Lensby Arxo
Download JSON
Question Saved analysis

Eine Forderung, entstanden am 15. März 2010, Klage am 2. Januar 2016: ist das Rechtsmittel nach dem BGB, dem Code civil und den UNIDROIT-Prinzipien ausgeschlossen?

Dieselben Daten, drei Texte. Das BGB lässt die regelmäßige Verjährung mit dem Schluss des Jahres eintreten. Der Code civil zählt fünf Jahre ab Kenntnis. Die Prinzipien schließen das Rechtsmittel aus, wenn die Verjährung geltend gemacht wird.

This is an assistant explanation, not a calculation result. Check the grounds and sources below.

At a glance

6

Select a result to explore its grounds

Detailed analysis

6

Condition

Fünf Jahre, BGB: die Verjährung ist am 31. Dezember 2013 eingetreten

Jurisdiction DeutschlandLaw as of 2016-01-02

Calculation result

Established

Input parameters

What we are finding

Tag, mit dessen Ablauf die Verjährung des Anspruchs eintritt

anspruch31 December 2013

Input facts

  • Tag, an dem der Anspruch entstanden ist (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 1, § 200)

    a: atag: 15 March 2010
  • Tag, an dem der Gläubiger von den den Anspruch begründenden Umständen und der Person des Schuldners Kenntnis erlangt hat (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 2) — festgestellte Tatsache, im Fall origin adjudicated

    a: atag: 15 March 2010
  • Kein Hemmungstatbestand der §§ 203–208 festgestellt — ausdrückliche Angabe des Falls; das Fehlen einer Angabe ist keine Verneinung

    a: a
  • der Schuldner beruft sich auf die Verjährung des Leistungs- oder Nacherfüllungsanspruchs (§ 218 Abs. 1)

    a: a
  • Inhaber des Anspruchs (Gläubiger)

    a: ap: g
  • Anspruchsgegner (Schuldner)

    a: ap: s
  • diese Person des BGB tritt in der vergleichenden Kette als dieses Gesicht auf

    px
    gg
    ss
  • dieser Anspruch ist das vergleichende Streitverhältnis

    a: ac: causa
  • the claimant brings a claim against the defendant — the contested relation the question is about

    causa: causaactor: greus: s
Original data · JSON
JSONRead only
{
  "args": [
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:anspruch",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "kind": "value",
      "type": {
        "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
      },
      "value": "2013-12-31"
    }
  ],
  "facts": [
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core#anspruch_entstanden_am"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "adjudicated",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#kenntnis_erlangt_am"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#keine_hemmung"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#schuldner_beruft_sich_auf_verjaehrung"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#g",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core#anspruchsinhaber"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#s",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core#anspruchsgegner"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#g",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#persona_of"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#s",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#persona_of"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#causa_of_anspruch"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
    }
  ],
  "kind": "truth",
  "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
  "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#verjaehrung_eingetreten_am"
}
Why this resultApplied rules and conditions

Derivation path11 steps

  1. 1

    Tag, an dem der Anspruch entstanden ist (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 1, § 200)

    a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 15 March 2010

    case fact
  2. 2

    Für den Tag der Entstehung des Anspruchs wird der Schluss des Jahres gesucht (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 1)

    für diesen Tag wird der Schluss des Jahres gesucht (§ 199 Abs. 1): a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 15 March 2010

    para. 199

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeGesuchtFuerEntstehung
    rule
  3. 3

    Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 9 — Ende des 9. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    31 December 2010 = month end of(add calendar period(month start of(15 March 2010), 9 calendar_month))

    para. 199

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat09
    rule
  4. 4

    Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): der Kandidat ist der 31. Dezember, wenn sein Monat 31 Tage hat, der folgende Monat 31 Tage und der übernächste höchstens 29 — Dezember, Januar, Februar

    Schluss des Jahres, in dem der Tag liegt (§ 199 Abs. 1): der 31. Dezember desselben Jahres: a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 15 March 2010; ultimo: 31 December 2010

    para. 199

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeIstDezember
    rule
  5. 5

    Kein Hemmungstatbestand der §§ 203–208 festgestellt — ausdrückliche Angabe des Falls; das Fehlen einer Angabe ist keine Verneinung

    a: urn:p12:anspruch

    case fact
  6. 6

    Tag, an dem der Gläubiger von den den Anspruch begründenden Umständen und der Person des Schuldners Kenntnis erlangt hat (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 2) — festgestellte Tatsache, im Fall origin adjudicated

    a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 15 March 2010

    • accepted externally
    accepted externally
  7. 7

    Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beginnt mit dem Schluss des Jahres, in dem der Anspruch entstanden ist und der Gläubiger Kenntnis erlangt hat (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 und 2) — Kenntnis nicht nach der Entstehung: Schluss des Entstehungsjahres

    Schluss des Jahres, mit dem die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beginnt (§ 199 Abs. 1): a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 31 December 2010

    para. 199

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#VerjaehrungsbeginnUltimoDerEntstehung
    rule
  8. 8

    Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beträgt drei Jahre (§ 195) — Jahresschritt vom Schluss des Jahres (§ 188 Abs. 2, Politik BGB_FRISTEN_KALENDER)

    31 December 2013 = add calendar period(31 December 2010, 3 calendar_year)

    para. 195

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#RegelmaessigeVerjaehrungsfrist
    rule
  9. 9

    Ohne festgestellte Hemmung endet die Verjährungsfrist mit der regelmäßigen Frist (§§ 195, 199; § 209 greift nicht)

    Tag, mit dessen Ablauf die Verjährungsfrist unter Berücksichtigung der Hemmung endet (§ 209): a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 31 December 2013

    para. 209

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#VerjaehrungsfristEndeOhneHemmung
    rule
  10. 10

    Ohne Hemmung tritt die Verjährung mit dem Ende der Verjährungsfrist ein

    Tag, mit dessen Ablauf die Verjährung des Anspruchs eintritt: a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 31 December 2013

    para. 209

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#VerjaehrungOhneHemmung
    rule
  11. 11

    Query evaluation

    query

verified by the engine: 8 · case fact: 2 · accepted externally: 1 · Full graph: 33 nodes

Steps of the saved proof from the case facts to the answer. Formulas are shown as written in the norm with bound values substituted; the page recomputes nothing.

Basis of this answer

Rules on the saved proof path for this answer.

de.bgb.fristen
  • Für den Tag der Entstehung des Anspruchs wird der Schluss des Jahres gesucht (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 1)

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeGesuchtFuerEntstehung
  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): der Kandidat ist der 31. Dezember, wenn sein Monat 31 Tage hat, der folgende Monat 31 Tage und der übernächste höchstens 29 — Dezember, Januar, Februar

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeIstDezember
  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 9 — Ende des 9. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat09
  • Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beträgt drei Jahre (§ 195) — Jahresschritt vom Schluss des Jahres (§ 188 Abs. 2, Politik BGB_FRISTEN_KALENDER)

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#RegelmaessigeVerjaehrungsfrist
  • Ohne Hemmung tritt die Verjährung mit dem Ende der Verjährungsfrist ein

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#VerjaehrungOhneHemmung
  • Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beginnt mit dem Schluss des Jahres, in dem der Anspruch entstanden ist und der Gläubiger Kenntnis erlangt hat (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 und 2) — Kenntnis nicht nach der Entstehung: Schluss des Entstehungsjahres

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#VerjaehrungsbeginnUltimoDerEntstehung
  • Ohne festgestellte Hemmung endet die Verjährungsfrist mit der regelmäßigen Frist (§§ 195, 199; § 209 greift nicht)

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#VerjaehrungsfristEndeOhneHemmung
Other rules in the evaluation14

Applied in the overall evaluation, but not on the proof path for this answer.

de.bgb.fristen
  • Für den Tag der Kenntniserlangung wird der Schluss des Jahres gesucht (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 2)

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeGesuchtFuerKenntnis
  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 0 — Ende des 0. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat00
  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 1 — Ende des 1. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat01
  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 2 — Ende des 2. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat02
  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 3 — Ende des 3. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat03
  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 4 — Ende des 4. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat04
  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 5 — Ende des 5. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat05
  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 6 — Ende des 6. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat06
  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 7 — Ende des 7. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat07
  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 8 — Ende des 8. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat08
  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 10 — Ende des 10. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat10
  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 11 — Ende des 11. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat11
  • Nach Eintritt der Verjährung ist der Schuldner berechtigt, die Leistung zu verweigern (§ 214 Abs. 1)

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#Leistungsverweigerungsrecht214
de.bgb.ius_privatum
  • Nach Eintritt der Verjährung ist der Schuldner berechtigt, die Leistung zu verweigern

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#EinredeExcludit
Issues · 4
Execution issues
  1. infoEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31

    редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_EN на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 81 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)

    Affected nodes
    • Article 5.2.3. The conferment of rights in the beneficiary includes the right to invoke a clause in the contract which excludes or limits the liability of the beneficiary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryMayInvokeClause
    • Articles 5.2.1 and 5.2.2. The parties may confer a right on a third party who must be identifiable with adequate certainty by the contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryRightExists
    • Article 5.1.4(2). To the extent that an obligation involves a duty of best efforts, that party is bound to make such efforts as would be made by a reasonable person of the same kind urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BestEffortsDutyPerformed
    • Article 1.9(1). The parties are bound by any usage to which they have agreed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByAgreedUsage
    • Article 1.9(1). The parties are bound by practices which they have established between themselves urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByEstablishedPractice
    • Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage
    • Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage/unless/0
    • Article 5.3.3(1). A party who prevented fulfilment contrary to good faith may not rely on the non-fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnPreventedCondition
    • Article 5.3.3(2). A party who brought about fulfilment contrary to good faith may not rely on the fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnProcuredCondition
    • Article 4.3. In applying Articles 4.1 and 4.2, regard shall be had to all the circumstances, including those listed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CircumstanceToBeRegarded
    • Article 1.11. Where a party has more than one place of business the relevant one is that which has the closest relationship to the contract and its performance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ClosestPlaceIsRelevant
    • Article 4.1(2) (opening words). Where the common intention can be established, the reasonable-persons reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CommonIntentionDisplacesReasonablePersons
    • Article 1.12(2). The computed last day does not stand where it is a holiday at the place of performance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ComputedLastDayYieldsToHoliday
    • Article 4.6. If contract terms supplied by one party are unclear, an interpretation against that party is preferred urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContraProferentem
    • Article 1.3. A contract validly entered into is binding upon the parties urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContractIsBinding
    • Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#Cooperate
    • Article 5.2.4. The promisor may assert against the beneficiary all defences which the promisor could assert against the promisee urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DefencesAgainstBeneficiary
    • Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective
    • Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective/unless/0
    • Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyOfGoodFaith
    • Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToCooperate
    • Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRights
    • Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRightsBreached
    • Article 5.1.1. The contractual obligations of the parties may be express urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ExpressIsContractual
    • Article 5.1.5. In determining the extent to which an obligation involves a duty of best efforts or a duty to achieve a specific result, regard shall be had to the listed factors urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FactorDeterminesKindOfDuty
    • Article 1.1. The parties are free to enter into a contract and to determine its content urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FreedomOfContract
    • Article 1.6(2). Issues within the scope of these Principles but not expressly settled by them are as far as possible to be settled in accordance with their underlying general principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GapSettledByUnderlyingPrinciples
    • Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaith
    • Article 1.7(2). The parties may not exclude or limit the duty of good faith and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaithCannotBeExcluded
    • Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted
    • Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted/unless/0
    • Article 5.1.2(c). Implied obligations stem from good faith and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromGoodFaith
    • Article 5.1.2(a). Implied obligations stem from the nature and purpose of the contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromNatureAndPurpose
    • Article 5.1.2(b). Implied obligations stem from practices established between the parties and usages urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromPracticesAndUsages
    • Article 5.1.2(d). Implied obligations stem from reasonableness urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromReasonableness
    • Article 5.1.1. The contractual obligations of the parties may be implied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedIsContractual
    • Article 1.8. A party cannot act inconsistently with an understanding it has caused the other party to have and upon which that other party reasonably has acted in reliance to its detriment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InconsistentBehaviourBarred
    • Article 4.2(2) (opening words). Where the intention was known to the other party, the reasonable-person reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#IntentionDisplacesReasonablePerson
    • Article 4.1(1). A contract shall be interpreted according to the common intention of the parties urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByCommonIntention
    • Article 4.1(2). If the common intention cannot be established, the contract shall be interpreted according to the meaning reasonable persons of the same kind would give it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByReasonablePersons
    • Article 1.4. Nothing in these Principles restricts the application of mandatory rules urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MandatoryRulesUnrestricted
    • Article 5.1.7(2). Where the price is to be determined by one party and that determination is manifestly unreasonable, a reasonable price shall be substituted notwithstanding any contract term to the contrary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ManifestlyUnreasonableDeterminationReplaced
    • Preamble. These Principles may be applied when the parties have agreed that their contract be governed by general principles of law, the lex mercatoria or the like urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyOnChoiceOfGeneralPrinciples
    • Preamble. These Principles may be applied when the parties have not chosen any law to govern their contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyWhereNoLawChosen
    • Preamble. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement domestic law urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretDomesticLaw
    • Preamble. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement international uniform law instruments urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretUniformLaw
    • Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated as otherwise provided in these Principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationAsProvided
    • Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated by agreement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByAgreement
    • Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated in accordance with its terms urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByTerms
    • Article 1.2. Nothing in these Principles requires a contract to be made in or evidenced by a particular form urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoFormRequired
    • Article 1.10(2)-(3). A notice is effective when it reaches the person to whom it is given urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoticeEffectiveOnReceipt
    • Article 4.7. In case of discrepancy between equally authoritative versions there is a preference for the interpretation according to the original version urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#OriginalVersionPreferred
    • Article 1.12(1). Official holidays or non-business days occurring during the period are included in calculating it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodEndsOn
    • Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday
    • Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday/unless/0
    • Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PreserveRights
    • Article 5.1.7(1). Where a contract does not fix the price, the parties are considered to have made reference to the price generally charged in comparable circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceByMarket
    • Article 5.1.7(1). If no such price is available, a reasonable price applies urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceReasonableWhereNoMarket
    • Preamble. These Principles shall be applied when the parties have agreed that their contract be governed by them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PrinciplesGovernByAgreement
    • Article 5.1.6. Where the quality of performance is neither fixed by nor determinable from the contract, a party is bound to render a performance of a quality that is reasonable and not less than average in the circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#QualityWhereNotFixed
    • Articles 4.4 and 4.5. Terms are to be read in the light of the whole contract and so as to give effect to all of them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReadingConformsToCanons
    • Article 5.1.9(1). An obligee may release its right by agreement with the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReleaseByAgreement
    • Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone
    • Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone/unless/0
    • Article 5.2.6. The beneficiary may renounce a right conferred on it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RenunciationEndsBeneficiaryRight
    • Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract
    • Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract/unless/0
    • Article 5.3.5. On fulfilment of a resolutive condition the rules on restitution apply with appropriate adaptations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RestitutionOnResolutiveCondition
    • Article 5.1.4(1). To the extent that an obligation involves a duty to achieve a specific result, that party is bound to achieve that result urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResultDutyPerformed
    • Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance
    • Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance/unless/0
    • Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant
    • Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant/unless/0
    • Article 4.2(1). Statements and other conduct shall be interpreted according to the party's intention if the other party knew or could not have been unaware of it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByIntention
    • Article 4.2(2). If the preceding paragraph is not applicable, statements shall be interpreted according to the meaning a reasonable person would give them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByReasonablePerson
    • Article 4.8(1). Where the parties have not agreed with respect to an important term, a term which is appropriate in the circumstances shall be supplied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SupplyOmittedTerm
    • Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect
    • Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect/unless/0
    • Article 5.1.8. A contract for an indefinite period may be terminated by either party by giving notice a reasonable time in advance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#TerminationOfIndefiniteContract
    • Article 5.1.7(2). A manifestly unreasonable determination does not stand as the applicable price urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#UnreasonableDeterminationDisplaced
    • Article 5.3.1. A contract or a contractual obligation may be made conditional upon the occurrence of a future uncertain event urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ValidCondition
    Details
    {
     "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_EN",
     "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
     "since": null,
     "state": "not_yet",
     "status": null
    }
  2. infoEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31

    редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_FR на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 79 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)

