • Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone/unless/0
    • Статья 5.2.6. The beneficiary may renounce a право conferred on it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RenunciationEndsBeneficiaryRight
    • Статья 5.3.2(b). The relevant договор or договорual обязательство comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract
    • Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract/unless/0
    • Статья 5.3.5. On fulfilment of a resolutive condition the rules on restitution apply with appropriate adaptations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RestitutionOnResolutiveCondition
    • Статья 5.1.4(1). To the extent that an обязательство involves a обязанность to achieve a specific result, that party связан to achieve that result urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResultDutyPerformed
    • Статья 5.2.5. Стороны may modify or revoke the правоs conferred until выгодоприобретатель has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance
    • Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance/unless/0
    • Статья 1.11. Where сторона has a single коммерческое предприятие that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant
    • Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant/unless/0
    • Статья 4.2(1). Statements and other conduct shall be interpreted according to сторона's intention if the other party knew or could not have been unaware of it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByIntention
    • Статья 4.2(2). If the preceding пункт is not applicable, statements shall be interpreted according to the meaning a разумное лицо would give them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByReasonablePerson
    • Статья 4.8(1). Where стороны have not agreed в отношении an important term, a term which is appropriate in the circumstances shall be supplied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SupplyOmittedTerm
    • Статья 5.3.2(a). The relevant договор or договорual обязательство takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect
    • Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect/unless/0
    • Статья 5.1.8. A договор for an indefinite period may be terminated by either party by giving notice a разумный срок in advance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#TerminationOfIndefiniteContract
    • Статья 5.1.7(2). A manifestly unreasonable deрасторжение does not stand as the applicable price urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#UnreasonableDeterminationDisplaced
    • Статья 5.3.1. A договор or договорual обязательство may be made conditional upon the occurrence of a future uncertain event urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ValidCondition
    Подробности
    {
 "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_EN",
 "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
 "since": null,
 "state": "not_yet",
 "status": null
}
  2. справкаEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31

    редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_FR на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 79 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)

    Задетые узлы
    • Статья 5.2.3. The conferment of правоs in выгодоприобретатель includes the право to invoke a оговорка in договор which excludes or limits the ответственность of выгодоприобретатель urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryMayInvokeClause
    • Статья 5.1.4(2). To the extent that an обязательство involves a обязанность of максимальные усилия, that party связан to make such efforts as would be made by a разумное лицо of the same kind urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BestEffortsDutyPerformed
    • Статья 1.9(1). Стороны связаны by any обычай to which they have agreed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByAgreedUsage
    • Статья 1.9(1). Стороны связаны by практики which they have established between themselves urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByEstablishedPractice
    • Статья 1.9(2). Стороны связаны by a обычай widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, кроме случаев, когда где its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage
    • Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage/unless/0
    • Статья 5.3.3(1). Сторона who prevented fulfilment contrary to добросовестность не вправе rely on the non-fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnPreventedCondition
    • Статья 5.3.3(2). Сторона who brought about fulfilment contrary to добросовестность не вправе rely on the fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnProcuredCondition
    • Статья 4.3. In applying Статьи 4.1 and 4.2, regard shall be had to all the circumstances, включая those listed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CircumstanceToBeRegarded
    • Статья 1.11. Where сторона has more than one коммерческое предприятие the relevant one is that which has the closest relationship to договор and its исполнение urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ClosestPlaceIsRelevant
    • Статья 4.1(2) (opening words). Where the common intention can be established, the reasonable-persons reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CommonIntentionDisplacesReasonablePersons
    • Статья 1.12(2). The computed last day does not stand где it is a holiday at the place of исполнение urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ComputedLastDayYieldsToHoliday
    • Статья 4.6. If договор terms supplied by one party are unclear, an interpretation against that party is preferred urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContraProferentem
    • Статья 1.3. A договор validly entered into is binding upon стороны urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContractIsBinding
    • Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#Cooperate
    • Статья 5.2.4. The promisor may assert against выгодоприобретатель all defences which the promisor could assert against the promisee urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DefencesAgainstBeneficiary
    • Статья 1.5. Стороны may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, кроме случаев, когда as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective
    • Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective/unless/0
    • Статья 1.7(1). Each party must act в соответствии с добросовестность and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyOfGoodFaith
    • Статья 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party когда such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the исполнение of that party's обязательствоs urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToCooperate
    • Статья 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, сторона не вправе, contrary to добросовестность, act so as to prejudice the other party's правоs in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRights
    • Статья 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, сторона не вправе, contrary to добросовестность, act so as to prejudice the other party's правоs in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRightsBreached
    • Статья 5.1.1. The договорual обязательствоs of стороны may be express urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ExpressIsContractual
    • Статья 5.1.5. In determining the extent to which an обязательство involves a обязанность of максимальные усилия or a обязанность to achieve a specific result, regard shall be had to the listed factors urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FactorDeterminesKindOfDuty
    • Статья 1.1. Стороны are free to enter into договор and to determine its content urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FreedomOfContract
    • Статья 1.6(2). Issues within the scope of these Principles but not expressly settled by them are as far as possible to be settled в соответствии с their underlying general principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GapSettledByUnderlyingPrinciples
    • Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaith
    • Статья 1.7(2). Стороны не вправе exclude or limit the обязанность of добросовестность and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaithCannotBeExcluded
    • Статья 5.1.9(2). An оферта to release a право gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if должник does not reject it без задержки urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted
    • Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted/unless/0
    • Статья 5.1.2(c). Implied обязательствоs stem from добросовестность and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromGoodFaith
    • Статья 5.1.2(a). Implied обязательствоs stem from the nature and purpose of договор urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromNatureAndPurpose
    • Статья 5.1.2(b). Implied обязательствоs stem from практики established between стороны and обычаи urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromPracticesAndUsages
    • Статья 5.1.2(d). Implied обязательствоs stem from reasonableness urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromReasonableness
    • Статья 5.1.1. The договорual обязательствоs of стороны may be implied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedIsContractual
    • Статья 1.8. Сторона cannot act inconsistently with an understanding it has caused the other party to have and upon which that other party reasonably has acted in reliance to its detriment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InconsistentBehaviourBarred
    • Статья 4.2(2) (opening words). Where the intention was known to the other party, the reasonable-person reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#IntentionDisplacesReasonablePerson
    • Статья 4.1(1). A договор shall be interpreted according to the common intention of стороны urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByCommonIntention
    • Статья 4.1(2). If the common intention cannot be established, договор shall be interpreted according to the meaning разумное лицоs of the same kind would give it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByReasonablePersons
    • Статья 1.4. Nothing in these Principles restricts the application of mandatory rules urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MandatoryRulesUnrestricted
    • Статья 5.1.7(2). Where the price is to be determined by one party and that deрасторжение is manifestly unreasonable, a reasonable price shall be substituted notwithstanding any договор term to the contrary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ManifestlyUnreasonableDeterminationReplaced
    • Преамбула. These Principles may be applied когда стороны have agreed that their договор be governed by general principles of law, the lex mercatoria or the like urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyOnChoiceOfGeneralPrinciples
    • Преамбула. These Principles may be applied когда стороны have not chosen any law to govern their договор urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyWhereNoLawChosen
    • Преамбула. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement domestic law urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretDomesticLaw
    • Преамбула. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement international uniform law instruments urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretUniformLaw
    • Статья 1.3. The договор can be modified or terminated as otherwise provided in these Principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationAsProvided
    • Статья 1.3. The договор can be modified or terminated по соглашению urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByAgreement
    • Статья 1.3. The договор can be modified or terminated в соответствии с its terms urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByTerms
    • Статья 1.2. Nothing in these Principles requires договор to be made in or evidenced by a particular form urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoFormRequired
    • Статья 1.10(2)-(3). A notice is effective когда it reaches the person to whom it is given urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoticeEffectiveOnReceipt
    • Статья 4.7. In case of discrepancy between equally authoritative versions there is a preference for the interpretation according to the original version urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#OriginalVersionPreferred
    • Статья 1.12(1). Official holidays or non-business days occurring during the period are included in calculating it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodEndsOn
    • Статья 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the коммерческое предприятие of сторона to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday
    • Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday/unless/0
    • Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PreserveRights
    • Статья 5.1.7(1). Where договор does not fix the price, стороны are considered to have made reference to the price generally charged in comparable circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceByMarket
    • Статья 5.1.7(1). If no such price is available, a reasonable price applies urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceReasonableWhereNoMarket
    • Преамбула. These Principles shall be applied когда стороны have agreed that their договор be governed by them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PrinciplesGovernByAgreement
    • Статья 5.1.6. Where the quality of исполнение is neither fixed by nor determinable from договор, сторона связан to render a исполнение of a quality that is reasonable and not less than average in the circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#QualityWhereNotFixed
    • Статья 5.1.9(1). An obligee may release its право по соглашению with должник urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReleaseByAgreement
    • Статья 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the коммерческое предприятие of сторона setting the time, если только the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone
    • Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone/unless/0
    • Статья 5.2.6. The beneficiary may renounce a право conferred on it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RenunciationEndsBeneficiaryRight
    • Статья 5.3.2(b). The relevant договор or договорual обязательство comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract
    • Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract/unless/0
    • Статья 5.3.5. On fulfilment of a resolutive condition the rules on restitution apply with appropriate adaptations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RestitutionOnResolutiveCondition
    • Статья 5.1.4(1). To the extent that an обязательство involves a обязанность to achieve a specific result, that party связан to achieve that result urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResultDutyPerformed
    • Статья 5.2.5. Стороны may modify or revoke the правоs conferred until выгодоприобретатель has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance
    • Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance/unless/0
    • Статья 1.11. Where сторона has a single коммерческое предприятие that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant
    • Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant/unless/0
    • Статья 4.2(1). Statements and other conduct shall be interpreted according to сторона's intention if the other party knew or could not have been unaware of it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByIntention
    • Статья 4.2(2). If the preceding пункт is not applicable, statements shall be interpreted according to the meaning a разумное лицо would give them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByReasonablePerson
    • Статья 4.8(1). Where стороны have not agreed в отношении an important term, a term which is appropriate in the circumstances shall be supplied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SupplyOmittedTerm
    • Статья 5.3.2(a). The relevant договор or договорual обязательство takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect
    • Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect/unless/0
    • Статья 5.1.8. A договор for an indefinite period may be terminated by either party by giving notice a разумный срок in advance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#TerminationOfIndefiniteContract
    • Статья 5.1.7(2). A manifestly unreasonable deрасторжение does not stand as the applicable price urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#UnreasonableDeterminationDisplaced
    • Статья 5.3.1. A договор or договорual обязательство may be made conditional upon the occurrence of a future uncertain event urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ValidCondition
    Подробности
    {
 "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_FR",
 "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
 "since": null,
 "state": "not_yet",
 "status": null
}
  3. справкаEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31

    редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_EN на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 26 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)

    Задетые узлы
    • Статья 10.4(1). Where должник acknowledges the право before the expiration of the general срок исковой давности, a new general срок исковой давности begins on the day after the acknowledgement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AcknowledgementStartsNewGeneralPeriod
    • Статья 10.6(1). In the absence of provisions determining the exact date of commencement, arbitral proceedings are deemed to commence on the date on which the request reaches должник urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ArbitrationCommencesOnRequest
    • Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration
    • Статья 10.1(2). This Chapter does not govern the time within which сторона must give notice or perform any act other than the institution of legal proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ChapterDoesNotGovernNoticeTime
    • Статья 10.9(1). The expiration of the срок исковой давности does not extinguish the право urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight
    • Статья 10.9(2). For the expiration of the срок исковой давности to have effect, должник must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted
    • Article 10.9(2). Once the obligor has asserted expiry, the barred exercise is a comparative remedium_exclusum urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit
    • Статья 10.3(a). Стороны не вправе shorten the general срок исковой давности to less than one year urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodFloorOfOneYear
    • Статья 10.2(1). The general срок исковой давности is three years beginning on the day after the day кредитор knows or ought to know the facts as a result of which the право can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodOfThreeYears
    • Статья 10.1(1). The exercise of правоs governed by Принципы is barred by the expiration of a срок исковой давности according to the rules of this Chapter urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#LimitationGovernsExerciseOfRights
    • Статья 10.3(c). Стороны не вправе extend the maximum срок исковой давности to more than fifteen years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodCeilingOfFifteenYears
    • Статья 10.4(2). The maximum срок исковой давности does not begin to run again, but may be exceeded by the beginning of a new general срок исковой давности urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodDoesNotRestart
    • Статья 10.3(b). Стороны не вправе shorten the maximum срок исковой давности to less than four years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodFloorOfFourYears
    • Статья 10.2(2). In any event, the maximum срок исковой давности is ten years beginning on the day after the day the право can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodOfTenYears
    • Статья 10.11. Where there has been исполнение in order to discharge an обязательство, there is no право of restitution merely because the срок исковой давности has expired urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#NoRestitutionAfterExpiration
    • Статья 10.9(2). For the expiration of the срок исковой давности to have effect, должник must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration
    • Статья 10.3. Стороны may modify the срок исковой давностиs urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PartiesMayModifyPeriods
    • Статья 10.9(3). A право may still be relied on as a defence even though the expiration of the срок исковой давности for that право has been asserted urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#RightStillAvailableAsDefence
    • Статья 10.10. The obligee may exercise the право of зачёт until должник has asserted the expiration of the срок исковой давности urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SetOffUntilExpirationAsserted
    • Статья 10.7. Статьи 10.5 and 10.6 apply with appropriate modifications to proceedings гдеby стороны request a third person to assist them in reaching an amicable settlement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByAmicableSettlementProceedings
    • Статья 10.6(1). The running of the срок исковой давности is suspended когда кредитор performs an act recognised by the law of the arbitral tribunal as asserting its право urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByArbitralAct
    • Статья 10.5(1)(c). The running of the срок исковой давности is suspended где кредитор has asserted its правоs in proceedings for dissolution of должник urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByDissolutionClaim
    • Статья 10.8(1). Where кредитор has been prevented by an impediment beyond its control, the general срок исковой давности is suspended so as not to expire before one year after the impediment has ceased to exist urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByImpediment
    • Статья 10.8(2). Where the impediment consists of the incapacity or death of сторона, suspension ceases когда a representative or successor has been appointed; the additional one-year period applies accordingly urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByIncapacityEndsOnAppointment
    • Статья 10.5(1)(b). The running of the срок исковой давности is suspended где кредитор has asserted its правоs in the insolvency proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByInsolvencyClaim
    • Статья 10.5(1)(a). The running of the срок исковой давности is suspended когда кредитор performs an act recognised by the law of суд as asserting its право urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByJudicialAct
    Подробности
    {
 "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_EN",
 "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
 "since": null,
 "state": "not_yet",
 "status": null
}
  4. справкаEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31

    редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_FR на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 26 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)

    Задетые узлы
    • Статья 10.4(1). Where должник acknowledges the право before the expiration of the general срок исковой давности, a new general срок исковой давности begins on the day after the acknowledgement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AcknowledgementStartsNewGeneralPeriod
    • Статья 10.6(1). In the absence of provisions determining the exact date of commencement, arbitral proceedings are deemed to commence on the date on which the request reaches должник urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ArbitrationCommencesOnRequest
    • Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration
    • Статья 10.1(2). This Chapter does not govern the time within which сторона must give notice or perform any act other than the institution of legal proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ChapterDoesNotGovernNoticeTime
    • Статья 10.9(1). The expiration of the срок исковой давности does not extinguish the право urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight
    • Статья 10.9(2). For the expiration of the срок исковой давности to have effect, должник must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted
    • Article 10.9(2). Once the obligor has asserted expiry, the barred exercise is a comparative remedium_exclusum urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit
    • Статья 10.3(a). Стороны не вправе shorten the general срок исковой давности to less than one year urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodFloorOfOneYear
    • Статья 10.2(1). The general срок исковой давности is three years beginning on the day after the day кредитор knows or ought to know the facts as a result of which the право can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodOfThreeYears
    • Статья 10.1(1). The exercise of правоs governed by Принципы is barred by the expiration of a срок исковой давности according to the rules of this Chapter urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#LimitationGovernsExerciseOfRights
    • Статья 10.3(c). Стороны не вправе extend the maximum срок исковой давности to more than fifteen years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodCeilingOfFifteenYears
    • Статья 10.4(2). The maximum срок исковой давности does not begin to run again, but may be exceeded by the beginning of a new general срок исковой давности urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodDoesNotRestart
    • Статья 10.3(b). Стороны не вправе shorten the maximum срок исковой давности to less than four years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodFloorOfFourYears
    • Статья 10.2(2). In any event, the maximum срок исковой давности is ten years beginning on the day after the day the право can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodOfTenYears
    • Статья 10.11. Where there has been исполнение in order to discharge an обязательство, there is no право of restitution merely because the срок исковой давности has expired urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#NoRestitutionAfterExpiration
    • Статья 10.9(2). For the expiration of the срок исковой давности to have effect, должник must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration
    • Статья 10.3. Стороны may modify the срок исковой давностиs urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PartiesMayModifyPeriods
    • Статья 10.9(3). A право may still be relied on as a defence even though the expiration of the срок исковой давности for that право has been asserted urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#RightStillAvailableAsDefence
    • Статья 10.10. The obligee may exercise the право of зачёт until должник has asserted the expiration of the срок исковой давности urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SetOffUntilExpirationAsserted
    • Статья 10.7. Статьи 10.5 and 10.6 apply with appropriate modifications to proceedings гдеby стороны request a third person to assist them in reaching an amicable settlement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByAmicableSettlementProceedings
    • Статья 10.6(1). The running of the срок исковой давности is suspended когда кредитор performs an act recognised by the law of the arbitral tribunal as asserting its право urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByArbitralAct
    • Статья 10.5(1)(c). The running of the срок исковой давности is suspended где кредитор has asserted its правоs in proceedings for dissolution of должник urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByDissolutionClaim
    • Статья 10.8(1). Where кредитор has been prevented by an impediment beyond its control, the general срок исковой давности is suspended so as not to expire before one year after the impediment has ceased to exist urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByImpediment
    • Статья 10.8(2). Where the impediment consists of the incapacity or death of сторона, suspension ceases когда a representative or successor has been appointed; the additional one-year period applies accordingly urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByIncapacityEndsOnAppointment
    • Статья 10.5(1)(b). The running of the срок исковой давности is suspended где кредитор has asserted its правоs in the insolvency proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByInsolvencyClaim
    • Статья 10.5(1)(a). The running of the срок исковой давности is suspended когда кредитор performs an act recognised by the law of суд as asserting its право urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByJudicialAct
    Подробности
    {
 "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_FR",
 "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
 "since": null,
 "state": "not_yet",
 "status": null
}

Как записал движок: код, тяжесть и текст с §-ссылками; порядок — как в документе исполнения.

Граф доказательств

Граф доказательства · 10 слой
query_evaluationremedium_exclusumrule_applicationEinredeExcluditrule_applicationLeistungsverweigerungsrecht214assertioncausa_of_anspruchassertionschuldner_beruft_sich_auf_verjaehrunassertionanspruchsgegnerassertionanspruchsinhaberassertionpersona_ofassertionpersona_ofassertionpetitiorule_applicationVerjaehrungOhneHemmungrule_applicationVerjaehrungsfristEndeOhneHemmungassertionkeine_hemmungrule_applicationRegelmaessigeVerjaehrungsfristrule_applicationVerjaehrungsbeginnUltimoDerEntstehunrule_applicationJahresendeIstDezemberassertionanspruch_entstanden_amassertionkenntnis_erlangt_amrule_applicationJahresendeKandidat09rule_applicationJahresendeGesuchtFuerEntstehung

Узлы доказательств: 33 · assertion 10, rule_application 21, candidate_closure 1, query_evaluation 1

Блок слишком большой для встроенного просмотра. Он целиком включён в JSON документа — без сокращений.

Скачать JSON ↓
Идентификаторы календаря и доказательства
Ссылка на доказательство
case/FuenfJahre_BGB/query/remedium-exclusum
Исходное обоснование · JSON

Блок слишком большой для встроенного просмотра. Он целиком включён в JSON документа — без сокращений.

Скачать JSON ↓
ИсточникиФрагментов: 4

paragraph/195

§ 195 Regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beträgt drei Jahre.
Исходные данные · JSON
JSONТолько чтение
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:53e15660089df268ecd95ba8fdcc0d8e73cba45a9e68c5cc802f87a60f03db9b",
  "edition": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_KONSOLIDIERT",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_P195",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 195 Regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "paragraph/195",
  "package": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:3a37767ed679ef6124cbd5c7272a5a798618598a194829b5a5ad5b10c1cfe898",
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 195 Regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist\nDie regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beträgt drei Jahre.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

paragraph/199

§ 199 Beginn der regelmäßigen Verjährungsfrist und Verjährungshöchstfristen (1) Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beginnt, soweit nicht ein anderer Verjährungsbeginn bestimmt ist, mit dem Schluss des Jahres, in dem 1. der Anspruch entstanden ist und 2. der Gläubiger von den den Anspruch begründenden Umständen und der Person des Schuldners Kenntnis erlangt oder ohne grobe Fahrlässigkeit erlangen müsste. (2) Schadensersatzansprüche, die auf der Verletzung des Lebens, des Körpers, der Gesundheit oder der Freiheit beruhen, verjähren ohne Rücksicht auf ihre Entstehung und die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in 30 Jahren von der Begehung der Handlung, der Pflichtverletzung oder dem sonstigen, den Schaden auslösenden Ereignis an. (3) Sonstige Schadensersatzansprüche verjähren 1. ohne Rücksicht auf die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in zehn Jahren von ihrer Entstehung an und 2. ohne Rücksicht auf ihre Entstehung und die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in 30 Jahren von der Begehung der Handlung, der Pflichtverletzung oder dem sonstigen, den Schaden auslösenden Ereignis an. Maßgeblich ist die früher endende Frist. (3a) Ansprüche, die auf einem Erbfall beruhen oder deren Geltendmachung die Kenntnis einer Verfügung von Todes wegen voraussetzt, verjähren ohne Rücksicht auf die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in 30 Jahren von der Entstehung des Anspruchs an. (4) Andere Ansprüche als die nach den Absätzen 2 bis 3a verjähren ohne Rücksicht auf die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in zehn Jahren von ihrer Entstehung an. (5) Geht der Anspruch auf ein Unterlassen, so tritt an die Stelle der Entstehung die Zuwiderhandlung.
Исходные данные · JSON
JSONТолько чтение
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:dbc2b5bc4ee946d17bb8636b8d724e0168033a99dc35c94f5c6eb2b53f2b838c",
  "edition": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_KONSOLIDIERT",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_P199",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 199 Beginn der regelmäßigen Verjährungsfrist und Verjährungshöchstfristen"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "paragraph/199",
  "package": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:2916e6a9e86d21f331739cafd8a135c863d9e0bf3087e8a13fb6c60d7f2df4da",
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 199 Beginn der regelmäßigen Verjährungsfrist und Verjährungshöchstfristen\n(1) Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beginnt, soweit nicht ein anderer Verjährungsbeginn bestimmt ist, mit dem Schluss des Jahres, in dem 1. der Anspruch entstanden ist und\n2. der Gläubiger von den den Anspruch begründenden Umständen und der Person des Schuldners Kenntnis erlangt oder ohne grobe Fahrlässigkeit erlangen müsste.\n(2) Schadensersatzansprüche, die auf der Verletzung des Lebens, des Körpers, der Gesundheit oder der Freiheit beruhen, verjähren ohne Rücksicht auf ihre Entstehung und die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in 30 Jahren von der Begehung der Handlung, der Pflichtverletzung oder dem sonstigen, den Schaden auslösenden Ereignis an.\n(3) Sonstige Schadensersatzansprüche verjähren 1. ohne Rücksicht auf die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in zehn Jahren von ihrer Entstehung an und\n2. ohne Rücksicht auf ihre Entstehung und die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in 30 Jahren von der Begehung der Handlung, der Pflichtverletzung oder dem sonstigen, den Schaden auslösenden Ereignis an.\nMaßgeblich ist die früher endende Frist.\n(3a) Ansprüche, die auf einem Erbfall beruhen oder deren Geltendmachung die Kenntnis einer Verfügung von Todes wegen voraussetzt, verjähren ohne Rücksicht auf die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in 30 Jahren von der Entstehung des Anspruchs an.\n(4) Andere Ansprüche als die nach den Absätzen 2 bis 3a verjähren ohne Rücksicht auf die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in zehn Jahren von ihrer Entstehung an.\n(5) Geht der Anspruch auf ein Unterlassen, so tritt an die Stelle der Entstehung die Zuwiderhandlung.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

paragraph/209

§ 209 Wirkung der Hemmung Der Zeitraum, während dessen die Verjährung gehemmt ist, wird in die Verjährungsfrist nicht eingerechnet.
Исходные данные · JSON
JSONТолько чтение
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:9d3c1967977b0f7d0bb0d9a7d89228d863b64a3cc4a8d54a9f351d8c9205188c",
  "edition": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_KONSOLIDIERT",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_P209",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 209 Wirkung der Hemmung"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "paragraph/209",
  "package": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:d3a5349ff97577ebae64e94327f4d26341f8d6fbce09a12c6615b96f59d9b9be",
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 209 Wirkung der Hemmung\nDer Zeitraum, während dessen die Verjährung gehemmt ist, wird in die Verjährungsfrist nicht eingerechnet.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

paragraph/214

§ 214 Wirkung der Verjährung (1) Nach Eintritt der Verjährung ist der Schuldner berechtigt, die Leistung zu verweigern. (2) Das zur Befriedigung eines verjährten Anspruchs Geleistete kann nicht zurückgefordert werden, auch wenn in Unkenntnis der Verjährung geleistet worden ist. Das Gleiche gilt von einem vertragsmäßigen Anerkenntnis sowie einer Sicherheitsleistung des Schuldners.
Исходные данные · JSON
JSONТолько чтение
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:12d652436994db82ae2d39189be9bf31cdc979290895389a4620639b3f937994",
  "edition": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_KONSOLIDIERT",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_P214",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 214 Wirkung der Verjährung"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "paragraph/214",
  "package": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:1f3cff3f6a0d4efb9796bd6eff87447e953e444a38ba0121caedb177cf59002e",
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 214 Wirkung der Verjährung\n(1) Nach Eintritt der Verjährung ist der Schuldner berechtigt, die Leistung zu verweigern.\n(2) Das zur Befriedigung eines verjährten Anspruchs Geleistete kann nicht zurückgefordert werden, auch wenn in Unkenntnis der Verjährung geleistet worden ist. Das Gleiche gilt von einem vertragsmäßigen Anerkenntnis sowie einer Sicherheitsleistung des Schuldners.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Пакеты в снимке

  • de.bgb.core
  • de.bgb.fristen
  • de.bgb.ius_privatum
  • doctrine.ius_privatum
  • fr.code_civil
  • unidroit.picc
  • unidroit.picc_limitation
Технические данныеПолный ответ, параметры и контрольные суммы
Статус расчёта
COMPUTED
Полный ответ движка
Fünf Jahre, BGB: das Rechtsmittel ist ausgeschlossen

Полный машинный результат · JSON

Блок слишком большой для встроенного просмотра. Он целиком включён в JSON документа — без сокращений.