    Affected nodes
    • Article 5.2.3. The conferment of rights in the beneficiary includes the right to invoke a clause in the contract which excludes or limits the liability of the beneficiary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryMayInvokeClause
    • Article 5.1.4(2). To the extent that an obligation involves a duty of best efforts, that party is bound to make such efforts as would be made by a reasonable person of the same kind urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BestEffortsDutyPerformed
    • Article 1.9(1). The parties are bound by any usage to which they have agreed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByAgreedUsage
    • Article 1.9(1). The parties are bound by practices which they have established between themselves urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByEstablishedPractice
    • Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage
    • Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage/unless/0
    • Article 5.3.3(1). A party who prevented fulfilment contrary to good faith may not rely on the non-fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnPreventedCondition
    • Article 5.3.3(2). A party who brought about fulfilment contrary to good faith may not rely on the fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnProcuredCondition
    • Article 4.3. In applying Articles 4.1 and 4.2, regard shall be had to all the circumstances, including those listed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CircumstanceToBeRegarded
    • Article 1.11. Where a party has more than one place of business the relevant one is that which has the closest relationship to the contract and its performance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ClosestPlaceIsRelevant
    • Article 4.1(2) (opening words). Where the common intention can be established, the reasonable-persons reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CommonIntentionDisplacesReasonablePersons
    • Article 1.12(2). The computed last day does not stand where it is a holiday at the place of performance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ComputedLastDayYieldsToHoliday
    • Article 4.6. If contract terms supplied by one party are unclear, an interpretation against that party is preferred urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContraProferentem
    • Article 1.3. A contract validly entered into is binding upon the parties urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContractIsBinding
    • Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#Cooperate
    • Article 5.2.4. The promisor may assert against the beneficiary all defences which the promisor could assert against the promisee urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DefencesAgainstBeneficiary
    • Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective
    • Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective/unless/0
    • Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyOfGoodFaith
    • Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToCooperate
    • Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRights
    • Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRightsBreached
    • Article 5.1.1. The contractual obligations of the parties may be express urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ExpressIsContractual
    • Article 5.1.5. In determining the extent to which an obligation involves a duty of best efforts or a duty to achieve a specific result, regard shall be had to the listed factors urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FactorDeterminesKindOfDuty
    • Article 1.1. The parties are free to enter into a contract and to determine its content urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FreedomOfContract
    • Article 1.6(2). Issues within the scope of these Principles but not expressly settled by them are as far as possible to be settled in accordance with their underlying general principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GapSettledByUnderlyingPrinciples
    • Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaith
    • Article 1.7(2). The parties may not exclude or limit the duty of good faith and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaithCannotBeExcluded
    • Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted
    • Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted/unless/0
    • Article 5.1.2(c). Implied obligations stem from good faith and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromGoodFaith
    • Article 5.1.2(a). Implied obligations stem from the nature and purpose of the contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromNatureAndPurpose
    • Article 5.1.2(b). Implied obligations stem from practices established between the parties and usages urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromPracticesAndUsages
    • Article 5.1.2(d). Implied obligations stem from reasonableness urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromReasonableness
    • Article 5.1.1. The contractual obligations of the parties may be implied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedIsContractual
    • Article 1.8. A party cannot act inconsistently with an understanding it has caused the other party to have and upon which that other party reasonably has acted in reliance to its detriment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InconsistentBehaviourBarred
    • Article 4.2(2) (opening words). Where the intention was known to the other party, the reasonable-person reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#IntentionDisplacesReasonablePerson
    • Article 4.1(1). A contract shall be interpreted according to the common intention of the parties urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByCommonIntention
    • Article 4.1(2). If the common intention cannot be established, the contract shall be interpreted according to the meaning reasonable persons of the same kind would give it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByReasonablePersons
    • Article 1.4. Nothing in these Principles restricts the application of mandatory rules urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MandatoryRulesUnrestricted
    • Article 5.1.7(2). Where the price is to be determined by one party and that determination is manifestly unreasonable, a reasonable price shall be substituted notwithstanding any contract term to the contrary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ManifestlyUnreasonableDeterminationReplaced
    • Preamble. These Principles may be applied when the parties have agreed that their contract be governed by general principles of law, the lex mercatoria or the like urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyOnChoiceOfGeneralPrinciples
    • Preamble. These Principles may be applied when the parties have not chosen any law to govern their contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyWhereNoLawChosen
    • Preamble. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement domestic law urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretDomesticLaw
    • Preamble. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement international uniform law instruments urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretUniformLaw
    • Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated as otherwise provided in these Principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationAsProvided
    • Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated by agreement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByAgreement
    • Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated in accordance with its terms urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByTerms
    • Article 1.2. Nothing in these Principles requires a contract to be made in or evidenced by a particular form urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoFormRequired
    • Article 1.10(2)-(3). A notice is effective when it reaches the person to whom it is given urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoticeEffectiveOnReceipt
    • Article 4.7. In case of discrepancy between equally authoritative versions there is a preference for the interpretation according to the original version urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#OriginalVersionPreferred
    • Article 1.12(1). Official holidays or non-business days occurring during the period are included in calculating it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodEndsOn
    • Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday
    • Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday/unless/0
    • Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PreserveRights
    • Article 5.1.7(1). Where a contract does not fix the price, the parties are considered to have made reference to the price generally charged in comparable circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceByMarket
    • Article 5.1.7(1). If no such price is available, a reasonable price applies urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceReasonableWhereNoMarket
    • Preamble. These Principles shall be applied when the parties have agreed that their contract be governed by them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PrinciplesGovernByAgreement
    • Article 5.1.6. Where the quality of performance is neither fixed by nor determinable from the contract, a party is bound to render a performance of a quality that is reasonable and not less than average in the circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#QualityWhereNotFixed
    • Article 5.1.9(1). An obligee may release its right by agreement with the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReleaseByAgreement
    • Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone
    • Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone/unless/0
    • Article 5.2.6. The beneficiary may renounce a right conferred on it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RenunciationEndsBeneficiaryRight
    • Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract
    • Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract/unless/0
    • Article 5.3.5. On fulfilment of a resolutive condition the rules on restitution apply with appropriate adaptations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RestitutionOnResolutiveCondition
    • Article 5.1.4(1). To the extent that an obligation involves a duty to achieve a specific result, that party is bound to achieve that result urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResultDutyPerformed
    • Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance
    • Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance/unless/0
    • Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant
    • Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant/unless/0
    • Article 4.2(1). Statements and other conduct shall be interpreted according to the party's intention if the other party knew or could not have been unaware of it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByIntention
    • Article 4.2(2). If the preceding paragraph is not applicable, statements shall be interpreted according to the meaning a reasonable person would give them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByReasonablePerson
    • Article 4.8(1). Where the parties have not agreed with respect to an important term, a term which is appropriate in the circumstances shall be supplied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SupplyOmittedTerm
    • Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect
    • Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect/unless/0
    • Article 5.1.8. A contract for an indefinite period may be terminated by either party by giving notice a reasonable time in advance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#TerminationOfIndefiniteContract
    • Article 5.1.7(2). A manifestly unreasonable determination does not stand as the applicable price urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#UnreasonableDeterminationDisplaced
    • Article 5.3.1. A contract or a contractual obligation may be made conditional upon the occurrence of a future uncertain event urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ValidCondition
    Details
    {
     "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_FR",
     "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
     "since": null,
     "state": "not_yet",
     "status": null
    }
  3. infoEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31

    редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_EN на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 26 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)

    Affected nodes
    • Article 10.4(1). Where the obligor acknowledges the right before the expiration of the general limitation period, a new general limitation period begins on the day after the acknowledgement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AcknowledgementStartsNewGeneralPeriod
    • Article 10.6(1). In the absence of provisions determining the exact date of commencement, arbitral proceedings are deemed to commence on the date on which the request reaches the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ArbitrationCommencesOnRequest
    • Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration
    • Article 10.1(2). This Chapter does not govern the time within which a party must give notice or perform any act other than the institution of legal proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ChapterDoesNotGovernNoticeTime
    • Article 10.9(1). The expiration of the limitation period does not extinguish the right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight
    • Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted
    • Article 10.9(2). Once the obligor has asserted expiry, the barred exercise is a comparative remedium_exclusum urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit
    • Article 10.3(a). The parties may not shorten the general limitation period to less than one year urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodFloorOfOneYear
    • Article 10.2(1). The general limitation period is three years beginning on the day after the day the obligee knows or ought to know the facts as a result of which the right can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodOfThreeYears
    • Article 10.1(1). The exercise of rights governed by the Principles is barred by the expiration of a limitation period according to the rules of this Chapter urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#LimitationGovernsExerciseOfRights
    • Article 10.3(c). The parties may not extend the maximum limitation period to more than fifteen years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodCeilingOfFifteenYears
    • Article 10.4(2). The maximum limitation period does not begin to run again, but may be exceeded by the beginning of a new general limitation period urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodDoesNotRestart
    • Article 10.3(b). The parties may not shorten the maximum limitation period to less than four years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodFloorOfFourYears
    • Article 10.2(2). In any event, the maximum limitation period is ten years beginning on the day after the day the right can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodOfTenYears
    • Article 10.11. Where there has been performance in order to discharge an obligation, there is no right of restitution merely because the limitation period has expired urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#NoRestitutionAfterExpiration
    • Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration
    • Article 10.3. The parties may modify the limitation periods urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PartiesMayModifyPeriods
    • Article 10.9(3). A right may still be relied on as a defence even though the expiration of the limitation period for that right has been asserted urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#RightStillAvailableAsDefence
    • Article 10.10. The obligee may exercise the right of set-off until the obligor has asserted the expiration of the limitation period urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SetOffUntilExpirationAsserted
    • Article 10.7. Articles 10.5 and 10.6 apply with appropriate modifications to proceedings whereby the parties request a third person to assist them in reaching an amicable settlement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByAmicableSettlementProceedings
    • Article 10.6(1). The running of the limitation period is suspended when the obligee performs an act recognised by the law of the arbitral tribunal as asserting its right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByArbitralAct
    • Article 10.5(1)(c). The running of the limitation period is suspended where the obligee has asserted its rights in proceedings for dissolution of the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByDissolutionClaim
    • Article 10.8(1). Where the obligee has been prevented by an impediment beyond its control, the general limitation period is suspended so as not to expire before one year after the impediment has ceased to exist urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByImpediment
    • Article 10.8(2). Where the impediment consists of the incapacity or death of a party, suspension ceases when a representative or successor has been appointed; the additional one-year period applies accordingly urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByIncapacityEndsOnAppointment
    • Article 10.5(1)(b). The running of the limitation period is suspended where the obligee has asserted its rights in the insolvency proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByInsolvencyClaim
    • Article 10.5(1)(a). The running of the limitation period is suspended when the obligee performs an act recognised by the law of the court as asserting its right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByJudicialAct
    Details
    {
     "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_EN",
     "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
     "since": null,
     "state": "not_yet",
     "status": null
    }
  4. infoEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31

    редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_FR на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 26 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)

    Affected nodes
    • Article 10.4(1). Where the obligor acknowledges the right before the expiration of the general limitation period, a new general limitation period begins on the day after the acknowledgement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AcknowledgementStartsNewGeneralPeriod
    • Article 10.6(1). In the absence of provisions determining the exact date of commencement, arbitral proceedings are deemed to commence on the date on which the request reaches the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ArbitrationCommencesOnRequest
    • Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration
    • Article 10.1(2). This Chapter does not govern the time within which a party must give notice or perform any act other than the institution of legal proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ChapterDoesNotGovernNoticeTime
    • Article 10.9(1). The expiration of the limitation period does not extinguish the right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight
    • Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted
    • Article 10.9(2). Once the obligor has asserted expiry, the barred exercise is a comparative remedium_exclusum urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit
    • Article 10.3(a). The parties may not shorten the general limitation period to less than one year urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodFloorOfOneYear
    • Article 10.2(1). The general limitation period is three years beginning on the day after the day the obligee knows or ought to know the facts as a result of which the right can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodOfThreeYears
    • Article 10.1(1). The exercise of rights governed by the Principles is barred by the expiration of a limitation period according to the rules of this Chapter urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#LimitationGovernsExerciseOfRights
    • Article 10.3(c). The parties may not extend the maximum limitation period to more than fifteen years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodCeilingOfFifteenYears
    • Article 10.4(2). The maximum limitation period does not begin to run again, but may be exceeded by the beginning of a new general limitation period urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodDoesNotRestart
    • Article 10.3(b). The parties may not shorten the maximum limitation period to less than four years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodFloorOfFourYears
    • Article 10.2(2). In any event, the maximum limitation period is ten years beginning on the day after the day the right can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodOfTenYears
    • Article 10.11. Where there has been performance in order to discharge an obligation, there is no right of restitution merely because the limitation period has expired urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#NoRestitutionAfterExpiration
    • Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration
    • Article 10.3. The parties may modify the limitation periods urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PartiesMayModifyPeriods
    • Article 10.9(3). A right may still be relied on as a defence even though the expiration of the limitation period for that right has been asserted urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#RightStillAvailableAsDefence
    • Article 10.10. The obligee may exercise the right of set-off until the obligor has asserted the expiration of the limitation period urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SetOffUntilExpirationAsserted
    • Article 10.7. Articles 10.5 and 10.6 apply with appropriate modifications to proceedings whereby the parties request a third person to assist them in reaching an amicable settlement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByAmicableSettlementProceedings
    • Article 10.6(1). The running of the limitation period is suspended when the obligee performs an act recognised by the law of the arbitral tribunal as asserting its right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByArbitralAct
    • Article 10.5(1)(c). The running of the limitation period is suspended where the obligee has asserted its rights in proceedings for dissolution of the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByDissolutionClaim
    • Article 10.8(1). Where the obligee has been prevented by an impediment beyond its control, the general limitation period is suspended so as not to expire before one year after the impediment has ceased to exist urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByImpediment
    • Article 10.8(2). Where the impediment consists of the incapacity or death of a party, suspension ceases when a representative or successor has been appointed; the additional one-year period applies accordingly urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByIncapacityEndsOnAppointment
    • Article 10.5(1)(b). The running of the limitation period is suspended where the obligee has asserted its rights in the insolvency proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByInsolvencyClaim
    • Article 10.5(1)(a). The running of the limitation period is suspended when the obligee performs an act recognised by the law of the court as asserting its right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByJudicialAct
    Details
    {
     "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_FR",
     "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
     "since": null,
     "state": "not_yet",
     "status": null
    }

As recorded by the engine: code, severity and message with §-references; order follows the evaluation document.

Proof graph

Proof graph · 8 layer
query_evaluationverjaehrung_eingetreten_amrule_applicationVerjaehrungOhneHemmungrule_applicationVerjaehrungsfristEndeOhneHemmungassertionkeine_hemmungrule_applicationRegelmaessigeVerjaehrungsfristrule_applicationVerjaehrungsbeginnUltimoDerEntstehunrule_applicationJahresendeIstDezemberassertionanspruch_entstanden_amassertionkenntnis_erlangt_amrule_applicationJahresendeKandidat09rule_applicationJahresendeGesuchtFuerEntstehung

Proof nodes: 33 · assertion 10, rule_application 21, candidate_closure 1, query_evaluation 1

This block is too large for inline viewing. It is included in full in the document JSON, without truncation.

Download JSON ↓
Calendar and proof identifiers
Proof reference
case/FuenfJahre_BGB/query/bgb-2013-12-31
Original reasoning · JSON

This block is too large for inline viewing. It is included in full in the document JSON, without truncation.

Download JSON ↓
SourcesExcerpts: 4

paragraph/195

§ 195 Regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beträgt drei Jahre.
Original data · JSON
JSONRead only
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:53e15660089df268ecd95ba8fdcc0d8e73cba45a9e68c5cc802f87a60f03db9b",
  "edition": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_KONSOLIDIERT",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_P195",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 195 Regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "paragraph/195",
  "package": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:3a37767ed679ef6124cbd5c7272a5a798618598a194829b5a5ad5b10c1cfe898",
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 195 Regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist\nDie regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beträgt drei Jahre.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

paragraph/199

§ 199 Beginn der regelmäßigen Verjährungsfrist und Verjährungshöchstfristen (1) Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beginnt, soweit nicht ein anderer Verjährungsbeginn bestimmt ist, mit dem Schluss des Jahres, in dem 1. der Anspruch entstanden ist und 2. der Gläubiger von den den Anspruch begründenden Umständen und der Person des Schuldners Kenntnis erlangt oder ohne grobe Fahrlässigkeit erlangen müsste. (2) Schadensersatzansprüche, die auf der Verletzung des Lebens, des Körpers, der Gesundheit oder der Freiheit beruhen, verjähren ohne Rücksicht auf ihre Entstehung und die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in 30 Jahren von der Begehung der Handlung, der Pflichtverletzung oder dem sonstigen, den Schaden auslösenden Ereignis an. (3) Sonstige Schadensersatzansprüche verjähren 1. ohne Rücksicht auf die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in zehn Jahren von ihrer Entstehung an und 2. ohne Rücksicht auf ihre Entstehung und die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in 30 Jahren von der Begehung der Handlung, der Pflichtverletzung oder dem sonstigen, den Schaden auslösenden Ereignis an. Maßgeblich ist die früher endende Frist. (3a) Ansprüche, die auf einem Erbfall beruhen oder deren Geltendmachung die Kenntnis einer Verfügung von Todes wegen voraussetzt, verjähren ohne Rücksicht auf die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in 30 Jahren von der Entstehung des Anspruchs an. (4) Andere Ansprüche als die nach den Absätzen 2 bis 3a verjähren ohne Rücksicht auf die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in zehn Jahren von ihrer Entstehung an. (5) Geht der Anspruch auf ein Unterlassen, so tritt an die Stelle der Entstehung die Zuwiderhandlung.
Original data · JSON
JSONRead only
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:dbc2b5bc4ee946d17bb8636b8d724e0168033a99dc35c94f5c6eb2b53f2b838c",
  "edition": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_KONSOLIDIERT",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_P199",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 199 Beginn der regelmäßigen Verjährungsfrist und Verjährungshöchstfristen"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "paragraph/199",
  "package": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:2916e6a9e86d21f331739cafd8a135c863d9e0bf3087e8a13fb6c60d7f2df4da",
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 199 Beginn der regelmäßigen Verjährungsfrist und Verjährungshöchstfristen\n(1) Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beginnt, soweit nicht ein anderer Verjährungsbeginn bestimmt ist, mit dem Schluss des Jahres, in dem 1. der Anspruch entstanden ist und\n2. der Gläubiger von den den Anspruch begründenden Umständen und der Person des Schuldners Kenntnis erlangt oder ohne grobe Fahrlässigkeit erlangen müsste.\n(2) Schadensersatzansprüche, die auf der Verletzung des Lebens, des Körpers, der Gesundheit oder der Freiheit beruhen, verjähren ohne Rücksicht auf ihre Entstehung und die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in 30 Jahren von der Begehung der Handlung, der Pflichtverletzung oder dem sonstigen, den Schaden auslösenden Ereignis an.\n(3) Sonstige Schadensersatzansprüche verjähren 1. ohne Rücksicht auf die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in zehn Jahren von ihrer Entstehung an und\n2. ohne Rücksicht auf ihre Entstehung und die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in 30 Jahren von der Begehung der Handlung, der Pflichtverletzung oder dem sonstigen, den Schaden auslösenden Ereignis an.\nMaßgeblich ist die früher endende Frist.\n(3a) Ansprüche, die auf einem Erbfall beruhen oder deren Geltendmachung die Kenntnis einer Verfügung von Todes wegen voraussetzt, verjähren ohne Rücksicht auf die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in 30 Jahren von der Entstehung des Anspruchs an.\n(4) Andere Ansprüche als die nach den Absätzen 2 bis 3a verjähren ohne Rücksicht auf die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in zehn Jahren von ihrer Entstehung an.\n(5) Geht der Anspruch auf ein Unterlassen, so tritt an die Stelle der Entstehung die Zuwiderhandlung.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

paragraph/209

§ 209 Wirkung der Hemmung Der Zeitraum, während dessen die Verjährung gehemmt ist, wird in die Verjährungsfrist nicht eingerechnet.
Original data · JSON
JSONRead only
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:9d3c1967977b0f7d0bb0d9a7d89228d863b64a3cc4a8d54a9f351d8c9205188c",
  "edition": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_KONSOLIDIERT",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_P209",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 209 Wirkung der Hemmung"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "paragraph/209",
  "package": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:d3a5349ff97577ebae64e94327f4d26341f8d6fbce09a12c6615b96f59d9b9be",
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 209 Wirkung der Hemmung\nDer Zeitraum, während dessen die Verjährung gehemmt ist, wird in die Verjährungsfrist nicht eingerechnet.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

paragraph/214

§ 214 Wirkung der Verjährung (1) Nach Eintritt der Verjährung ist der Schuldner berechtigt, die Leistung zu verweigern. (2) Das zur Befriedigung eines verjährten Anspruchs Geleistete kann nicht zurückgefordert werden, auch wenn in Unkenntnis der Verjährung geleistet worden ist. Das Gleiche gilt von einem vertragsmäßigen Anerkenntnis sowie einer Sicherheitsleistung des Schuldners.
Original data · JSON
JSONRead only
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:12d652436994db82ae2d39189be9bf31cdc979290895389a4620639b3f937994",
  "edition": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_KONSOLIDIERT",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_P214",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 214 Wirkung der Verjährung"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "paragraph/214",
  "package": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:1f3cff3f6a0d4efb9796bd6eff87447e953e444a38ba0121caedb177cf59002e",
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 214 Wirkung der Verjährung\n(1) Nach Eintritt der Verjährung ist der Schuldner berechtigt, die Leistung zu verweigern.\n(2) Das zur Befriedigung eines verjährten Anspruchs Geleistete kann nicht zurückgefordert werden, auch wenn in Unkenntnis der Verjährung geleistet worden ist. Das Gleiche gilt von einem vertragsmäßigen Anerkenntnis sowie einer Sicherheitsleistung des Schuldners.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Packages in the snapshot

  • de.bgb.core
  • de.bgb.fristen
  • de.bgb.ius_privatum
  • doctrine.ius_privatum
  • fr.code_civil
  • unidroit.picc
  • unidroit.picc_limitation
Technical dataFull response, parameters and checksums
Calculation status
COMPUTED
Full engine response
Fünf Jahre, BGB: die Verjährung ist am 31. Dezember 2013 eingetreten

Complete machine result · JSON

This block is too large for inline viewing. It is included in full in the document JSON, without truncation.

Download JSON ↓

Execution · JSON

This block is too large for inline viewing. It is included in full in the document JSON, without truncation.

Download JSON ↓

Display metadata

This block is too large for inline viewing. It is included in full in the document JSON, without truncation.

Download JSON ↓

JSON · calculations, sources and exact data

JSONRead only
{
  "acts": [
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:a6813604c35567e7c586d334efbf524d08f3467170c4b732cfb15809cacf4ff4",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core",
      "package": "de.bgb.core"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:998148eaeeed28f1565811474ee7beb7eacc616c5681ed9638edc976512a9884",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
      "package": "de.bgb.fristen"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:86a5a00db16e32187223ceeec6748eb7d42d18b7c370c8b15ac64d2f3f655ff7",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum",
      "package": "de.bgb.ius_privatum"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:7202de5de49a8a9d12837bc19cb7008ba2d1a68dbcc0134e0afccf1440a6d5ed",
      "namespace": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum",
      "package": "doctrine.ius_privatum"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:ad41d027ba92c38ca5eecc1d16097d0bbc8c5a74946fc1a6397c6dadac61158f",
      "namespace": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
      "package": "fr.code_civil"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:719bfd408eed92ad497ba071482354d4ad32b81ef9f41c6654f224416c19e603",
      "namespace": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc",
      "package": "unidroit.picc"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:b311d0d422a1079f71113320bd818236f7b09507c7dd960bdafceb91285497d9",
      "namespace": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "package": "unidroit.picc_limitation"
    }
  ],
  "caseHash": "sha256:46016aa963d29cfc446a35c6a945630088a81b841001fff20f3772522d11579f",
  "jurisdiction": "Deutschland",
  "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
  "mode": "audit",
  "programHash": "sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e",
  "resultHash": "sha256:b3bbea0a38c7e961187d2faf46be42d341419cff3cf8fa9f8d6d5820e5728a99",
  "timezone": "Europe/Berlin"
}
evaluation SHA-256
sha256:db2c9aab40d8baf3e7fe3441de35432d2b2b178582562fa1a485b3ed756817bf
Original data · JSON
JSONRead only
{
  "args": [
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:anspruch",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "kind": "value",
      "type": {
        "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
      },
      "value": "2013-12-31"
    }
  ],
  "facts": [
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core#anspruch_entstanden_am"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "adjudicated",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#kenntnis_erlangt_am"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#keine_hemmung"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#schuldner_beruft_sich_auf_verjaehrung"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#g",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core#anspruchsinhaber"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#s",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core#anspruchsgegner"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#g",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#persona_of"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#s",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#persona_of"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#causa_of_anspruch"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
    }
  ],
  "kind": "truth",
  "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
  "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#verjaehrung_eingetreten_am"
}

Condition

Fünf Jahre, BGB: das Rechtsmittel ist ausgeschlossen

Jurisdiction DeutschlandLaw as of 2016-01-02

Calculation result

Established

Input parameters

What we are finding

the remedy is excluded: by exception, consumption by contest, prescription, or the defendant's immunity

gscausa

Input facts

  • Tag, an dem der Anspruch entstanden ist (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 1, § 200)

    a: atag: 15 March 2010
  • Tag, an dem der Gläubiger von den den Anspruch begründenden Umständen und der Person des Schuldners Kenntnis erlangt hat (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 2) — festgestellte Tatsache, im Fall origin adjudicated

    a: atag: 15 March 2010
  • Kein Hemmungstatbestand der §§ 203–208 festgestellt — ausdrückliche Angabe des Falls; das Fehlen einer Angabe ist keine Verneinung

    a: a
  • der Schuldner beruft sich auf die Verjährung des Leistungs- oder Nacherfüllungsanspruchs (§ 218 Abs. 1)

    a: a
  • Inhaber des Anspruchs (Gläubiger)

    a: ap: g
  • Anspruchsgegner (Schuldner)

    a: ap: s
  • diese Person des BGB tritt in der vergleichenden Kette als dieses Gesicht auf

    px
    gg
    ss
  • dieser Anspruch ist das vergleichende Streitverhältnis

    a: ac: causa
  • the claimant brings a claim against the defendant — the contested relation the question is about

    causa: causaactor: greus: s
Original data · JSON
JSONRead only
{
  "args": [
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:causa",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    }
  ],
  "facts": [
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core#anspruch_entstanden_am"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "adjudicated",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#kenntnis_erlangt_am"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#keine_hemmung"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#schuldner_beruft_sich_auf_verjaehrung"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#g",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core#anspruchsinhaber"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#s",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core#anspruchsgegner"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#g",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#persona_of"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#s",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#persona_of"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#causa_of_anspruch"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
    }
  ],
  "kind": "truth",
  "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
  "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"
}
Why this resultApplied rules and conditions

Derivation path20 steps

  1. 1

    dieser Anspruch ist das vergleichende Streitverhältnis

    a: urn:p12:anspruch; c: urn:p12:causa

    case fact
  2. 2

    der Schuldner beruft sich auf die Verjährung des Leistungs- oder Nacherfüllungsanspruchs (§ 218 Abs. 1)

    a: urn:p12:anspruch

    case fact
  3. 3

    Tag, an dem der Anspruch entstanden ist (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 1, § 200)

    a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 15 March 2010

    case fact
  4. 4

    Für den Tag der Entstehung des Anspruchs wird der Schluss des Jahres gesucht (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 1)

    für diesen Tag wird der Schluss des Jahres gesucht (§ 199 Abs. 1): a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 15 March 2010

    para. 199

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeGesuchtFuerEntstehung
    rule
  5. 5

    Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 9 — Ende des 9. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    31 December 2010 = month end of(add calendar period(month start of(15 March 2010), 9 calendar_month))

    para. 199

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat09
    rule
  6. 6

    Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): der Kandidat ist der 31. Dezember, wenn sein Monat 31 Tage hat, der folgende Monat 31 Tage und der übernächste höchstens 29 — Dezember, Januar, Februar

    Schluss des Jahres, in dem der Tag liegt (§ 199 Abs. 1): der 31. Dezember desselben Jahres: a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 15 March 2010; ultimo: 31 December 2010

    para. 199

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeIstDezember
    rule
  7. 7

    Anspruchsgegner (Schuldner)

    a: urn:p12:anspruch; p: urn:p12:person:s

    case fact
  8. 8

    Inhaber des Anspruchs (Gläubiger)

    a: urn:p12:anspruch; p: urn:p12:person:g

    case fact
  9. 9

    Kein Hemmungstatbestand der §§ 203–208 festgestellt — ausdrückliche Angabe des Falls; das Fehlen einer Angabe ist keine Verneinung

    a: urn:p12:anspruch

    case fact
  10. 10

    Tag, an dem der Gläubiger von den den Anspruch begründenden Umständen und der Person des Schuldners Kenntnis erlangt hat (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 2) — festgestellte Tatsache, im Fall origin adjudicated

    a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 15 March 2010

    • accepted externally
    accepted externally
  11. 11

    Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beginnt mit dem Schluss des Jahres, in dem der Anspruch entstanden ist und der Gläubiger Kenntnis erlangt hat (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 und 2) — Kenntnis nicht nach der Entstehung: Schluss des Entstehungsjahres

    Schluss des Jahres, mit dem die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beginnt (§ 199 Abs. 1): a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 31 December 2010

    para. 199

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#VerjaehrungsbeginnUltimoDerEntstehung
    rule
  12. 12

    Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beträgt drei Jahre (§ 195) — Jahresschritt vom Schluss des Jahres (§ 188 Abs. 2, Politik BGB_FRISTEN_KALENDER)

    31 December 2013 = add calendar period(31 December 2010, 3 calendar_year)

    para. 195

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#RegelmaessigeVerjaehrungsfrist
    rule
  13. 13

    Ohne festgestellte Hemmung endet die Verjährungsfrist mit der regelmäßigen Frist (§§ 195, 199; § 209 greift nicht)

    Tag, mit dessen Ablauf die Verjährungsfrist unter Berücksichtigung der Hemmung endet (§ 209): a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 31 December 2013

    para. 209

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#VerjaehrungsfristEndeOhneHemmung
    rule
  14. 14

    Ohne Hemmung tritt die Verjährung mit dem Ende der Verjährungsfrist ein

    Tag, mit dessen Ablauf die Verjährung des Anspruchs eintritt: a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 31 December 2013

    para. 209

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#VerjaehrungOhneHemmung
    rule
  15. 15

    Nach Eintritt der Verjährung ist der Schuldner berechtigt, die Leistung zu verweigern (§ 214 Abs. 1)

    der Schuldner ist berechtigt, die Leistung zu verweigern (§ 214 Abs. 1): a: urn:p12:anspruch

    para. 214

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#Leistungsverweigerungsrecht214
    rule
  16. 16

    diese Person des BGB tritt in der vergleichenden Kette als dieses Gesicht auf

    p: urn:p12:person:g; x: urn:p12:persona:g

    case fact
  17. 17

    diese Person des BGB tritt in der vergleichenden Kette als dieses Gesicht auf

    p: urn:p12:person:s; x: urn:p12:persona:s

    case fact
  18. 18

    the claimant brings a claim against the defendant — the contested relation the question is about

    causa: urn:p12:causa; actor: urn:p12:persona:g; reus: urn:p12:persona:s

    case fact
  19. 19

    Nach Eintritt der Verjährung ist der Schuldner berechtigt, die Leistung zu verweigern

    the remedy is excluded: by exception, consumption by contest, prescription, or the defendant's immunity: actor: urn:p12:persona:g; reus: urn:p12:persona:s; causa: urn:p12:causa

    BGB P214

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#EinredeExcludit
    rule
  20. 20

    Query evaluation

    query

verified by the engine: 10 · case fact: 9 · accepted externally: 1 · Full graph: 33 nodes

Steps of the saved proof from the case facts to the answer. Formulas are shown as written in the norm with bound values substituted; the page recomputes nothing.

Basis of this answer

Rules on the saved proof path for this answer.

de.bgb.fristen
  • Für den Tag der Entstehung des Anspruchs wird der Schluss des Jahres gesucht (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 1)

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeGesuchtFuerEntstehung
  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): der Kandidat ist der 31. Dezember, wenn sein Monat 31 Tage hat, der folgende Monat 31 Tage und der übernächste höchstens 29 — Dezember, Januar, Februar

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeIstDezember
  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 9 — Ende des 9. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat09
  • Nach Eintritt der Verjährung ist der Schuldner berechtigt, die Leistung zu verweigern (§ 214 Abs. 1)

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#Leistungsverweigerungsrecht214
  • Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beträgt drei Jahre (§ 195) — Jahresschritt vom Schluss des Jahres (§ 188 Abs. 2, Politik BGB_FRISTEN_KALENDER)

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#RegelmaessigeVerjaehrungsfrist
  • Ohne Hemmung tritt die Verjährung mit dem Ende der Verjährungsfrist ein

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#VerjaehrungOhneHemmung
  • Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beginnt mit dem Schluss des Jahres, in dem der Anspruch entstanden ist und der Gläubiger Kenntnis erlangt hat (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 und 2) — Kenntnis nicht nach der Entstehung: Schluss des Entstehungsjahres

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#VerjaehrungsbeginnUltimoDerEntstehung
  • Ohne festgestellte Hemmung endet die Verjährungsfrist mit der regelmäßigen Frist (§§ 195, 199; § 209 greift nicht)

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#VerjaehrungsfristEndeOhneHemmung
de.bgb.ius_privatum
  • Nach Eintritt der Verjährung ist der Schuldner berechtigt, die Leistung zu verweigern

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#EinredeExcludit
Other rules in the evaluation12

Applied in the overall evaluation, but not on the proof path for this answer.

de.bgb.fristen
  • Für den Tag der Kenntniserlangung wird der Schluss des Jahres gesucht (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 2)

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeGesuchtFuerKenntnis
  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 0 — Ende des 0. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat00
  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 1 — Ende des 1. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat01
  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 2 — Ende des 2. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat02
  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 3 — Ende des 3. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat03
  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 4 — Ende des 4. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat04
  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 5 — Ende des 5. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat05
  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 6 — Ende des 6. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat06
  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 7 — Ende des 7. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat07
  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 8 — Ende des 8. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat08
  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 10 — Ende des 10. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat10
  • Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 11 — Ende des 11. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages

    Identifier
    urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat11
Issues · 4
Execution issues
  1. infoEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31

    редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_EN на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 81 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)

    Affected nodes
    • Article 5.2.3. The conferment of rights in the beneficiary includes the right to invoke a clause in the contract which excludes or limits the liability of the beneficiary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryMayInvokeClause
    • Articles 5.2.1 and 5.2.2. The parties may confer a right on a third party who must be identifiable with adequate certainty by the contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryRightExists
    • Article 5.1.4(2). To the extent that an obligation involves a duty of best efforts, that party is bound to make such efforts as would be made by a reasonable person of the same kind urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BestEffortsDutyPerformed
    • Article 1.9(1). The parties are bound by any usage to which they have agreed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByAgreedUsage
    • Article 1.9(1). The parties are bound by practices which they have established between themselves urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByEstablishedPractice
    • Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage
    • Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage/unless/0
    • Article 5.3.3(1). A party who prevented fulfilment contrary to good faith may not rely on the non-fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnPreventedCondition
    • Article 5.3.3(2). A party who brought about fulfilment contrary to good faith may not rely on the fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnProcuredCondition
    • Article 4.3. In applying Articles 4.1 and 4.2, regard shall be had to all the circumstances, including those listed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CircumstanceToBeRegarded
    • Article 1.11. Where a party has more than one place of business the relevant one is that which has the closest relationship to the contract and its performance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ClosestPlaceIsRelevant
    • Article 4.1(2) (opening words). Where the common intention can be established, the reasonable-persons reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CommonIntentionDisplacesReasonablePersons
    • Article 1.12(2). The computed last day does not stand where it is a holiday at the place of performance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ComputedLastDayYieldsToHoliday
    • Article 4.6. If contract terms supplied by one party are unclear, an interpretation against that party is preferred urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContraProferentem
    • Article 1.3. A contract validly entered into is binding upon the parties urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContractIsBinding
    • Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#Cooperate
    • Article 5.2.4. The promisor may assert against the beneficiary all defences which the promisor could assert against the promisee urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DefencesAgainstBeneficiary
    • Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective
    • Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective/unless/0
    • Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyOfGoodFaith
    • Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToCooperate
    • Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRights
    • Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRightsBreached
    • Article 5.1.1. The contractual obligations of the parties may be express urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ExpressIsContractual
    • Article 5.1.5. In determining the extent to which an obligation involves a duty of best efforts or a duty to achieve a specific result, regard shall be had to the listed factors urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FactorDeterminesKindOfDuty
    • Article 1.1. The parties are free to enter into a contract and to determine its content urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FreedomOfContract
    • Article 1.6(2). Issues within the scope of these Principles but not expressly settled by them are as far as possible to be settled in accordance with their underlying general principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GapSettledByUnderlyingPrinciples
    • Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaith
    • Article 1.7(2). The parties may not exclude or limit the duty of good faith and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaithCannotBeExcluded
    • Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted
    • Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted/unless/0
    • Article 5.1.2(c). Implied obligations stem from good faith and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromGoodFaith
    • Article 5.1.2(a). Implied obligations stem from the nature and purpose of the contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromNatureAndPurpose
    • Article 5.1.2(b). Implied obligations stem from practices established between the parties and usages urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromPracticesAndUsages
    • Article 5.1.2(d). Implied obligations stem from reasonableness urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromReasonableness
    • Article 5.1.1. The contractual obligations of the parties may be implied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedIsContractual
    • Article 1.8. A party cannot act inconsistently with an understanding it has caused the other party to have and upon which that other party reasonably has acted in reliance to its detriment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InconsistentBehaviourBarred
    • Article 4.2(2) (opening words). Where the intention was known to the other party, the reasonable-person reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#IntentionDisplacesReasonablePerson
    • Article 4.1(1). A contract shall be interpreted according to the common intention of the parties urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByCommonIntention
    • Article 4.1(2). If the common intention cannot be established, the contract shall be interpreted according to the meaning reasonable persons of the same kind would give it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByReasonablePersons
    • Article 1.4. Nothing in these Principles restricts the application of mandatory rules urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MandatoryRulesUnrestricted
    • Article 5.1.7(2). Where the price is to be determined by one party and that determination is manifestly unreasonable, a reasonable price shall be substituted notwithstanding any contract term to the contrary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ManifestlyUnreasonableDeterminationReplaced
    • Preamble. These Principles may be applied when the parties have agreed that their contract be governed by general principles of law, the lex mercatoria or the like urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyOnChoiceOfGeneralPrinciples
    • Preamble. These Principles may be applied when the parties have not chosen any law to govern their contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyWhereNoLawChosen
    • Preamble. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement domestic law urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretDomesticLaw
    • Preamble. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement international uniform law instruments urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretUniformLaw
    • Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated as otherwise provided in these Principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationAsProvided
    • Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated by agreement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByAgreement
    • Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated in accordance with its terms urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByTerms
    • Article 1.2. Nothing in these Principles requires a contract to be made in or evidenced by a particular form urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoFormRequired
    • Article 1.10(2)-(3). A notice is effective when it reaches the person to whom it is given urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoticeEffectiveOnReceipt
    • Article 4.7. In case of discrepancy between equally authoritative versions there is a preference for the interpretation according to the original version urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#OriginalVersionPreferred
    • Article 1.12(1). Official holidays or non-business days occurring during the period are included in calculating it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodEndsOn
    • Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday
    • Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday/unless/0
    • Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PreserveRights
    • Article 5.1.7(1). Where a contract does not fix the price, the parties are considered to have made reference to the price generally charged in comparable circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceByMarket
    • Article 5.1.7(1). If no such price is available, a reasonable price applies urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceReasonableWhereNoMarket
    • Preamble. These Principles shall be applied when the parties have agreed that their contract be governed by them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PrinciplesGovernByAgreement
    • Article 5.1.6. Where the quality of performance is neither fixed by nor determinable from the contract, a party is bound to render a performance of a quality that is reasonable and not less than average in the circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#QualityWhereNotFixed
    • Articles 4.4 and 4.5. Terms are to be read in the light of the whole contract and so as to give effect to all of them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReadingConformsToCanons
    • Article 5.1.9(1). An obligee may release its right by agreement with the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReleaseByAgreement
    • Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone
    • Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone/unless/0
    • Article 5.2.6. The beneficiary may renounce a right conferred on it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RenunciationEndsBeneficiaryRight
    • Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract
    • Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract/unless/0
    • Article 5.3.5. On fulfilment of a resolutive condition the rules on restitution apply with appropriate adaptations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RestitutionOnResolutiveCondition
    • Article 5.1.4(1). To the extent that an obligation involves a duty to achieve a specific result, that party is bound to achieve that result urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResultDutyPerformed
    • Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance
    • Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance/unless/0
    • Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant
    • Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant/unless/0
    • Article 4.2(1). Statements and other conduct shall be interpreted according to the party's intention if the other party knew or could not have been unaware of it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByIntention
    • Article 4.2(2). If the preceding paragraph is not applicable, statements shall be interpreted according to the meaning a reasonable person would give them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByReasonablePerson
    • Article 4.8(1). Where the parties have not agreed with respect to an important term, a term which is appropriate in the circumstances shall be supplied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SupplyOmittedTerm
    • Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect
    • Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect/unless/0
    • Article 5.1.8. A contract for an indefinite period may be terminated by either party by giving notice a reasonable time in advance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#TerminationOfIndefiniteContract
    • Article 5.1.7(2). A manifestly unreasonable determination does not stand as the applicable price urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#UnreasonableDeterminationDisplaced
    • Article 5.3.1. A contract or a contractual obligation may be made conditional upon the occurrence of a future uncertain event urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ValidCondition
    Details
    {
     "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_EN",
     "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
     "since": null,
     "state": "not_yet",
     "status": null
    }
  2. infoEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31

    редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_FR на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 79 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)

    Affected nodes
    • Article 5.2.3. The conferment of rights in the beneficiary includes the right to invoke a clause in the contract which excludes or limits the liability of the beneficiary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryMayInvokeClause
    • Article 5.1.4(2). To the extent that an obligation involves a duty of best efforts, that party is bound to make such efforts as would be made by a reasonable person of the same kind urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BestEffortsDutyPerformed
    • Article 1.9(1). The parties are bound by any usage to which they have agreed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByAgreedUsage
    • Article 1.9(1). The parties are bound by practices which they have established between themselves urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByEstablishedPractice
    • Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage
    • Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage/unless/0
    • Article 5.3.3(1). A party who prevented fulfilment contrary to good faith may not rely on the non-fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnPreventedCondition
    • Article 5.3.3(2). A party who brought about fulfilment contrary to good faith may not rely on the fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnProcuredCondition
    • Article 4.3. In applying Articles 4.1 and 4.2, regard shall be had to all the circumstances, including those listed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CircumstanceToBeRegarded
    • Article 1.11. Where a party has more than one place of business the relevant one is that which has the closest relationship to the contract and its performance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ClosestPlaceIsRelevant
    • Article 4.1(2) (opening words). Where the common intention can be established, the reasonable-persons reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CommonIntentionDisplacesReasonablePersons
    • Article 1.12(2). The computed last day does not stand where it is a holiday at the place of performance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ComputedLastDayYieldsToHoliday
    • Article 4.6. If contract terms supplied by one party are unclear, an interpretation against that party is preferred urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContraProferentem
    • Article 1.3. A contract validly entered into is binding upon the parties urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContractIsBinding
    • Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#Cooperate
    • Article 5.2.4. The promisor may assert against the beneficiary all defences which the promisor could assert against the promisee urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DefencesAgainstBeneficiary
    • Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective
    • Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective/unless/0
    • Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyOfGoodFaith
    • Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToCooperate
    • Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRights
    • Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRightsBreached
    • Article 5.1.1. The contractual obligations of the parties may be express urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ExpressIsContractual
    • Article 5.1.5. In determining the extent to which an obligation involves a duty of best efforts or a duty to achieve a specific result, regard shall be had to the listed factors urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FactorDeterminesKindOfDuty
    • Article 1.1. The parties are free to enter into a contract and to determine its content urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FreedomOfContract
    • Article 1.6(2). Issues within the scope of these Principles but not expressly settled by them are as far as possible to be settled in accordance with their underlying general principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GapSettledByUnderlyingPrinciples
    • Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaith
    • Article 1.7(2). The parties may not exclude or limit the duty of good faith and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaithCannotBeExcluded
    • Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted
    • Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted/unless/0
    • Article 5.1.2(c). Implied obligations stem from good faith and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromGoodFaith
    • Article 5.1.2(a). Implied obligations stem from the nature and purpose of the contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromNatureAndPurpose
    • Article 5.1.2(b). Implied obligations stem from practices established between the parties and usages urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromPracticesAndUsages
    • Article 5.1.2(d). Implied obligations stem from reasonableness urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromReasonableness
    • Article 5.1.1. The contractual obligations of the parties may be implied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedIsContractual
    • Article 1.8. A party cannot act inconsistently with an understanding it has caused the other party to have and upon which that other party reasonably has acted in reliance to its detriment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InconsistentBehaviourBarred
    • Article 4.2(2) (opening words). Where the intention was known to the other party, the reasonable-person reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#IntentionDisplacesReasonablePerson
    • Article 4.1(1). A contract shall be interpreted according to the common intention of the parties urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByCommonIntention
    • Article 4.1(2). If the common intention cannot be established, the contract shall be interpreted according to the meaning reasonable persons of the same kind would give it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByReasonablePersons
    • Article 1.4. Nothing in these Principles restricts the application of mandatory rules urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MandatoryRulesUnrestricted
    • Article 5.1.7(2). Where the price is to be determined by one party and that determination is manifestly unreasonable, a reasonable price shall be substituted notwithstanding any contract term to the contrary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ManifestlyUnreasonableDeterminationReplaced
    • Preamble. These Principles may be applied when the parties have agreed that their contract be governed by general principles of law, the lex mercatoria or the like urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyOnChoiceOfGeneralPrinciples
    • Preamble. These Principles may be applied when the parties have not chosen any law to govern their contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyWhereNoLawChosen
    • Preamble. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement domestic law urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretDomesticLaw
    • Preamble. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement international uniform law instruments urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretUniformLaw
    • Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated as otherwise provided in these Principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationAsProvided
    • Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated by agreement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByAgreement
    • Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated in accordance with its terms urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByTerms
    • Article 1.2. Nothing in these Principles requires a contract to be made in or evidenced by a particular form urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoFormRequired
    • Article 1.10(2)-(3). A notice is effective when it reaches the person to whom it is given urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoticeEffectiveOnReceipt
    • Article 4.7. In case of discrepancy between equally authoritative versions there is a preference for the interpretation according to the original version urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#OriginalVersionPreferred
    • Article 1.12(1). Official holidays or non-business days occurring during the period are included in calculating it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodEndsOn
    • Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday
    • Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday/unless/0
    • Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PreserveRights
    • Article 5.1.7(1). Where a contract does not fix the price, the parties are considered to have made reference to the price generally charged in comparable circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceByMarket
    • Article 5.1.7(1). If no such price is available, a reasonable price applies urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceReasonableWhereNoMarket
    • Preamble. These Principles shall be applied when the parties have agreed that their contract be governed by them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PrinciplesGovernByAgreement
    • Article 5.1.6. Where the quality of performance is neither fixed by nor determinable from the contract, a party is bound to render a performance of a quality that is reasonable and not less than average in the circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#QualityWhereNotFixed
    • Article 5.1.9(1). An obligee may release its right by agreement with the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReleaseByAgreement
    • Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone
    • Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone/unless/0
    • Article 5.2.6. The beneficiary may renounce a right conferred on it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RenunciationEndsBeneficiaryRight
    • Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract
    • Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract/unless/0
    • Article 5.3.5. On fulfilment of a resolutive condition the rules on restitution apply with appropriate adaptations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RestitutionOnResolutiveCondition
    • Article 5.1.4(1). To the extent that an obligation involves a duty to achieve a specific result, that party is bound to achieve that result urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResultDutyPerformed
    • Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance
    • Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance/unless/0
    • Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant
    • Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant/unless/0
    • Article 4.2(1). Statements and other conduct shall be interpreted according to the party's intention if the other party knew or could not have been unaware of it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByIntention
    • Article 4.2(2). If the preceding paragraph is not applicable, statements shall be interpreted according to the meaning a reasonable person would give them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByReasonablePerson
    • Article 4.8(1). Where the parties have not agreed with respect to an important term, a term which is appropriate in the circumstances shall be supplied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SupplyOmittedTerm
    • Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect
    • Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect/unless/0
    • Article 5.1.8. A contract for an indefinite period may be terminated by either party by giving notice a reasonable time in advance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#TerminationOfIndefiniteContract
    • Article 5.1.7(2). A manifestly unreasonable determination does not stand as the applicable price urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#UnreasonableDeterminationDisplaced
    • Article 5.3.1. A contract or a contractual obligation may be made conditional upon the occurrence of a future uncertain event urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ValidCondition
    Details
    {
     "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_FR",
     "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
     "since": null,
     "state": "not_yet",
     "status": null
    }
  3. infoEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31

    редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_EN на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 26 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)

    Affected nodes
    • Article 10.4(1). Where the obligor acknowledges the right before the expiration of the general limitation period, a new general limitation period begins on the day after the acknowledgement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AcknowledgementStartsNewGeneralPeriod
    • Article 10.6(1). In the absence of provisions determining the exact date of commencement, arbitral proceedings are deemed to commence on the date on which the request reaches the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ArbitrationCommencesOnRequest
    • Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration
    • Article 10.1(2). This Chapter does not govern the time within which a party must give notice or perform any act other than the institution of legal proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ChapterDoesNotGovernNoticeTime
    • Article 10.9(1). The expiration of the limitation period does not extinguish the right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight
    • Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted
    • Article 10.9(2). Once the obligor has asserted expiry, the barred exercise is a comparative remedium_exclusum urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit
    • Article 10.3(a). The parties may not shorten the general limitation period to less than one year urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodFloorOfOneYear
    • Article 10.2(1). The general limitation period is three years beginning on the day after the day the obligee knows or ought to know the facts as a result of which the right can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodOfThreeYears
    • Article 10.1(1). The exercise of rights governed by the Principles is barred by the expiration of a limitation period according to the rules of this Chapter urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#LimitationGovernsExerciseOfRights
    • Article 10.3(c). The parties may not extend the maximum limitation period to more than fifteen years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodCeilingOfFifteenYears
    • Article 10.4(2). The maximum limitation period does not begin to run again, but may be exceeded by the beginning of a new general limitation period urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodDoesNotRestart
    • Article 10.3(b). The parties may not shorten the maximum limitation period to less than four years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodFloorOfFourYears
    • Article 10.2(2). In any event, the maximum limitation period is ten years beginning on the day after the day the right can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodOfTenYears
    • Article 10.11. Where there has been performance in order to discharge an obligation, there is no right of restitution merely because the limitation period has expired urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#NoRestitutionAfterExpiration
    • Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration
    • Article 10.3. The parties may modify the limitation periods urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PartiesMayModifyPeriods
    • Article 10.9(3). A right may still be relied on as a defence even though the expiration of the limitation period for that right has been asserted urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#RightStillAvailableAsDefence
    • Article 10.10. The obligee may exercise the right of set-off until the obligor has asserted the expiration of the limitation period urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SetOffUntilExpirationAsserted
    • Article 10.7. Articles 10.5 and 10.6 apply with appropriate modifications to proceedings whereby the parties request a third person to assist them in reaching an amicable settlement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByAmicableSettlementProceedings
    • Article 10.6(1). The running of the limitation period is suspended when the obligee performs an act recognised by the law of the arbitral tribunal as asserting its right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByArbitralAct
    • Article 10.5(1)(c). The running of the limitation period is suspended where the obligee has asserted its rights in proceedings for dissolution of the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByDissolutionClaim
    • Article 10.8(1). Where the obligee has been prevented by an impediment beyond its control, the general limitation period is suspended so as not to expire before one year after the impediment has ceased to exist urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByImpediment
    • Article 10.8(2). Where the impediment consists of the incapacity or death of a party, suspension ceases when a representative or successor has been appointed; the additional one-year period applies accordingly urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByIncapacityEndsOnAppointment
    • Article 10.5(1)(b). The running of the limitation period is suspended where the obligee has asserted its rights in the insolvency proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByInsolvencyClaim
    • Article 10.5(1)(a). The running of the limitation period is suspended when the obligee performs an act recognised by the law of the court as asserting its right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByJudicialAct
    Details
    {
     "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_EN",
     "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
     "since": null,
     "state": "not_yet",
     "status": null
    }
  4. infoEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31

    редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_FR на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 26 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)

    Affected nodes
    • Article 10.4(1). Where the obligor acknowledges the right before the expiration of the general limitation period, a new general limitation period begins on the day after the acknowledgement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AcknowledgementStartsNewGeneralPeriod
    • Article 10.6(1). In the absence of provisions determining the exact date of commencement, arbitral proceedings are deemed to commence on the date on which the request reaches the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ArbitrationCommencesOnRequest
    • Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration
    • Article 10.1(2). This Chapter does not govern the time within which a party must give notice or perform any act other than the institution of legal proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ChapterDoesNotGovernNoticeTime
    • Article 10.9(1). The expiration of the limitation period does not extinguish the right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight
    • Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted
    • Article 10.9(2). Once the obligor has asserted expiry, the barred exercise is a comparative remedium_exclusum urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit
    • Article 10.3(a). The parties may not shorten the general limitation period to less than one year urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodFloorOfOneYear
    • Article 10.2(1). The general limitation period is three years beginning on the day after the day the obligee knows or ought to know the facts as a result of which the right can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodOfThreeYears
    • Article 10.1(1). The exercise of rights governed by the Principles is barred by the expiration of a limitation period according to the rules of this Chapter urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#LimitationGovernsExerciseOfRights
    • Article 10.3(c). The parties may not extend the maximum limitation period to more than fifteen years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodCeilingOfFifteenYears
    • Article 10.4(2). The maximum limitation period does not begin to run again, but may be exceeded by the beginning of a new general limitation period urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodDoesNotRestart
    • Article 10.3(b). The parties may not shorten the maximum limitation period to less than four years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodFloorOfFourYears
    • Article 10.2(2). In any event, the maximum limitation period is ten years beginning on the day after the day the right can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodOfTenYears
    • Article 10.11. Where there has been performance in order to discharge an obligation, there is no right of restitution merely because the limitation period has expired urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#NoRestitutionAfterExpiration
    • Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration
    • Article 10.3. The parties may modify the limitation periods urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PartiesMayModifyPeriods
    • Article 10.9(3). A right may still be relied on as a defence even though the expiration of the limitation period for that right has been asserted urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#RightStillAvailableAsDefence
    • Article 10.10. The obligee may exercise the right of set-off until the obligor has asserted the expiration of the limitation period urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SetOffUntilExpirationAsserted
    • Article 10.7. Articles 10.5 and 10.6 apply with appropriate modifications to proceedings whereby the parties request a third person to assist them in reaching an amicable settlement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByAmicableSettlementProceedings
    • Article 10.6(1). The running of the limitation period is suspended when the obligee performs an act recognised by the law of the arbitral tribunal as asserting its right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByArbitralAct
    • Article 10.5(1)(c). The running of the limitation period is suspended where the obligee has asserted its rights in proceedings for dissolution of the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByDissolutionClaim
    • Article 10.8(1). Where the obligee has been prevented by an impediment beyond its control, the general limitation period is suspended so as not to expire before one year after the impediment has ceased to exist urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByImpediment
    • Article 10.8(2). Where the impediment consists of the incapacity or death of a party, suspension ceases when a representative or successor has been appointed; the additional one-year period applies accordingly urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByIncapacityEndsOnAppointment
    • Article 10.5(1)(b). The running of the limitation period is suspended where the obligee has asserted its rights in the insolvency proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByInsolvencyClaim
    • Article 10.5(1)(a). The running of the limitation period is suspended when the obligee performs an act recognised by the law of the court as asserting its right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByJudicialAct
    Details
    {
     "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_FR",
     "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
     "since": null,
     "state": "not_yet",
     "status": null
    }

As recorded by the engine: code, severity and message with §-references; order follows the evaluation document.

Proof graph

Proof graph · 10 layer
query_evaluationremedium_exclusumrule_applicationEinredeExcluditrule_applicationLeistungsverweigerungsrecht214assertioncausa_of_anspruchassertionschuldner_beruft_sich_auf_verjaehrunassertionanspruchsgegnerassertionanspruchsinhaberassertionpersona_ofassertionpersona_ofassertionpetitiorule_applicationVerjaehrungOhneHemmungrule_applicationVerjaehrungsfristEndeOhneHemmungassertionkeine_hemmungrule_applicationRegelmaessigeVerjaehrungsfristrule_applicationVerjaehrungsbeginnUltimoDerEntstehunrule_applicationJahresendeIstDezemberassertionanspruch_entstanden_amassertionkenntnis_erlangt_amrule_applicationJahresendeKandidat09rule_applicationJahresendeGesuchtFuerEntstehung

Proof nodes: 33 · assertion 10, rule_application 21, candidate_closure 1, query_evaluation 1

This block is too large for inline viewing. It is included in full in the document JSON, without truncation.

Download JSON ↓
Calendar and proof identifiers
Proof reference
case/FuenfJahre_BGB/query/remedium-exclusum
Original reasoning · JSON

This block is too large for inline viewing. It is included in full in the document JSON, without truncation.