Скачать JSON ↓

Исполнение · JSON

Блок слишком большой для встроенного просмотра. Он целиком включён в JSON документа — без сокращений.

Скачать JSON ↓

Метаданные отображения

Блок слишком большой для встроенного просмотра. Он целиком включён в JSON документа — без сокращений.

Скачать JSON ↓

JSON · расчёты, источники и точные данные

JSONТолько чтение
{
  "acts": [
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:a6813604c35567e7c586d334efbf524d08f3467170c4b732cfb15809cacf4ff4",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core",
      "package": "de.bgb.core"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:998148eaeeed28f1565811474ee7beb7eacc616c5681ed9638edc976512a9884",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
      "package": "de.bgb.fristen"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:86a5a00db16e32187223ceeec6748eb7d42d18b7c370c8b15ac64d2f3f655ff7",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum",
      "package": "de.bgb.ius_privatum"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:7202de5de49a8a9d12837bc19cb7008ba2d1a68dbcc0134e0afccf1440a6d5ed",
      "namespace": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum",
      "package": "doctrine.ius_privatum"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:ad41d027ba92c38ca5eecc1d16097d0bbc8c5a74946fc1a6397c6dadac61158f",
      "namespace": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
      "package": "fr.code_civil"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:719bfd408eed92ad497ba071482354d4ad32b81ef9f41c6654f224416c19e603",
      "namespace": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc",
      "package": "unidroit.picc"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:b311d0d422a1079f71113320bd818236f7b09507c7dd960bdafceb91285497d9",
      "namespace": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "package": "unidroit.picc_limitation"
    }
  ],
  "caseHash": "sha256:46016aa963d29cfc446a35c6a945630088a81b841001fff20f3772522d11579f",
  "jurisdiction": "Deutschland",
  "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
  "mode": "audit",
  "programHash": "sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e",
  "resultHash": "sha256:3b8c31a7d40225f7dc8d028edbb4ba6636cb6413c662d58b3d87d109175fd196",
  "timezone": "Europe/Berlin"
}
evaluation SHA-256
sha256:1525ffc0f486d03fad6ab7b8a3160e766825ca1f8503179d41d4f5ec448585cd
Исходные данные · JSON
JSONТолько чтение
{
  "args": [
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:causa",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    }
  ],
  "facts": [
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core#anspruch_entstanden_am"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "adjudicated",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#kenntnis_erlangt_am"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#keine_hemmung"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#schuldner_beruft_sich_auf_verjaehrung"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#g",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core#anspruchsinhaber"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#s",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core#anspruchsgegner"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#g",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#persona_of"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#s",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#persona_of"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#causa_of_anspruch"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
    }
  ],
  "kind": "truth",
  "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
  "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"
}

Nach fünf Jahren ist die deutsche Verjährung am 31. Dezember 2013 eingetreten, und das Rechtsmittel ist ausgeschlossen.

Fünf Jahre, BGB: die Verjährung ist am 31. Dezember 2013 eingetreten

Проверка условия

Fünf Jahre, Code civil: die Klage ist verjährt

Юрисдикция DeutschlandПраво на дату 02.01.2016

Результат расчёта

Установлено

Исходные параметры

Что определяем

action prescrite à cette date

causa2 января 2016 г.

Исходные факты

  • créance exigible depuis ce jour

    causa: causajour: 15 марта 2010 г.

  • le titulaire a connu les faits lui permettant d'exercer son droit ce jour

    causa: causajour: 15 марта 2010 г.

  • action introduite ce jour

    causa: causajour: 2 января 2016 г.

  • prescription non interrompue et non suspendue

    causa: causa

  • истец предъявляет к ответчику притязание — спорное отношение, о котором задаётся вопрос

    causa: causaactor: greus: s
Исходные данные · JSON
JSONТолько чтение
{
  "args": [
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:causa",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "kind": "value",
      "type": {
        "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
      },
      "value": "2016-01-02"
    }
  ],
  "facts": [
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#creance_exigible_depuis"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#titulaire_connait_les_faits_le"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2016-01-02"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#action_introduite_le"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#prescription_non_interrompue"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
    }
  ],
  "kind": "truth",
  "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
  "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#action_prescrite_le"
}
Почему такой результатПрименённые правила и условия

Путь вывода8 шагов

  1. 1

    action introduite ce jour

    causa: urn:p12:causa; jour: 2 января 2016 г.

    факт дела
  2. 2

    le titulaire a connu les faits lui permettant d'exercer son droit ce jour

    causa: urn:p12:causa; jour: 15 марта 2010 г.

    факт дела
  3. 3

    créance exigible depuis ce jour

    causa: urn:p12:causa; jour: 15 марта 2010 г.

    факт дела
  4. 4

    cinq ans à compter du jour où le titulaire a connu les faits

    point de départ du délai quinquennal: causa: urn:p12:causa; jour: 15 марта 2010 г.

    ст. 2224

    Идентификатор
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#PointDepartConnaissanceReelle
    правило
  5. 5

    prescription non interrompue et non suspendue

    causa: urn:p12:causa

    факт дела
  6. 6

    délai de cinq ans, compté par jours

    15 марта 2015 г. = add calendar period(15 марта 2010 г., 5 calendar_year)

    ст. 2224, ст. 2228, ст. 2229

    Идентификатор
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#EcheanceCinqAns
    правило
  7. 7

    la prescription est acquise lorsque le dernier jour du terme est accompli

    action prescrite à cette date: causa: urn:p12:causa; jour: 2 января 2016 г.

    ст. 2219, ст. 2229

    Идентификатор
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#ActionPrescriteApresEcheance
    правило
  8. 8

    Вычисление запроса

    запрос

проверено движком: 4 · факт дела: 4 · Полный граф: 12 узлов

Шаги сохранённого доказательства от фактов дела к ответу. Формулы показаны как записаны в норме, с подставленными значениями; страница ничего не пересчитывает.

Основание этого ответа

Правила из сохранённой цепочки доказательства ответа.

fr.code_civil

  • la prescription est acquise lorsque le dernier jour du terme est accompli

    Идентификатор
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#ActionPrescriteApresEcheance

  • délai de cinq ans, compté par jours

    Идентификатор
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#EcheanceCinqAns

  • cinq ans à compter du jour où le titulaire a connu les faits

    Идентификатор
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#PointDepartConnaissanceReelle
Другие правила расчёта3

Применены в общем расчёте, но не входят в цепочку доказательства этого ответа.

fr.code_civil

  • Article 2232, alinéa 2. Hors butoir opposable, l'échéance après plancher est la date applicable

    Идентификатор
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#DateApplicableSansButoirOpposable

  • Sans médiation, conciliation ni mesure d'instruction, l'échéance du délai n'est pas relevée

    Идентификатор
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#EcheanceApresPlancherSansMinimale

  • la prescription extinctive éteint le droit par l'inaction de son titulaire

    Идентификатор
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#PrescriptionExcludit
Замечания · 4
Отказы и замечания исполнения
  1. справкаEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31

    редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_EN на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 81 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)

    Задетые узлы
    • Статья 5.2.3. The conferment of правоs in выгодоприобретатель includes the право to invoke a оговорка in договор which excludes or limits the ответственность of выгодоприобретатель urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryMayInvokeClause
    • Статьи 5.2.1 and 5.2.2. Стороны may confer a право on a третье лицо who must be identifiable with adequate certainty by договор urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryRightExists
    • Статья 5.1.4(2). To the extent that an обязательство involves a обязанность of максимальные усилия, that party связан to make such efforts as would be made by a разумное лицо of the same kind urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BestEffortsDutyPerformed
    • Статья 1.9(1). Стороны связаны by any обычай to which they have agreed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByAgreedUsage
    • Статья 1.9(1). Стороны связаны by практики which they have established between themselves urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByEstablishedPractice
    • Статья 1.9(2). Стороны связаны by a обычай widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, кроме случаев, когда где its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage
    • Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage/unless/0
    • Статья 5.3.3(1). Сторона who prevented fulfilment contrary to добросовестность не вправе rely on the non-fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnPreventedCondition
    • Статья 5.3.3(2). Сторона who brought about fulfilment contrary to добросовестность не вправе rely on the fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnProcuredCondition
    • Статья 4.3. In applying Статьи 4.1 and 4.2, regard shall be had to all the circumstances, включая those listed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CircumstanceToBeRegarded
    • Статья 1.11. Where сторона has more than one коммерческое предприятие the relevant one is that which has the closest relationship to договор and its исполнение urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ClosestPlaceIsRelevant
    • Статья 4.1(2) (opening words). Where the common intention can be established, the reasonable-persons reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CommonIntentionDisplacesReasonablePersons
    • Статья 1.12(2). The computed last day does not stand где it is a holiday at the place of исполнение urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ComputedLastDayYieldsToHoliday
    • Статья 4.6. If договор terms supplied by one party are unclear, an interpretation against that party is preferred urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContraProferentem
    • Статья 1.3. A договор validly entered into is binding upon стороны urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContractIsBinding
    • Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#Cooperate
    • Статья 5.2.4. The promisor may assert against выгодоприобретатель all defences which the promisor could assert against the promisee urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DefencesAgainstBeneficiary
    • Статья 1.5. Стороны may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, кроме случаев, когда as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective
    • Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective/unless/0
    • Статья 1.7(1). Each party must act в соответствии с добросовестность and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyOfGoodFaith
    • Статья 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party когда such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the исполнение of that party's обязательствоs urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToCooperate
    • Статья 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, сторона не вправе, contrary to добросовестность, act so as to prejudice the other party's правоs in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRights
    • Статья 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, сторона не вправе, contrary to добросовестность, act so as to prejudice the other party's правоs in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRightsBreached
    • Статья 5.1.1. The договорual обязательствоs of стороны may be express urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ExpressIsContractual
    • Статья 5.1.5. In determining the extent to which an обязательство involves a обязанность of максимальные усилия or a обязанность to achieve a specific result, regard shall be had to the listed factors urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FactorDeterminesKindOfDuty
    • Статья 1.1. Стороны are free to enter into договор and to determine its content urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FreedomOfContract
    • Статья 1.6(2). Issues within the scope of these Principles but not expressly settled by them are as far as possible to be settled в соответствии с their underlying general principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GapSettledByUnderlyingPrinciples
    • Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaith
    • Статья 1.7(2). Стороны не вправе exclude or limit the обязанность of добросовестность and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaithCannotBeExcluded
    • Статья 5.1.9(2). An оферта to release a право gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if должник does not reject it без задержки urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted
    • Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted/unless/0
    • Статья 5.1.2(c). Implied обязательствоs stem from добросовестность and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromGoodFaith
    • Статья 5.1.2(a). Implied обязательствоs stem from the nature and purpose of договор urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromNatureAndPurpose
    • Статья 5.1.2(b). Implied обязательствоs stem from практики established between стороны and обычаи urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromPracticesAndUsages
    • Статья 5.1.2(d). Implied обязательствоs stem from reasonableness urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromReasonableness
    • Статья 5.1.1. The договорual обязательствоs of стороны may be implied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedIsContractual
    • Статья 1.8. Сторона cannot act inconsistently with an understanding it has caused the other party to have and upon which that other party reasonably has acted in reliance to its detriment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InconsistentBehaviourBarred
    • Статья 4.2(2) (opening words). Where the intention was known to the other party, the reasonable-person reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#IntentionDisplacesReasonablePerson
    • Статья 4.1(1). A договор shall be interpreted according to the common intention of стороны urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByCommonIntention
    • Статья 4.1(2). If the common intention cannot be established, договор shall be interpreted according to the meaning разумное лицоs of the same kind would give it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByReasonablePersons
    • Статья 1.4. Nothing in these Principles restricts the application of mandatory rules urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MandatoryRulesUnrestricted
    • Статья 5.1.7(2). Where the price is to be determined by one party and that deрасторжение is manifestly unreasonable, a reasonable price shall be substituted notwithstanding any договор term to the contrary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ManifestlyUnreasonableDeterminationReplaced
    • Преамбула. These Principles may be applied когда стороны have agreed that their договор be governed by general principles of law, the lex mercatoria or the like urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyOnChoiceOfGeneralPrinciples
    • Преамбула. These Principles may be applied когда стороны have not chosen any law to govern their договор urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyWhereNoLawChosen
    • Преамбула. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement domestic law urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretDomesticLaw
    • Преамбула. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement international uniform law instruments urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretUniformLaw
    • Статья 1.3. The договор can be modified or terminated as otherwise provided in these Principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationAsProvided
    • Статья 1.3. The договор can be modified or terminated по соглашению urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByAgreement
    • Статья 1.3. The договор can be modified or terminated в соответствии с its terms urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByTerms
    • Статья 1.2. Nothing in these Principles requires договор to be made in or evidenced by a particular form urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoFormRequired
    • Статья 1.10(2)-(3). A notice is effective когда it reaches the person to whom it is given urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoticeEffectiveOnReceipt
    • Статья 4.7. In case of discrepancy between equally authoritative versions there is a preference for the interpretation according to the original version urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#OriginalVersionPreferred
    • Статья 1.12(1). Official holidays or non-business days occurring during the period are included in calculating it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodEndsOn
    • Статья 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the коммерческое предприятие of сторона to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday
    • Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday/unless/0
    • Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PreserveRights
    • Статья 5.1.7(1). Where договор does not fix the price, стороны are considered to have made reference to the price generally charged in comparable circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceByMarket
    • Статья 5.1.7(1). If no such price is available, a reasonable price applies urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceReasonableWhereNoMarket
    • Преамбула. These Principles shall be applied когда стороны have agreed that their договор be governed by them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PrinciplesGovernByAgreement
    • Статья 5.1.6. Where the quality of исполнение is neither fixed by nor determinable from договор, сторона связан to render a исполнение of a quality that is reasonable and not less than average in the circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#QualityWhereNotFixed
    • Статьи 4.4 and 4.5. Terms are to be read in the light of the whole договор and so as to give effect to all of them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReadingConformsToCanons
    • Статья 5.1.9(1). An obligee may release its право по соглашению with должник urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReleaseByAgreement
    • Статья 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the коммерческое предприятие of сторона setting the time, если только the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone
    • Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone/unless/0
    • Статья 5.2.6. The beneficiary may renounce a право conferred on it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RenunciationEndsBeneficiaryRight
    • Статья 5.3.2(b). The relevant договор or договорual обязательство comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract
    • Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract/unless/0
    • Статья 5.3.5. On fulfilment of a resolutive condition the rules on restitution apply with appropriate adaptations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RestitutionOnResolutiveCondition
    • Статья 5.1.4(1). To the extent that an обязательство involves a обязанность to achieve a specific result, that party связан to achieve that result urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResultDutyPerformed
    • Статья 5.2.5. Стороны may modify or revoke the правоs conferred until выгодоприобретатель has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance
    • Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance/unless/0
    • Статья 1.11. Where сторона has a single коммерческое предприятие that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant
    • Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant/unless/0
    • Статья 4.2(1). Statements and other conduct shall be interpreted according to сторона's intention if the other party knew or could not have been unaware of it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByIntention
    • Статья 4.2(2). If the preceding пункт is not applicable, statements shall be interpreted according to the meaning a разумное лицо would give them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByReasonablePerson
    • Статья 4.8(1). Where стороны have not agreed в отношении an important term, a term which is appropriate in the circumstances shall be supplied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SupplyOmittedTerm
    • Статья 5.3.2(a). The relevant договор or договорual обязательство takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect
    • Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect/unless/0
    • Статья 5.1.8. A договор for an indefinite period may be terminated by either party by giving notice a разумный срок in advance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#TerminationOfIndefiniteContract
    • Статья 5.1.7(2). A manifestly unreasonable deрасторжение does not stand as the applicable price urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#UnreasonableDeterminationDisplaced
    • Статья 5.3.1. A договор or договорual обязательство may be made conditional upon the occurrence of a future uncertain event urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ValidCondition
    Подробности
    {
 "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_EN",
 "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
 "since": null,
 "state": "not_yet",
 "status": null
}
  2. справкаEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31

    редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_FR на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 79 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)

    Задетые узлы
    • Статья 5.2.3. The conferment of правоs in выгодоприобретатель includes the право to invoke a оговорка in договор which excludes or limits the ответственность of выгодоприобретатель urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryMayInvokeClause
    • Статья 5.1.4(2). To the extent that an обязательство involves a обязанность of максимальные усилия, that party связан to make such efforts as would be made by a разумное лицо of the same kind urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BestEffortsDutyPerformed
    • Статья 1.9(1). Стороны связаны by any обычай to which they have agreed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByAgreedUsage
    • Статья 1.9(1). Стороны связаны by практики which they have established between themselves urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByEstablishedPractice
    • Статья 1.9(2). Стороны связаны by a обычай widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, кроме случаев, когда где its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage
    • Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage/unless/0
    • Статья 5.3.3(1). Сторона who prevented fulfilment contrary to добросовестность не вправе rely on the non-fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnPreventedCondition
    • Статья 5.3.3(2). Сторона who brought about fulfilment contrary to добросовестность не вправе rely on the fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnProcuredCondition
    • Статья 4.3. In applying Статьи 4.1 and 4.2, regard shall be had to all the circumstances, включая those listed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CircumstanceToBeRegarded
    • Статья 1.11. Where сторона has more than one коммерческое предприятие the relevant one is that which has the closest relationship to договор and its исполнение urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ClosestPlaceIsRelevant
    • Статья 4.1(2) (opening words). Where the common intention can be established, the reasonable-persons reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CommonIntentionDisplacesReasonablePersons
    • Статья 1.12(2). The computed last day does not stand где it is a holiday at the place of исполнение urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ComputedLastDayYieldsToHoliday
    • Статья 4.6. If договор terms supplied by one party are unclear, an interpretation against that party is preferred urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContraProferentem
    • Статья 1.3. A договор validly entered into is binding upon стороны urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContractIsBinding
    • Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#Cooperate
    • Статья 5.2.4. The promisor may assert against выгодоприобретатель all defences which the promisor could assert against the promisee urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DefencesAgainstBeneficiary
    • Статья 1.5. Стороны may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, кроме случаев, когда as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective
    • Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective/unless/0
    • Статья 1.7(1). Each party must act в соответствии с добросовестность and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyOfGoodFaith
    • Статья 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party когда such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the исполнение of that party's обязательствоs urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToCooperate
    • Статья 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, сторона не вправе, contrary to добросовестность, act so as to prejudice the other party's правоs in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRights
    • Статья 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, сторона не вправе, contrary to добросовестность, act so as to prejudice the other party's правоs in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRightsBreached
    • Статья 5.1.1. The договорual обязательствоs of стороны may be express urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ExpressIsContractual
    • Статья 5.1.5. In determining the extent to which an обязательство involves a обязанность of максимальные усилия or a обязанность to achieve a specific result, regard shall be had to the listed factors urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FactorDeterminesKindOfDuty
    • Статья 1.1. Стороны are free to enter into договор and to determine its content urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FreedomOfContract
    • Статья 1.6(2). Issues within the scope of these Principles but not expressly settled by them are as far as possible to be settled в соответствии с their underlying general principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GapSettledByUnderlyingPrinciples
    • Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaith
    • Статья 1.7(2). Стороны не вправе exclude or limit the обязанность of добросовестность and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaithCannotBeExcluded
    • Статья 5.1.9(2). An оферта to release a право gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if должник does not reject it без задержки urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted
    • Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted/unless/0
    • Статья 5.1.2(c). Implied обязательствоs stem from добросовестность and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromGoodFaith
    • Статья 5.1.2(a). Implied обязательствоs stem from the nature and purpose of договор urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromNatureAndPurpose
    • Статья 5.1.2(b). Implied обязательствоs stem from практики established between стороны and обычаи urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromPracticesAndUsages
    • Статья 5.1.2(d). Implied обязательствоs stem from reasonableness urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromReasonableness
    • Статья 5.1.1. The договорual обязательствоs of стороны may be implied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedIsContractual
    • Статья 1.8. Сторона cannot act inconsistently with an understanding it has caused the other party to have and upon which that other party reasonably has acted in reliance to its detriment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InconsistentBehaviourBarred
    • Статья 4.2(2) (opening words). Where the intention was known to the other party, the reasonable-person reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#IntentionDisplacesReasonablePerson
    • Статья 4.1(1). A договор shall be interpreted according to the common intention of стороны urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByCommonIntention
    • Статья 4.1(2). If the common intention cannot be established, договор shall be interpreted according to the meaning разумное лицоs of the same kind would give it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByReasonablePersons
    • Статья 1.4. Nothing in these Principles restricts the application of mandatory rules urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MandatoryRulesUnrestricted
    • Статья 5.1.7(2). Where the price is to be determined by one party and that deрасторжение is manifestly unreasonable, a reasonable price shall be substituted notwithstanding any договор term to the contrary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ManifestlyUnreasonableDeterminationReplaced
    • Преамбула. These Principles may be applied когда стороны have agreed that their договор be governed by general principles of law, the lex mercatoria or the like urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyOnChoiceOfGeneralPrinciples
    • Преамбула. These Principles may be applied когда стороны have not chosen any law to govern their договор urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyWhereNoLawChosen
    • Преамбула. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement domestic law urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretDomesticLaw
    • Преамбула. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement international uniform law instruments urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretUniformLaw
    • Статья 1.3. The договор can be modified or terminated as otherwise provided in these Principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationAsProvided
    • Статья 1.3. The договор can be modified or terminated по соглашению urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByAgreement
    • Статья 1.3. The договор can be modified or terminated в соответствии с its terms urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByTerms
    • Статья 1.2. Nothing in these Principles requires договор to be made in or evidenced by a particular form urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoFormRequired
    • Статья 1.10(2)-(3). A notice is effective когда it reaches the person to whom it is given urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoticeEffectiveOnReceipt
    • Статья 4.7. In case of discrepancy between equally authoritative versions there is a preference for the interpretation according to the original version urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#OriginalVersionPreferred
    • Статья 1.12(1). Official holidays or non-business days occurring during the period are included in calculating it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodEndsOn
    • Статья 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the коммерческое предприятие of сторона to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday
    • Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday/unless/0
    • Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PreserveRights
    • Статья 5.1.7(1). Where договор does not fix the price, стороны are considered to have made reference to the price generally charged in comparable circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceByMarket
    • Статья 5.1.7(1). If no such price is available, a reasonable price applies urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceReasonableWhereNoMarket
    • Преамбула. These Principles shall be applied когда стороны have agreed that their договор be governed by them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PrinciplesGovernByAgreement
    • Статья 5.1.6. Where the quality of исполнение is neither fixed by nor determinable from договор, сторона связан to render a исполнение of a quality that is reasonable and not less than average in the circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#QualityWhereNotFixed
    • Статья 5.1.9(1). An obligee may release its право по соглашению with должник urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReleaseByAgreement
    • Статья 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the коммерческое предприятие of сторона setting the time, если только the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone
    • Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone/unless/0
    • Статья 5.2.6. The beneficiary may renounce a право conferred on it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RenunciationEndsBeneficiaryRight
    • Статья 5.3.2(b). The relevant договор or договорual обязательство comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract
    • Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract/unless/0
    • Статья 5.3.5. On fulfilment of a resolutive condition the rules on restitution apply with appropriate adaptations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RestitutionOnResolutiveCondition
    • Статья 5.1.4(1). To the extent that an обязательство involves a обязанность to achieve a specific result, that party связан to achieve that result urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResultDutyPerformed
    • Статья 5.2.5. Стороны may modify or revoke the правоs conferred until выгодоприобретатель has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance
    • Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance/unless/0
    • Статья 1.11. Where сторона has a single коммерческое предприятие that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant
    • Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant/unless/0
    • Статья 4.2(1). Statements and other conduct shall be interpreted according to сторона's intention if the other party knew or could not have been unaware of it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByIntention
    • Статья 4.2(2). If the preceding пункт is not applicable, statements shall be interpreted according to the meaning a разумное лицо would give them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByReasonablePerson
    • Статья 4.8(1). Where стороны have not agreed в отношении an important term, a term which is appropriate in the circumstances shall be supplied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SupplyOmittedTerm
    • Статья 5.3.2(a). The relevant договор or договорual обязательство takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect
    • Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect/unless/0
    • Статья 5.1.8. A договор for an indefinite period may be terminated by either party by giving notice a разумный срок in advance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#TerminationOfIndefiniteContract
    • Статья 5.1.7(2). A manifestly unreasonable deрасторжение does not stand as the applicable price urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#UnreasonableDeterminationDisplaced
    • Статья 5.3.1. A договор or договорual обязательство may be made conditional upon the occurrence of a future uncertain event urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ValidCondition
    Подробности
    {
 "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_FR",
 "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
 "since": null,
 "state": "not_yet",
 "status": null
}
  3. справкаEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31

    редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_EN на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 26 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)

    Задетые узлы
    • Статья 10.4(1). Where должник acknowledges the право before the expiration of the general срок исковой давности, a new general срок исковой давности begins on the day after the acknowledgement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AcknowledgementStartsNewGeneralPeriod
    • Статья 10.6(1). In the absence of provisions determining the exact date of commencement, arbitral proceedings are deemed to commence on the date on which the request reaches должник urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ArbitrationCommencesOnRequest
    • Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration
    • Статья 10.1(2). This Chapter does not govern the time within which сторона must give notice or perform any act other than the institution of legal proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ChapterDoesNotGovernNoticeTime
    • Статья 10.9(1). The expiration of the срок исковой давности does not extinguish the право urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight
    • Статья 10.9(2). For the expiration of the срок исковой давности to have effect, должник must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted
    • Article 10.9(2). Once the obligor has asserted expiry, the barred exercise is a comparative remedium_exclusum urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit
    • Статья 10.3(a). Стороны не вправе shorten the general срок исковой давности to less than one year urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodFloorOfOneYear
    • Статья 10.2(1). The general срок исковой давности is three years beginning on the day after the day кредитор knows or ought to know the facts as a result of which the право can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodOfThreeYears
    • Статья 10.1(1). The exercise of правоs governed by Принципы is barred by the expiration of a срок исковой давности according to the rules of this Chapter urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#LimitationGovernsExerciseOfRights
    • Статья 10.3(c). Стороны не вправе extend the maximum срок исковой давности to more than fifteen years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodCeilingOfFifteenYears
    • Статья 10.4(2). The maximum срок исковой давности does not begin to run again, but may be exceeded by the beginning of a new general срок исковой давности urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodDoesNotRestart
    • Статья 10.3(b). Стороны не вправе shorten the maximum срок исковой давности to less than four years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodFloorOfFourYears
    • Статья 10.2(2). In any event, the maximum срок исковой давности is ten years beginning on the day after the day the право can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodOfTenYears
    • Статья 10.11. Where there has been исполнение in order to discharge an обязательство, there is no право of restitution merely because the срок исковой давности has expired urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#NoRestitutionAfterExpiration
    • Статья 10.9(2). For the expiration of the срок исковой давности to have effect, должник must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration
    • Статья 10.3. Стороны may modify the срок исковой давностиs urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PartiesMayModifyPeriods
    • Статья 10.9(3). A право may still be relied on as a defence even though the expiration of the срок исковой давности for that право has been asserted urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#RightStillAvailableAsDefence
    • Статья 10.10. The obligee may exercise the право of зачёт until должник has asserted the expiration of the срок исковой давности urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SetOffUntilExpirationAsserted
    • Статья 10.7. Статьи 10.5 and 10.6 apply with appropriate modifications to proceedings гдеby стороны request a third person to assist them in reaching an amicable settlement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByAmicableSettlementProceedings
    • Статья 10.6(1). The running of the срок исковой давности is suspended когда кредитор performs an act recognised by the law of the arbitral tribunal as asserting its право urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByArbitralAct
    • Статья 10.5(1)(c). The running of the срок исковой давности is suspended где кредитор has asserted its правоs in proceedings for dissolution of должник urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByDissolutionClaim
    • Статья 10.8(1). Where кредитор has been prevented by an impediment beyond its control, the general срок исковой давности is suspended so as not to expire before one year after the impediment has ceased to exist urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByImpediment
    • Статья 10.8(2). Where the impediment consists of the incapacity or death of сторона, suspension ceases когда a representative or successor has been appointed; the additional one-year period applies accordingly urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByIncapacityEndsOnAppointment
    • Статья 10.5(1)(b). The running of the срок исковой давности is suspended где кредитор has asserted its правоs in the insolvency proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByInsolvencyClaim
    • Статья 10.5(1)(a). The running of the срок исковой давности is suspended когда кредитор performs an act recognised by the law of суд as asserting its право urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByJudicialAct
    Подробности
    {
 "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_EN",
 "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
 "since": null,
 "state": "not_yet",
 "status": null
}
  4. справкаEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31

    редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_FR на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 26 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)

    Задетые узлы
    • Статья 10.4(1). Where должник acknowledges the право before the expiration of the general срок исковой давности, a new general срок исковой давности begins on the day after the acknowledgement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AcknowledgementStartsNewGeneralPeriod
    • Статья 10.6(1). In the absence of provisions determining the exact date of commencement, arbitral proceedings are deemed to commence on the date on which the request reaches должник urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ArbitrationCommencesOnRequest
    • Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration
    • Статья 10.1(2). This Chapter does not govern the time within which сторона must give notice or perform any act other than the institution of legal proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ChapterDoesNotGovernNoticeTime
    • Статья 10.9(1). The expiration of the срок исковой давности does not extinguish the право urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight
    • Статья 10.9(2). For the expiration of the срок исковой давности to have effect, должник must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted
    • Article 10.9(2). Once the obligor has asserted expiry, the barred exercise is a comparative remedium_exclusum urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit
    • Статья 10.3(a). Стороны не вправе shorten the general срок исковой давности to less than one year urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodFloorOfOneYear
    • Статья 10.2(1). The general срок исковой давности is three years beginning on the day after the day кредитор knows or ought to know the facts as a result of which the право can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodOfThreeYears
    • Статья 10.1(1). The exercise of правоs governed by Принципы is barred by the expiration of a срок исковой давности according to the rules of this Chapter urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#LimitationGovernsExerciseOfRights
    • Статья 10.3(c). Стороны не вправе extend the maximum срок исковой давности to more than fifteen years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodCeilingOfFifteenYears
    • Статья 10.4(2). The maximum срок исковой давности does not begin to run again, but may be exceeded by the beginning of a new general срок исковой давности urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodDoesNotRestart
    • Статья 10.3(b). Стороны не вправе shorten the maximum срок исковой давности to less than four years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodFloorOfFourYears
    • Статья 10.2(2). In any event, the maximum срок исковой давности is ten years beginning on the day after the day the право can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodOfTenYears
    • Статья 10.11. Where there has been исполнение in order to discharge an обязательство, there is no право of restitution merely because the срок исковой давности has expired urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#NoRestitutionAfterExpiration
    • Статья 10.9(2). For the expiration of the срок исковой давности to have effect, должник must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration
    • Статья 10.3. Стороны may modify the срок исковой давностиs urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PartiesMayModifyPeriods
    • Статья 10.9(3). A право may still be relied on as a defence even though the expiration of the срок исковой давности for that право has been asserted urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#RightStillAvailableAsDefence
    • Статья 10.10. The obligee may exercise the право of зачёт until должник has asserted the expiration of the срок исковой давности urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SetOffUntilExpirationAsserted
    • Статья 10.7. Статьи 10.5 and 10.6 apply with appropriate modifications to proceedings гдеby стороны request a third person to assist them in reaching an amicable settlement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByAmicableSettlementProceedings
    • Статья 10.6(1). The running of the срок исковой давности is suspended когда кредитор performs an act recognised by the law of the arbitral tribunal as asserting its право urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByArbitralAct
    • Статья 10.5(1)(c). The running of the срок исковой давности is suspended где кредитор has asserted its правоs in proceedings for dissolution of должник urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByDissolutionClaim
    • Статья 10.8(1). Where кредитор has been prevented by an impediment beyond its control, the general срок исковой давности is suspended so as not to expire before one year after the impediment has ceased to exist urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByImpediment
    • Статья 10.8(2). Where the impediment consists of the incapacity or death of сторона, suspension ceases когда a representative or successor has been appointed; the additional one-year period applies accordingly urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByIncapacityEndsOnAppointment
    • Статья 10.5(1)(b). The running of the срок исковой давности is suspended где кредитор has asserted its правоs in the insolvency proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByInsolvencyClaim
    • Статья 10.5(1)(a). The running of the срок исковой давности is suspended когда кредитор performs an act recognised by the law of суд as asserting its право urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByJudicialAct
    Подробности
    {
 "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_FR",
 "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
 "since": null,
 "state": "not_yet",
 "status": null
}

Как записал движок: код, тяжесть и текст с §-ссылками; порядок — как в документе исполнения.

Граф доказательств

Граф доказательства · 5 слой
query_evaluationaction_prescrite_lerule_applicationActionPrescriteApresEcheancerule_applicationEcheanceCinqAnsassertionaction_introduite_lerule_applicationPointDepartConnaissanceReelleassertionprescription_non_interrompueassertiontitulaire_connait_les_faits_leassertioncreance_exigible_depuis

Узлы доказательств: 12 · assertion 5, rule_application 6, query_evaluation 1

Блок слишком большой для встроенного просмотра. Он целиком включён в JSON документа — без сокращений.

Скачать JSON ↓
Идентификаторы календаря и доказательства
Ссылка на доказательство
case/FuenfJahre_CC/query/cc-prescrite
Исходное обоснование · JSON

Блок слишком большой для встроенного просмотра. Он целиком включён в JSON документа — без сокращений.

Скачать JSON ↓
ИсточникиФрагментов: 7

Статья 2219

Article 2219 La prescription extinctive est un mode d'extinction d'un droit résultant de l'inaction de son titulaire pendant un certain laps de temps.
Исходные данные · JSON
JSONТолько чтение
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:6df4090af33e5e220e1ccb8dce8f8d00f5f0e141aadbd8f85537aa44bf7a63f7",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2219",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2219"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2219",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:0b7ecca0ee814319db91d174578fb164b2ac80bbd82794ff733b36bd4f55401a",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2219\nLa prescription extinctive est un mode d'extinction d'un droit résultant de l'inaction de son titulaire pendant un certain laps de temps.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Статья 2224

Article 2224 Les actions personnelles ou mobilières se prescrivent par cinq ans à compter du jour où le titulaire d'un droit a connu ou aurait dû connaître les faits lui permettant de l'exercer.
Исходные данные · JSON
JSONТолько чтение
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:bdab8bd64c835fd72d22b2500bf46d2189e23899c1a2355f5df83442df6121ab",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2224",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2224"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2224",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:672b74a19b0ebe429181790cbe798f0f53e22cb2eeb8706cded06dbf5a40c629",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2224\nLes actions personnelles ou mobilières se prescrivent par cinq ans à compter du jour où le titulaire d'un droit a connu ou aurait dû connaître les faits lui permettant de l'exercer.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Статья 2228

Article 2228 La prescription se compte par jours, et non par heures.
Исходные данные · JSON
JSONТолько чтение
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:a65f1c87050358f486df72292dbb5562439921a55708065026e1560803461b7b",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2228",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2228"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2228",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:dd06365b6b1300407fadd02ddc12c5220fd9139343f3ce91809ff20bf62588a6",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2228\nLa prescription se compte par jours, et non par heures.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Статья 2229

Article 2229 Elle est acquise lorsque le dernier jour du terme est accompli.
Исходные данные · JSON
JSONТолько чтение
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:43dd3aa87d9bddf34522d203c9afc34f12ce9f5292aa3748835cbccf72dfcccd",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2229",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2229"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2229",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:28578b7da1445ef66f205effb784bcc5dae77310d748b2ae6ccebd52a8ca3009",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2229\nElle est acquise lorsque le dernier jour du terme est accompli.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Статья 2232

Article 2232 Le report du point de départ, la suspension ou l'interruption de la prescription ne peut avoir pour effet de porter le délai de la prescription extinctive au-delà de vingt ans à compter du jour de la naissance du droit. Le premier alinéa n'est pas applicable dans les cas mentionnés aux articles 2226, 2226-1, 2227, 2233 et 2236, au premier alinéa de l'article 2241 et à l'article 2244. Il ne s'applique pas non plus aux actions relatives à l'état des personnes.
Исходные данные · JSON
JSONТолько чтение
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:d0aa882fc857d081bcada43191910d722446f91fb14fb86b7e7322957b4070c8",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2232",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2232"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2232",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:b1a33bf6d27cec1af359949222bf7220bc63bc536ae53eb79e94833b5d293e0b",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2232\nLe report du point de départ, la suspension ou l'interruption de la prescription ne peut avoir pour effet de porter le délai de la prescription extinctive au-delà de vingt ans à compter du jour de la naissance du droit.\nLe premier alinéa n'est pas applicable dans les cas mentionnés aux articles 2226, 2226-1, 2227, 2233 et 2236, au premier alinéa de l'article 2241 et à l'article 2244. Il ne s'applique pas non plus aux actions relatives à l'état des personnes.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Статья 2238

Article 2238 La prescription est suspendue à compter du jour où, après la survenance d'un litige, les parties conviennent de recourir à la médiation ou à la conciliation ou, à défaut d'accord écrit, à compter du jour de la première réunion de médiation ou de conciliation. La prescription est également suspendue à compter de la conclusion d'une convention de procédure participative ou à compter de l'accord du débiteur constaté par l'huissier de justice pour participer à la procédure prévue à l'article L. 125-1 du code des procédures civiles d'exécution. Le délai de prescription recommence à courir, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois, à compter de la date à laquelle soit l'une des parties ou les deux, soit le médiateur ou le conciliateur déclarent que la médiation ou la conciliation est terminée. En cas de convention de procédure participative, le délai de prescription recommence à courir à compter du terme de la convention, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois. En cas d'échec de la procédure prévue au même article, le délai de prescription recommence à courir à compter de la date du refus du débiteur, constaté par l'huissier, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois.
Исходные данные · JSON
JSONТолько чтение
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:85fb1ede52113abd61e7bcfa34017c1229badc1205a9cac686e65c4640912b6f",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2238",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2238"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2238",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:7de68d6ed845bcd95c5ca76851b7d5c42c0b755a0f7a53080cbbcbb127ac61f7",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2238\nLa prescription est suspendue à compter du jour où, après la survenance d'un litige, les parties conviennent de recourir à la médiation ou à la conciliation ou, à défaut d'accord écrit, à compter du jour de la première réunion de médiation ou de conciliation. La prescription est également suspendue à compter de la conclusion d'une convention de procédure participative ou à compter de l'accord du débiteur constaté par l'huissier de justice pour participer à la procédure prévue à l'article L. 125-1 du code des procédures civiles d'exécution.\nLe délai de prescription recommence à courir, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois, à compter de la date à laquelle soit l'une des parties ou les deux, soit le médiateur ou le conciliateur déclarent que la médiation ou la conciliation est terminée. En cas de convention de procédure participative, le délai de prescription recommence à courir à compter du terme de la convention, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois. En cas d'échec de la procédure prévue au même article, le délai de prescription recommence à courir à compter de la date du refus du débiteur, constaté par l'huissier, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Статья 2239

Article 2239 La prescription est également suspendue lorsque le juge fait droit à une demande de mesure d'instruction présentée avant tout procès. Le délai de prescription recommence à courir, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois, à compter du jour où la mesure a été exécutée.
Исходные данные · JSON
JSONТолько чтение
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:16731a698eded878eaa02339d6b1fd92b7299d446eab076502a9c24717cfd0cc",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2239",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2239"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2239",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:9e742ac71c8ecd1fe04db3e3bfceb323387b9b856a4882cc1429615d47e89d12",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2239\nLa prescription est également suspendue lorsque le juge fait droit à une demande de mesure d'instruction présentée avant tout procès.\nLe délai de prescription recommence à courir, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois, à compter du jour où la mesure a été exécutée.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Пакеты в снимке

  • de.bgb.core
  • de.bgb.fristen
  • de.bgb.ius_privatum
  • doctrine.ius_privatum
  • fr.code_civil
  • unidroit.picc
  • unidroit.picc_limitation
Технические данныеПолный ответ, параметры и контрольные суммы
Статус расчёта
COMPUTED
Полный ответ движка
Fünf Jahre, Code civil: die Klage ist verjährt

Полный машинный результат · JSON

Блок слишком большой для встроенного просмотра. Он целиком включён в JSON документа — без сокращений.

Скачать JSON ↓

Исполнение · JSON

Блок слишком большой для встроенного просмотра. Он целиком включён в JSON документа — без сокращений.

Скачать JSON ↓

Метаданные отображения

Блок слишком большой для встроенного просмотра. Он целиком включён в JSON документа — без сокращений.

Скачать JSON ↓

JSON · расчёты, источники и точные данные

JSONТолько чтение
{
  "acts": [
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:a6813604c35567e7c586d334efbf524d08f3467170c4b732cfb15809cacf4ff4",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core",
      "package": "de.bgb.core"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:998148eaeeed28f1565811474ee7beb7eacc616c5681ed9638edc976512a9884",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
      "package": "de.bgb.fristen"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:86a5a00db16e32187223ceeec6748eb7d42d18b7c370c8b15ac64d2f3f655ff7",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum",
      "package": "de.bgb.ius_privatum"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:7202de5de49a8a9d12837bc19cb7008ba2d1a68dbcc0134e0afccf1440a6d5ed",
      "namespace": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum",
      "package": "doctrine.ius_privatum"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:ad41d027ba92c38ca5eecc1d16097d0bbc8c5a74946fc1a6397c6dadac61158f",
      "namespace": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
      "package": "fr.code_civil"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:719bfd408eed92ad497ba071482354d4ad32b81ef9f41c6654f224416c19e603",
      "namespace": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc",
      "package": "unidroit.picc"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:b311d0d422a1079f71113320bd818236f7b09507c7dd960bdafceb91285497d9",
      "namespace": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "package": "unidroit.picc_limitation"
    }
  ],
  "caseHash": "sha256:1cd2738ae024892e46fd2940deb1436562d2b339b4aef7c72b99c36680f1f4bd",
  "jurisdiction": "Deutschland",
  "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
  "mode": "audit",
  "programHash": "sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e",
  "resultHash": "sha256:1b7a72c8a363f484f2c126fd9af22e345b6113d651669e8d86fd57e78bc688c0",
  "timezone": "UTC"
}
evaluation SHA-256
sha256:0bcd196ba381c52743eee0b8127c89f485d0716b5b84dec4b642c17a4313c2e3
Исходные данные · JSON
JSONТолько чтение
{
  "args": [
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:causa",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "kind": "value",
      "type": {
        "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
      },
      "value": "2016-01-02"
    }
  ],
  "facts": [
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#creance_exigible_depuis"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#titulaire_connait_les_faits_le"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2016-01-02"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#action_introduite_le"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#prescription_non_interrompue"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
    }
  ],
  "kind": "truth",
  "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
  "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#action_prescrite_le"
}

Проверка условия

Fünf Jahre, Code civil: das Rechtsmittel ist ausgeschlossen

Юрисдикция DeutschlandПраво на дату 02.01.2016

Результат расчёта

Установлено

Исходные параметры

Что определяем

средство защиты отнято: возражением, погашением тяжбой, давностью, иммунитетом ответчика

gscausa

Исходные факты

  • créance exigible depuis ce jour

    causa: causajour: 15 марта 2010 г.

  • le titulaire a connu les faits lui permettant d'exercer son droit ce jour

    causa: causajour: 15 марта 2010 г.

  • action introduite ce jour

    causa: causajour: 2 января 2016 г.

  • prescription non interrompue et non suspendue

    causa: causa

  • истец предъявляет к ответчику притязание — спорное отношение, о котором задаётся вопрос

    causa: causaactor: greus: s
Исходные данные · JSON
JSONТолько чтение
{
  "args": [
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:causa",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    }
  ],
  "facts": [
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#creance_exigible_depuis"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#titulaire_connait_les_faits_le"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2016-01-02"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#action_introduite_le"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#prescription_non_interrompue"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
    }
  ],
  "kind": "truth",
  "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
  "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"
}
Почему такой результатПрименённые правила и условия

Путь вывода10 шагов

  1. 1

    action introduite ce jour

    causa: urn:p12:causa; jour: 2 января 2016 г.

    факт дела
  2. 2

    le titulaire a connu les faits lui permettant d'exercer son droit ce jour

    causa: urn:p12:causa; jour: 15 марта 2010 г.

    факт дела
  3. 3

    créance exigible depuis ce jour

    causa: urn:p12:causa; jour: 15 марта 2010 г.

    факт дела
  4. 4

    cinq ans à compter du jour où le titulaire a connu les faits

    point de départ du délai quinquennal: causa: urn:p12:causa; jour: 15 марта 2010 г.

    ст. 2224

    Идентификатор
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#PointDepartConnaissanceReelle
    правило
  5. 5

    истец предъявляет к ответчику притязание — спорное отношение, о котором задаётся вопрос

    causa: urn:p12:causa; actor: urn:p12:persona:g; reus: urn:p12:persona:s

    факт дела
  6. 6

    prescription non interrompue et non suspendue

    causa: urn:p12:causa

    факт дела
  7. 7

    délai de cinq ans, compté par jours

    15 марта 2015 г. = add calendar period(15 марта 2010 г., 5 calendar_year)

    ст. 2224, ст. 2228, ст. 2229

    Идентификатор
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#EcheanceCinqAns
    правило
  8. 8

    la prescription est acquise lorsque le dernier jour du terme est accompli

    action prescrite à cette date: causa: urn:p12:causa; jour: 2 января 2016 г.

    ст. 2219, ст. 2229

    Идентификатор
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#ActionPrescriteApresEcheance
    правило
  9. 9

    la prescription extinctive éteint le droit par l'inaction de son titulaire

    средство защиты отнято: возражением, погашением тяжбой, давностью, иммунитетом ответчика: actor: urn:p12:persona:g; reus: urn:p12:persona:s; causa: urn:p12:causa

    ст. 2219, ст. 2224

    Идентификатор
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#PrescriptionExcludit
    правило
  10. 10

    Вычисление запроса

    запрос

проверено движком: 5 · факт дела: 5 · Полный граф: 12 узлов

Шаги сохранённого доказательства от фактов дела к ответу. Формулы показаны как записаны в норме, с подставленными значениями; страница ничего не пересчитывает.

Основание этого ответа

Правила из сохранённой цепочки доказательства ответа.

fr.code_civil

  • la prescription est acquise lorsque le dernier jour du terme est accompli

    Идентификатор
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#ActionPrescriteApresEcheance

  • délai de cinq ans, compté par jours

    Идентификатор
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#EcheanceCinqAns

  • cinq ans à compter du jour où le titulaire a connu les faits

    Идентификатор
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#PointDepartConnaissanceReelle

  • la prescription extinctive éteint le droit par l'inaction de son titulaire

    Идентификатор
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#PrescriptionExcludit
Другие правила расчёта2

Применены в общем расчёте, но не входят в цепочку доказательства этого ответа.

fr.code_civil

  • Article 2232, alinéa 2. Hors butoir opposable, l'échéance après plancher est la date applicable

    Идентификатор
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#DateApplicableSansButoirOpposable

  • Sans médiation, conciliation ni mesure d'instruction, l'échéance du délai n'est pas relevée

    Идентификатор
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#EcheanceApresPlancherSansMinimale
Замечания · 4
Отказы и замечания исполнения
  1. справкаEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31

    редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_EN на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 81 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)

    Задетые узлы
    • Статья 5.2.3. The conferment of правоs in выгодоприобретатель includes the право to invoke a оговорка in договор which excludes or limits the ответственность of выгодоприобретатель urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryMayInvokeClause
    • Статьи 5.2.1 and 5.2.2. Стороны may confer a право on a третье лицо who must be identifiable with adequate certainty by договор urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryRightExists
    • Статья 5.1.4(2). To the extent that an обязательство involves a обязанность of максимальные усилия, that party связан to make such efforts as would be made by a разумное лицо of the same kind urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BestEffortsDutyPerformed
    • Статья 1.9(1). Стороны связаны by any обычай to which they have agreed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByAgreedUsage
    • Статья 1.9(1). Стороны связаны by практики which they have established between themselves urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByEstablishedPractice
    • Статья 1.9(2). Стороны связаны by a обычай widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, кроме случаев, когда где its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage
    • Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage/unless/0
    • Статья 5.3.3(1). Сторона who prevented fulfilment contrary to добросовестность не вправе rely on the non-fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnPreventedCondition
    • Статья 5.3.3(2). Сторона who brought about fulfilment contrary to добросовестность не вправе rely on the fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnProcuredCondition
    • Статья 4.3. In applying Статьи 4.1 and 4.2, regard shall be had to all the circumstances, включая those listed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CircumstanceToBeRegarded
    • Статья 1.11. Where сторона has more than one коммерческое предприятие the relevant one is that which has the closest relationship to договор and its исполнение urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ClosestPlaceIsRelevant
    • Статья 4.1(2) (opening words). Where the common intention can be established, the reasonable-persons reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CommonIntentionDisplacesReasonablePersons
    • Статья 1.12(2). The computed last day does not stand где it is a holiday at the place of исполнение urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ComputedLastDayYieldsToHoliday
    • Статья 4.6. If договор terms supplied by one party are unclear, an interpretation against that party is preferred urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContraProferentem
    • Статья 1.3. A договор validly entered into is binding upon стороны urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContractIsBinding
    • Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#Cooperate
    • Статья 5.2.4. The promisor may assert against выгодоприобретатель all defences which the promisor could assert against the promisee urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DefencesAgainstBeneficiary
    • Статья 1.5. Стороны may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, кроме случаев, когда as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective
    • Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective/unless/0
    • Статья 1.7(1). Each party must act в соответствии с добросовестность and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyOfGoodFaith
    • Статья 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party когда such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the исполнение of that party's обязательствоs urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToCooperate
    • Статья 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, сторона не вправе, contrary to добросовестность, act so as to prejudice the other party's правоs in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRights
    • Статья 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, сторона не вправе, contrary to добросовестность, act so as to prejudice the other party's правоs in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRightsBreached
    • Статья 5.1.1. The договорual обязательствоs of стороны may be express urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ExpressIsContractual
    • Статья 5.1.5. In determining the extent to which an обязательство involves a обязанность of максимальные усилия or a обязанность to achieve a specific result, regard shall be had to the listed factors urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FactorDeterminesKindOfDuty
    • Статья 1.1. Стороны are free to enter into договор and to determine its content urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FreedomOfContract
    • Статья 1.6(2). Issues within the scope of these Principles but not expressly settled by them are as far as possible to be settled в соответствии с their underlying general principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GapSettledByUnderlyingPrinciples
    • Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaith
    • Статья 1.7(2). Стороны не вправе exclude or limit the обязанность of добросовестность and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaithCannotBeExcluded
    • Статья 5.1.9(2). An оферта to release a право gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if должник does not reject it без задержки urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted
    • Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted/unless/0
    • Статья 5.1.2(c). Implied обязательствоs stem from добросовестность and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromGoodFaith
    • Статья 5.1.2(a). Implied обязательствоs stem from the nature and purpose of договор urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromNatureAndPurpose
    • Статья 5.1.2(b). Implied обязательствоs stem from практики established between стороны and обычаи urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromPracticesAndUsages
    • Статья 5.1.2(d). Implied обязательствоs stem from reasonableness urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromReasonableness
    • Статья 5.1.1. The договорual обязательствоs of стороны may be implied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedIsContractual
    • Статья 1.8. Сторона cannot act inconsistently with an understanding it has caused the other party to have and upon which that other party reasonably has acted in reliance to its detriment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InconsistentBehaviourBarred
    • Статья 4.2(2) (opening words). Where the intention was known to the other party, the reasonable-person reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#IntentionDisplacesReasonablePerson
    • Статья 4.1(1). A договор shall be interpreted according to the common intention of стороны urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByCommonIntention
    • Статья 4.1(2). If the common intention cannot be established, договор shall be interpreted according to the meaning разумное лицоs of the same kind would give it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByReasonablePersons
    • Статья 1.4. Nothing in these Principles restricts the application of mandatory rules urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MandatoryRulesUnrestricted
    • Статья 5.1.7(2). Where the price is to be determined by one party and that deрасторжение is manifestly unreasonable, a reasonable price shall be substituted notwithstanding any договор term to the contrary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ManifestlyUnreasonableDeterminationReplaced
    • Преамбула. These Principles may be applied когда стороны have agreed that their договор be governed by general principles of law, the lex mercatoria or the like urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyOnChoiceOfGeneralPrinciples
    • Преамбула. These Principles may be applied когда стороны have not chosen any law to govern their договор urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyWhereNoLawChosen
    • Преамбула. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement domestic law urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretDomesticLaw
    • Преамбула. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement international uniform law instruments urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretUniformLaw
    • Статья 1.3. The договор can be modified or terminated as otherwise provided in these Principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationAsProvided
    • Статья 1.3. The договор can be modified or terminated по соглашению urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByAgreement
    • Статья 1.3. The договор can be modified or terminated в соответствии с its terms urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByTerms
    • Статья 1.2. Nothing in these Principles requires договор to be made in or evidenced by a particular form urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoFormRequired
    • Статья 1.10(2)-(3). A notice is effective когда it reaches the person to whom it is given urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoticeEffectiveOnReceipt
    • Статья 4.7. In case of discrepancy between equally authoritative versions there is a preference for the interpretation according to the original version urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#OriginalVersionPreferred
    • Статья 1.12(1). Official holidays or non-business days occurring during the period are included in calculating it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodEndsOn
    • Статья 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the коммерческое предприятие of сторона to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday
    • Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday/unless/0
    • Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PreserveRights
    • Статья 5.1.7(1). Where договор does not fix the price, стороны are considered to have made reference to the price generally charged in comparable circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceByMarket
    • Статья 5.1.7(1). If no such price is available, a reasonable price applies urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceReasonableWhereNoMarket
    • Преамбула. These Principles shall be applied когда стороны have agreed that their договор be governed by them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PrinciplesGovernByAgreement
    • Статья 5.1.6. Where the quality of исполнение is neither fixed by nor determinable from договор, сторона связан to render a исполнение of a quality that is reasonable and not less than average in the circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#QualityWhereNotFixed
    • Статьи 4.4 and 4.5. Terms are to be read in the light of the whole договор and so as to give effect to all of them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReadingConformsToCanons
    • Статья 5.1.9(1). An obligee may release its право по соглашению with должник urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReleaseByAgreement
    • Статья 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the коммерческое предприятие of сторона setting the time, если только the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone
    • Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone/unless/0
    • Статья 5.2.6. The beneficiary may renounce a право conferred on it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RenunciationEndsBeneficiaryRight
    • Статья 5.3.2(b). The relevant договор or договорual обязательство comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract
    • Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract/unless/0
    • Статья 5.3.5. On fulfilment of a resolutive condition the rules on restitution apply with appropriate adaptations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RestitutionOnResolutiveCondition
    • Статья 5.1.4(1). To the extent that an обязательство involves a обязанность to achieve a specific result, that party связан to achieve that result urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResultDutyPerformed
    • Статья 5.2.5. Стороны may modify or revoke the правоs conferred until выгодоприобретатель has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance
    • Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance/unless/0
    • Статья 1.11. Where сторона has a single коммерческое предприятие that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant
    • Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant/unless/0
    • Статья 4.2(1). Statements and other conduct shall be interpreted according to сторона's intention if the other party knew or could not have been unaware of it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByIntention
    • Статья 4.2(2). If the preceding пункт is not applicable, statements shall be interpreted according to the meaning a разумное лицо would give them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByReasonablePerson
    • Статья 4.8(1). Where стороны have not agreed в отношении an important term, a term which is appropriate in the circumstances shall be supplied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SupplyOmittedTerm
    • Статья 5.3.2(a). The relevant договор or договорual обязательство takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect
    • Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect/unless/0
    • Статья 5.1.8. A договор for an indefinite period may be terminated by either party by giving notice a разумный срок in advance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#TerminationOfIndefiniteContract
    • Статья 5.1.7(2). A manifestly unreasonable deрасторжение does not stand as the applicable price urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#UnreasonableDeterminationDisplaced
    • Статья 5.3.1. A договор or договорual обязательство may be made conditional upon the occurrence of a future uncertain event urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ValidCondition
    Подробности
    {
 "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_EN",
 "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
 "since": null,
 "state": "not_yet",
 "status": null
}
  2. справкаEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31

    редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_FR на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 79 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)

    Задетые узлы
    • Статья 5.2.3. The conferment of правоs in выгодоприобретатель includes the право to invoke a оговорка in договор which excludes or limits the ответственность of выгодоприобретатель urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryMayInvokeClause
    • Статья 5.1.4(2). To the extent that an обязательство involves a обязанность of максимальные усилия, that party связан to make such efforts as would be made by a разумное лицо of the same kind urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BestEffortsDutyPerformed
    • Статья 1.9(1). Стороны связаны by any обычай to which they have agreed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByAgreedUsage
    • Статья 1.9(1). Стороны связаны by практики which they have established between themselves urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByEstablishedPractice
    • Статья 1.9(2). Стороны связаны by a обычай widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, кроме случаев, когда где its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage
    • Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage/unless/0
    • Статья 5.3.3(1). Сторона who prevented fulfilment contrary to добросовестность не вправе rely on the non-fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnPreventedCondition
    • Статья 5.3.3(2). Сторона who brought about fulfilment contrary to добросовестность не вправе rely on the fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnProcuredCondition
    • Статья 4.3. In applying Статьи 4.1 and 4.2, regard shall be had to all the circumstances, включая those listed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CircumstanceToBeRegarded
    • Статья 1.11. Where сторона has more than one коммерческое предприятие the relevant one is that which has the closest relationship to договор and its исполнение urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ClosestPlaceIsRelevant
    • Статья 4.1(2) (opening words). Where the common intention can be established, the reasonable-persons reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CommonIntentionDisplacesReasonablePersons
    • Статья 1.12(2). The computed last day does not stand где it is a holiday at the place of исполнение urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ComputedLastDayYieldsToHoliday
    • Статья 4.6. If договор terms supplied by one party are unclear, an interpretation against that party is preferred urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContraProferentem
    • Статья 1.3. A договор validly entered into is binding upon стороны urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContractIsBinding
    • Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#Cooperate
    • Статья 5.2.4. The promisor may assert against выгодоприобретатель all defences which the promisor could assert against the promisee urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DefencesAgainstBeneficiary
    • Статья 1.5. Стороны may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, кроме случаев, когда as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective
    • Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective/unless/0
    • Статья 1.7(1). Each party must act в соответствии с добросовестность and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyOfGoodFaith
    • Статья 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party когда such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the исполнение of that party's обязательствоs urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToCooperate
    • Статья 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, сторона не вправе, contrary to добросовестность, act so as to prejudice the other party's правоs in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRights
    • Статья 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, сторона не вправе, contrary to добросовестность, act so as to prejudice the other party's правоs in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRightsBreached
    • Статья 5.1.1. The договорual обязательствоs of стороны may be express urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ExpressIsContractual
    • Статья 5.1.5. In determining the extent to which an обязательство involves a обязанность of максимальные усилия or a обязанность to achieve a specific result, regard shall be had to the listed factors urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FactorDeterminesKindOfDuty
    • Статья 1.1. Стороны are free to enter into договор and to determine its content urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FreedomOfContract
    • Статья 1.6(2). Issues within the scope of these Principles but not expressly settled by them are as far as possible to be settled в соответствии с their underlying general principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GapSettledByUnderlyingPrinciples
    • Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaith
    • Статья 1.7(2). Стороны не вправе exclude or limit the обязанность of добросовестность and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaithCannotBeExcluded
    • Статья 5.1.9(2). An оферта to release a право gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if должник does not reject it без задержки urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted
    • Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted/unless/0
    • Статья 5.1.2(c). Implied обязательствоs stem from добросовестность and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromGoodFaith
    • Статья 5.1.2(a). Implied обязательствоs stem from the nature and purpose of договор urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromNatureAndPurpose
    • Статья 5.1.2(b). Implied обязательствоs stem from практики established between стороны and обычаи urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromPracticesAndUsages
    • Статья 5.1.2(d). Implied обязательствоs stem from reasonableness urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromReasonableness
    • Статья 5.1.1. The договорual обязательствоs of стороны may be implied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedIsContractual
    • Статья 1.8. Сторона cannot act inconsistently with an understanding it has caused the other party to have and upon which that other party reasonably has acted in reliance to its detriment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InconsistentBehaviourBarred
    • Статья 4.2(2) (opening words). Where the intention was known to the other party, the reasonable-person reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#IntentionDisplacesReasonablePerson
    • Статья 4.1(1). A договор shall be interpreted according to the common intention of стороны urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByCommonIntention
    • Статья 4.1(2). If the common intention cannot be established, договор shall be interpreted according to the meaning разумное лицоs of the same kind would give it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByReasonablePersons
    • Статья 1.4. Nothing in these Principles restricts the application of mandatory rules urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MandatoryRulesUnrestricted
    • Статья 5.1.7(2). Where the price is to be determined by one party and that deрасторжение is manifestly unreasonable, a reasonable price shall be substituted notwithstanding any договор term to the contrary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ManifestlyUnreasonableDeterminationReplaced
    • Преамбула. These Principles may be applied когда стороны have agreed that their договор be governed by general principles of law, the lex mercatoria or the like urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyOnChoiceOfGeneralPrinciples
    • Преамбула. These Principles may be applied когда стороны have not chosen any law to govern their договор urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyWhereNoLawChosen
    • Преамбула. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement domestic law urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretDomesticLaw
    • Преамбула. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement international uniform law instruments urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretUniformLaw
    • Статья 1.3. The договор can be modified or terminated as otherwise provided in these Principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationAsProvided
    • Статья 1.3. The договор can be modified or terminated по соглашению urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByAgreement
    • Статья 1.3. The договор can be modified or terminated в соответствии с its terms urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByTerms
    • Статья 1.2. Nothing in these Principles requires договор to be made in or evidenced by a particular form urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoFormRequired
    • Статья 1.10(2)-(3). A notice is effective когда it reaches the person to whom it is given urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoticeEffectiveOnReceipt
    • Статья 4.7. In case of discrepancy between equally authoritative versions there is a preference for the interpretation according to the original version urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#OriginalVersionPreferred
    • Статья 1.12(1). Official holidays or non-business days occurring during the period are included in calculating it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodEndsOn
    • Статья 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the коммерческое предприятие of сторона to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday
    • Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday/unless/0
    • Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PreserveRights
    • Статья 5.1.7(1). Where договор does not fix the price, стороны are considered to have made reference to the price generally charged in comparable circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceByMarket
    • Статья 5.1.7(1). If no such price is available, a reasonable price applies urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceReasonableWhereNoMarket
    • Преамбула. These Principles shall be applied когда стороны have agreed that their договор be governed by them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PrinciplesGovernByAgreement
    • Статья 5.1.6. Where the quality of исполнение is neither fixed by nor determinable from договор, сторона связан to render a исполнение of a quality that is reasonable and not less than average in the circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#QualityWhereNotFixed
    • Статья 5.1.9(1). An obligee may release its право по соглашению with должник urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReleaseByAgreement
    • Статья 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the коммерческое предприятие of сторона setting the time, если только the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone
    • Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone/unless/0
    • Статья 5.2.6. The beneficiary may renounce a право conferred on it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RenunciationEndsBeneficiaryRight
    • Статья 5.3.2(b). The relevant договор or договорual обязательство comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract
    • Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract/unless/0
    • Статья 5.3.5. On fulfilment of a resolutive condition the rules on restitution apply with appropriate adaptations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RestitutionOnResolutiveCondition
    • Статья 5.1.4(1). To the extent that an обязательство involves a обязанность to achieve a specific result, that party связан to achieve that result urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResultDutyPerformed
    • Статья 5.2.5. Стороны may modify or revoke the правоs conferred until выгодоприобретатель has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance
    • Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance/unless/0
    • Статья 1.11. Where сторона has a single коммерческое предприятие that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant
    • Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant/unless/0
    • Статья 4.2(1). Statements and other conduct shall be interpreted according to сторона's intention if the other party knew or could not have been unaware of it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByIntention
    • Статья 4.2(2). If the preceding пункт is not applicable, statements shall be interpreted according to the meaning a разумное лицо would give them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByReasonablePerson
    • Статья 4.8(1). Where стороны have not agreed в отношении an important term, a term which is appropriate in the circumstances shall be supplied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SupplyOmittedTerm
    • Статья 5.3.2(a). The relevant договор or договорual обязательство takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect
    • Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect/unless/0
    • Статья 5.1.8. A договор for an indefinite period may be terminated by either party by giving notice a разумный срок in advance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#TerminationOfIndefiniteContract
    • Статья 5.1.7(2). A manifestly unreasonable deрасторжение does not stand as the applicable price urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#UnreasonableDeterminationDisplaced
    • Статья 5.3.1. A договор or договорual обязательство may be made conditional upon the occurrence of a future uncertain event urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ValidCondition
    Подробности
    {
 "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_FR",
 "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
 "since": null,
 "state": "not_yet",
 "status": null
}
  3. справкаEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31

    редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_EN на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 26 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)

    Задетые узлы
    • Статья 10.4(1). Where должник acknowledges the право before the expiration of the general срок исковой давности, a new general срок исковой давности begins on the day after the acknowledgement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AcknowledgementStartsNewGeneralPeriod
    • Статья 10.6(1). In the absence of provisions determining the exact date of commencement, arbitral proceedings are deemed to commence on the date on which the request reaches должник urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ArbitrationCommencesOnRequest
    • Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration
    • Статья 10.1(2). This Chapter does not govern the time within which сторона must give notice or perform any act other than the institution of legal proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ChapterDoesNotGovernNoticeTime
    • Статья 10.9(1). The expiration of the срок исковой давности does not extinguish the право urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight
    • Статья 10.9(2). For the expiration of the срок исковой давности to have effect, должник must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted
    • Article 10.9(2). Once the obligor has asserted expiry, the barred exercise is a comparative remedium_exclusum urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit
    • Статья 10.3(a). Стороны не вправе shorten the general срок исковой давности to less than one year urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodFloorOfOneYear
    • Статья 10.2(1). The general срок исковой давности is three years beginning on the day after the day кредитор knows or ought to know the facts as a result of which the право can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodOfThreeYears
    • Статья 10.1(1). The exercise of правоs governed by Принципы is barred by the expiration of a срок исковой давности according to the rules of this Chapter urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#LimitationGovernsExerciseOfRights
    • Статья 10.3(c). Стороны не вправе extend the maximum срок исковой давности to more than fifteen years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodCeilingOfFifteenYears
    • Статья 10.4(2). The maximum срок исковой давности does not begin to run again, but may be exceeded by the beginning of a new general срок исковой давности urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodDoesNotRestart
    • Статья 10.3(b). Стороны не вправе shorten the maximum срок исковой давности to less than four years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodFloorOfFourYears
    • Статья 10.2(2). In any event, the maximum срок исковой давности is ten years beginning on the day after the day the право can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodOfTenYears
    • Статья 10.11. Where there has been исполнение in order to discharge an обязательство, there is no право of restitution merely because the срок исковой давности has expired urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#NoRestitutionAfterExpiration
    • Статья 10.9(2). For the expiration of the срок исковой давности to have effect, должник must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration
    • Статья 10.3. Стороны may modify the срок исковой давностиs urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PartiesMayModifyPeriods
    • Статья 10.9(3). A право may still be relied on as a defence even though the expiration of the срок исковой давности for that право has been asserted urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#RightStillAvailableAsDefence
    • Статья 10.10. The obligee may exercise the право of зачёт until должник has asserted the expiration of the срок исковой давности urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SetOffUntilExpirationAsserted
    • Статья 10.7. Статьи 10.5 and 10.6 apply with appropriate modifications to proceedings гдеby стороны request a third person to assist them in reaching an amicable settlement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByAmicableSettlementProceedings
    • Статья 10.6(1). The running of the срок исковой давности is suspended когда кредитор performs an act recognised by the law of the arbitral tribunal as asserting its право urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByArbitralAct
    • Статья 10.5(1)(c). The running of the срок исковой давности is suspended где кредитор has asserted its правоs in proceedings for dissolution of должник urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByDissolutionClaim
    • Статья 10.8(1). Where кредитор has been prevented by an impediment beyond its control, the general срок исковой давности is suspended so as not to expire before one year after the impediment has ceased to exist urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByImpediment
    • Статья 10.8(2). Where the impediment consists of the incapacity or death of сторона, suspension ceases когда a representative or successor has been appointed; the additional one-year period applies accordingly urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByIncapacityEndsOnAppointment
    • Статья 10.5(1)(b). The running of the срок исковой давности is suspended где кредитор has asserted its правоs in the insolvency proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByInsolvencyClaim
    • Статья 10.5(1)(a). The running of the срок исковой давности is suspended когда кредитор performs an act recognised by the law of суд as asserting its право urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByJudicialAct
    Подробности
    {
 "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_EN",
 "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
 "since": null,
 "state": "not_yet",
 "status": null
}
  4. справкаEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31

    редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_FR на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 26 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)

    Задетые узлы
    • Статья 10.4(1). Where должник acknowledges the право before the expiration of the general срок исковой давности, a new general срок исковой давности begins on the day after the acknowledgement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AcknowledgementStartsNewGeneralPeriod
    • Статья 10.6(1). In the absence of provisions determining the exact date of commencement, arbitral proceedings are deemed to commence on the date on which the request reaches должник urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ArbitrationCommencesOnRequest
    • Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration
    • Статья 10.1(2). This Chapter does not govern the time within which сторона must give notice or perform any act other than the institution of legal proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ChapterDoesNotGovernNoticeTime
    • Статья 10.9(1). The expiration of the срок исковой давности does not extinguish the право urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight
    • Статья 10.9(2). For the expiration of the срок исковой давности to have effect, должник must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted
    • Article 10.9(2). Once the obligor has asserted expiry, the barred exercise is a comparative remedium_exclusum urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit
    • Статья 10.3(a). Стороны не вправе shorten the general срок исковой давности to less than one year urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodFloorOfOneYear
    • Статья 10.2(1). The general срок исковой давности is three years beginning on the day after the day кредитор knows or ought to know the facts as a result of which the право can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodOfThreeYears
    • Статья 10.1(1). The exercise of правоs governed by Принципы is barred by the expiration of a срок исковой давности according to the rules of this Chapter urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#LimitationGovernsExerciseOfRights
    • Статья 10.3(c). Стороны не вправе extend the maximum срок исковой давности to more than fifteen years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodCeilingOfFifteenYears
    • Статья 10.4(2). The maximum срок исковой давности does not begin to run again, but may be exceeded by the beginning of a new general срок исковой давности urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodDoesNotRestart
    • Статья 10.3(b). Стороны не вправе shorten the maximum срок исковой давности to less than four years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodFloorOfFourYears
    • Статья 10.2(2). In any event, the maximum срок исковой давности is ten years beginning on the day after the day the право can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodOfTenYears
    • Статья 10.11. Where there has been исполнение in order to discharge an обязательство, there is no право of restitution merely because the срок исковой давности has expired urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#NoRestitutionAfterExpiration
    • Статья 10.9(2). For the expiration of the срок исковой давности to have effect, должник must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration
    • Статья 10.3. Стороны may modify the срок исковой давностиs urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PartiesMayModifyPeriods
    • Статья 10.9(3). A право may still be relied on as a defence even though the expiration of the срок исковой давности for that право has been asserted urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#RightStillAvailableAsDefence
    • Статья 10.10. The obligee may exercise the право of зачёт until должник has asserted the expiration of the срок исковой давности urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SetOffUntilExpirationAsserted
    • Статья 10.7. Статьи 10.5 and 10.6 apply with appropriate modifications to proceedings гдеby стороны request a third person to assist them in reaching an amicable settlement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByAmicableSettlementProceedings
    • Статья 10.6(1). The running of the срок исковой давности is suspended когда кредитор performs an act recognised by the law of the arbitral tribunal as asserting its право urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByArbitralAct
    • Статья 10.5(1)(c). The running of the срок исковой давности is suspended где кредитор has asserted its правоs in proceedings for dissolution of должник urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByDissolutionClaim
    • Статья 10.8(1). Where кредитор has been prevented by an impediment beyond its control, the general срок исковой давности is suspended so as not to expire before one year after the impediment has ceased to exist urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByImpediment
    • Статья 10.8(2). Where the impediment consists of the incapacity or death of сторона, suspension ceases когда a representative or successor has been appointed; the additional one-year period applies accordingly urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByIncapacityEndsOnAppointment
    • Статья 10.5(1)(b). The running of the срок исковой давности is suspended где кредитор has asserted its правоs in the insolvency proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByInsolvencyClaim
    • Статья 10.5(1)(a). The running of the срок исковой давности is suspended когда кредитор performs an act recognised by the law of суд as asserting its право urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByJudicialAct
    Подробности
    {
 "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_FR",
 "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
 "since": null,
 "state": "not_yet",
 "status": null
}

Как записал движок: код, тяжесть и текст с §-ссылками; порядок — как в документе исполнения.

Граф доказательств

Граф доказательства · 6 слой
query_evaluationremedium_exclusumrule_applicationPrescriptionExcluditrule_applicationActionPrescriteApresEcheanceassertionpetitiorule_applicationEcheanceCinqAnsassertionaction_introduite_lerule_applicationPointDepartConnaissanceReelleassertionprescription_non_interrompueassertiontitulaire_connait_les_faits_leassertioncreance_exigible_depuis

Узлы доказательств: 12 · assertion 5, rule_application 6, query_evaluation 1

Блок слишком большой для встроенного просмотра. Он целиком включён в JSON документа — без сокращений.