Download JSON ↓
SourcesExcerpts: 4

paragraph/195

§ 195 Regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beträgt drei Jahre.
Original data · JSON
JSONRead only
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:53e15660089df268ecd95ba8fdcc0d8e73cba45a9e68c5cc802f87a60f03db9b",
  "edition": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_KONSOLIDIERT",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_P195",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 195 Regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "paragraph/195",
  "package": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:3a37767ed679ef6124cbd5c7272a5a798618598a194829b5a5ad5b10c1cfe898",
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 195 Regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist\nDie regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beträgt drei Jahre.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

paragraph/199

§ 199 Beginn der regelmäßigen Verjährungsfrist und Verjährungshöchstfristen (1) Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beginnt, soweit nicht ein anderer Verjährungsbeginn bestimmt ist, mit dem Schluss des Jahres, in dem 1. der Anspruch entstanden ist und 2. der Gläubiger von den den Anspruch begründenden Umständen und der Person des Schuldners Kenntnis erlangt oder ohne grobe Fahrlässigkeit erlangen müsste. (2) Schadensersatzansprüche, die auf der Verletzung des Lebens, des Körpers, der Gesundheit oder der Freiheit beruhen, verjähren ohne Rücksicht auf ihre Entstehung und die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in 30 Jahren von der Begehung der Handlung, der Pflichtverletzung oder dem sonstigen, den Schaden auslösenden Ereignis an. (3) Sonstige Schadensersatzansprüche verjähren 1. ohne Rücksicht auf die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in zehn Jahren von ihrer Entstehung an und 2. ohne Rücksicht auf ihre Entstehung und die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in 30 Jahren von der Begehung der Handlung, der Pflichtverletzung oder dem sonstigen, den Schaden auslösenden Ereignis an. Maßgeblich ist die früher endende Frist. (3a) Ansprüche, die auf einem Erbfall beruhen oder deren Geltendmachung die Kenntnis einer Verfügung von Todes wegen voraussetzt, verjähren ohne Rücksicht auf die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in 30 Jahren von der Entstehung des Anspruchs an. (4) Andere Ansprüche als die nach den Absätzen 2 bis 3a verjähren ohne Rücksicht auf die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in zehn Jahren von ihrer Entstehung an. (5) Geht der Anspruch auf ein Unterlassen, so tritt an die Stelle der Entstehung die Zuwiderhandlung.
Original data · JSON
JSONRead only
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:dbc2b5bc4ee946d17bb8636b8d724e0168033a99dc35c94f5c6eb2b53f2b838c",
  "edition": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_KONSOLIDIERT",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_P199",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 199 Beginn der regelmäßigen Verjährungsfrist und Verjährungshöchstfristen"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "paragraph/199",
  "package": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:2916e6a9e86d21f331739cafd8a135c863d9e0bf3087e8a13fb6c60d7f2df4da",
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 199 Beginn der regelmäßigen Verjährungsfrist und Verjährungshöchstfristen\n(1) Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beginnt, soweit nicht ein anderer Verjährungsbeginn bestimmt ist, mit dem Schluss des Jahres, in dem 1. der Anspruch entstanden ist und\n2. der Gläubiger von den den Anspruch begründenden Umständen und der Person des Schuldners Kenntnis erlangt oder ohne grobe Fahrlässigkeit erlangen müsste.\n(2) Schadensersatzansprüche, die auf der Verletzung des Lebens, des Körpers, der Gesundheit oder der Freiheit beruhen, verjähren ohne Rücksicht auf ihre Entstehung und die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in 30 Jahren von der Begehung der Handlung, der Pflichtverletzung oder dem sonstigen, den Schaden auslösenden Ereignis an.\n(3) Sonstige Schadensersatzansprüche verjähren 1. ohne Rücksicht auf die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in zehn Jahren von ihrer Entstehung an und\n2. ohne Rücksicht auf ihre Entstehung und die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in 30 Jahren von der Begehung der Handlung, der Pflichtverletzung oder dem sonstigen, den Schaden auslösenden Ereignis an.\nMaßgeblich ist die früher endende Frist.\n(3a) Ansprüche, die auf einem Erbfall beruhen oder deren Geltendmachung die Kenntnis einer Verfügung von Todes wegen voraussetzt, verjähren ohne Rücksicht auf die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in 30 Jahren von der Entstehung des Anspruchs an.\n(4) Andere Ansprüche als die nach den Absätzen 2 bis 3a verjähren ohne Rücksicht auf die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in zehn Jahren von ihrer Entstehung an.\n(5) Geht der Anspruch auf ein Unterlassen, so tritt an die Stelle der Entstehung die Zuwiderhandlung.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

paragraph/209

§ 209 Wirkung der Hemmung Der Zeitraum, während dessen die Verjährung gehemmt ist, wird in die Verjährungsfrist nicht eingerechnet.
Original data · JSON
JSONRead only
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:9d3c1967977b0f7d0bb0d9a7d89228d863b64a3cc4a8d54a9f351d8c9205188c",
  "edition": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_KONSOLIDIERT",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_P209",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 209 Wirkung der Hemmung"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "paragraph/209",
  "package": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:d3a5349ff97577ebae64e94327f4d26341f8d6fbce09a12c6615b96f59d9b9be",
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 209 Wirkung der Hemmung\nDer Zeitraum, während dessen die Verjährung gehemmt ist, wird in die Verjährungsfrist nicht eingerechnet.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

paragraph/214

§ 214 Wirkung der Verjährung (1) Nach Eintritt der Verjährung ist der Schuldner berechtigt, die Leistung zu verweigern. (2) Das zur Befriedigung eines verjährten Anspruchs Geleistete kann nicht zurückgefordert werden, auch wenn in Unkenntnis der Verjährung geleistet worden ist. Das Gleiche gilt von einem vertragsmäßigen Anerkenntnis sowie einer Sicherheitsleistung des Schuldners.
Original data · JSON
JSONRead only
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:12d652436994db82ae2d39189be9bf31cdc979290895389a4620639b3f937994",
  "edition": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_KONSOLIDIERT",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_P214",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 214 Wirkung der Verjährung"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "paragraph/214",
  "package": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:1f3cff3f6a0d4efb9796bd6eff87447e953e444a38ba0121caedb177cf59002e",
      "language": "de",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "§ 214 Wirkung der Verjährung\n(1) Nach Eintritt der Verjährung ist der Schuldner berechtigt, die Leistung zu verweigern.\n(2) Das zur Befriedigung eines verjährten Anspruchs Geleistete kann nicht zurückgefordert werden, auch wenn in Unkenntnis der Verjährung geleistet worden ist. Das Gleiche gilt von einem vertragsmäßigen Anerkenntnis sowie einer Sicherheitsleistung des Schuldners.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Packages in the snapshot

  • de.bgb.core
  • de.bgb.fristen
  • de.bgb.ius_privatum
  • doctrine.ius_privatum
  • fr.code_civil
  • unidroit.picc
  • unidroit.picc_limitation
Technical dataFull response, parameters and checksums
Calculation status
COMPUTED
Full engine response
Fünf Jahre, BGB: das Rechtsmittel ist ausgeschlossen

Complete machine result · JSON

This block is too large for inline viewing. It is included in full in the document JSON, without truncation.

Download JSON ↓

Execution · JSON

This block is too large for inline viewing. It is included in full in the document JSON, without truncation.

Download JSON ↓

Display metadata

This block is too large for inline viewing. It is included in full in the document JSON, without truncation.

Download JSON ↓

JSON · calculations, sources and exact data

JSONRead only
{
  "acts": [
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:a6813604c35567e7c586d334efbf524d08f3467170c4b732cfb15809cacf4ff4",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core",
      "package": "de.bgb.core"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:998148eaeeed28f1565811474ee7beb7eacc616c5681ed9638edc976512a9884",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
      "package": "de.bgb.fristen"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:86a5a00db16e32187223ceeec6748eb7d42d18b7c370c8b15ac64d2f3f655ff7",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum",
      "package": "de.bgb.ius_privatum"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:7202de5de49a8a9d12837bc19cb7008ba2d1a68dbcc0134e0afccf1440a6d5ed",
      "namespace": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum",
      "package": "doctrine.ius_privatum"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:ad41d027ba92c38ca5eecc1d16097d0bbc8c5a74946fc1a6397c6dadac61158f",
      "namespace": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
      "package": "fr.code_civil"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:719bfd408eed92ad497ba071482354d4ad32b81ef9f41c6654f224416c19e603",
      "namespace": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc",
      "package": "unidroit.picc"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:b311d0d422a1079f71113320bd818236f7b09507c7dd960bdafceb91285497d9",
      "namespace": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "package": "unidroit.picc_limitation"
    }
  ],
  "caseHash": "sha256:46016aa963d29cfc446a35c6a945630088a81b841001fff20f3772522d11579f",
  "jurisdiction": "Deutschland",
  "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
  "mode": "audit",
  "programHash": "sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e",
  "resultHash": "sha256:3b8c31a7d40225f7dc8d028edbb4ba6636cb6413c662d58b3d87d109175fd196",
  "timezone": "Europe/Berlin"
}
evaluation SHA-256
sha256:1525ffc0f486d03fad6ab7b8a3160e766825ca1f8503179d41d4f5ec448585cd
Original data · JSON
JSONRead only
{
  "args": [
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:causa",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    }
  ],
  "facts": [
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core#anspruch_entstanden_am"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "adjudicated",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#kenntnis_erlangt_am"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#keine_hemmung"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#schuldner_beruft_sich_auf_verjaehrung"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#g",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core#anspruchsinhaber"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#s",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core#anspruchsgegner"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#g",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#persona_of"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#s",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#persona_of"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
          "kind": "const_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#causa_of_anspruch"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
    }
  ],
  "kind": "truth",
  "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
  "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"
}

Nach fünf Jahren ist die deutsche Verjährung am 31. Dezember 2013 eingetreten, und das Rechtsmittel ist ausgeschlossen.

Condition

Fünf Jahre, Code civil: die Klage ist verjährt

Jurisdiction DeutschlandLaw as of 2016-01-02

Calculation result

Established

Input parameters

What we are finding

claim time-barred on this date

causa2 January 2016

Input facts

  • claim enforceable from this date

    causa: causajour: 15 March 2010
  • the right-holder knew the facts permitting the claim on this date

    causa: causajour: 15 March 2010
  • action brought on this date

    causa: causajour: 2 January 2016
  • limitation period neither interrupted nor suspended

    causa: causa
  • the claimant brings a claim against the defendant — the contested relation the question is about

    causa: causaactor: greus: s
Original data · JSON
JSONRead only
{
  "args": [
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:causa",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "kind": "value",
      "type": {
        "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
      },
      "value": "2016-01-02"
    }
  ],
  "facts": [
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#creance_exigible_depuis"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#titulaire_connait_les_faits_le"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2016-01-02"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#action_introduite_le"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#prescription_non_interrompue"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
    }
  ],
  "kind": "truth",
  "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
  "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#action_prescrite_le"
}
Why this resultApplied rules and conditions

Derivation path8 steps

  1. 1

    action brought on this date

    causa: urn:p12:causa; jour: 2 January 2016

    case fact
  2. 2

    the right-holder knew the facts permitting the claim on this date

    causa: urn:p12:causa; jour: 15 March 2010

    case fact
  3. 3

    claim enforceable from this date

    causa: urn:p12:causa; jour: 15 March 2010

    case fact
  4. 4

    five years from the date of actual knowledge

    starting point of the five-year period: causa: urn:p12:causa; jour: 15 March 2010

    art. 2224

    Identifier
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#PointDepartConnaissanceReelle
    rule
  5. 5

    limitation period neither interrupted nor suspended

    causa: urn:p12:causa

    case fact
  6. 6

    five-year deadline counted by days

    15 March 2015 = add calendar period(15 March 2010, 5 calendar_year)

    art. 2224, art. 2228, art. 2229

    Identifier
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#EcheanceCinqAns
    rule
  7. 7

    the claim is time-barred after the last day has elapsed

    claim time-barred on this date: causa: urn:p12:causa; jour: 2 January 2016

    art. 2219, art. 2229

    Identifier
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#ActionPrescriteApresEcheance
    rule
  8. 8

    Query evaluation

    query

verified by the engine: 4 · case fact: 4 · Full graph: 12 nodes

Steps of the saved proof from the case facts to the answer. Formulas are shown as written in the norm with bound values substituted; the page recomputes nothing.

Basis of this answer

Rules on the saved proof path for this answer.

fr.code_civil
  • the claim is time-barred after the last day has elapsed

    Identifier
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#ActionPrescriteApresEcheance
  • five-year deadline counted by days

    Identifier
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#EcheanceCinqAns
  • five years from the date of actual knowledge

    Identifier
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#PointDepartConnaissanceReelle
Other rules in the evaluation3

Applied in the overall evaluation, but not on the proof path for this answer.

fr.code_civil
  • Article 2232, paragraph 2. Without an opposable long-stop, the deadline after the floor is the applicable date

    Identifier
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#DateApplicableSansButoirOpposable
  • Without mediation, conciliation or an investigative measure, the period's deadline is not raised

    Identifier
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#EcheanceApresPlancherSansMinimale
  • an extinctive limitation result excludes the remedy in the comparative private-law chain

    Identifier
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#PrescriptionExcludit
Issues · 4
Execution issues
  1. infoEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31

    редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_EN на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 81 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)

    Affected nodes
    • Article 5.2.3. The conferment of rights in the beneficiary includes the right to invoke a clause in the contract which excludes or limits the liability of the beneficiary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryMayInvokeClause
    • Articles 5.2.1 and 5.2.2. The parties may confer a right on a third party who must be identifiable with adequate certainty by the contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryRightExists
    • Article 5.1.4(2). To the extent that an obligation involves a duty of best efforts, that party is bound to make such efforts as would be made by a reasonable person of the same kind urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BestEffortsDutyPerformed
    • Article 1.9(1). The parties are bound by any usage to which they have agreed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByAgreedUsage
    • Article 1.9(1). The parties are bound by practices which they have established between themselves urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByEstablishedPractice
    • Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage
    • Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage/unless/0
    • Article 5.3.3(1). A party who prevented fulfilment contrary to good faith may not rely on the non-fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnPreventedCondition
    • Article 5.3.3(2). A party who brought about fulfilment contrary to good faith may not rely on the fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnProcuredCondition
    • Article 4.3. In applying Articles 4.1 and 4.2, regard shall be had to all the circumstances, including those listed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CircumstanceToBeRegarded
    • Article 1.11. Where a party has more than one place of business the relevant one is that which has the closest relationship to the contract and its performance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ClosestPlaceIsRelevant
    • Article 4.1(2) (opening words). Where the common intention can be established, the reasonable-persons reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CommonIntentionDisplacesReasonablePersons
    • Article 1.12(2). The computed last day does not stand where it is a holiday at the place of performance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ComputedLastDayYieldsToHoliday
    • Article 4.6. If contract terms supplied by one party are unclear, an interpretation against that party is preferred urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContraProferentem
    • Article 1.3. A contract validly entered into is binding upon the parties urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContractIsBinding
    • Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#Cooperate
    • Article 5.2.4. The promisor may assert against the beneficiary all defences which the promisor could assert against the promisee urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DefencesAgainstBeneficiary
    • Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective
    • Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective/unless/0
    • Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyOfGoodFaith
    • Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToCooperate
    • Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRights
    • Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRightsBreached
    • Article 5.1.1. The contractual obligations of the parties may be express urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ExpressIsContractual
    • Article 5.1.5. In determining the extent to which an obligation involves a duty of best efforts or a duty to achieve a specific result, regard shall be had to the listed factors urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FactorDeterminesKindOfDuty
    • Article 1.1. The parties are free to enter into a contract and to determine its content urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FreedomOfContract
    • Article 1.6(2). Issues within the scope of these Principles but not expressly settled by them are as far as possible to be settled in accordance with their underlying general principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GapSettledByUnderlyingPrinciples
    • Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaith
    • Article 1.7(2). The parties may not exclude or limit the duty of good faith and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaithCannotBeExcluded
    • Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted
    • Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted/unless/0
    • Article 5.1.2(c). Implied obligations stem from good faith and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromGoodFaith
    • Article 5.1.2(a). Implied obligations stem from the nature and purpose of the contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromNatureAndPurpose
    • Article 5.1.2(b). Implied obligations stem from practices established between the parties and usages urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromPracticesAndUsages
    • Article 5.1.2(d). Implied obligations stem from reasonableness urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromReasonableness
    • Article 5.1.1. The contractual obligations of the parties may be implied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedIsContractual
    • Article 1.8. A party cannot act inconsistently with an understanding it has caused the other party to have and upon which that other party reasonably has acted in reliance to its detriment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InconsistentBehaviourBarred
    • Article 4.2(2) (opening words). Where the intention was known to the other party, the reasonable-person reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#IntentionDisplacesReasonablePerson
    • Article 4.1(1). A contract shall be interpreted according to the common intention of the parties urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByCommonIntention
    • Article 4.1(2). If the common intention cannot be established, the contract shall be interpreted according to the meaning reasonable persons of the same kind would give it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByReasonablePersons
    • Article 1.4. Nothing in these Principles restricts the application of mandatory rules urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MandatoryRulesUnrestricted
    • Article 5.1.7(2). Where the price is to be determined by one party and that determination is manifestly unreasonable, a reasonable price shall be substituted notwithstanding any contract term to the contrary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ManifestlyUnreasonableDeterminationReplaced
    • Preamble. These Principles may be applied when the parties have agreed that their contract be governed by general principles of law, the lex mercatoria or the like urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyOnChoiceOfGeneralPrinciples
    • Preamble. These Principles may be applied when the parties have not chosen any law to govern their contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyWhereNoLawChosen
    • Preamble. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement domestic law urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretDomesticLaw
    • Preamble. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement international uniform law instruments urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretUniformLaw
    • Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated as otherwise provided in these Principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationAsProvided
    • Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated by agreement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByAgreement
    • Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated in accordance with its terms urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByTerms
    • Article 1.2. Nothing in these Principles requires a contract to be made in or evidenced by a particular form urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoFormRequired
    • Article 1.10(2)-(3). A notice is effective when it reaches the person to whom it is given urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoticeEffectiveOnReceipt
    • Article 4.7. In case of discrepancy between equally authoritative versions there is a preference for the interpretation according to the original version urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#OriginalVersionPreferred
    • Article 1.12(1). Official holidays or non-business days occurring during the period are included in calculating it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodEndsOn
    • Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday
    • Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday/unless/0
    • Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PreserveRights
    • Article 5.1.7(1). Where a contract does not fix the price, the parties are considered to have made reference to the price generally charged in comparable circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceByMarket
    • Article 5.1.7(1). If no such price is available, a reasonable price applies urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceReasonableWhereNoMarket
    • Preamble. These Principles shall be applied when the parties have agreed that their contract be governed by them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PrinciplesGovernByAgreement
    • Article 5.1.6. Where the quality of performance is neither fixed by nor determinable from the contract, a party is bound to render a performance of a quality that is reasonable and not less than average in the circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#QualityWhereNotFixed
    • Articles 4.4 and 4.5. Terms are to be read in the light of the whole contract and so as to give effect to all of them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReadingConformsToCanons
    • Article 5.1.9(1). An obligee may release its right by agreement with the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReleaseByAgreement
    • Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone
    • Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone/unless/0
    • Article 5.2.6. The beneficiary may renounce a right conferred on it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RenunciationEndsBeneficiaryRight
    • Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract
    • Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract/unless/0
    • Article 5.3.5. On fulfilment of a resolutive condition the rules on restitution apply with appropriate adaptations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RestitutionOnResolutiveCondition
    • Article 5.1.4(1). To the extent that an obligation involves a duty to achieve a specific result, that party is bound to achieve that result urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResultDutyPerformed
    • Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance
    • Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance/unless/0
    • Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant
    • Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant/unless/0
    • Article 4.2(1). Statements and other conduct shall be interpreted according to the party's intention if the other party knew or could not have been unaware of it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByIntention
    • Article 4.2(2). If the preceding paragraph is not applicable, statements shall be interpreted according to the meaning a reasonable person would give them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByReasonablePerson
    • Article 4.8(1). Where the parties have not agreed with respect to an important term, a term which is appropriate in the circumstances shall be supplied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SupplyOmittedTerm
    • Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect
    • Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect/unless/0
    • Article 5.1.8. A contract for an indefinite period may be terminated by either party by giving notice a reasonable time in advance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#TerminationOfIndefiniteContract
    • Article 5.1.7(2). A manifestly unreasonable determination does not stand as the applicable price urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#UnreasonableDeterminationDisplaced
    • Article 5.3.1. A contract or a contractual obligation may be made conditional upon the occurrence of a future uncertain event urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ValidCondition
    Details
    {
     "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_EN",
     "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
     "since": null,
     "state": "not_yet",
     "status": null
    }
  2. infoEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31

    редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_FR на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 79 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)

    Affected nodes
    • Article 5.2.3. The conferment of rights in the beneficiary includes the right to invoke a clause in the contract which excludes or limits the liability of the beneficiary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryMayInvokeClause
    • Article 5.1.4(2). To the extent that an obligation involves a duty of best efforts, that party is bound to make such efforts as would be made by a reasonable person of the same kind urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BestEffortsDutyPerformed
    • Article 1.9(1). The parties are bound by any usage to which they have agreed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByAgreedUsage
    • Article 1.9(1). The parties are bound by practices which they have established between themselves urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByEstablishedPractice
    • Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage
    • Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage/unless/0
    • Article 5.3.3(1). A party who prevented fulfilment contrary to good faith may not rely on the non-fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnPreventedCondition
    • Article 5.3.3(2). A party who brought about fulfilment contrary to good faith may not rely on the fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnProcuredCondition
    • Article 4.3. In applying Articles 4.1 and 4.2, regard shall be had to all the circumstances, including those listed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CircumstanceToBeRegarded
    • Article 1.11. Where a party has more than one place of business the relevant one is that which has the closest relationship to the contract and its performance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ClosestPlaceIsRelevant
    • Article 4.1(2) (opening words). Where the common intention can be established, the reasonable-persons reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CommonIntentionDisplacesReasonablePersons
    • Article 1.12(2). The computed last day does not stand where it is a holiday at the place of performance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ComputedLastDayYieldsToHoliday
    • Article 4.6. If contract terms supplied by one party are unclear, an interpretation against that party is preferred urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContraProferentem
    • Article 1.3. A contract validly entered into is binding upon the parties urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContractIsBinding
    • Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#Cooperate
    • Article 5.2.4. The promisor may assert against the beneficiary all defences which the promisor could assert against the promisee urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DefencesAgainstBeneficiary
    • Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective
    • Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective/unless/0
    • Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyOfGoodFaith
    • Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToCooperate
    • Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRights
    • Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRightsBreached
    • Article 5.1.1. The contractual obligations of the parties may be express urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ExpressIsContractual
    • Article 5.1.5. In determining the extent to which an obligation involves a duty of best efforts or a duty to achieve a specific result, regard shall be had to the listed factors urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FactorDeterminesKindOfDuty
    • Article 1.1. The parties are free to enter into a contract and to determine its content urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FreedomOfContract
    • Article 1.6(2). Issues within the scope of these Principles but not expressly settled by them are as far as possible to be settled in accordance with their underlying general principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GapSettledByUnderlyingPrinciples
    • Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaith
    • Article 1.7(2). The parties may not exclude or limit the duty of good faith and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaithCannotBeExcluded
    • Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted
    • Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted/unless/0
    • Article 5.1.2(c). Implied obligations stem from good faith and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromGoodFaith
    • Article 5.1.2(a). Implied obligations stem from the nature and purpose of the contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromNatureAndPurpose
    • Article 5.1.2(b). Implied obligations stem from practices established between the parties and usages urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromPracticesAndUsages
    • Article 5.1.2(d). Implied obligations stem from reasonableness urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromReasonableness
    • Article 5.1.1. The contractual obligations of the parties may be implied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedIsContractual
    • Article 1.8. A party cannot act inconsistently with an understanding it has caused the other party to have and upon which that other party reasonably has acted in reliance to its detriment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InconsistentBehaviourBarred
    • Article 4.2(2) (opening words). Where the intention was known to the other party, the reasonable-person reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#IntentionDisplacesReasonablePerson
    • Article 4.1(1). A contract shall be interpreted according to the common intention of the parties urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByCommonIntention
    • Article 4.1(2). If the common intention cannot be established, the contract shall be interpreted according to the meaning reasonable persons of the same kind would give it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByReasonablePersons
    • Article 1.4. Nothing in these Principles restricts the application of mandatory rules urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MandatoryRulesUnrestricted
    • Article 5.1.7(2). Where the price is to be determined by one party and that determination is manifestly unreasonable, a reasonable price shall be substituted notwithstanding any contract term to the contrary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ManifestlyUnreasonableDeterminationReplaced
    • Preamble. These Principles may be applied when the parties have agreed that their contract be governed by general principles of law, the lex mercatoria or the like urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyOnChoiceOfGeneralPrinciples
    • Preamble. These Principles may be applied when the parties have not chosen any law to govern their contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyWhereNoLawChosen
    • Preamble. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement domestic law urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretDomesticLaw
    • Preamble. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement international uniform law instruments urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretUniformLaw
    • Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated as otherwise provided in these Principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationAsProvided
    • Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated by agreement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByAgreement
    • Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated in accordance with its terms urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByTerms
    • Article 1.2. Nothing in these Principles requires a contract to be made in or evidenced by a particular form urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoFormRequired
    • Article 1.10(2)-(3). A notice is effective when it reaches the person to whom it is given urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoticeEffectiveOnReceipt
    • Article 4.7. In case of discrepancy between equally authoritative versions there is a preference for the interpretation according to the original version urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#OriginalVersionPreferred
    • Article 1.12(1). Official holidays or non-business days occurring during the period are included in calculating it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodEndsOn
    • Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday
    • Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday/unless/0
    • Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PreserveRights
    • Article 5.1.7(1). Where a contract does not fix the price, the parties are considered to have made reference to the price generally charged in comparable circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceByMarket
    • Article 5.1.7(1). If no such price is available, a reasonable price applies urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceReasonableWhereNoMarket
    • Preamble. These Principles shall be applied when the parties have agreed that their contract be governed by them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PrinciplesGovernByAgreement
    • Article 5.1.6. Where the quality of performance is neither fixed by nor determinable from the contract, a party is bound to render a performance of a quality that is reasonable and not less than average in the circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#QualityWhereNotFixed
    • Article 5.1.9(1). An obligee may release its right by agreement with the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReleaseByAgreement
    • Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone
    • Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone/unless/0
    • Article 5.2.6. The beneficiary may renounce a right conferred on it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RenunciationEndsBeneficiaryRight
    • Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract
    • Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract/unless/0
    • Article 5.3.5. On fulfilment of a resolutive condition the rules on restitution apply with appropriate adaptations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RestitutionOnResolutiveCondition
    • Article 5.1.4(1). To the extent that an obligation involves a duty to achieve a specific result, that party is bound to achieve that result urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResultDutyPerformed
    • Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance
    • Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance/unless/0
    • Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant
    • Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant/unless/0
    • Article 4.2(1). Statements and other conduct shall be interpreted according to the party's intention if the other party knew or could not have been unaware of it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByIntention
    • Article 4.2(2). If the preceding paragraph is not applicable, statements shall be interpreted according to the meaning a reasonable person would give them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByReasonablePerson
    • Article 4.8(1). Where the parties have not agreed with respect to an important term, a term which is appropriate in the circumstances shall be supplied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SupplyOmittedTerm
    • Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect
    • Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect/unless/0
    • Article 5.1.8. A contract for an indefinite period may be terminated by either party by giving notice a reasonable time in advance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#TerminationOfIndefiniteContract
    • Article 5.1.7(2). A manifestly unreasonable determination does not stand as the applicable price urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#UnreasonableDeterminationDisplaced
    • Article 5.3.1. A contract or a contractual obligation may be made conditional upon the occurrence of a future uncertain event urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ValidCondition
    Details
    {
     "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_FR",
     "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
     "since": null,
     "state": "not_yet",
     "status": null
    }
  3. infoEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31

    редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_EN на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 26 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)

    Affected nodes
    • Article 10.4(1). Where the obligor acknowledges the right before the expiration of the general limitation period, a new general limitation period begins on the day after the acknowledgement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AcknowledgementStartsNewGeneralPeriod
    • Article 10.6(1). In the absence of provisions determining the exact date of commencement, arbitral proceedings are deemed to commence on the date on which the request reaches the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ArbitrationCommencesOnRequest
    • Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration
    • Article 10.1(2). This Chapter does not govern the time within which a party must give notice or perform any act other than the institution of legal proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ChapterDoesNotGovernNoticeTime
    • Article 10.9(1). The expiration of the limitation period does not extinguish the right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight
    • Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted
    • Article 10.9(2). Once the obligor has asserted expiry, the barred exercise is a comparative remedium_exclusum urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit
    • Article 10.3(a). The parties may not shorten the general limitation period to less than one year urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodFloorOfOneYear
    • Article 10.2(1). The general limitation period is three years beginning on the day after the day the obligee knows or ought to know the facts as a result of which the right can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodOfThreeYears
    • Article 10.1(1). The exercise of rights governed by the Principles is barred by the expiration of a limitation period according to the rules of this Chapter urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#LimitationGovernsExerciseOfRights
    • Article 10.3(c). The parties may not extend the maximum limitation period to more than fifteen years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodCeilingOfFifteenYears
    • Article 10.4(2). The maximum limitation period does not begin to run again, but may be exceeded by the beginning of a new general limitation period urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodDoesNotRestart
    • Article 10.3(b). The parties may not shorten the maximum limitation period to less than four years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodFloorOfFourYears
    • Article 10.2(2). In any event, the maximum limitation period is ten years beginning on the day after the day the right can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodOfTenYears
    • Article 10.11. Where there has been performance in order to discharge an obligation, there is no right of restitution merely because the limitation period has expired urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#NoRestitutionAfterExpiration
    • Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration
    • Article 10.3. The parties may modify the limitation periods urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PartiesMayModifyPeriods
    • Article 10.9(3). A right may still be relied on as a defence even though the expiration of the limitation period for that right has been asserted urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#RightStillAvailableAsDefence
    • Article 10.10. The obligee may exercise the right of set-off until the obligor has asserted the expiration of the limitation period urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SetOffUntilExpirationAsserted
    • Article 10.7. Articles 10.5 and 10.6 apply with appropriate modifications to proceedings whereby the parties request a third person to assist them in reaching an amicable settlement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByAmicableSettlementProceedings
    • Article 10.6(1). The running of the limitation period is suspended when the obligee performs an act recognised by the law of the arbitral tribunal as asserting its right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByArbitralAct
    • Article 10.5(1)(c). The running of the limitation period is suspended where the obligee has asserted its rights in proceedings for dissolution of the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByDissolutionClaim
    • Article 10.8(1). Where the obligee has been prevented by an impediment beyond its control, the general limitation period is suspended so as not to expire before one year after the impediment has ceased to exist urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByImpediment
    • Article 10.8(2). Where the impediment consists of the incapacity or death of a party, suspension ceases when a representative or successor has been appointed; the additional one-year period applies accordingly urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByIncapacityEndsOnAppointment
    • Article 10.5(1)(b). The running of the limitation period is suspended where the obligee has asserted its rights in the insolvency proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByInsolvencyClaim
    • Article 10.5(1)(a). The running of the limitation period is suspended when the obligee performs an act recognised by the law of the court as asserting its right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByJudicialAct
    Details
    {
     "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_EN",
     "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
     "since": null,
     "state": "not_yet",
     "status": null
    }
  4. infoEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31

    редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_FR на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 26 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)

    Affected nodes
    • Article 10.4(1). Where the obligor acknowledges the right before the expiration of the general limitation period, a new general limitation period begins on the day after the acknowledgement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AcknowledgementStartsNewGeneralPeriod
    • Article 10.6(1). In the absence of provisions determining the exact date of commencement, arbitral proceedings are deemed to commence on the date on which the request reaches the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ArbitrationCommencesOnRequest
    • Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration
    • Article 10.1(2). This Chapter does not govern the time within which a party must give notice or perform any act other than the institution of legal proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ChapterDoesNotGovernNoticeTime
    • Article 10.9(1). The expiration of the limitation period does not extinguish the right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight
    • Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted
    • Article 10.9(2). Once the obligor has asserted expiry, the barred exercise is a comparative remedium_exclusum urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit
    • Article 10.3(a). The parties may not shorten the general limitation period to less than one year urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodFloorOfOneYear
    • Article 10.2(1). The general limitation period is three years beginning on the day after the day the obligee knows or ought to know the facts as a result of which the right can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodOfThreeYears
    • Article 10.1(1). The exercise of rights governed by the Principles is barred by the expiration of a limitation period according to the rules of this Chapter urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#LimitationGovernsExerciseOfRights
    • Article 10.3(c). The parties may not extend the maximum limitation period to more than fifteen years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodCeilingOfFifteenYears
    • Article 10.4(2). The maximum limitation period does not begin to run again, but may be exceeded by the beginning of a new general limitation period urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodDoesNotRestart
    • Article 10.3(b). The parties may not shorten the maximum limitation period to less than four years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodFloorOfFourYears
    • Article 10.2(2). In any event, the maximum limitation period is ten years beginning on the day after the day the right can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodOfTenYears
    • Article 10.11. Where there has been performance in order to discharge an obligation, there is no right of restitution merely because the limitation period has expired urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#NoRestitutionAfterExpiration
    • Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration
    • Article 10.3. The parties may modify the limitation periods urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PartiesMayModifyPeriods
    • Article 10.9(3). A right may still be relied on as a defence even though the expiration of the limitation period for that right has been asserted urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#RightStillAvailableAsDefence
    • Article 10.10. The obligee may exercise the right of set-off until the obligor has asserted the expiration of the limitation period urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SetOffUntilExpirationAsserted
    • Article 10.7. Articles 10.5 and 10.6 apply with appropriate modifications to proceedings whereby the parties request a third person to assist them in reaching an amicable settlement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByAmicableSettlementProceedings
    • Article 10.6(1). The running of the limitation period is suspended when the obligee performs an act recognised by the law of the arbitral tribunal as asserting its right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByArbitralAct
    • Article 10.5(1)(c). The running of the limitation period is suspended where the obligee has asserted its rights in proceedings for dissolution of the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByDissolutionClaim
    • Article 10.8(1). Where the obligee has been prevented by an impediment beyond its control, the general limitation period is suspended so as not to expire before one year after the impediment has ceased to exist urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByImpediment
    • Article 10.8(2). Where the impediment consists of the incapacity or death of a party, suspension ceases when a representative or successor has been appointed; the additional one-year period applies accordingly urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByIncapacityEndsOnAppointment
    • Article 10.5(1)(b). The running of the limitation period is suspended where the obligee has asserted its rights in the insolvency proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByInsolvencyClaim
    • Article 10.5(1)(a). The running of the limitation period is suspended when the obligee performs an act recognised by the law of the court as asserting its right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByJudicialAct
    Details
    {
     "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_FR",
     "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
     "since": null,
     "state": "not_yet",
     "status": null
    }

As recorded by the engine: code, severity and message with §-references; order follows the evaluation document.

Proof graph

Proof graph · 5 layer
query_evaluationaction_prescrite_lerule_applicationActionPrescriteApresEcheancerule_applicationEcheanceCinqAnsassertionaction_introduite_lerule_applicationPointDepartConnaissanceReelleassertionprescription_non_interrompueassertiontitulaire_connait_les_faits_leassertioncreance_exigible_depuis

Proof nodes: 12 · assertion 5, rule_application 6, query_evaluation 1

This block is too large for inline viewing. It is included in full in the document JSON, without truncation.

Download JSON ↓
Calendar and proof identifiers
Proof reference
case/FuenfJahre_CC/query/cc-prescrite
Original reasoning · JSON

This block is too large for inline viewing. It is included in full in the document JSON, without truncation.