Скачать JSON ↓
Идентификаторы календаря и доказательства
Ссылка на доказательство
case/FuenfJahre_CC/query/remedium-exclusum
Исходное обоснование · JSON

Блок слишком большой для встроенного просмотра. Он целиком включён в JSON документа — без сокращений.

Скачать JSON ↓
ИсточникиФрагментов: 7

Статья 2219

Article 2219 La prescription extinctive est un mode d'extinction d'un droit résultant de l'inaction de son titulaire pendant un certain laps de temps.
Исходные данные · JSON
JSONТолько чтение
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:6df4090af33e5e220e1ccb8dce8f8d00f5f0e141aadbd8f85537aa44bf7a63f7",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2219",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2219"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2219",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:0b7ecca0ee814319db91d174578fb164b2ac80bbd82794ff733b36bd4f55401a",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2219\nLa prescription extinctive est un mode d'extinction d'un droit résultant de l'inaction de son titulaire pendant un certain laps de temps.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Статья 2224

Article 2224 Les actions personnelles ou mobilières se prescrivent par cinq ans à compter du jour où le titulaire d'un droit a connu ou aurait dû connaître les faits lui permettant de l'exercer.
Исходные данные · JSON
JSONТолько чтение
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:bdab8bd64c835fd72d22b2500bf46d2189e23899c1a2355f5df83442df6121ab",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2224",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2224"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2224",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:672b74a19b0ebe429181790cbe798f0f53e22cb2eeb8706cded06dbf5a40c629",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2224\nLes actions personnelles ou mobilières se prescrivent par cinq ans à compter du jour où le titulaire d'un droit a connu ou aurait dû connaître les faits lui permettant de l'exercer.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Статья 2228

Article 2228 La prescription se compte par jours, et non par heures.
Исходные данные · JSON
JSONТолько чтение
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:a65f1c87050358f486df72292dbb5562439921a55708065026e1560803461b7b",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2228",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2228"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2228",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:dd06365b6b1300407fadd02ddc12c5220fd9139343f3ce91809ff20bf62588a6",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2228\nLa prescription se compte par jours, et non par heures.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Статья 2229

Article 2229 Elle est acquise lorsque le dernier jour du terme est accompli.
Исходные данные · JSON
JSONТолько чтение
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:43dd3aa87d9bddf34522d203c9afc34f12ce9f5292aa3748835cbccf72dfcccd",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2229",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2229"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2229",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:28578b7da1445ef66f205effb784bcc5dae77310d748b2ae6ccebd52a8ca3009",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2229\nElle est acquise lorsque le dernier jour du terme est accompli.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Статья 2232

Article 2232 Le report du point de départ, la suspension ou l'interruption de la prescription ne peut avoir pour effet de porter le délai de la prescription extinctive au-delà de vingt ans à compter du jour de la naissance du droit. Le premier alinéa n'est pas applicable dans les cas mentionnés aux articles 2226, 2226-1, 2227, 2233 et 2236, au premier alinéa de l'article 2241 et à l'article 2244. Il ne s'applique pas non plus aux actions relatives à l'état des personnes.
Исходные данные · JSON
JSONТолько чтение
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:d0aa882fc857d081bcada43191910d722446f91fb14fb86b7e7322957b4070c8",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2232",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2232"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2232",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:b1a33bf6d27cec1af359949222bf7220bc63bc536ae53eb79e94833b5d293e0b",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2232\nLe report du point de départ, la suspension ou l'interruption de la prescription ne peut avoir pour effet de porter le délai de la prescription extinctive au-delà de vingt ans à compter du jour de la naissance du droit.\nLe premier alinéa n'est pas applicable dans les cas mentionnés aux articles 2226, 2226-1, 2227, 2233 et 2236, au premier alinéa de l'article 2241 et à l'article 2244. Il ne s'applique pas non plus aux actions relatives à l'état des personnes.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Статья 2238

Article 2238 La prescription est suspendue à compter du jour où, après la survenance d'un litige, les parties conviennent de recourir à la médiation ou à la conciliation ou, à défaut d'accord écrit, à compter du jour de la première réunion de médiation ou de conciliation. La prescription est également suspendue à compter de la conclusion d'une convention de procédure participative ou à compter de l'accord du débiteur constaté par l'huissier de justice pour participer à la procédure prévue à l'article L. 125-1 du code des procédures civiles d'exécution. Le délai de prescription recommence à courir, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois, à compter de la date à laquelle soit l'une des parties ou les deux, soit le médiateur ou le conciliateur déclarent que la médiation ou la conciliation est terminée. En cas de convention de procédure participative, le délai de prescription recommence à courir à compter du terme de la convention, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois. En cas d'échec de la procédure prévue au même article, le délai de prescription recommence à courir à compter de la date du refus du débiteur, constaté par l'huissier, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois.
Исходные данные · JSON
JSONТолько чтение
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:85fb1ede52113abd61e7bcfa34017c1229badc1205a9cac686e65c4640912b6f",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2238",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2238"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2238",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:7de68d6ed845bcd95c5ca76851b7d5c42c0b755a0f7a53080cbbcbb127ac61f7",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2238\nLa prescription est suspendue à compter du jour où, après la survenance d'un litige, les parties conviennent de recourir à la médiation ou à la conciliation ou, à défaut d'accord écrit, à compter du jour de la première réunion de médiation ou de conciliation. La prescription est également suspendue à compter de la conclusion d'une convention de procédure participative ou à compter de l'accord du débiteur constaté par l'huissier de justice pour participer à la procédure prévue à l'article L. 125-1 du code des procédures civiles d'exécution.\nLe délai de prescription recommence à courir, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois, à compter de la date à laquelle soit l'une des parties ou les deux, soit le médiateur ou le conciliateur déclarent que la médiation ou la conciliation est terminée. En cas de convention de procédure participative, le délai de prescription recommence à courir à compter du terme de la convention, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois. En cas d'échec de la procédure prévue au même article, le délai de prescription recommence à courir à compter de la date du refus du débiteur, constaté par l'huissier, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Статья 2239

Article 2239 La prescription est également suspendue lorsque le juge fait droit à une demande de mesure d'instruction présentée avant tout procès. Le délai de prescription recommence à courir, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois, à compter du jour où la mesure a été exécutée.
Исходные данные · JSON
JSONТолько чтение
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:16731a698eded878eaa02339d6b1fd92b7299d446eab076502a9c24717cfd0cc",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2239",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2239"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2239",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:9e742ac71c8ecd1fe04db3e3bfceb323387b9b856a4882cc1429615d47e89d12",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2239\nLa prescription est également suspendue lorsque le juge fait droit à une demande de mesure d'instruction présentée avant tout procès.\nLe délai de prescription recommence à courir, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois, à compter du jour où la mesure a été exécutée.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Пакеты в снимке

  • de.bgb.core
  • de.bgb.fristen
  • de.bgb.ius_privatum
  • doctrine.ius_privatum
  • fr.code_civil
  • unidroit.picc
  • unidroit.picc_limitation
Технические данныеПолный ответ, параметры и контрольные суммы
Статус расчёта
COMPUTED
Полный ответ движка
Fünf Jahre, Code civil: das Rechtsmittel ist ausgeschlossen

Полный машинный результат · JSON

Блок слишком большой для встроенного просмотра. Он целиком включён в JSON документа — без сокращений.

Скачать JSON ↓

Исполнение · JSON

Блок слишком большой для встроенного просмотра. Он целиком включён в JSON документа — без сокращений.

Скачать JSON ↓

Метаданные отображения

Блок слишком большой для встроенного просмотра. Он целиком включён в JSON документа — без сокращений.

Скачать JSON ↓

JSON · расчёты, источники и точные данные

JSONТолько чтение
{
  "acts": [
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:a6813604c35567e7c586d334efbf524d08f3467170c4b732cfb15809cacf4ff4",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core",
      "package": "de.bgb.core"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:998148eaeeed28f1565811474ee7beb7eacc616c5681ed9638edc976512a9884",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
      "package": "de.bgb.fristen"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:86a5a00db16e32187223ceeec6748eb7d42d18b7c370c8b15ac64d2f3f655ff7",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum",
      "package": "de.bgb.ius_privatum"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:7202de5de49a8a9d12837bc19cb7008ba2d1a68dbcc0134e0afccf1440a6d5ed",
      "namespace": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum",
      "package": "doctrine.ius_privatum"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:ad41d027ba92c38ca5eecc1d16097d0bbc8c5a74946fc1a6397c6dadac61158f",
      "namespace": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
      "package": "fr.code_civil"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:719bfd408eed92ad497ba071482354d4ad32b81ef9f41c6654f224416c19e603",
      "namespace": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc",
      "package": "unidroit.picc"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:b311d0d422a1079f71113320bd818236f7b09507c7dd960bdafceb91285497d9",
      "namespace": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "package": "unidroit.picc_limitation"
    }
  ],
  "caseHash": "sha256:1cd2738ae024892e46fd2940deb1436562d2b339b4aef7c72b99c36680f1f4bd",
  "jurisdiction": "Deutschland",
  "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
  "mode": "audit",
  "programHash": "sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e",
  "resultHash": "sha256:e7b66d5baa5e7549686900b9d08e95ca26887f3d7ee53eaf713bbc3700ff2578",
  "timezone": "UTC"
}
evaluation SHA-256
sha256:634f4470f8c92a90a0ff084228d2a8f088f1c16eb8df83ef622972cb380b4b81
Исходные данные · JSON
JSONТолько чтение
{
  "args": [
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:causa",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    }
  ],
  "facts": [
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#creance_exigible_depuis"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#titulaire_connait_les_faits_le"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2016-01-02"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#action_introduite_le"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#prescription_non_interrompue"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
    }
  ],
  "kind": "truth",
  "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
  "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"
}

Nach dem Code civil ist die Klage verjährt, und das Rechtsmittel ist ausgeschlossen.

Fünf Jahre, Code civil: die Klage ist verjährt

Проверка условия

Fünf Jahre, PICC: das Rechtsmittel ist ausgeschlossen

Юрисдикция DeutschlandПраво на дату 01.06.2016

Результат расчёта

Установлено

Исходные параметры

Что определяем

средство защиты отнято: возражением, погашением тяжбой, давностью, иммунитетом ответчика

gscausa

Исходные факты

  • the право belongs to кредитор against должник under that договор

    r: rightc: contractobligee: obligeeobligor: obligor

  • the срок исковой давности for the право has expired

    r: right

  • должник has asserted the expiration of the срок исковой давности as a defence

    r: right

  • the contracting party appears in the comparative chain as this persona

    px
    obligeeg
    obligors

  • this right is the comparative causa

    r: rightc: causa

  • истец предъявляет к ответчику притязание — спорное отношение, о котором задаётся вопрос

    causa: causaactor: greus: s
Исходные данные · JSON
JSONТолько чтение
{
  "args": [
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:causa",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    }
  ],
  "facts": [
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:right",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:contract",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:obligee",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:obligor",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#right_of"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:right",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#limitation_expired"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:right",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#expiration_asserted_as_defence"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:obligee",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#persona_of_party"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:obligor",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#persona_of_party"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:right",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#causa_of_right"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
    }
  ],
  "kind": "truth",
  "legalTime": "2016-06-01",
  "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"
}
Почему такой результатПрименённые правила и условия

Путь вывода10 шагов

  1. 1

    должник has asserted the expiration of the срок исковой давности as a defence

    r: urn:p12:right

    факт дела
  2. 2

    this right is the comparative causa

    r: urn:p12:right; c: urn:p12:causa

    факт дела
  3. 3

    the срок исковой давности for the право has expired

    r: urn:p12:right

    факт дела
  4. 4

    Статья 10.9(2). For the expiration of the срок исковой давности to have effect, должник must assert it as a defence

    the expiration of the срок исковой давности has effect and bars the exercise of the право (article 10.9(2)): r: urn:p12:right

    ст. 10_9, ст. 10_9

    Идентификатор
    urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted
    правило
  5. 5

    the contracting party appears in the comparative chain as this persona

    p: urn:p12:obligee; x: urn:p12:persona:g

    факт дела
  6. 6

    the contracting party appears in the comparative chain as this persona

    p: urn:p12:obligor; x: urn:p12:persona:s

    факт дела
  7. 7

    истец предъявляет к ответчику притязание — спорное отношение, о котором задаётся вопрос

    causa: urn:p12:causa; actor: urn:p12:persona:g; reus: urn:p12:persona:s

    факт дела
  8. 8

    the право belongs to кредитор against должник under that договор

    r: urn:p12:right; c: urn:p12:contract; obligee: urn:p12:obligee; obligor: urn:p12:obligor

    факт дела
  9. 9

    Article 10.9(2). Once the obligor has asserted expiry, the barred exercise is a comparative remedium_exclusum

    средство защиты отнято: возражением, погашением тяжбой, давностью, иммунитетом ответчика: actor: urn:p12:persona:g; reus: urn:p12:persona:s; causa: urn:p12:causa

    ст. 10_9, ст. 10_9

    Идентификатор
    urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit
    правило
  10. 10

    Вычисление запроса

    запрос

проверено движком: 3 · факт дела: 7 · Полный граф: 15 узлов

Шаги сохранённого доказательства от фактов дела к ответу. Формулы показаны как записаны в норме, с подставленными значениями; страница ничего не пересчитывает.

Основание этого ответа

Правила из сохранённой цепочки доказательства ответа.

unidroit.picc_limitation

  • Статья 10.9(2). For the expiration of the срок исковой давности to have effect, должник must assert it as a defence

    Идентификатор
    urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted

  • Article 10.9(2). Once the obligor has asserted expiry, the barred exercise is a comparative remedium_exclusum

    Идентификатор
    urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit
Другие правила расчёта1

Применены в общем расчёте, но не входят в цепочку доказательства этого ответа.

unidroit.picc_limitation

  • Статья 10.9(1). The expiration of the срок исковой давности does not extinguish the право

    Идентификатор
    urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight

Граф доказательств

Граф доказательства · 4 слой
query_evaluationremedium_exclusumrule_applicationExpiryExcluditrule_applicationExpirationNeedsToBeAssertedassertioncausa_of_rightassertionpersona_of_partyassertionpersona_of_partyassertionpetitioassertionright_ofassertionexpiration_asserted_as_defenceassertionlimitation_expired

Узлы доказательств: 15 · assertion 7, rule_application 3, candidate_closure 2, norm_creation 2, query_evaluation 1

assertion · urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#asserted
attributes
assertion
asserted
conclusion
Аргументы
  • Идентификатор
    right
    Тип
    entity_ref
Тип
literal
Знак
positive
Условие
expiration_asserted_as_defence
evidence
—
Идентификатор
asserted
Тип
assertion
Посылки
—
sourceAnchors
—
assertion · urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#causa
attributes
assertion
causa
conclusion
Аргументы
  • Идентификатор
    right
    Тип
    entity_ref
  • Идентификатор
    causa
    Тип
    entity_ref
Тип
literal
Знак
positive
Условие
causa_of_right
evidence
—
Идентификатор
causa
Тип
assertion
Посылки
—
sourceAnchors
—
assertion · urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#expired
attributes
assertion
expired
conclusion
Аргументы
  • Идентификатор
    right
    Тип
    entity_ref
Тип
literal
Знак
positive
Условие
limitation_expired
evidence
—
Идентификатор
expired
Тип
assertion
Посылки
—
sourceAnchors
—
rule_application · urn:proof:apply:ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight:e72996a2c7c818667c2d5d0c4953a8cd27d6a6e1543f4123a71643aa9d0f1fd7
attributes
—
conclusion
Аргументы
  • Идентификатор
    right
    Тип
    entity_ref
Тип
literal
Знак
positive
Условие
right_not_extinguished
evidence
—
Идентификатор
e72996a2c7c818667c2d5d0c4953a8cd27d6a6e1543f4123a71643aa9d0f1fd7
Тип
rule_application
Посылки
  • expired
Правило
ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight
sourceAnchors
—
substitution
v0
Идентификатор
right
Тип
entity_ref
rule_application · urn:proof:apply:ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted:b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a
attributes
strength
defeasible
conclusion
Аргументы
  • Идентификатор
    right
    Тип
    entity_ref
Тип
literal
Знак
positive
Условие
exercise_barred
evidence
—
Идентификатор
b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a
Тип
rule_application
Посылки
  • asserted
  • expired
Правило
ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted
sourceAnchors
—
substitution
v0
Идентификатор
right
Тип
entity_ref
assertion · urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-ee
attributes
assertion
persona-ee
conclusion
Аргументы
  • Идентификатор
    obligee
    Тип
    entity_ref
  • Идентификатор
    g
    Тип
    entity_ref
Тип
literal
Знак
positive
Условие
persona_of_party
evidence
—
Идентификатор
persona-ee
Тип
assertion
Посылки
—
sourceAnchors
—
assertion · urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-or
attributes
assertion
persona-or
conclusion
Аргументы
  • Идентификатор
    obligor
    Тип
    entity_ref
  • Идентификатор
    s
    Тип
    entity_ref
Тип
literal
Знак
positive
Условие
persona_of_party
evidence
—
Идентификатор
persona-or
Тип
assertion
Посылки
—
sourceAnchors
—
assertion · urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#petitio
attributes
assertion
petitio
conclusion
Аргументы
  • Идентификатор
    causa
    Тип
    entity_ref
  • Идентификатор
    g
    Тип
    entity_ref
  • Идентификатор
    s
    Тип
    entity_ref
Тип
literal
Знак
positive
Условие
petitio
evidence
—
Идентификатор
petitio
Тип
assertion
Посылки
—
sourceAnchors
—
assertion · urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#right
attributes
assertion
right
conclusion
Аргументы
  • Идентификатор
    right
    Тип
    entity_ref
  • Идентификатор
    contract
    Тип
    entity_ref
  • Идентификатор
    obligee
    Тип
    entity_ref
  • Идентификатор
    obligor
    Тип
    entity_ref
Тип
literal
Знак
positive
Условие
right_of
evidence
—
Идентификатор
right
Тип
assertion
Посылки
—
sourceAnchors
—
rule_application · urn:proof:apply:ExpiryExcludit:3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08
attributes
strength
defeasible
conclusion
Аргументы
  • Идентификатор
    g
    Тип
    entity_ref
  • Идентификатор
    s
    Тип
    entity_ref
  • Идентификатор
    causa
    Тип
    entity_ref
Тип
literal
Знак
positive
Условие
remedium_exclusum
evidence
—
Идентификатор
3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08
Тип
rule_application
Посылки
  • b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a
  • causa
  • persona-ee
  • persona-or
  • petitio
  • right
Правило
ExpiryExcludit
sourceAnchors
—
substitution
v0
Идентификатор
right
Тип
entity_ref
v1
Идентификатор
contract
Тип
entity_ref
v2
Идентификатор
obligee
Тип
entity_ref
v3
Идентификатор
obligor
Тип
entity_ref
v4
Идентификатор
g
Тип
entity_ref
v5
Идентификатор
s
Тип
entity_ref
v6
Идентификатор
causa
Тип
entity_ref
candidate_closure · urn:proof:closure:5c179d0511534ea8f4a0279345ef7a2b1a23bdcc26d6d1612de2857c05a880e8
attributes
allApplicableCandidateIds
  • b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a
conflictKey
{"args":[{"id":"urn:p12:right","kind":"entity_ref"}],"predicate":"urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#exercise_barred"}
evaluationInputSemanticHash
sha256:65ecdb8c6264f3a7a6d29f6d5192ec6abc010262def4a431ab776e2e4c296189
priorityGraphHash
sha256:6b3988214869dbb43cb853d84175aa853fdc4ae24ef2c02a3ad2ff6ee9175009
programSemanticHash
sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e
stratum
0
survivingCandidateIds
  • b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a
conclusion
Аргументы
  • Идентификатор
    right
    Тип
    entity_ref
Тип
literal
Знак
positive
Условие
exercise_barred
evidence
—
Идентификатор
5c179d0511534ea8f4a0279345ef7a2b1a23bdcc26d6d1612de2857c05a880e8
Тип
candidate_closure
Посылки
  • b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a
sourceAnchors
—
candidate_closure · urn:proof:closure:8638c0c81bea0030247e55a2eb549849cac9d6601dd0c7d8e6f6cd4a9fa342a6
attributes
allApplicableCandidateIds
  • 3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08
conflictKey
{"args":[{"id":"urn:p12:persona:g","kind":"entity_ref"},{"id":"urn:p12:persona:s","kind":"entity_ref"},{"id":"urn:p12:causa","kind":"entity_ref"}],"predicate":"urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"}
evaluationInputSemanticHash
sha256:65ecdb8c6264f3a7a6d29f6d5192ec6abc010262def4a431ab776e2e4c296189
priorityGraphHash
sha256:6b3988214869dbb43cb853d84175aa853fdc4ae24ef2c02a3ad2ff6ee9175009
programSemanticHash
sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e
stratum
1
survivingCandidateIds
  • 3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08
conclusion
Аргументы
  • Идентификатор
    g
    Тип
    entity_ref
  • Идентификатор
    s
    Тип
    entity_ref
  • Идентификатор
    causa
    Тип
    entity_ref
Тип
literal
Знак
positive
Условие
remedium_exclusum
evidence
—
Идентификатор
8638c0c81bea0030247e55a2eb549849cac9d6601dd0c7d8e6f6cd4a9fa342a6
Тип
candidate_closure
Посылки
  • 3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08
sourceAnchors
—
norm_creation · urn:proof:norm:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:afdfdc38f985ee76be6696fefa043d02eab3f3028a81eda75212e7e7e40626cd
attributes
Правило
ObligorMayAssertExpiration
conclusion
position
ObligorMayAssertExpiration:0
Шаблон
AssertExpiration
evidence
—
Идентификатор
ObligorMayAssertExpiration:afdfdc38f985ee76be6696fefa043d02eab3f3028a81eda75212e7e7e40626cd
Тип
norm_creation
Посылки
  • expired
  • right
sourceAnchors
—
norm_creation · urn:proof:effect:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:3c6d86faa190c8fc5b60ef4e0496bd7e10151bc54b4039a0aa3ee195bfa9ddda
attributes
mechanism
power_exercise
power
ObligorMayAssertExpiration:0
conclusion
Аргументы
  • Идентификатор
    right
    Тип
    entity_ref
Тип
literal
Знак
positive
Условие
exercise_barred
evidence
—
Идентификатор
ObligorMayAssertExpiration:3c6d86faa190c8fc5b60ef4e0496bd7e10151bc54b4039a0aa3ee195bfa9ddda
Тип
norm_creation
Посылки
  • asserted
  • expired
  • ObligorMayAssertExpiration:afdfdc38f985ee76be6696fefa043d02eab3f3028a81eda75212e7e7e40626cd
sourceAnchors
—
query_evaluation · urn:proof:query:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum
attributes
—
conclusion
literal
Аргументы
  • Идентификатор
    g
    Тип
    entity_ref
  • Идентификатор
    s
    Тип
    entity_ref
  • Идентификатор
    causa
    Тип
    entity_ref
Тип
literal
Знак
positive
Условие
remedium_exclusum
truthStatus
Установлено
evidence
—
Идентификатор
case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum
Тип
query_evaluation
Посылки
  • 3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08
sourceAnchors
—
Идентификаторы календаря и доказательства
Ссылка на доказательство
case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum
Исходное обоснование · JSON
JSONТолько чтение
{
  "evaluation": {
    "conflicts": [],
    "issues": [],
    "manifest": {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:fffa79f793fdd68f8845672eeddc65b8fdf4ef6eeeaec06576dbb468caf49482",
      "calendarSnapshot": "",
      "caseHash": "sha256:65ecdb8c6264f3a7a6d29f6d5192ec6abc010262def4a431ab776e2e4c296189",
      "decisionTime": "2016-06-01T12:00:00Z",
      "evidenceSnapshotHash": "sha256:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
      "externalSnapshots": {},
      "id": "urn:manifest:oracle-1",
      "interpretations": [],
      "knowledgeTime": "2016-06-01T12:00:00Z",
      "legalTime": "2016-06-01",
      "lockfileHash": "sha256:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
      "mode": "audit",
      "policies": {},
      "programHash": "sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e",
      "resolvedEditions": {},
      "semanticHash": "sha256:364375d9d043f792e2e9617f027871552318c1e762d06c441b07692a1a57c9e5",
      "semantics": "law.core/0.2.1",
      "theoryHash": "sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e",
      "timezone": "UTC"
    },
    "positions": [
      {
        "createdBy": "urn:proof:norm:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:afdfdc38f985ee76be6696fefa043d02eab3f3028a81eda75212e7e7e40626cd",
        "holder": "urn:p12:obligor",
        "id": "urn:position:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:0",
        "manifest": "urn:manifest:oracle-1",
        "modality": "power",
        "payload": {
          "effect": {
            "after": {
              "args": [
                {
                  "id": "urn:p12:right",
                  "kind": "entity_ref"
                }
              ],
              "kind": "literal",
              "polarity": "positive",
              "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#exercise_barred"
            },
            "kind": "create"
          },
          "exercise": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "function": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#expiration_asserted_as_defence",
            "kind": "call"
          },
          "holder": {
            "id": "urn:p12:obligor",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          },
          "kind": "power",
          "over": {
            "id": "urn:p12:right",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          },
          "validWhen": {
            "formula": {
              "args": [
                {
                  "id": "urn:p12:right",
                  "kind": "entity_ref"
                }
              ],
              "kind": "literal",
              "polarity": "positive",
              "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#limitation_expired"
            },
            "kind": "status",
            "status": "established"
          }
        },
        "proof": "urn:proof:norm:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:afdfdc38f985ee76be6696fefa043d02eab3f3028a81eda75212e7e7e40626cd",
        "status": "ACTIVE",
        "statusHistory": [],
        "template": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration"
      }
    ],
    "proofGraph": {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "attributes": {
            "assertion": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#asserted"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#expiration_asserted_as_defence"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#asserted",
          "kind": "assertion",
          "premises": [],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "assertion": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#causa"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:causa",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#causa_of_right"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#causa",
          "kind": "assertion",
          "premises": [],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "assertion": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#expired"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#limitation_expired"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#expired",
          "kind": "assertion",
          "premises": [],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {},
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#right_not_extinguished"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:apply:ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight:e72996a2c7c818667c2d5d0c4953a8cd27d6a6e1543f4123a71643aa9d0f1fd7",
          "kind": "rule_application",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#expired"
          ],
          "rule": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight",
          "sourceAnchors": [],
          "substitution": {
            "v0": {
              "id": "urn:p12:right",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            }
          }
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "strength": "defeasible"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#exercise_barred"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:apply:ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted:b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a",
          "kind": "rule_application",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#asserted",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#expired"
          ],
          "rule": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted",
          "sourceAnchors": [],
          "substitution": {
            "v0": {
              "id": "urn:p12:right",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            }
          }
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "assertion": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-ee"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:obligee",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#persona_of_party"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-ee",
          "kind": "assertion",
          "premises": [],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "assertion": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-or"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:obligor",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#persona_of_party"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-or",
          "kind": "assertion",
          "premises": [],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "assertion": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#petitio"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:causa",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#petitio",
          "kind": "assertion",
          "premises": [],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "assertion": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#right"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:contract",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:obligee",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:obligor",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#right_of"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#right",
          "kind": "assertion",
          "premises": [],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "strength": "defeasible"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:causa",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:apply:ExpiryExcludit:3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08",
          "kind": "rule_application",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:apply:ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted:b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#causa",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-ee",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-or",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#petitio",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#right"
          ],
          "rule": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit",
          "sourceAnchors": [],
          "substitution": {
            "v0": {
              "id": "urn:p12:right",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            },
            "v1": {
              "id": "urn:p12:contract",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            },
            "v2": {
              "id": "urn:p12:obligee",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            },
            "v3": {
              "id": "urn:p12:obligor",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            },
            "v4": {
              "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            },
            "v5": {
              "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            },
            "v6": {
              "id": "urn:p12:causa",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            }
          }
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "allApplicableCandidateIds": [
              "urn:proof:apply:ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted:b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a"
            ],
            "conflictKey": "{\"args\":[{\"id\":\"urn:p12:right\",\"kind\":\"entity_ref\"}],\"predicate\":\"urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#exercise_barred\"}",
            "evaluationInputSemanticHash": "sha256:65ecdb8c6264f3a7a6d29f6d5192ec6abc010262def4a431ab776e2e4c296189",
            "priorityGraphHash": "sha256:6b3988214869dbb43cb853d84175aa853fdc4ae24ef2c02a3ad2ff6ee9175009",
            "programSemanticHash": "sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e",
            "stratum": 0,
            "survivingCandidateIds": [
              "urn:proof:apply:ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted:b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a"
            ]
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#exercise_barred"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:closure:5c179d0511534ea8f4a0279345ef7a2b1a23bdcc26d6d1612de2857c05a880e8",
          "kind": "candidate_closure",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:apply:ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted:b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a"
          ],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "allApplicableCandidateIds": [
              "urn:proof:apply:ExpiryExcludit:3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08"
            ],
            "conflictKey": "{\"args\":[{\"id\":\"urn:p12:persona:g\",\"kind\":\"entity_ref\"},{\"id\":\"urn:p12:persona:s\",\"kind\":\"entity_ref\"},{\"id\":\"urn:p12:causa\",\"kind\":\"entity_ref\"}],\"predicate\":\"urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum\"}",
            "evaluationInputSemanticHash": "sha256:65ecdb8c6264f3a7a6d29f6d5192ec6abc010262def4a431ab776e2e4c296189",
            "priorityGraphHash": "sha256:6b3988214869dbb43cb853d84175aa853fdc4ae24ef2c02a3ad2ff6ee9175009",
            "programSemanticHash": "sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e",
            "stratum": 1,
            "survivingCandidateIds": [
              "urn:proof:apply:ExpiryExcludit:3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08"
            ]
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:causa",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:closure:8638c0c81bea0030247e55a2eb549849cac9d6601dd0c7d8e6f6cd4a9fa342a6",
          "kind": "candidate_closure",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:apply:ExpiryExcludit:3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08"
          ],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "rule": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "position": "urn:position:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:0",
            "template": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:norm:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:afdfdc38f985ee76be6696fefa043d02eab3f3028a81eda75212e7e7e40626cd",
          "kind": "norm_creation",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#expired",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#right"
          ],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "mechanism": "power_exercise",
            "power": "urn:position:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:0"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#exercise_barred"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:effect:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:3c6d86faa190c8fc5b60ef4e0496bd7e10151bc54b4039a0aa3ee195bfa9ddda",
          "kind": "norm_creation",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#asserted",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#expired",
            "urn:proof:norm:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:afdfdc38f985ee76be6696fefa043d02eab3f3028a81eda75212e7e7e40626cd"
          ],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {},
          "conclusion": {
            "literal": {
              "args": [
                {
                  "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
                  "kind": "entity_ref"
                },
                {
                  "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
                  "kind": "entity_ref"
                },
                {
                  "id": "urn:p12:causa",
                  "kind": "entity_ref"
                }
              ],
              "kind": "literal",
              "polarity": "positive",
              "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"
            },
            "truthStatus": "TRUE_ONLY"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:query:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum",
          "kind": "query_evaluation",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:apply:ExpiryExcludit:3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08"
          ],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        }
      ],
      "proofHash": "sha256:87bde4a2cf01c341a428ac2a56c5a644c865d1dceab100f038f0900696ceeccb",
      "roots": [
        "urn:proof:query:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum"
      ]
    },
    "resultHash": "sha256:7d6420f869f194c56f0e17d6ec83188bea3ec4c0fa3c59ce44fb61219412f696",
    "results": [
      {
        "conflicts": [],
        "evaluationStatus": "COMPUTED",
        "evidence": [],
        "id": "urn:result:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum",
        "judgmentRequests": [],
        "manifest": "urn:manifest:oracle-1",
        "missingInputs": [],
        "normativeStatusSupports": [],
        "proof": "urn:proof:query:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum",
        "query": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum",
        "resultKind": "PROPOSITION",
        "sourceAnchors": [],
        "target": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum",
        "truthStatus": "TRUE_ONLY"
      }
    ],
    "schemaVersion": "law.core.evaluation/0.2"
  },
  "proofRef": "urn:proof:query:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum",
  "rulesApplied": [
    "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight",
    "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted",
    "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit"
  ]
}
ИсточникиФрагментов: 2

article/10_9

ARTICLE 10.9 (Effects of expiration of limitation period) The expiration of the limitation period does not extinguish the right. (2) For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence. (3) A right may still be relied on as a defence even though the expiration of the limitation period for that right has been asserted.
Исходные данные · JSON
JSONТолько чтение
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:2cce2f0a30e87640ae26f97b896d7242eb290a76d732263621d6f082f40462a6",
  "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_EN",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_ART10_9_EN",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "locator": "article/10_9",
  "package": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:88a854749716a48eb1dce761802f51e9c586a310ee9e0377758d0973b7ecd006",
      "language": "en",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "ARTICLE 10.9\n(Effects of expiration of limitation period)\nThe expiration of the limitation period does not extinguish the right.\n(2) For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must\nassert it as a defence.\n(3) A right may still be relied on as a defence even though the expiration of the\nlimitation period for that right has been asserted."
    }
  ]
}

article/10_9

ARTICLE 10.9 (Effet de l’expiration du délai) 1) L’expiration du délai de prescription n’éteint pas le droit. 2) L’expiration du délai de prescription n’a d’effet que si le débiteur l’invoque comme moyen de défense. 3) Un droit peut toujours être invoqué comme moyen de défense, même si l’expiration du délai de prescription a été soulevée.
Исходные данные · JSON
JSONТолько чтение
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:ce451e46bca3943b449198a0800bf504859f69a2eccaa1cc83372438137069cf",
  "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_FR",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_ART10_9_FR",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "locator": "article/10_9",
  "package": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:234d9a881e76dcd6d82c945bdbc2c3b643e0a5d6f6d9b4c2a2d8d58296ecfdcd",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "ARTICLE 10.9\n(Effet de l’expiration du délai)\n1)\nL’expiration du délai de prescription n’éteint pas le droit.\n2)\nL’expiration du délai de prescription n’a d’effet que si le débiteur l’invoque\ncomme moyen de défense.\n3)\nUn droit peut toujours être invoqué comme moyen de défense, même si\nl’expiration du délai de prescription a été soulevée."
    }
  ]
}

Пакеты в снимке

  • de.bgb.core
  • de.bgb.fristen
  • de.bgb.ius_privatum
  • doctrine.ius_privatum
  • fr.code_civil
  • unidroit.picc
  • unidroit.picc_limitation
Технические данныеПолный ответ, параметры и контрольные суммы
Статус расчёта
COMPUTED
Полный ответ движка
Fünf Jahre, PICC: das Rechtsmittel ist ausgeschlossen

Полный машинный результат · JSON

JSONТолько чтение
{
  "answer": {
    "evaluationStatus": "COMPUTED",
    "kind": "TRUTH",
    "missingInputs": [],
    "truthStatus": "TRUE_ONLY"
  },
  "evaluation": {
    "conflicts": [],
    "issues": [],
    "manifest": {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:fffa79f793fdd68f8845672eeddc65b8fdf4ef6eeeaec06576dbb468caf49482",
      "calendarSnapshot": "",
      "caseHash": "sha256:65ecdb8c6264f3a7a6d29f6d5192ec6abc010262def4a431ab776e2e4c296189",
      "decisionTime": "2016-06-01T12:00:00Z",
      "evidenceSnapshotHash": "sha256:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
      "externalSnapshots": {},
      "id": "urn:manifest:oracle-1",
      "interpretations": [],
      "knowledgeTime": "2016-06-01T12:00:00Z",
      "legalTime": "2016-06-01",
      "lockfileHash": "sha256:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
      "mode": "audit",
      "policies": {},
      "programHash": "sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e",
      "resolvedEditions": {},
      "semanticHash": "sha256:364375d9d043f792e2e9617f027871552318c1e762d06c441b07692a1a57c9e5",
      "semantics": "law.core/0.2.1",
      "theoryHash": "sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e",
      "timezone": "UTC"
    },
    "positions": [
      {
        "createdBy": "urn:proof:norm:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:afdfdc38f985ee76be6696fefa043d02eab3f3028a81eda75212e7e7e40626cd",
        "holder": "urn:p12:obligor",
        "id": "urn:position:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:0",
        "manifest": "urn:manifest:oracle-1",
        "modality": "power",
        "payload": {
          "effect": {
            "after": {
              "args": [
                {
                  "id": "urn:p12:right",
                  "kind": "entity_ref"
                }
              ],
              "kind": "literal",
              "polarity": "positive",
              "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#exercise_barred"
            },
            "kind": "create"
          },
          "exercise": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "function": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#expiration_asserted_as_defence",
            "kind": "call"
          },
          "holder": {
            "id": "urn:p12:obligor",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          },
          "kind": "power",
          "over": {
            "id": "urn:p12:right",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          },
          "validWhen": {
            "formula": {
              "args": [
                {
                  "id": "urn:p12:right",
                  "kind": "entity_ref"
                }
              ],
              "kind": "literal",
              "polarity": "positive",
              "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#limitation_expired"
            },
            "kind": "status",
            "status": "established"
          }
        },
        "proof": "urn:proof:norm:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:afdfdc38f985ee76be6696fefa043d02eab3f3028a81eda75212e7e7e40626cd",
        "status": "ACTIVE",
        "statusHistory": [],
        "template": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration"
      }
    ],
    "proofGraph": {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "attributes": {
            "assertion": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#asserted"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#expiration_asserted_as_defence"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#asserted",
          "kind": "assertion",
          "premises": [],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "assertion": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#causa"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:causa",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#causa_of_right"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#causa",
          "kind": "assertion",
          "premises": [],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "assertion": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#expired"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#limitation_expired"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#expired",
          "kind": "assertion",
          "premises": [],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {},
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#right_not_extinguished"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:apply:ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight:e72996a2c7c818667c2d5d0c4953a8cd27d6a6e1543f4123a71643aa9d0f1fd7",
          "kind": "rule_application",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#expired"
          ],
          "rule": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight",
          "sourceAnchors": [],
          "substitution": {
            "v0": {
              "id": "urn:p12:right",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            }
          }
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "strength": "defeasible"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#exercise_barred"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:apply:ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted:b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a",
          "kind": "rule_application",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#asserted",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#expired"
          ],
          "rule": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted",
          "sourceAnchors": [],
          "substitution": {
            "v0": {
              "id": "urn:p12:right",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            }
          }
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "assertion": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-ee"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:obligee",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#persona_of_party"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-ee",
          "kind": "assertion",
          "premises": [],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "assertion": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-or"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:obligor",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#persona_of_party"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-or",
          "kind": "assertion",
          "premises": [],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "assertion": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#petitio"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:causa",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#petitio",
          "kind": "assertion",
          "premises": [],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "assertion": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#right"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:contract",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:obligee",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:obligor",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#right_of"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#right",
          "kind": "assertion",
          "premises": [],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "strength": "defeasible"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:causa",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:apply:ExpiryExcludit:3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08",
          "kind": "rule_application",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:apply:ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted:b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#causa",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-ee",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-or",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#petitio",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#right"
          ],
          "rule": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit",
          "sourceAnchors": [],
          "substitution": {
            "v0": {
              "id": "urn:p12:right",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            },
            "v1": {
              "id": "urn:p12:contract",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            },
            "v2": {
              "id": "urn:p12:obligee",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            },
            "v3": {
              "id": "urn:p12:obligor",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            },
            "v4": {
              "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            },
            "v5": {
              "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            },
            "v6": {
              "id": "urn:p12:causa",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            }
          }
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "allApplicableCandidateIds": [
              "urn:proof:apply:ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted:b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a"
            ],
            "conflictKey": "{\"args\":[{\"id\":\"urn:p12:right\",\"kind\":\"entity_ref\"}],\"predicate\":\"urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#exercise_barred\"}",
            "evaluationInputSemanticHash": "sha256:65ecdb8c6264f3a7a6d29f6d5192ec6abc010262def4a431ab776e2e4c296189",
            "priorityGraphHash": "sha256:6b3988214869dbb43cb853d84175aa853fdc4ae24ef2c02a3ad2ff6ee9175009",
            "programSemanticHash": "sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e",
            "stratum": 0,
            "survivingCandidateIds": [
              "urn:proof:apply:ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted:b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a"
            ]
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#exercise_barred"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:closure:5c179d0511534ea8f4a0279345ef7a2b1a23bdcc26d6d1612de2857c05a880e8",
          "kind": "candidate_closure",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:apply:ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted:b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a"
          ],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "allApplicableCandidateIds": [
              "urn:proof:apply:ExpiryExcludit:3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08"
            ],
            "conflictKey": "{\"args\":[{\"id\":\"urn:p12:persona:g\",\"kind\":\"entity_ref\"},{\"id\":\"urn:p12:persona:s\",\"kind\":\"entity_ref\"},{\"id\":\"urn:p12:causa\",\"kind\":\"entity_ref\"}],\"predicate\":\"urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum\"}",
            "evaluationInputSemanticHash": "sha256:65ecdb8c6264f3a7a6d29f6d5192ec6abc010262def4a431ab776e2e4c296189",
            "priorityGraphHash": "sha256:6b3988214869dbb43cb853d84175aa853fdc4ae24ef2c02a3ad2ff6ee9175009",
            "programSemanticHash": "sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e",
            "stratum": 1,
            "survivingCandidateIds": [
              "urn:proof:apply:ExpiryExcludit:3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08"
            ]
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:causa",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:closure:8638c0c81bea0030247e55a2eb549849cac9d6601dd0c7d8e6f6cd4a9fa342a6",
          "kind": "candidate_closure",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:apply:ExpiryExcludit:3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08"
          ],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "rule": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "position": "urn:position:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:0",
            "template": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:norm:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:afdfdc38f985ee76be6696fefa043d02eab3f3028a81eda75212e7e7e40626cd",
          "kind": "norm_creation",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#expired",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#right"
          ],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "mechanism": "power_exercise",
            "power": "urn:position:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:0"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#exercise_barred"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:effect:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:3c6d86faa190c8fc5b60ef4e0496bd7e10151bc54b4039a0aa3ee195bfa9ddda",
          "kind": "norm_creation",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#asserted",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#expired",
            "urn:proof:norm:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:afdfdc38f985ee76be6696fefa043d02eab3f3028a81eda75212e7e7e40626cd"
          ],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {},
          "conclusion": {
            "literal": {
              "args": [
                {
                  "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
                  "kind": "entity_ref"
                },
                {
                  "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
                  "kind": "entity_ref"
                },
                {
                  "id": "urn:p12:causa",
                  "kind": "entity_ref"
                }
              ],
              "kind": "literal",
              "polarity": "positive",
              "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"
            },
            "truthStatus": "TRUE_ONLY"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:query:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum",
          "kind": "query_evaluation",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:apply:ExpiryExcludit:3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08"
          ],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        }
      ],
      "proofHash": "sha256:87bde4a2cf01c341a428ac2a56c5a644c865d1dceab100f038f0900696ceeccb",
      "roots": [
        "urn:proof:query:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum"
      ]
    },
    "resultHash": "sha256:7d6420f869f194c56f0e17d6ec83188bea3ec4c0fa3c59ce44fb61219412f696",
    "results": [
      {
        "conflicts": [],
        "evaluationStatus": "COMPUTED",
        "evidence": [],
        "id": "urn:result:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum",
        "judgmentRequests": [],
        "manifest": "urn:manifest:oracle-1",
        "missingInputs": [],
        "normativeStatusSupports": [],
        "proof": "urn:proof:query:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum",
        "query": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum",
        "resultKind": "PROPOSITION",
        "sourceAnchors": [],
        "target": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum",
        "truthStatus": "TRUE_ONLY"
      }
    ],
    "schemaVersion": "law.core.evaluation/0.2"
  },
  "evaluationStatus": "COMPUTED",
  "issues": [],
  "judgmentRequests": [],
  "proofRef": "urn:proof:query:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum",
  "provenance": {
    "acts": [
      {
        "artifactHash": "sha256:a6813604c35567e7c586d334efbf524d08f3467170c4b732cfb15809cacf4ff4",
        "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core",
        "package": "de.bgb.core"
      },
      {
        "artifactHash": "sha256:998148eaeeed28f1565811474ee7beb7eacc616c5681ed9638edc976512a9884",
        "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
        "package": "de.bgb.fristen"
      },
      {
        "artifactHash": "sha256:86a5a00db16e32187223ceeec6748eb7d42d18b7c370c8b15ac64d2f3f655ff7",
        "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum",
        "package": "de.bgb.ius_privatum"
      },
      {
        "artifactHash": "sha256:7202de5de49a8a9d12837bc19cb7008ba2d1a68dbcc0134e0afccf1440a6d5ed",
        "namespace": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum",
        "package": "doctrine.ius_privatum"
      },
      {
        "artifactHash": "sha256:ad41d027ba92c38ca5eecc1d16097d0bbc8c5a74946fc1a6397c6dadac61158f",
        "namespace": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
        "package": "fr.code_civil"
      },
      {
        "artifactHash": "sha256:719bfd408eed92ad497ba071482354d4ad32b81ef9f41c6654f224416c19e603",
        "namespace": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc",
        "package": "unidroit.picc"
      },
      {
        "artifactHash": "sha256:b311d0d422a1079f71113320bd818236f7b09507c7dd960bdafceb91285497d9",
        "namespace": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
        "package": "unidroit.picc_limitation"
      }
    ],
    "caseHash": "sha256:65ecdb8c6264f3a7a6d29f6d5192ec6abc010262def4a431ab776e2e4c296189",
    "jurisdiction": "Deutschland",
    "legalTime": "2016-06-01",
    "mode": "audit",
    "programHash": "sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e",
    "resultHash": "sha256:7d6420f869f194c56f0e17d6ec83188bea3ec4c0fa3c59ce44fb61219412f696",
    "timezone": "UTC"
  },
  "rulesApplied": [
    "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight",
    "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted",
    "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit"
  ]
}

Исполнение · JSON

Блок слишком большой для встроенного просмотра. Он целиком включён в JSON документа — без сокращений.

Скачать JSON ↓

Метаданные отображения

JSONТолько чтение
{
  "schemaVersion": "law.answers.presentation/0.1",
  "source": {
    "requestCanonicalSha256": "sha256:fc2aa17be9f80b15e3bfd4a4ebde4ce2c9f55cc7a91a330fb4f67bc07bb8fb2c"
  },
  "steps": [
    {
      "assertionOrigin": "case_input",
      "conclusion": {
        "args": [
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:right",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          }
        ],
        "kind": "literal",
        "polarity": "positive",
        "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#expiration_asserted_as_defence"
      },
      "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#asserted",
      "kind": "assertion",
      "originStatus": "available",
      "premises": [],
      "trust": "case"
    },
    {
      "assertionOrigin": "case_input",
      "conclusion": {
        "args": [
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:right",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          },
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:causa",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          }
        ],
        "kind": "literal",
        "polarity": "positive",
        "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#causa_of_right"
      },
      "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#causa",
      "kind": "assertion",
      "originStatus": "available",
      "premises": [],
      "trust": "case"
    },
    {
      "assertionOrigin": "case_input",
      "conclusion": {
        "args": [
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:right",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          }
        ],
        "kind": "literal",
        "polarity": "positive",
        "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#limitation_expired"
      },
      "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#expired",
      "kind": "assertion",
      "originStatus": "available",
      "premises": [],
      "trust": "case"
    },
    {
      "conclusion": {
        "args": [
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:right",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          }
        ],
        "kind": "literal",
        "polarity": "positive",
        "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#exercise_barred"
      },
      "head": {
        "args": [
          {
            "kind": "var",
            "var": "v0"
          }
        ],
        "kind": "literal",
        "polarity": "positive",
        "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#exercise_barred"
      },
      "id": "urn:proof:apply:ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted:b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a",
      "kind": "rule_application",
      "originStatus": "available",
      "premises": [
        "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#asserted",
        "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#expired"
      ],
      "rule": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted",
      "sourceAnchors": [
        "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_ART10_9_EN",
        "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_ART10_9_FR"
      ],
      "strength": "defeasible",
      "substitution": {
        "v0": {
          "id": "urn:p12:right",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      },
      "trust": "engine",
      "variables": [
        {
          "id": "v0",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Right"
          }
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "assertionOrigin": "case_input",
      "conclusion": {
        "args": [
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:obligee",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          },
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          }
        ],
        "kind": "literal",
        "polarity": "positive",
        "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#persona_of_party"
      },
      "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-ee",
      "kind": "assertion",
      "originStatus": "available",
      "premises": [],
      "trust": "case"
    },
    {
      "assertionOrigin": "case_input",
      "conclusion": {
        "args": [
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:obligor",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          },
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          }
        ],
        "kind": "literal",
        "polarity": "positive",
        "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#persona_of_party"
      },
      "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-or",
      "kind": "assertion",
      "originStatus": "available",
      "premises": [],
      "trust": "case"
    },
    {
      "assertionOrigin": "case_input",
      "conclusion": {
        "args": [
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:causa",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          },
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          },
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          }
        ],
        "kind": "literal",
        "polarity": "positive",
        "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
      },
      "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#petitio",
      "kind": "assertion",
      "originStatus": "available",
      "premises": [],
      "trust": "case"
    },
    {
      "assertionOrigin": "case_input",
      "conclusion": {
        "args": [
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:right",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          },
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:contract",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          },
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:obligee",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          },
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:obligor",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          }
        ],
        "kind": "literal",
        "polarity": "positive",
        "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#right_of"
      },
      "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#right",
      "kind": "assertion",
      "originStatus": "available",
      "premises": [],
      "trust": "case"
    },
    {
      "conclusion": {
        "args": [
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          },
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          },
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:causa",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          }
        ],
        "kind": "literal",
        "polarity": "positive",
        "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"
      },
      "head": {
        "args": [
          {
            "kind": "var",
            "var": "v4"
          },
          {
            "kind": "var",
            "var": "v5"
          },
          {
            "kind": "var",
            "var": "v6"
          }
        ],
        "kind": "literal",
        "polarity": "positive",
        "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"
      },
      "id": "urn:proof:apply:ExpiryExcludit:3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08",
      "kind": "rule_application",
      "originStatus": "available",
      "premises": [
        "urn:proof:apply:ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted:b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a",
        "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#causa",
        "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-ee",
        "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-or",
        "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#petitio",
        "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#right"
      ],
      "rule": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit",
      "sourceAnchors": [
        "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_ART10_9_EN",
        "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_ART10_9_FR"
      ],
      "strength": "defeasible",
      "substitution": {
        "v0": {
          "id": "urn:p12:right",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        "v1": {
          "id": "urn:p12:contract",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        "v2": {
          "id": "urn:p12:obligee",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        "v3": {
          "id": "urn:p12:obligor",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        "v4": {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        "v5": {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        "v6": {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      },
      "trust": "engine",
      "variables": [
        {
          "id": "v0",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Right"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "v1",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Contract"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "v2",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Party"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "v3",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Party"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "v4",
          "type": {
            "name": "doctrine.ius_privatum#Persona"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "v5",
          "type": {
            "name": "doctrine.ius_privatum#Persona"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "v6",
          "type": {
            "name": "doctrine.ius_privatum#Causa"
          }
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "conclusion": {
        "literal": {
          "args": [
            {
              "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            },
            {
              "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            },
            {
              "id": "urn:p12:causa",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            }
          ],
          "kind": "literal",
          "polarity": "positive",
          "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"
        },
        "truthStatus": "TRUE_ONLY"
      },
      "id": "urn:proof:query:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum",
      "kind": "query_evaluation",
      "originStatus": "available",
      "premises": [
        "urn:proof:apply:ExpiryExcludit:3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08"
      ],
      "trust": "engine"
    }
  ],
  "symbols": [
    {
      "id": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#Causa",
      "kind": "type_decl",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "ru-KZ",
          "status": "unofficial",
          "text": "притязание как основание тяжбы: договор, деликт, собственность, наследство — одно спорное отношение между двумя лицами"
        }
      ],
      "name": "Causa",
      "package": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#Persona",
      "kind": "type_decl",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "ru-KZ",
          "status": "unofficial",
          "text": "лицо частного права: истец, ответчик, собственник, должник, кредитор, наследник"
        }
      ],
      "name": "Persona",
      "package": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio",
      "kind": "symbol_decl",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "ru-KZ",
          "status": "unofficial",
          "text": "истец предъявляет к ответчику притязание — спорное отношение, о котором задаётся вопрос"
        }
      ],
      "name": "petitio",
      "package": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum",
      "parameters": [
        {
          "id": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio/arg/causa",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "causa",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#Causa"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio/arg/actor",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "actor",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#Persona"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio/arg/reus",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "reus",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#Persona"
          }
        }
      ],
      "symbolKind": "relation"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum",
      "kind": "symbol_decl",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "ru-KZ",
          "status": "unofficial",
          "text": "средство защиты отнято: возражением, погашением тяжбой, давностью, иммунитетом ответчика"
        }
      ],
      "name": "remedium_exclusum",
      "package": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum",
      "parameters": [
        {
          "id": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum/arg/actor",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "actor",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#Persona"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum/arg/reus",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "reus",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#Persona"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum/arg/causa",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "causa",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#Causa"
          }
        }
      ],
      "symbolKind": "relation"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration",
      "kind": "norm_template",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "en",
          "status": "official",
          "text": "Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence"
        }
      ],
      "package": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight",
      "kind": "rule",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "en",
          "status": "official",
          "text": "Article 10.9(1). The expiration of the limitation period does not extinguish the right"
        }
      ],
      "package": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "strength": "strict"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted",
      "kind": "rule",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "en",
          "status": "official",
          "text": "Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence"
        }
      ],
      "package": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "strength": "defeasible"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit",
      "kind": "rule",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "en",
          "status": "official",
          "text": "Article 10.9(2). Once the obligor has asserted expiry, the barred exercise is a comparative remedium_exclusum"
        }
      ],
      "package": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "strength": "defeasible"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration",
      "kind": "rule",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "en",
          "status": "official",
          "text": "Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence"
        }
      ],
      "package": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "strength": "strict"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Right",
      "kind": "type_decl",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "en",
          "status": "official",
          "text": "Right governed by the Principles"
        }
      ],
      "name": "Right",
      "package": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#causa_of_right",
      "kind": "symbol_decl",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "en",
          "status": "official",
          "text": "this right is the comparative causa"
        }
      ],
      "name": "causa_of_right",
      "package": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "parameters": [
        {
          "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#causa_of_right/arg/r",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "r",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Right"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#causa_of_right/arg/c",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "c",
          "type": {
            "name": "doctrine.ius_privatum#Causa"
          }
        }
      ],
      "symbolKind": "relation"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#exercise_barred",
      "kind": "symbol_decl",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "en",
          "status": "official",
          "text": "the expiration of the limitation period has effect and bars the exercise of the right (article 10.9(2))"
        }
      ],
      "name": "exercise_barred",
      "package": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "parameters": [
        {
          "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#exercise_barred/arg/r",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "r",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Right"
          }
        }
      ],
      "symbolKind": "relation"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#expiration_asserted_as_defence",
      "kind": "symbol_decl",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "en",
          "status": "official",
          "text": "the obligor has asserted the expiration of the limitation period as a defence"
        }
      ],
      "name": "expiration_asserted_as_defence",
      "package": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "parameters": [
        {
          "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#expiration_asserted_as_defence/arg/r",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "r",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Right"
          }
        }
      ],
      "symbolKind": "relation"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#limitation_expired",
      "kind": "symbol_decl",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "en",
          "status": "official",
          "text": "the limitation period for the right has expired"
        }
      ],
      "name": "limitation_expired",
      "package": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "parameters": [
        {
          "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#limitation_expired/arg/r",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "r",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Right"
          }
        }
      ],
      "symbolKind": "relation"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#persona_of_party",
      "kind": "symbol_decl",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "en",
          "status": "official",
          "text": "the contracting party appears in the comparative chain as this persona"
        }
      ],
      "name": "persona_of_party",
      "package": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "parameters": [
        {
          "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#persona_of_party/arg/p",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "p",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Party"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#persona_of_party/arg/x",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "x",
          "type": {
            "name": "doctrine.ius_privatum#Persona"
          }
        }
      ],
      "symbolKind": "relation"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#right_not_extinguished",
      "kind": "symbol_decl",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "en",
          "status": "official",
          "text": "the expiration of the limitation period does not extinguish the right (article 10.9(1))"
        }
      ],
      "name": "right_not_extinguished",
      "package": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "parameters": [
        {
          "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#right_not_extinguished/arg/r",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "r",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Right"
          }
        }
      ],
      "symbolKind": "relation"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#right_of",
      "kind": "symbol_decl",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "en",
          "status": "official",
          "text": "the right belongs to the obligee against the obligor under that contract"
        }
      ],
      "name": "right_of",
      "package": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "parameters": [
        {
          "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#right_of/arg/r",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "r",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Right"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#right_of/arg/c",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "c",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Contract"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#right_of/arg/obligee",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "obligee",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Party"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#right_of/arg/obligor",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "obligor",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Party"
          }
        }
      ],
      "symbolKind": "relation"
    }
  ]
}

JSON · расчёты, источники и точные данные

JSONТолько чтение
{
  "acts": [
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:a6813604c35567e7c586d334efbf524d08f3467170c4b732cfb15809cacf4ff4",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core",
      "package": "de.bgb.core"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:998148eaeeed28f1565811474ee7beb7eacc616c5681ed9638edc976512a9884",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
      "package": "de.bgb.fristen"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:86a5a00db16e32187223ceeec6748eb7d42d18b7c370c8b15ac64d2f3f655ff7",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum",
      "package": "de.bgb.ius_privatum"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:7202de5de49a8a9d12837bc19cb7008ba2d1a68dbcc0134e0afccf1440a6d5ed",
      "namespace": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum",
      "package": "doctrine.ius_privatum"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:ad41d027ba92c38ca5eecc1d16097d0bbc8c5a74946fc1a6397c6dadac61158f",
      "namespace": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
      "package": "fr.code_civil"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:719bfd408eed92ad497ba071482354d4ad32b81ef9f41c6654f224416c19e603",
      "namespace": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc",
      "package": "unidroit.picc"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:b311d0d422a1079f71113320bd818236f7b09507c7dd960bdafceb91285497d9",
      "namespace": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "package": "unidroit.picc_limitation"
    }
  ],
  "caseHash": "sha256:65ecdb8c6264f3a7a6d29f6d5192ec6abc010262def4a431ab776e2e4c296189",
  "jurisdiction": "Deutschland",
  "legalTime": "2016-06-01",
  "mode": "audit",
  "programHash": "sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e",
  "resultHash": "sha256:7d6420f869f194c56f0e17d6ec83188bea3ec4c0fa3c59ce44fb61219412f696",
  "timezone": "UTC"
}
evaluation SHA-256
sha256:364f99c2cdf1eaceb1c94636c5bf963ae4cce12a3771b5658761828599ca07a3
Исходные данные · JSON
JSONТолько чтение
{
  "args": [
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:causa",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    }
  ],
  "facts": [
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:right",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:contract",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:obligee",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:obligor",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#right_of"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:right",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#limitation_expired"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:right",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#expiration_asserted_as_defence"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:obligee",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#persona_of_party"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:obligor",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#persona_of_party"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:right",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#causa_of_right"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
    }
  ],
  "kind": "truth",
  "legalTime": "2016-06-01",
  "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"
}

Nach den Prinzipien ist das Rechtsmittel ausgeschlossen, weil die Verjährung geltend gemacht ist.

Проверка условия

Zwei Jahre, Code civil: die Klage ist nicht verjährt

Юрисдикция DeutschlandПраво на дату 02.01.2016

Результат расчёта

Опровергнуто

Исходные параметры

Что определяем

action prescrite à cette date

causa2 января 2016 г.

Исходные факты

  • créance exigible depuis ce jour

    causa: causajour: 15 марта 2014 г.

  • le titulaire a connu les faits lui permettant d'exercer son droit ce jour

    causa: causajour: 15 марта 2014 г.

  • action introduite ce jour

    causa: causajour: 2 января 2016 г.

  • prescription non interrompue et non suspendue

    causa: causa

  • истец предъявляет к ответчику притязание — спорное отношение, о котором задаётся вопрос

    causa: causaactor: greus: s
Исходные данные · JSON
JSONТолько чтение
{
  "args": [
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:causa",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "kind": "value",
      "type": {
        "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
      },
      "value": "2016-01-02"
    }
  ],
  "facts": [
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2014-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#creance_exigible_depuis"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2014-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#titulaire_connait_les_faits_le"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2016-01-02"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#action_introduite_le"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#prescription_non_interrompue"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
    }
  ],
  "kind": "truth",
  "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
  "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#action_prescrite_le"
}
Почему такой результатПрименённые правила и условия

Путь вывода8 шагов

  1. 1

    action introduite ce jour

    causa: urn:p12:causa; jour: 2 января 2016 г.

    факт дела
  2. 2

    le titulaire a connu les faits lui permettant d'exercer son droit ce jour

    causa: urn:p12:causa; jour: 15 марта 2014 г.

    факт дела
  3. 3

    créance exigible depuis ce jour

    causa: urn:p12:causa; jour: 15 марта 2014 г.

    факт дела
  4. 4

    cinq ans à compter du jour où le titulaire a connu les faits

    point de départ du délai quinquennal: causa: urn:p12:causa; jour: 15 марта 2014 г.

    ст. 2224

    Идентификатор
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#PointDepartConnaissanceReelle
    правило
  5. 5

    prescription non interrompue et non suspendue

    causa: urn:p12:causa

    факт дела
  6. 6

    délai de cinq ans, compté par jours

    15 марта 2019 г. = add calendar period(15 марта 2014 г., 5 calendar_year)

    ст. 2224, ст. 2228, ст. 2229

    Идентификатор
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#EcheanceCinqAns
    правило
  7. 7

    le dernier jour du terme n'est pas encore accompli

    не action prescrite à cette date: causa: urn:p12:causa; jour: 2 января 2016 г.

    ст. 2219, ст. 2229

    Идентификатор
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#ActionNonPrescriteAvantOuAEcheance
    правило
  8. 8

    Вычисление запроса

    запрос

проверено движком: 4 · факт дела: 4 · Полный граф: 10 узлов

Шаги сохранённого доказательства от фактов дела к ответу. Формулы показаны как записаны в норме, с подставленными значениями; страница ничего не пересчитывает.

Основание этого ответа

Правила из сохранённой цепочки доказательства ответа.

fr.code_civil

  • le dernier jour du terme n'est pas encore accompli

    Идентификатор
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#ActionNonPrescriteAvantOuAEcheance

  • délai de cinq ans, compté par jours

    Идентификатор
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#EcheanceCinqAns

  • cinq ans à compter du jour où le titulaire a connu les faits

    Идентификатор
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#PointDepartConnaissanceReelle
Другие правила расчёта2

Применены в общем расчёте, но не входят в цепочку доказательства этого ответа.

fr.code_civil

  • Article 2232, alinéa 2. Hors butoir opposable, l'échéance après plancher est la date applicable

    Идентификатор
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#DateApplicableSansButoirOpposable

  • Sans médiation, conciliation ni mesure d'instruction, l'échéance du délai n'est pas relevée

    Идентификатор
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#EcheanceApresPlancherSansMinimale
Замечания · 4
Отказы и замечания исполнения
  1. справкаEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31

    редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_EN на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 81 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)

    Задетые узлы
    • Статья 5.2.3. The conferment of правоs in выгодоприобретатель includes the право to invoke a оговорка in договор which excludes or limits the ответственность of выгодоприобретатель urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryMayInvokeClause
    • Статьи 5.2.1 and 5.2.2. Стороны may confer a право on a третье лицо who must be identifiable with adequate certainty by договор urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryRightExists
    • Статья 5.1.4(2). To the extent that an обязательство involves a обязанность of максимальные усилия, that party связан to make such efforts as would be made by a разумное лицо of the same kind urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BestEffortsDutyPerformed
    • Статья 1.9(1). Стороны связаны by any обычай to which they have agreed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByAgreedUsage
    • Статья 1.9(1). Стороны связаны by практики which they have established between themselves urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByEstablishedPractice
    • Статья 1.9(2). Стороны связаны by a обычай widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, кроме случаев, когда где its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage
    • Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage/unless/0
    • Статья 5.3.3(1). Сторона who prevented fulfilment contrary to добросовестность не вправе rely on the non-fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnPreventedCondition
    • Статья 5.3.3(2). Сторона who brought about fulfilment contrary to добросовестность не вправе rely on the fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnProcuredCondition
    • Статья 4.3. In applying Статьи 4.1 and 4.2, regard shall be had to all the circumstances, включая those listed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CircumstanceToBeRegarded
    • Статья 1.11. Where сторона has more than one коммерческое предприятие the relevant one is that which has the closest relationship to договор and its исполнение urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ClosestPlaceIsRelevant
    • Статья 4.1(2) (opening words). Where the common intention can be established, the reasonable-persons reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CommonIntentionDisplacesReasonablePersons
    • Статья 1.12(2). The computed last day does not stand где it is a holiday at the place of исполнение urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ComputedLastDayYieldsToHoliday
    • Статья 4.6. If договор terms supplied by one party are unclear, an interpretation against that party is preferred urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContraProferentem
    • Статья 1.3. A договор validly entered into is binding upon стороны urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContractIsBinding
    • Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#Cooperate
    • Статья 5.2.4. The promisor may assert against выгодоприобретатель all defences which the promisor could assert against the promisee urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DefencesAgainstBeneficiary
    • Статья 1.5. Стороны may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, кроме случаев, когда as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective
    • Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective/unless/0
    • Статья 1.7(1). Each party must act в соответствии с добросовестность and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyOfGoodFaith
    • Статья 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party когда such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the исполнение of that party's обязательствоs urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToCooperate
    • Статья 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, сторона не вправе, contrary to добросовестность, act so as to prejudice the other party's правоs in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRights
    • Статья 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, сторона не вправе, contrary to добросовестность, act so as to prejudice the other party's правоs in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRightsBreached
    • Статья 5.1.1. The договорual обязательствоs of стороны may be express urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ExpressIsContractual
    • Статья 5.1.5. In determining the extent to which an обязательство involves a обязанность of максимальные усилия or a обязанность to achieve a specific result, regard shall be had to the listed factors urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FactorDeterminesKindOfDuty
    • Статья 1.1. Стороны are free to enter into договор and to determine its content urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FreedomOfContract
    • Статья 1.6(2). Issues within the scope of these Principles but not expressly settled by them are as far as possible to be settled в соответствии с their underlying general principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GapSettledByUnderlyingPrinciples
    • Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaith
    • Статья 1.7(2). Стороны не вправе exclude or limit the обязанность of добросовестность and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaithCannotBeExcluded
    • Статья 5.1.9(2). An оферта to release a право gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if должник does not reject it без задержки urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted
    • Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted/unless/0
    • Статья 5.1.2(c). Implied обязательствоs stem from добросовестность and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromGoodFaith
    • Статья 5.1.2(a). Implied обязательствоs stem from the nature and purpose of договор urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromNatureAndPurpose
    • Статья 5.1.2(b). Implied обязательствоs stem from практики established between стороны and обычаи urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromPracticesAndUsages
    • Статья 5.1.2(d). Implied обязательствоs stem from reasonableness urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromReasonableness
    • Статья 5.1.1. The договорual обязательствоs of стороны may be implied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedIsContractual
    • Статья 1.8. Сторона cannot act inconsistently with an understanding it has caused the other party to have and upon which that other party reasonably has acted in reliance to its detriment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InconsistentBehaviourBarred
    • Статья 4.2(2) (opening words). Where the intention was known to the other party, the reasonable-person reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#IntentionDisplacesReasonablePerson
    • Статья 4.1(1). A договор shall be interpreted according to the common intention of стороны urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByCommonIntention
    • Статья 4.1(2). If the common intention cannot be established, договор shall be interpreted according to the meaning разумное лицоs of the same kind would give it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByReasonablePersons
    • Статья 1.4. Nothing in these Principles restricts the application of mandatory rules urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MandatoryRulesUnrestricted
    • Статья 5.1.7(2). Where the price is to be determined by one party and that deрасторжение is manifestly unreasonable, a reasonable price shall be substituted notwithstanding any договор term to the contrary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ManifestlyUnreasonableDeterminationReplaced
    • Преамбула. These Principles may be applied когда стороны have agreed that their договор be governed by general principles of law, the lex mercatoria or the like urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyOnChoiceOfGeneralPrinciples
    • Преамбула. These Principles may be applied когда стороны have not chosen any law to govern their договор urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyWhereNoLawChosen
    • Преамбула. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement domestic law urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretDomesticLaw
    • Преамбула. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement international uniform law instruments urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretUniformLaw
    • Статья 1.3. The договор can be modified or terminated as otherwise provided in these Principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationAsProvided
    • Статья 1.3. The договор can be modified or terminated по соглашению urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByAgreement
    • Статья 1.3. The договор can be modified or terminated в соответствии с its terms urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByTerms
    • Статья 1.2. Nothing in these Principles requires договор to be made in or evidenced by a particular form urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoFormRequired
    • Статья 1.10(2)-(3). A notice is effective когда it reaches the person to whom it is given urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoticeEffectiveOnReceipt
    • Статья 4.7. In case of discrepancy between equally authoritative versions there is a preference for the interpretation according to the original version urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#OriginalVersionPreferred
    • Статья 1.12(1). Official holidays or non-business days occurring during the period are included in calculating it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodEndsOn
    • Статья 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the коммерческое предприятие of сторона to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday
    • Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday/unless/0
    • Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PreserveRights
    • Статья 5.1.7(1). Where договор does not fix the price, стороны are considered to have made reference to the price generally charged in comparable circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceByMarket
    • Статья 5.1.7(1). If no such price is available, a reasonable price applies urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceReasonableWhereNoMarket
    • Преамбула. These Principles shall be applied когда стороны have agreed that their договор be governed by them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PrinciplesGovernByAgreement
    • Статья 5.1.6. Where the quality of исполнение is neither fixed by nor determinable from договор, сторона связан to render a исполнение of a quality that is reasonable and not less than average in the circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#QualityWhereNotFixed
    • Статьи 4.4 and 4.5. Terms are to be read in the light of the whole договор and so as to give effect to all of them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReadingConformsToCanons
    • Статья 5.1.9(1). An obligee may release its право по соглашению with должник urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReleaseByAgreement
    • Статья 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the коммерческое предприятие of сторона setting the time, если только the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone
    • Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone/unless/0
    • Статья 5.2.6. The beneficiary may renounce a право conferred on it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RenunciationEndsBeneficiaryRight
    • Статья 5.3.2(b). The relevant договор or договорual обязательство comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract
    • Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract/unless/0
    • Статья 5.3.5. On fulfilment of a resolutive condition the rules on restitution apply with appropriate adaptations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RestitutionOnResolutiveCondition
    • Статья 5.1.4(1). To the extent that an обязательство involves a обязанность to achieve a specific result, that party связан to achieve that result urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResultDutyPerformed
    • Статья 5.2.5. Стороны may modify or revoke the правоs conferred until выгодоприобретатель has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance
    • Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance/unless/0
    • Статья 1.11. Where сторона has a single коммерческое предприятие that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant
    • Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant/unless/0
    • Статья 4.2(1). Statements and other conduct shall be interpreted according to сторона's intention if the other party knew or could not have been unaware of it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByIntention
    • Статья 4.2(2). If the preceding пункт is not applicable, statements shall be interpreted according to the meaning a разумное лицо would give them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByReasonablePerson
    • Статья 4.8(1). Where стороны have not agreed в отношении an important term, a term which is appropriate in the circumstances shall be supplied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SupplyOmittedTerm
    • Статья 5.3.2(a). The relevant договор or договорual обязательство takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect
    • Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect/unless/0
    • Статья 5.1.8. A договор for an indefinite period may be terminated by either party by giving notice a разумный срок in advance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#TerminationOfIndefiniteContract
    • Статья 5.1.7(2). A manifestly unreasonable deрасторжение does not stand as the applicable price urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#UnreasonableDeterminationDisplaced
    • Статья 5.3.1. A договор or договорual обязательство may be made conditional upon the occurrence of a future uncertain event urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ValidCondition
    Подробности
    {
 "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_EN",
 "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
 "since": null,
 "state": "not_yet",
 "status": null
}
  2. справкаEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31

    редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_FR на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 79 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)

    Задетые узлы
    • Статья 5.2.3. The conferment of правоs in выгодоприобретатель includes the право to invoke a оговорка in договор which excludes or limits the ответственность of выгодоприобретатель urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryMayInvokeClause
    • Статья 5.1.4(2). To the extent that an обязательство involves a обязанность of максимальные усилия, that party связан to make such efforts as would be made by a разумное лицо of the same kind urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BestEffortsDutyPerformed
    • Статья 1.9(1). Стороны связаны by any обычай to which they have agreed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByAgreedUsage
    • Статья 1.9(1). Стороны связаны by практики which they have established between themselves urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByEstablishedPractice
    • Статья 1.9(2). Стороны связаны by a обычай widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, кроме случаев, когда где its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage
    • Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage/unless/0
    • Статья 5.3.3(1). Сторона who prevented fulfilment contrary to добросовестность не вправе rely on the non-fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnPreventedCondition
    • Статья 5.3.3(2). Сторона who brought about fulfilment contrary to добросовестность не вправе rely on the fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnProcuredCondition
    • Статья 4.3. In applying Статьи 4.1 and 4.2, regard shall be had to all the circumstances, включая those listed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CircumstanceToBeRegarded
    • Статья 1.11. Where сторона has more than one коммерческое предприятие the relevant one is that which has the closest relationship to договор and its исполнение urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ClosestPlaceIsRelevant
    • Статья 4.1(2) (opening words). Where the common intention can be established, the reasonable-persons reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CommonIntentionDisplacesReasonablePersons
    • Статья 1.12(2). The computed last day does not stand где it is a holiday at the place of исполнение urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ComputedLastDayYieldsToHoliday
    • Статья 4.6. If договор terms supplied by one party are unclear, an interpretation against that party is preferred urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContraProferentem
    • Статья 1.3. A договор validly entered into is binding upon стороны urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContractIsBinding
    • Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#Cooperate
    • Статья 5.2.4. The promisor may assert against выгодоприобретатель all defences which the promisor could assert against the promisee urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DefencesAgainstBeneficiary
    • Статья 1.5. Стороны may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, кроме случаев, когда as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective
    • Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective/unless/0
    • Статья 1.7(1). Each party must act в соответствии с добросовестность and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyOfGoodFaith
    • Статья 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party когда such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the исполнение of that party's обязательствоs urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToCooperate
    • Статья 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, сторона не вправе, contrary to добросовестность, act so as to prejudice the other party's правоs in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRights
    • Статья 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, сторона не вправе, contrary to добросовестность, act so as to prejudice the other party's правоs in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRightsBreached
    • Статья 5.1.1. The договорual обязательствоs of стороны may be express urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ExpressIsContractual
    • Статья 5.1.5. In determining the extent to which an обязательство involves a обязанность of максимальные усилия or a обязанность to achieve a specific result, regard shall be had to the listed factors urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FactorDeterminesKindOfDuty
    • Статья 1.1. Стороны are free to enter into договор and to determine its content urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FreedomOfContract
    • Статья 1.6(2). Issues within the scope of these Principles but not expressly settled by them are as far as possible to be settled в соответствии с their underlying general principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GapSettledByUnderlyingPrinciples
    • Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaith
    • Статья 1.7(2). Стороны не вправе exclude or limit the обязанность of добросовестность and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaithCannotBeExcluded
    • Статья 5.1.9(2). An оферта to release a право gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if должник does not reject it без задержки urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted
    • Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted/unless/0
    • Статья 5.1.2(c). Implied обязательствоs stem from добросовестность and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromGoodFaith
    • Статья 5.1.2(a). Implied обязательствоs stem from the nature and purpose of договор urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromNatureAndPurpose
    • Статья 5.1.2(b). Implied обязательствоs stem from практики established between стороны and обычаи urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromPracticesAndUsages
    • Статья 5.1.2(d). Implied обязательствоs stem from reasonableness urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromReasonableness
    • Статья 5.1.1. The договорual обязательствоs of стороны may be implied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedIsContractual
    • Статья 1.8. Сторона cannot act inconsistently with an understanding it has caused the other party to have and upon which that other party reasonably has acted in reliance to its detriment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InconsistentBehaviourBarred
    • Статья 4.2(2) (opening words). Where the intention was known to the other party, the reasonable-person reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#IntentionDisplacesReasonablePerson
    • Статья 4.1(1). A договор shall be interpreted according to the common intention of стороны urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByCommonIntention
    • Статья 4.1(2). If the common intention cannot be established, договор shall be interpreted according to the meaning разумное лицоs of the same kind would give it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByReasonablePersons
    • Статья 1.4. Nothing in these Principles restricts the application of mandatory rules urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MandatoryRulesUnrestricted
    • Статья 5.1.7(2). Where the price is to be determined by one party and that deрасторжение is manifestly unreasonable, a reasonable price shall be substituted notwithstanding any договор term to the contrary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ManifestlyUnreasonableDeterminationReplaced
    • Преамбула. These Principles may be applied когда стороны have agreed that their договор be governed by general principles of law, the lex mercatoria or the like urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyOnChoiceOfGeneralPrinciples
    • Преамбула. These Principles may be applied когда стороны have not chosen any law to govern their договор urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyWhereNoLawChosen
    • Преамбула. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement domestic law urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretDomesticLaw
    • Преамбула. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement international uniform law instruments urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretUniformLaw
    • Статья 1.3. The договор can be modified or terminated as otherwise provided in these Principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationAsProvided
    • Статья 1.3. The договор can be modified or terminated по соглашению urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByAgreement
    • Статья 1.3. The договор can be modified or terminated в соответствии с its terms urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByTerms
    • Статья 1.2. Nothing in these Principles requires договор to be made in or evidenced by a particular form urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoFormRequired
    • Статья 1.10(2)-(3). A notice is effective когда it reaches the person to whom it is given urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoticeEffectiveOnReceipt
    • Статья 4.7. In case of discrepancy between equally authoritative versions there is a preference for the interpretation according to the original version urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#OriginalVersionPreferred
    • Статья 1.12(1). Official holidays or non-business days occurring during the period are included in calculating it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodEndsOn
    • Статья 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the коммерческое предприятие of сторона to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday
    • Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday/unless/0
    • Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PreserveRights
    • Статья 5.1.7(1). Where договор does not fix the price, стороны are considered to have made reference to the price generally charged in comparable circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceByMarket
    • Статья 5.1.7(1). If no such price is available, a reasonable price applies urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceReasonableWhereNoMarket
    • Преамбула. These Principles shall be applied когда стороны have agreed that their договор be governed by them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PrinciplesGovernByAgreement
    • Статья 5.1.6. Where the quality of исполнение is neither fixed by nor determinable from договор, сторона связан to render a исполнение of a quality that is reasonable and not less than average in the circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#QualityWhereNotFixed
    • Статья 5.1.9(1). An obligee may release its право по соглашению with должник urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReleaseByAgreement
    • Статья 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the коммерческое предприятие of сторона setting the time, если только the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone
    • Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone/unless/0
    • Статья 5.2.6. The beneficiary may renounce a право conferred on it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RenunciationEndsBeneficiaryRight
    • Статья 5.3.2(b). The relevant договор or договорual обязательство comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract
    • Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract/unless/0
    • Статья 5.3.5. On fulfilment of a resolutive condition the rules on restitution apply with appropriate adaptations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RestitutionOnResolutiveCondition
    • Статья 5.1.4(1). To the extent that an обязательство involves a обязанность to achieve a specific result, that party связан to achieve that result urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResultDutyPerformed
    • Статья 5.2.5. Стороны may modify or revoke the правоs conferred until выгодоприобретатель has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance
    • Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance/unless/0
    • Статья 1.11. Where сторона has a single коммерческое предприятие that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant
    • Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant/unless/0
    • Статья 4.2(1). Statements and other conduct shall be interpreted according to сторона's intention if the other party knew or could not have been unaware of it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByIntention
    • Статья 4.2(2). If the preceding пункт is not applicable, statements shall be interpreted according to the meaning a разумное лицо would give them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByReasonablePerson
    • Статья 4.8(1). Where стороны have not agreed в отношении an important term, a term which is appropriate in the circumstances shall be supplied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SupplyOmittedTerm
    • Статья 5.3.2(a). The relevant договор or договорual обязательство takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect
    • Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect/unless/0
    • Статья 5.1.8. A договор for an indefinite period may be terminated by either party by giving notice a разумный срок in advance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#TerminationOfIndefiniteContract
    • Статья 5.1.7(2). A manifestly unreasonable deрасторжение does not stand as the applicable price urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#UnreasonableDeterminationDisplaced
    • Статья 5.3.1. A договор or договорual обязательство may be made conditional upon the occurrence of a future uncertain event urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ValidCondition
    Подробности
    {
 "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_FR",
 "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
 "since": null,
 "state": "not_yet",
 "status": null
}
  3. справкаEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31

    редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_EN на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 26 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)

    Задетые узлы
    • Статья 10.4(1). Where должник acknowledges the право before the expiration of the general срок исковой давности, a new general срок исковой давности begins on the day after the acknowledgement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AcknowledgementStartsNewGeneralPeriod
    • Статья 10.6(1). In the absence of provisions determining the exact date of commencement, arbitral proceedings are deemed to commence on the date on which the request reaches должник urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ArbitrationCommencesOnRequest
    • Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration
    • Статья 10.1(2). This Chapter does not govern the time within which сторона must give notice or perform any act other than the institution of legal proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ChapterDoesNotGovernNoticeTime
    • Статья 10.9(1). The expiration of the срок исковой давности does not extinguish the право urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight
    • Статья 10.9(2). For the expiration of the срок исковой давности to have effect, должник must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted
    • Article 10.9(2). Once the obligor has asserted expiry, the barred exercise is a comparative remedium_exclusum urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit
    • Статья 10.3(a). Стороны не вправе shorten the general срок исковой давности to less than one year urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodFloorOfOneYear
    • Статья 10.2(1). The general срок исковой давности is three years beginning on the day after the day кредитор knows or ought to know the facts as a result of which the право can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodOfThreeYears
    • Статья 10.1(1). The exercise of правоs governed by Принципы is barred by the expiration of a срок исковой давности according to the rules of this Chapter urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#LimitationGovernsExerciseOfRights
    • Статья 10.3(c). Стороны не вправе extend the maximum срок исковой давности to more than fifteen years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodCeilingOfFifteenYears
    • Статья 10.4(2). The maximum срок исковой давности does not begin to run again, but may be exceeded by the beginning of a new general срок исковой давности urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodDoesNotRestart
    • Статья 10.3(b). Стороны не вправе shorten the maximum срок исковой давности to less than four years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodFloorOfFourYears
    • Статья 10.2(2). In any event, the maximum срок исковой давности is ten years beginning on the day after the day the право can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodOfTenYears
    • Статья 10.11. Where there has been исполнение in order to discharge an обязательство, there is no право of restitution merely because the срок исковой давности has expired urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#NoRestitutionAfterExpiration
    • Статья 10.9(2). For the expiration of the срок исковой давности to have effect, должник must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration
    • Статья 10.3. Стороны may modify the срок исковой давностиs urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PartiesMayModifyPeriods
    • Статья 10.9(3). A право may still be relied on as a defence even though the expiration of the срок исковой давности for that право has been asserted urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#RightStillAvailableAsDefence
    • Статья 10.10. The obligee may exercise the право of зачёт until должник has asserted the expiration of the срок исковой давности urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SetOffUntilExpirationAsserted
    • Статья 10.7. Статьи 10.5 and 10.6 apply with appropriate modifications to proceedings гдеby стороны request a third person to assist them in reaching an amicable settlement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByAmicableSettlementProceedings
    • Статья 10.6(1). The running of the срок исковой давности is suspended когда кредитор performs an act recognised by the law of the arbitral tribunal as asserting its право urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByArbitralAct
    • Статья 10.5(1)(c). The running of the срок исковой давности is suspended где кредитор has asserted its правоs in proceedings for dissolution of должник urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByDissolutionClaim
    • Статья 10.8(1). Where кредитор has been prevented by an impediment beyond its control, the general срок исковой давности is suspended so as not to expire before one year after the impediment has ceased to exist urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByImpediment
    • Статья 10.8(2). Where the impediment consists of the incapacity or death of сторона, suspension ceases когда a representative or successor has been appointed; the additional one-year period applies accordingly urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByIncapacityEndsOnAppointment
    • Статья 10.5(1)(b). The running of the срок исковой давности is suspended где кредитор has asserted its правоs in the insolvency proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByInsolvencyClaim
    • Статья 10.5(1)(a). The running of the срок исковой давности is suspended когда кредитор performs an act recognised by the law of суд as asserting its право urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByJudicialAct
    Подробности
    {
 "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_EN",
 "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
 "since": null,
 "state": "not_yet",
 "status": null
}
  4. справкаEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31

    редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_FR на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 26 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)

    Задетые узлы
    • Статья 10.4(1). Where должник acknowledges the право before the expiration of the general срок исковой давности, a new general срок исковой давности begins on the day after the acknowledgement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AcknowledgementStartsNewGeneralPeriod
    • Статья 10.6(1). In the absence of provisions determining the exact date of commencement, arbitral proceedings are deemed to commence on the date on which the request reaches должник urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ArbitrationCommencesOnRequest
    • Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration
    • Статья 10.1(2). This Chapter does not govern the time within which сторона must give notice or perform any act other than the institution of legal proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ChapterDoesNotGovernNoticeTime
    • Статья 10.9(1). The expiration of the срок исковой давности does not extinguish the право urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight
    • Статья 10.9(2). For the expiration of the срок исковой давности to have effect, должник must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted
    • Article 10.9(2). Once the obligor has asserted expiry, the barred exercise is a comparative remedium_exclusum urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit
    • Статья 10.3(a). Стороны не вправе shorten the general срок исковой давности to less than one year urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodFloorOfOneYear
    • Статья 10.2(1). The general срок исковой давности is three years beginning on the day after the day кредитор knows or ought to know the facts as a result of which the право can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodOfThreeYears
    • Статья 10.1(1). The exercise of правоs governed by Принципы is barred by the expiration of a срок исковой давности according to the rules of this Chapter urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#LimitationGovernsExerciseOfRights
    • Статья 10.3(c). Стороны не вправе extend the maximum срок исковой давности to more than fifteen years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodCeilingOfFifteenYears
    • Статья 10.4(2). The maximum срок исковой давности does not begin to run again, but may be exceeded by the beginning of a new general срок исковой давности urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodDoesNotRestart
    • Статья 10.3(b). Стороны не вправе shorten the maximum срок исковой давности to less than four years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodFloorOfFourYears
    • Статья 10.2(2). In any event, the maximum срок исковой давности is ten years beginning on the day after the day the право can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodOfTenYears
    • Статья 10.11. Where there has been исполнение in order to discharge an обязательство, there is no право of restitution merely because the срок исковой давности has expired urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#NoRestitutionAfterExpiration
    • Статья 10.9(2). For the expiration of the срок исковой давности to have effect, должник must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration
    • Статья 10.3. Стороны may modify the срок исковой давностиs urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PartiesMayModifyPeriods
    • Статья 10.9(3). A право may still be relied on as a defence even though the expiration of the срок исковой давности for that право has been asserted urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#RightStillAvailableAsDefence
    • Статья 10.10. The obligee may exercise the право of зачёт until должник has asserted the expiration of the срок исковой давности urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SetOffUntilExpirationAsserted
    • Статья 10.7. Статьи 10.5 and 10.6 apply with appropriate modifications to proceedings гдеby стороны request a third person to assist them in reaching an amicable settlement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByAmicableSettlementProceedings
    • Статья 10.6(1). The running of the срок исковой давности is suspended когда кредитор performs an act recognised by the law of the arbitral tribunal as asserting its право urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByArbitralAct
    • Статья 10.5(1)(c). The running of the срок исковой давности is suspended где кредитор has asserted its правоs in proceedings for dissolution of должник urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByDissolutionClaim
    • Статья 10.8(1). Where кредитор has been prevented by an impediment beyond its control, the general срок исковой давности is suspended so as not to expire before one year after the impediment has ceased to exist urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByImpediment
    • Статья 10.8(2). Where the impediment consists of the incapacity or death of сторона, suspension ceases когда a representative or successor has been appointed; the additional one-year period applies accordingly urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByIncapacityEndsOnAppointment
    • Статья 10.5(1)(b). The running of the срок исковой давности is suspended где кредитор has asserted its правоs in the insolvency proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByInsolvencyClaim
    • Статья 10.5(1)(a). The running of the срок исковой давности is suspended когда кредитор performs an act recognised by the law of суд as asserting its право urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByJudicialAct
    Подробности
    {
 "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_FR",
 "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
 "since": null,
 "state": "not_yet",
 "status": null
}

Как записал движок: код, тяжесть и текст с §-ссылками; порядок — как в документе исполнения.

Граф доказательств

Граф доказательства · 5 слой
query_evaluationaction_prescrite_lerule_applicationActionNonPrescriteAvantOuAEcheancerule_applicationEcheanceCinqAnsassertionaction_introduite_lerule_applicationPointDepartConnaissanceReelleassertionprescription_non_interrompueassertiontitulaire_connait_les_faits_leassertioncreance_exigible_depuis

Узлы доказательств: 10 · assertion 4, rule_application 5, query_evaluation 1

Блок слишком большой для встроенного просмотра. Он целиком включён в JSON документа — без сокращений.

Скачать JSON ↓
Идентификаторы календаря и доказательства
Ссылка на доказательство
case/ZweiJahre_CC/query/cc-prescrite
Исходное обоснование · JSON

Блок слишком большой для встроенного просмотра. Он целиком включён в JSON документа — без сокращений.

Скачать JSON ↓
ИсточникиФрагментов: 7

Статья 2219

Article 2219 La prescription extinctive est un mode d'extinction d'un droit résultant de l'inaction de son titulaire pendant un certain laps de temps.
Исходные данные · JSON
JSONТолько чтение
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:6df4090af33e5e220e1ccb8dce8f8d00f5f0e141aadbd8f85537aa44bf7a63f7",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2219",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2219"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2219",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:0b7ecca0ee814319db91d174578fb164b2ac80bbd82794ff733b36bd4f55401a",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2219\nLa prescription extinctive est un mode d'extinction d'un droit résultant de l'inaction de son titulaire pendant un certain laps de temps.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Статья 2224

Article 2224 Les actions personnelles ou mobilières se prescrivent par cinq ans à compter du jour où le titulaire d'un droit a connu ou aurait dû connaître les faits lui permettant de l'exercer.
Исходные данные · JSON
JSONТолько чтение
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:bdab8bd64c835fd72d22b2500bf46d2189e23899c1a2355f5df83442df6121ab",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2224",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2224"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2224",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:672b74a19b0ebe429181790cbe798f0f53e22cb2eeb8706cded06dbf5a40c629",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2224\nLes actions personnelles ou mobilières se prescrivent par cinq ans à compter du jour où le titulaire d'un droit a connu ou aurait dû connaître les faits lui permettant de l'exercer.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Статья 2228

Article 2228 La prescription se compte par jours, et non par heures.
Исходные данные · JSON
JSONТолько чтение
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:a65f1c87050358f486df72292dbb5562439921a55708065026e1560803461b7b",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2228",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2228"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2228",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:dd06365b6b1300407fadd02ddc12c5220fd9139343f3ce91809ff20bf62588a6",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2228\nLa prescription se compte par jours, et non par heures.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Статья 2229

Article 2229 Elle est acquise lorsque le dernier jour du terme est accompli.
Исходные данные · JSON
JSONТолько чтение
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:43dd3aa87d9bddf34522d203c9afc34f12ce9f5292aa3748835cbccf72dfcccd",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2229",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2229"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2229",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:28578b7da1445ef66f205effb784bcc5dae77310d748b2ae6ccebd52a8ca3009",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2229\nElle est acquise lorsque le dernier jour du terme est accompli.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Статья 2232

Article 2232 Le report du point de départ, la suspension ou l'interruption de la prescription ne peut avoir pour effet de porter le délai de la prescription extinctive au-delà de vingt ans à compter du jour de la naissance du droit. Le premier alinéa n'est pas applicable dans les cas mentionnés aux articles 2226, 2226-1, 2227, 2233 et 2236, au premier alinéa de l'article 2241 et à l'article 2244. Il ne s'applique pas non plus aux actions relatives à l'état des personnes.
Исходные данные · JSON
JSONТолько чтение
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:d0aa882fc857d081bcada43191910d722446f91fb14fb86b7e7322957b4070c8",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2232",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2232"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2232",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:b1a33bf6d27cec1af359949222bf7220bc63bc536ae53eb79e94833b5d293e0b",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2232\nLe report du point de départ, la suspension ou l'interruption de la prescription ne peut avoir pour effet de porter le délai de la prescription extinctive au-delà de vingt ans à compter du jour de la naissance du droit.\nLe premier alinéa n'est pas applicable dans les cas mentionnés aux articles 2226, 2226-1, 2227, 2233 et 2236, au premier alinéa de l'article 2241 et à l'article 2244. Il ne s'applique pas non plus aux actions relatives à l'état des personnes.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Статья 2238

Article 2238 La prescription est suspendue à compter du jour où, après la survenance d'un litige, les parties conviennent de recourir à la médiation ou à la conciliation ou, à défaut d'accord écrit, à compter du jour de la première réunion de médiation ou de conciliation. La prescription est également suspendue à compter de la conclusion d'une convention de procédure participative ou à compter de l'accord du débiteur constaté par l'huissier de justice pour participer à la procédure prévue à l'article L. 125-1 du code des procédures civiles d'exécution. Le délai de prescription recommence à courir, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois, à compter de la date à laquelle soit l'une des parties ou les deux, soit le médiateur ou le conciliateur déclarent que la médiation ou la conciliation est terminée. En cas de convention de procédure participative, le délai de prescription recommence à courir à compter du terme de la convention, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois. En cas d'échec de la procédure prévue au même article, le délai de prescription recommence à courir à compter de la date du refus du débiteur, constaté par l'huissier, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois.
Исходные данные · JSON
JSONТолько чтение
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:85fb1ede52113abd61e7bcfa34017c1229badc1205a9cac686e65c4640912b6f",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2238",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2238"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2238",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:7de68d6ed845bcd95c5ca76851b7d5c42c0b755a0f7a53080cbbcbb127ac61f7",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2238\nLa prescription est suspendue à compter du jour où, après la survenance d'un litige, les parties conviennent de recourir à la médiation ou à la conciliation ou, à défaut d'accord écrit, à compter du jour de la première réunion de médiation ou de conciliation. La prescription est également suspendue à compter de la conclusion d'une convention de procédure participative ou à compter de l'accord du débiteur constaté par l'huissier de justice pour participer à la procédure prévue à l'article L. 125-1 du code des procédures civiles d'exécution.\nLe délai de prescription recommence à courir, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois, à compter de la date à laquelle soit l'une des parties ou les deux, soit le médiateur ou le conciliateur déclarent que la médiation ou la conciliation est terminée. En cas de convention de procédure participative, le délai de prescription recommence à courir à compter du terme de la convention, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois. En cas d'échec de la procédure prévue au même article, le délai de prescription recommence à courir à compter de la date du refus du débiteur, constaté par l'huissier, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Статья 2239

Article 2239 La prescription est également suspendue lorsque le juge fait droit à une demande de mesure d'instruction présentée avant tout procès. Le délai de prescription recommence à courir, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois, à compter du jour où la mesure a été exécutée.
Исходные данные · JSON
JSONТолько чтение
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:16731a698eded878eaa02339d6b1fd92b7299d446eab076502a9c24717cfd0cc",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2239",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2239"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2239",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:9e742ac71c8ecd1fe04db3e3bfceb323387b9b856a4882cc1429615d47e89d12",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2239\nLa prescription est également suspendue lorsque le juge fait droit à une demande de mesure d'instruction présentée avant tout procès.\nLe délai de prescription recommence à courir, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois, à compter du jour où la mesure a été exécutée.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Пакеты в снимке

  • de.bgb.core
  • de.bgb.fristen
  • de.bgb.ius_privatum
  • doctrine.ius_privatum
  • fr.code_civil
  • unidroit.picc
  • unidroit.picc_limitation
Технические данныеПолный ответ, параметры и контрольные суммы
Статус расчёта
COMPUTED
Полный ответ движка
Zwei Jahre, Code civil: die Klage ist nicht verjährt

Полный машинный результат · JSON

Блок слишком большой для встроенного просмотра. Он целиком включён в JSON документа — без сокращений.

Скачать JSON ↓

Исполнение · JSON

Блок слишком большой для встроенного просмотра. Он целиком включён в JSON документа — без сокращений.

Скачать JSON ↓

Метаданные отображения

Блок слишком большой для встроенного просмотра. Он целиком включён в JSON документа — без сокращений.

Скачать JSON ↓

JSON · расчёты, источники и точные данные

JSONТолько чтение
{
  "acts": [
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:a6813604c35567e7c586d334efbf524d08f3467170c4b732cfb15809cacf4ff4",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core",
      "package": "de.bgb.core"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:998148eaeeed28f1565811474ee7beb7eacc616c5681ed9638edc976512a9884",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
      "package": "de.bgb.fristen"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:86a5a00db16e32187223ceeec6748eb7d42d18b7c370c8b15ac64d2f3f655ff7",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum",
      "package": "de.bgb.ius_privatum"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:7202de5de49a8a9d12837bc19cb7008ba2d1a68dbcc0134e0afccf1440a6d5ed",
      "namespace": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum",
      "package": "doctrine.ius_privatum"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:ad41d027ba92c38ca5eecc1d16097d0bbc8c5a74946fc1a6397c6dadac61158f",
      "namespace": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
      "package": "fr.code_civil"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:719bfd408eed92ad497ba071482354d4ad32b81ef9f41c6654f224416c19e603",
      "namespace": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc",
      "package": "unidroit.picc"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:b311d0d422a1079f71113320bd818236f7b09507c7dd960bdafceb91285497d9",
      "namespace": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "package": "unidroit.picc_limitation"
    }
  ],
  "caseHash": "sha256:44bf9c77a11b9a491773aa06437c96080852a6c99f75cc4ccda4a8f795f7136d",
  "jurisdiction": "Deutschland",
  "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
  "mode": "audit",
  "programHash": "sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e",
  "resultHash": "sha256:79d9c0afff9713df79f5881d566513daec0a4a1f6e06ab171f810b8ff37a4e50",
  "timezone": "UTC"
}
evaluation SHA-256
sha256:979f29a3c2372b19165a5ab12148f78b5fae75b6d3c81fd38678391bd2d21300
Исходные данные · JSON
JSONТолько чтение
{
  "args": [
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:causa",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "kind": "value",
      "type": {
        "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
      },
      "value": "2016-01-02"
    }
  ],
  "facts": [
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2014-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#creance_exigible_depuis"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2014-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#titulaire_connait_les_faits_le"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2016-01-02"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#action_introduite_le"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#prescription_non_interrompue"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
    }
  ],
  "kind": "truth",
  "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
  "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#action_prescrite_le"
}

Nach zwei Jahren ist die französische Klage noch nicht verjährt.

Как сослаться

Снимок неизменяем: его закрепляет SHA-256 скачиваемого JSON, поэтому дата обращения не нужна.

Текст ссылки
«Eine Forderung, entstanden am 15. März 2010, Klage am 2. Januar 2016: ist das Rechtsmittel nach dem BGB, dem Code civil und den UNIDROIT-Prinzipien ausgeschlossen?». Arxo Lens. https://lens.arxo.io/a/b_53bf8ccac0d621cc2507b1b9b4a53c448203f6b570111d248dba3bf7de49c48a. SHA-256 снимка: 53bf8ccac0d621cc2507b1b9b4a53c448203f6b570111d248dba3bf7de49c48a.
BibTeX
@misc{arxo-lens-b_53bf8ccac0d6,
  title = {Eine Forderung, entstanden am 15. März 2010, Klage am 2. Januar 2016: ist das Rechtsmittel nach dem BGB, dem Code civil und den UNIDROIT-Prinzipien ausgeschlossen?},
  howpublished = {Arxo Lens},
  url = {https://lens.arxo.io/a/b_53bf8ccac0d621cc2507b1b9b4a53c448203f6b570111d248dba3bf7de49c48a},
  note = {SHA-256 53bf8ccac0d621cc2507b1b9b4a53c448203f6b570111d248dba3bf7de49c48a}
}
Код для вставки

Карточка показывает результат и ведёт к полному разбору; cookies не ставит.

<iframe src="https://lens.arxo.io/embed/b_53bf8ccac0d621cc2507b1b9b4a53c448203f6b570111d248dba3bf7de49c48a?lang=ru" width="100%" height="390" loading="lazy" title="Ein Fall, drei Kodizes — Arxo Lens" style="border:0"></iframe>

Анонимная статистика посещений, без cookies.