Download JSON ↓
SourcesExcerpts: 7

Article 2219

Article 2219 La prescription extinctive est un mode d'extinction d'un droit résultant de l'inaction de son titulaire pendant un certain laps de temps.
Original data · JSON
JSONRead only
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:6df4090af33e5e220e1ccb8dce8f8d00f5f0e141aadbd8f85537aa44bf7a63f7",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2219",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2219"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2219",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:0b7ecca0ee814319db91d174578fb164b2ac80bbd82794ff733b36bd4f55401a",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2219\nLa prescription extinctive est un mode d'extinction d'un droit résultant de l'inaction de son titulaire pendant un certain laps de temps.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Article 2224

Article 2224 Les actions personnelles ou mobilières se prescrivent par cinq ans à compter du jour où le titulaire d'un droit a connu ou aurait dû connaître les faits lui permettant de l'exercer.
Original data · JSON
JSONRead only
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:bdab8bd64c835fd72d22b2500bf46d2189e23899c1a2355f5df83442df6121ab",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2224",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2224"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2224",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:672b74a19b0ebe429181790cbe798f0f53e22cb2eeb8706cded06dbf5a40c629",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2224\nLes actions personnelles ou mobilières se prescrivent par cinq ans à compter du jour où le titulaire d'un droit a connu ou aurait dû connaître les faits lui permettant de l'exercer.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Article 2228

Article 2228 La prescription se compte par jours, et non par heures.
Original data · JSON
JSONRead only
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:a65f1c87050358f486df72292dbb5562439921a55708065026e1560803461b7b",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2228",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2228"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2228",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:dd06365b6b1300407fadd02ddc12c5220fd9139343f3ce91809ff20bf62588a6",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2228\nLa prescription se compte par jours, et non par heures.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Article 2229

Article 2229 Elle est acquise lorsque le dernier jour du terme est accompli.
Original data · JSON
JSONRead only
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:43dd3aa87d9bddf34522d203c9afc34f12ce9f5292aa3748835cbccf72dfcccd",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2229",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2229"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2229",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:28578b7da1445ef66f205effb784bcc5dae77310d748b2ae6ccebd52a8ca3009",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2229\nElle est acquise lorsque le dernier jour du terme est accompli.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Article 2232

Article 2232 Le report du point de départ, la suspension ou l'interruption de la prescription ne peut avoir pour effet de porter le délai de la prescription extinctive au-delà de vingt ans à compter du jour de la naissance du droit. Le premier alinéa n'est pas applicable dans les cas mentionnés aux articles 2226, 2226-1, 2227, 2233 et 2236, au premier alinéa de l'article 2241 et à l'article 2244. Il ne s'applique pas non plus aux actions relatives à l'état des personnes.
Original data · JSON
JSONRead only
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:d0aa882fc857d081bcada43191910d722446f91fb14fb86b7e7322957b4070c8",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2232",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2232"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2232",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:b1a33bf6d27cec1af359949222bf7220bc63bc536ae53eb79e94833b5d293e0b",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2232\nLe report du point de départ, la suspension ou l'interruption de la prescription ne peut avoir pour effet de porter le délai de la prescription extinctive au-delà de vingt ans à compter du jour de la naissance du droit.\nLe premier alinéa n'est pas applicable dans les cas mentionnés aux articles 2226, 2226-1, 2227, 2233 et 2236, au premier alinéa de l'article 2241 et à l'article 2244. Il ne s'applique pas non plus aux actions relatives à l'état des personnes.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Article 2238

Article 2238 La prescription est suspendue à compter du jour où, après la survenance d'un litige, les parties conviennent de recourir à la médiation ou à la conciliation ou, à défaut d'accord écrit, à compter du jour de la première réunion de médiation ou de conciliation. La prescription est également suspendue à compter de la conclusion d'une convention de procédure participative ou à compter de l'accord du débiteur constaté par l'huissier de justice pour participer à la procédure prévue à l'article L. 125-1 du code des procédures civiles d'exécution. Le délai de prescription recommence à courir, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois, à compter de la date à laquelle soit l'une des parties ou les deux, soit le médiateur ou le conciliateur déclarent que la médiation ou la conciliation est terminée. En cas de convention de procédure participative, le délai de prescription recommence à courir à compter du terme de la convention, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois. En cas d'échec de la procédure prévue au même article, le délai de prescription recommence à courir à compter de la date du refus du débiteur, constaté par l'huissier, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois.
Original data · JSON
JSONRead only
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:85fb1ede52113abd61e7bcfa34017c1229badc1205a9cac686e65c4640912b6f",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2238",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2238"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2238",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:7de68d6ed845bcd95c5ca76851b7d5c42c0b755a0f7a53080cbbcbb127ac61f7",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2238\nLa prescription est suspendue à compter du jour où, après la survenance d'un litige, les parties conviennent de recourir à la médiation ou à la conciliation ou, à défaut d'accord écrit, à compter du jour de la première réunion de médiation ou de conciliation. La prescription est également suspendue à compter de la conclusion d'une convention de procédure participative ou à compter de l'accord du débiteur constaté par l'huissier de justice pour participer à la procédure prévue à l'article L. 125-1 du code des procédures civiles d'exécution.\nLe délai de prescription recommence à courir, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois, à compter de la date à laquelle soit l'une des parties ou les deux, soit le médiateur ou le conciliateur déclarent que la médiation ou la conciliation est terminée. En cas de convention de procédure participative, le délai de prescription recommence à courir à compter du terme de la convention, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois. En cas d'échec de la procédure prévue au même article, le délai de prescription recommence à courir à compter de la date du refus du débiteur, constaté par l'huissier, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Article 2239

Article 2239 La prescription est également suspendue lorsque le juge fait droit à une demande de mesure d'instruction présentée avant tout procès. Le délai de prescription recommence à courir, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois, à compter du jour où la mesure a été exécutée.
Original data · JSON
JSONRead only
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:16731a698eded878eaa02339d6b1fd92b7299d446eab076502a9c24717cfd0cc",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2239",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2239"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2239",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:9e742ac71c8ecd1fe04db3e3bfceb323387b9b856a4882cc1429615d47e89d12",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2239\nLa prescription est également suspendue lorsque le juge fait droit à une demande de mesure d'instruction présentée avant tout procès.\nLe délai de prescription recommence à courir, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois, à compter du jour où la mesure a été exécutée.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Packages in the snapshot

  • de.bgb.core
  • de.bgb.fristen
  • de.bgb.ius_privatum
  • doctrine.ius_privatum
  • fr.code_civil
  • unidroit.picc
  • unidroit.picc_limitation
Technical dataFull response, parameters and checksums
Calculation status
COMPUTED
Full engine response
Fünf Jahre, Code civil: die Klage ist verjährt

Complete machine result · JSON

This block is too large for inline viewing. It is included in full in the document JSON, without truncation.

Download JSON ↓

Execution · JSON

This block is too large for inline viewing. It is included in full in the document JSON, without truncation.

Download JSON ↓

Display metadata

This block is too large for inline viewing. It is included in full in the document JSON, without truncation.

Download JSON ↓

JSON · calculations, sources and exact data

JSONRead only
{
  "acts": [
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:a6813604c35567e7c586d334efbf524d08f3467170c4b732cfb15809cacf4ff4",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core",
      "package": "de.bgb.core"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:998148eaeeed28f1565811474ee7beb7eacc616c5681ed9638edc976512a9884",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
      "package": "de.bgb.fristen"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:86a5a00db16e32187223ceeec6748eb7d42d18b7c370c8b15ac64d2f3f655ff7",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum",
      "package": "de.bgb.ius_privatum"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:7202de5de49a8a9d12837bc19cb7008ba2d1a68dbcc0134e0afccf1440a6d5ed",
      "namespace": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum",
      "package": "doctrine.ius_privatum"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:ad41d027ba92c38ca5eecc1d16097d0bbc8c5a74946fc1a6397c6dadac61158f",
      "namespace": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
      "package": "fr.code_civil"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:719bfd408eed92ad497ba071482354d4ad32b81ef9f41c6654f224416c19e603",
      "namespace": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc",
      "package": "unidroit.picc"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:b311d0d422a1079f71113320bd818236f7b09507c7dd960bdafceb91285497d9",
      "namespace": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "package": "unidroit.picc_limitation"
    }
  ],
  "caseHash": "sha256:1cd2738ae024892e46fd2940deb1436562d2b339b4aef7c72b99c36680f1f4bd",
  "jurisdiction": "Deutschland",
  "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
  "mode": "audit",
  "programHash": "sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e",
  "resultHash": "sha256:1b7a72c8a363f484f2c126fd9af22e345b6113d651669e8d86fd57e78bc688c0",
  "timezone": "UTC"
}
evaluation SHA-256
sha256:0bcd196ba381c52743eee0b8127c89f485d0716b5b84dec4b642c17a4313c2e3
Original data · JSON
JSONRead only
{
  "args": [
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:causa",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "kind": "value",
      "type": {
        "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
      },
      "value": "2016-01-02"
    }
  ],
  "facts": [
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#creance_exigible_depuis"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#titulaire_connait_les_faits_le"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2016-01-02"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#action_introduite_le"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#prescription_non_interrompue"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
    }
  ],
  "kind": "truth",
  "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
  "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#action_prescrite_le"
}

Condition

Fünf Jahre, Code civil: das Rechtsmittel ist ausgeschlossen

Jurisdiction DeutschlandLaw as of 2016-01-02

Calculation result

Established

Input parameters

What we are finding

the remedy is excluded: by exception, consumption by contest, prescription, or the defendant's immunity

gscausa

Input facts

  • claim enforceable from this date

    causa: causajour: 15 March 2010
  • the right-holder knew the facts permitting the claim on this date

    causa: causajour: 15 March 2010
  • action brought on this date

    causa: causajour: 2 January 2016
  • limitation period neither interrupted nor suspended

    causa: causa
  • the claimant brings a claim against the defendant — the contested relation the question is about

    causa: causaactor: greus: s
Original data · JSON
JSONRead only
{
  "args": [
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:causa",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    }
  ],
  "facts": [
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#creance_exigible_depuis"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#titulaire_connait_les_faits_le"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2016-01-02"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#action_introduite_le"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#prescription_non_interrompue"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
    }
  ],
  "kind": "truth",
  "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
  "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"
}
Why this resultApplied rules and conditions

Derivation path10 steps

  1. 1

    action brought on this date

    causa: urn:p12:causa; jour: 2 January 2016

    case fact
  2. 2

    the right-holder knew the facts permitting the claim on this date

    causa: urn:p12:causa; jour: 15 March 2010

    case fact
  3. 3

    claim enforceable from this date

    causa: urn:p12:causa; jour: 15 March 2010

    case fact
  4. 4

    five years from the date of actual knowledge

    starting point of the five-year period: causa: urn:p12:causa; jour: 15 March 2010

    art. 2224

    Identifier
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#PointDepartConnaissanceReelle
    rule
  5. 5

    the claimant brings a claim against the defendant — the contested relation the question is about

    causa: urn:p12:causa; actor: urn:p12:persona:g; reus: urn:p12:persona:s

    case fact
  6. 6

    limitation period neither interrupted nor suspended

    causa: urn:p12:causa

    case fact
  7. 7

    five-year deadline counted by days

    15 March 2015 = add calendar period(15 March 2010, 5 calendar_year)

    art. 2224, art. 2228, art. 2229

    Identifier
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#EcheanceCinqAns
    rule
  8. 8

    the claim is time-barred after the last day has elapsed

    claim time-barred on this date: causa: urn:p12:causa; jour: 2 January 2016

    art. 2219, art. 2229

    Identifier
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#ActionPrescriteApresEcheance
    rule
  9. 9

    an extinctive limitation result excludes the remedy in the comparative private-law chain

    the remedy is excluded: by exception, consumption by contest, prescription, or the defendant's immunity: actor: urn:p12:persona:g; reus: urn:p12:persona:s; causa: urn:p12:causa

    art. 2219, art. 2224

    Identifier
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#PrescriptionExcludit
    rule
  10. 10

    Query evaluation

    query

verified by the engine: 5 · case fact: 5 · Full graph: 12 nodes

Steps of the saved proof from the case facts to the answer. Formulas are shown as written in the norm with bound values substituted; the page recomputes nothing.

Basis of this answer

Rules on the saved proof path for this answer.

fr.code_civil
  • the claim is time-barred after the last day has elapsed

    Identifier
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#ActionPrescriteApresEcheance
  • five-year deadline counted by days

    Identifier
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#EcheanceCinqAns
  • five years from the date of actual knowledge

    Identifier
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#PointDepartConnaissanceReelle
  • an extinctive limitation result excludes the remedy in the comparative private-law chain

    Identifier
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#PrescriptionExcludit
Other rules in the evaluation2

Applied in the overall evaluation, but not on the proof path for this answer.

fr.code_civil
  • Article 2232, paragraph 2. Without an opposable long-stop, the deadline after the floor is the applicable date

    Identifier
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#DateApplicableSansButoirOpposable
  • Without mediation, conciliation or an investigative measure, the period's deadline is not raised

    Identifier
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#EcheanceApresPlancherSansMinimale
Issues · 4
Execution issues
  1. infoEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31

    редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_EN на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 81 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)

    Affected nodes
    • Article 5.2.3. The conferment of rights in the beneficiary includes the right to invoke a clause in the contract which excludes or limits the liability of the beneficiary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryMayInvokeClause
    • Articles 5.2.1 and 5.2.2. The parties may confer a right on a third party who must be identifiable with adequate certainty by the contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryRightExists
    • Article 5.1.4(2). To the extent that an obligation involves a duty of best efforts, that party is bound to make such efforts as would be made by a reasonable person of the same kind urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BestEffortsDutyPerformed
    • Article 1.9(1). The parties are bound by any usage to which they have agreed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByAgreedUsage
    • Article 1.9(1). The parties are bound by practices which they have established between themselves urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByEstablishedPractice
    • Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage
    • Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage/unless/0
    • Article 5.3.3(1). A party who prevented fulfilment contrary to good faith may not rely on the non-fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnPreventedCondition
    • Article 5.3.3(2). A party who brought about fulfilment contrary to good faith may not rely on the fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnProcuredCondition
    • Article 4.3. In applying Articles 4.1 and 4.2, regard shall be had to all the circumstances, including those listed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CircumstanceToBeRegarded
    • Article 1.11. Where a party has more than one place of business the relevant one is that which has the closest relationship to the contract and its performance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ClosestPlaceIsRelevant
    • Article 4.1(2) (opening words). Where the common intention can be established, the reasonable-persons reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CommonIntentionDisplacesReasonablePersons
    • Article 1.12(2). The computed last day does not stand where it is a holiday at the place of performance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ComputedLastDayYieldsToHoliday
    • Article 4.6. If contract terms supplied by one party are unclear, an interpretation against that party is preferred urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContraProferentem
    • Article 1.3. A contract validly entered into is binding upon the parties urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContractIsBinding
    • Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#Cooperate
    • Article 5.2.4. The promisor may assert against the beneficiary all defences which the promisor could assert against the promisee urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DefencesAgainstBeneficiary
    • Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective
    • Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective/unless/0
    • Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyOfGoodFaith
    • Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToCooperate
    • Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRights
    • Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRightsBreached
    • Article 5.1.1. The contractual obligations of the parties may be express urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ExpressIsContractual
    • Article 5.1.5. In determining the extent to which an obligation involves a duty of best efforts or a duty to achieve a specific result, regard shall be had to the listed factors urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FactorDeterminesKindOfDuty
    • Article 1.1. The parties are free to enter into a contract and to determine its content urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FreedomOfContract
    • Article 1.6(2). Issues within the scope of these Principles but not expressly settled by them are as far as possible to be settled in accordance with their underlying general principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GapSettledByUnderlyingPrinciples
    • Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaith
    • Article 1.7(2). The parties may not exclude or limit the duty of good faith and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaithCannotBeExcluded
    • Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted
    • Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted/unless/0
    • Article 5.1.2(c). Implied obligations stem from good faith and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromGoodFaith
    • Article 5.1.2(a). Implied obligations stem from the nature and purpose of the contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromNatureAndPurpose
    • Article 5.1.2(b). Implied obligations stem from practices established between the parties and usages urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromPracticesAndUsages
    • Article 5.1.2(d). Implied obligations stem from reasonableness urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromReasonableness
    • Article 5.1.1. The contractual obligations of the parties may be implied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedIsContractual
    • Article 1.8. A party cannot act inconsistently with an understanding it has caused the other party to have and upon which that other party reasonably has acted in reliance to its detriment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InconsistentBehaviourBarred
    • Article 4.2(2) (opening words). Where the intention was known to the other party, the reasonable-person reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#IntentionDisplacesReasonablePerson
    • Article 4.1(1). A contract shall be interpreted according to the common intention of the parties urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByCommonIntention
    • Article 4.1(2). If the common intention cannot be established, the contract shall be interpreted according to the meaning reasonable persons of the same kind would give it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByReasonablePersons
    • Article 1.4. Nothing in these Principles restricts the application of mandatory rules urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MandatoryRulesUnrestricted
    • Article 5.1.7(2). Where the price is to be determined by one party and that determination is manifestly unreasonable, a reasonable price shall be substituted notwithstanding any contract term to the contrary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ManifestlyUnreasonableDeterminationReplaced
    • Preamble. These Principles may be applied when the parties have agreed that their contract be governed by general principles of law, the lex mercatoria or the like urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyOnChoiceOfGeneralPrinciples
    • Preamble. These Principles may be applied when the parties have not chosen any law to govern their contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyWhereNoLawChosen
    • Preamble. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement domestic law urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretDomesticLaw
    • Preamble. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement international uniform law instruments urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretUniformLaw
    • Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated as otherwise provided in these Principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationAsProvided
    • Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated by agreement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByAgreement
    • Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated in accordance with its terms urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByTerms
    • Article 1.2. Nothing in these Principles requires a contract to be made in or evidenced by a particular form urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoFormRequired
    • Article 1.10(2)-(3). A notice is effective when it reaches the person to whom it is given urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoticeEffectiveOnReceipt
    • Article 4.7. In case of discrepancy between equally authoritative versions there is a preference for the interpretation according to the original version urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#OriginalVersionPreferred
    • Article 1.12(1). Official holidays or non-business days occurring during the period are included in calculating it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodEndsOn
    • Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday
    • Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday/unless/0
    • Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PreserveRights
    • Article 5.1.7(1). Where a contract does not fix the price, the parties are considered to have made reference to the price generally charged in comparable circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceByMarket
    • Article 5.1.7(1). If no such price is available, a reasonable price applies urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceReasonableWhereNoMarket
    • Preamble. These Principles shall be applied when the parties have agreed that their contract be governed by them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PrinciplesGovernByAgreement
    • Article 5.1.6. Where the quality of performance is neither fixed by nor determinable from the contract, a party is bound to render a performance of a quality that is reasonable and not less than average in the circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#QualityWhereNotFixed
    • Articles 4.4 and 4.5. Terms are to be read in the light of the whole contract and so as to give effect to all of them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReadingConformsToCanons
    • Article 5.1.9(1). An obligee may release its right by agreement with the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReleaseByAgreement
    • Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone
    • Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone/unless/0
    • Article 5.2.6. The beneficiary may renounce a right conferred on it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RenunciationEndsBeneficiaryRight
    • Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract
    • Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract/unless/0
    • Article 5.3.5. On fulfilment of a resolutive condition the rules on restitution apply with appropriate adaptations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RestitutionOnResolutiveCondition
    • Article 5.1.4(1). To the extent that an obligation involves a duty to achieve a specific result, that party is bound to achieve that result urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResultDutyPerformed
    • Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance
    • Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance/unless/0
    • Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant
    • Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant/unless/0
    • Article 4.2(1). Statements and other conduct shall be interpreted according to the party's intention if the other party knew or could not have been unaware of it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByIntention
    • Article 4.2(2). If the preceding paragraph is not applicable, statements shall be interpreted according to the meaning a reasonable person would give them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByReasonablePerson
    • Article 4.8(1). Where the parties have not agreed with respect to an important term, a term which is appropriate in the circumstances shall be supplied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SupplyOmittedTerm
    • Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect
    • Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect/unless/0
    • Article 5.1.8. A contract for an indefinite period may be terminated by either party by giving notice a reasonable time in advance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#TerminationOfIndefiniteContract
    • Article 5.1.7(2). A manifestly unreasonable determination does not stand as the applicable price urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#UnreasonableDeterminationDisplaced
    • Article 5.3.1. A contract or a contractual obligation may be made conditional upon the occurrence of a future uncertain event urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ValidCondition
    Details
    {
     "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_EN",
     "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
     "since": null,
     "state": "not_yet",
     "status": null
    }
  2. infoEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31

    редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_FR на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 79 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)

    Affected nodes
    • Article 5.2.3. The conferment of rights in the beneficiary includes the right to invoke a clause in the contract which excludes or limits the liability of the beneficiary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryMayInvokeClause
    • Article 5.1.4(2). To the extent that an obligation involves a duty of best efforts, that party is bound to make such efforts as would be made by a reasonable person of the same kind urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BestEffortsDutyPerformed
    • Article 1.9(1). The parties are bound by any usage to which they have agreed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByAgreedUsage
    • Article 1.9(1). The parties are bound by practices which they have established between themselves urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByEstablishedPractice
    • Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage
    • Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage/unless/0
    • Article 5.3.3(1). A party who prevented fulfilment contrary to good faith may not rely on the non-fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnPreventedCondition
    • Article 5.3.3(2). A party who brought about fulfilment contrary to good faith may not rely on the fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnProcuredCondition
    • Article 4.3. In applying Articles 4.1 and 4.2, regard shall be had to all the circumstances, including those listed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CircumstanceToBeRegarded
    • Article 1.11. Where a party has more than one place of business the relevant one is that which has the closest relationship to the contract and its performance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ClosestPlaceIsRelevant
    • Article 4.1(2) (opening words). Where the common intention can be established, the reasonable-persons reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CommonIntentionDisplacesReasonablePersons
    • Article 1.12(2). The computed last day does not stand where it is a holiday at the place of performance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ComputedLastDayYieldsToHoliday
    • Article 4.6. If contract terms supplied by one party are unclear, an interpretation against that party is preferred urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContraProferentem
    • Article 1.3. A contract validly entered into is binding upon the parties urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContractIsBinding
    • Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#Cooperate
    • Article 5.2.4. The promisor may assert against the beneficiary all defences which the promisor could assert against the promisee urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DefencesAgainstBeneficiary
    • Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective
    • Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective/unless/0
    • Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyOfGoodFaith
    • Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToCooperate
    • Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRights
    • Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRightsBreached
    • Article 5.1.1. The contractual obligations of the parties may be express urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ExpressIsContractual
    • Article 5.1.5. In determining the extent to which an obligation involves a duty of best efforts or a duty to achieve a specific result, regard shall be had to the listed factors urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FactorDeterminesKindOfDuty
    • Article 1.1. The parties are free to enter into a contract and to determine its content urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FreedomOfContract
    • Article 1.6(2). Issues within the scope of these Principles but not expressly settled by them are as far as possible to be settled in accordance with their underlying general principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GapSettledByUnderlyingPrinciples
    • Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaith
    • Article 1.7(2). The parties may not exclude or limit the duty of good faith and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaithCannotBeExcluded
    • Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted
    • Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted/unless/0
    • Article 5.1.2(c). Implied obligations stem from good faith and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromGoodFaith
    • Article 5.1.2(a). Implied obligations stem from the nature and purpose of the contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromNatureAndPurpose
    • Article 5.1.2(b). Implied obligations stem from practices established between the parties and usages urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromPracticesAndUsages
    • Article 5.1.2(d). Implied obligations stem from reasonableness urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromReasonableness
    • Article 5.1.1. The contractual obligations of the parties may be implied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedIsContractual
    • Article 1.8. A party cannot act inconsistently with an understanding it has caused the other party to have and upon which that other party reasonably has acted in reliance to its detriment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InconsistentBehaviourBarred
    • Article 4.2(2) (opening words). Where the intention was known to the other party, the reasonable-person reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#IntentionDisplacesReasonablePerson
    • Article 4.1(1). A contract shall be interpreted according to the common intention of the parties urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByCommonIntention
    • Article 4.1(2). If the common intention cannot be established, the contract shall be interpreted according to the meaning reasonable persons of the same kind would give it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByReasonablePersons
    • Article 1.4. Nothing in these Principles restricts the application of mandatory rules urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MandatoryRulesUnrestricted
    • Article 5.1.7(2). Where the price is to be determined by one party and that determination is manifestly unreasonable, a reasonable price shall be substituted notwithstanding any contract term to the contrary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ManifestlyUnreasonableDeterminationReplaced
    • Preamble. These Principles may be applied when the parties have agreed that their contract be governed by general principles of law, the lex mercatoria or the like urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyOnChoiceOfGeneralPrinciples
    • Preamble. These Principles may be applied when the parties have not chosen any law to govern their contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyWhereNoLawChosen
    • Preamble. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement domestic law urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretDomesticLaw
    • Preamble. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement international uniform law instruments urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretUniformLaw
    • Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated as otherwise provided in these Principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationAsProvided
    • Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated by agreement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByAgreement
    • Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated in accordance with its terms urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByTerms
    • Article 1.2. Nothing in these Principles requires a contract to be made in or evidenced by a particular form urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoFormRequired
    • Article 1.10(2)-(3). A notice is effective when it reaches the person to whom it is given urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoticeEffectiveOnReceipt
    • Article 4.7. In case of discrepancy between equally authoritative versions there is a preference for the interpretation according to the original version urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#OriginalVersionPreferred
    • Article 1.12(1). Official holidays or non-business days occurring during the period are included in calculating it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodEndsOn
    • Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday
    • Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday/unless/0
    • Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PreserveRights
    • Article 5.1.7(1). Where a contract does not fix the price, the parties are considered to have made reference to the price generally charged in comparable circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceByMarket
    • Article 5.1.7(1). If no such price is available, a reasonable price applies urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceReasonableWhereNoMarket
    • Preamble. These Principles shall be applied when the parties have agreed that their contract be governed by them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PrinciplesGovernByAgreement
    • Article 5.1.6. Where the quality of performance is neither fixed by nor determinable from the contract, a party is bound to render a performance of a quality that is reasonable and not less than average in the circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#QualityWhereNotFixed
    • Article 5.1.9(1). An obligee may release its right by agreement with the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReleaseByAgreement
    • Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone
    • Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone/unless/0
    • Article 5.2.6. The beneficiary may renounce a right conferred on it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RenunciationEndsBeneficiaryRight
    • Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract
    • Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract/unless/0
    • Article 5.3.5. On fulfilment of a resolutive condition the rules on restitution apply with appropriate adaptations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RestitutionOnResolutiveCondition
    • Article 5.1.4(1). To the extent that an obligation involves a duty to achieve a specific result, that party is bound to achieve that result urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResultDutyPerformed
    • Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance
    • Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance/unless/0
    • Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant
    • Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant/unless/0
    • Article 4.2(1). Statements and other conduct shall be interpreted according to the party's intention if the other party knew or could not have been unaware of it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByIntention
    • Article 4.2(2). If the preceding paragraph is not applicable, statements shall be interpreted according to the meaning a reasonable person would give them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByReasonablePerson
    • Article 4.8(1). Where the parties have not agreed with respect to an important term, a term which is appropriate in the circumstances shall be supplied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SupplyOmittedTerm
    • Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect
    • Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect/unless/0
    • Article 5.1.8. A contract for an indefinite period may be terminated by either party by giving notice a reasonable time in advance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#TerminationOfIndefiniteContract
    • Article 5.1.7(2). A manifestly unreasonable determination does not stand as the applicable price urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#UnreasonableDeterminationDisplaced
    • Article 5.3.1. A contract or a contractual obligation may be made conditional upon the occurrence of a future uncertain event urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ValidCondition
    Details
    {
     "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_FR",
     "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
     "since": null,
     "state": "not_yet",
     "status": null
    }
  3. infoEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31

    редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_EN на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 26 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)

    Affected nodes
    • Article 10.4(1). Where the obligor acknowledges the right before the expiration of the general limitation period, a new general limitation period begins on the day after the acknowledgement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AcknowledgementStartsNewGeneralPeriod
    • Article 10.6(1). In the absence of provisions determining the exact date of commencement, arbitral proceedings are deemed to commence on the date on which the request reaches the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ArbitrationCommencesOnRequest
    • Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration
    • Article 10.1(2). This Chapter does not govern the time within which a party must give notice or perform any act other than the institution of legal proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ChapterDoesNotGovernNoticeTime
    • Article 10.9(1). The expiration of the limitation period does not extinguish the right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight
    • Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted
    • Article 10.9(2). Once the obligor has asserted expiry, the barred exercise is a comparative remedium_exclusum urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit
    • Article 10.3(a). The parties may not shorten the general limitation period to less than one year urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodFloorOfOneYear
    • Article 10.2(1). The general limitation period is three years beginning on the day after the day the obligee knows or ought to know the facts as a result of which the right can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodOfThreeYears
    • Article 10.1(1). The exercise of rights governed by the Principles is barred by the expiration of a limitation period according to the rules of this Chapter urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#LimitationGovernsExerciseOfRights
    • Article 10.3(c). The parties may not extend the maximum limitation period to more than fifteen years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodCeilingOfFifteenYears
    • Article 10.4(2). The maximum limitation period does not begin to run again, but may be exceeded by the beginning of a new general limitation period urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodDoesNotRestart
    • Article 10.3(b). The parties may not shorten the maximum limitation period to less than four years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodFloorOfFourYears
    • Article 10.2(2). In any event, the maximum limitation period is ten years beginning on the day after the day the right can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodOfTenYears
    • Article 10.11. Where there has been performance in order to discharge an obligation, there is no right of restitution merely because the limitation period has expired urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#NoRestitutionAfterExpiration
    • Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration
    • Article 10.3. The parties may modify the limitation periods urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PartiesMayModifyPeriods
    • Article 10.9(3). A right may still be relied on as a defence even though the expiration of the limitation period for that right has been asserted urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#RightStillAvailableAsDefence
    • Article 10.10. The obligee may exercise the right of set-off until the obligor has asserted the expiration of the limitation period urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SetOffUntilExpirationAsserted
    • Article 10.7. Articles 10.5 and 10.6 apply with appropriate modifications to proceedings whereby the parties request a third person to assist them in reaching an amicable settlement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByAmicableSettlementProceedings
    • Article 10.6(1). The running of the limitation period is suspended when the obligee performs an act recognised by the law of the arbitral tribunal as asserting its right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByArbitralAct
    • Article 10.5(1)(c). The running of the limitation period is suspended where the obligee has asserted its rights in proceedings for dissolution of the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByDissolutionClaim
    • Article 10.8(1). Where the obligee has been prevented by an impediment beyond its control, the general limitation period is suspended so as not to expire before one year after the impediment has ceased to exist urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByImpediment
    • Article 10.8(2). Where the impediment consists of the incapacity or death of a party, suspension ceases when a representative or successor has been appointed; the additional one-year period applies accordingly urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByIncapacityEndsOnAppointment
    • Article 10.5(1)(b). The running of the limitation period is suspended where the obligee has asserted its rights in the insolvency proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByInsolvencyClaim
    • Article 10.5(1)(a). The running of the limitation period is suspended when the obligee performs an act recognised by the law of the court as asserting its right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByJudicialAct
    Details
    {
     "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_EN",
     "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
     "since": null,
     "state": "not_yet",
     "status": null
    }
  4. infoEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31

    редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_FR на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 26 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)

    Affected nodes
    • Article 10.4(1). Where the obligor acknowledges the right before the expiration of the general limitation period, a new general limitation period begins on the day after the acknowledgement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AcknowledgementStartsNewGeneralPeriod
    • Article 10.6(1). In the absence of provisions determining the exact date of commencement, arbitral proceedings are deemed to commence on the date on which the request reaches the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ArbitrationCommencesOnRequest
    • Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration
    • Article 10.1(2). This Chapter does not govern the time within which a party must give notice or perform any act other than the institution of legal proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ChapterDoesNotGovernNoticeTime
    • Article 10.9(1). The expiration of the limitation period does not extinguish the right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight
    • Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted
    • Article 10.9(2). Once the obligor has asserted expiry, the barred exercise is a comparative remedium_exclusum urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit
    • Article 10.3(a). The parties may not shorten the general limitation period to less than one year urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodFloorOfOneYear
    • Article 10.2(1). The general limitation period is three years beginning on the day after the day the obligee knows or ought to know the facts as a result of which the right can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodOfThreeYears
    • Article 10.1(1). The exercise of rights governed by the Principles is barred by the expiration of a limitation period according to the rules of this Chapter urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#LimitationGovernsExerciseOfRights
    • Article 10.3(c). The parties may not extend the maximum limitation period to more than fifteen years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodCeilingOfFifteenYears
    • Article 10.4(2). The maximum limitation period does not begin to run again, but may be exceeded by the beginning of a new general limitation period urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodDoesNotRestart
    • Article 10.3(b). The parties may not shorten the maximum limitation period to less than four years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodFloorOfFourYears
    • Article 10.2(2). In any event, the maximum limitation period is ten years beginning on the day after the day the right can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodOfTenYears
    • Article 10.11. Where there has been performance in order to discharge an obligation, there is no right of restitution merely because the limitation period has expired urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#NoRestitutionAfterExpiration
    • Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration
    • Article 10.3. The parties may modify the limitation periods urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PartiesMayModifyPeriods
    • Article 10.9(3). A right may still be relied on as a defence even though the expiration of the limitation period for that right has been asserted urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#RightStillAvailableAsDefence
    • Article 10.10. The obligee may exercise the right of set-off until the obligor has asserted the expiration of the limitation period urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SetOffUntilExpirationAsserted
    • Article 10.7. Articles 10.5 and 10.6 apply with appropriate modifications to proceedings whereby the parties request a third person to assist them in reaching an amicable settlement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByAmicableSettlementProceedings
    • Article 10.6(1). The running of the limitation period is suspended when the obligee performs an act recognised by the law of the arbitral tribunal as asserting its right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByArbitralAct
    • Article 10.5(1)(c). The running of the limitation period is suspended where the obligee has asserted its rights in proceedings for dissolution of the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByDissolutionClaim
    • Article 10.8(1). Where the obligee has been prevented by an impediment beyond its control, the general limitation period is suspended so as not to expire before one year after the impediment has ceased to exist urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByImpediment
    • Article 10.8(2). Where the impediment consists of the incapacity or death of a party, suspension ceases when a representative or successor has been appointed; the additional one-year period applies accordingly urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByIncapacityEndsOnAppointment
    • Article 10.5(1)(b). The running of the limitation period is suspended where the obligee has asserted its rights in the insolvency proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByInsolvencyClaim
    • Article 10.5(1)(a). The running of the limitation period is suspended when the obligee performs an act recognised by the law of the court as asserting its right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByJudicialAct
    Details
    {
     "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_FR",
     "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
     "since": null,
     "state": "not_yet",
     "status": null
    }

As recorded by the engine: code, severity and message with §-references; order follows the evaluation document.

Proof graph

Proof graph · 6 layer
query_evaluationremedium_exclusumrule_applicationPrescriptionExcluditrule_applicationActionPrescriteApresEcheanceassertionpetitiorule_applicationEcheanceCinqAnsassertionaction_introduite_lerule_applicationPointDepartConnaissanceReelleassertionprescription_non_interrompueassertiontitulaire_connait_les_faits_leassertioncreance_exigible_depuis

Proof nodes: 12 · assertion 5, rule_application 6, query_evaluation 1

This block is too large for inline viewing. It is included in full in the document JSON, without truncation.

Download JSON ↓
Calendar and proof identifiers
Proof reference
case/FuenfJahre_CC/query/remedium-exclusum
Original reasoning · JSON

This block is too large for inline viewing. It is included in full in the document JSON, without truncation.

Download JSON ↓
SourcesExcerpts: 7

Article 2219

Article 2219 La prescription extinctive est un mode d'extinction d'un droit résultant de l'inaction de son titulaire pendant un certain laps de temps.
Original data · JSON
JSONRead only
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:6df4090af33e5e220e1ccb8dce8f8d00f5f0e141aadbd8f85537aa44bf7a63f7",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2219",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2219"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2219",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:0b7ecca0ee814319db91d174578fb164b2ac80bbd82794ff733b36bd4f55401a",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2219\nLa prescription extinctive est un mode d'extinction d'un droit résultant de l'inaction de son titulaire pendant un certain laps de temps.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Article 2224

Article 2224 Les actions personnelles ou mobilières se prescrivent par cinq ans à compter du jour où le titulaire d'un droit a connu ou aurait dû connaître les faits lui permettant de l'exercer.
Original data · JSON
JSONRead only
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:bdab8bd64c835fd72d22b2500bf46d2189e23899c1a2355f5df83442df6121ab",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2224",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2224"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2224",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:672b74a19b0ebe429181790cbe798f0f53e22cb2eeb8706cded06dbf5a40c629",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2224\nLes actions personnelles ou mobilières se prescrivent par cinq ans à compter du jour où le titulaire d'un droit a connu ou aurait dû connaître les faits lui permettant de l'exercer.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Article 2228

Article 2228 La prescription se compte par jours, et non par heures.
Original data · JSON
JSONRead only
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:a65f1c87050358f486df72292dbb5562439921a55708065026e1560803461b7b",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2228",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2228"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2228",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:dd06365b6b1300407fadd02ddc12c5220fd9139343f3ce91809ff20bf62588a6",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2228\nLa prescription se compte par jours, et non par heures.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Article 2229

Article 2229 Elle est acquise lorsque le dernier jour du terme est accompli.
Original data · JSON
JSONRead only
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:43dd3aa87d9bddf34522d203c9afc34f12ce9f5292aa3748835cbccf72dfcccd",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2229",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2229"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2229",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:28578b7da1445ef66f205effb784bcc5dae77310d748b2ae6ccebd52a8ca3009",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2229\nElle est acquise lorsque le dernier jour du terme est accompli.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Article 2232

Article 2232 Le report du point de départ, la suspension ou l'interruption de la prescription ne peut avoir pour effet de porter le délai de la prescription extinctive au-delà de vingt ans à compter du jour de la naissance du droit. Le premier alinéa n'est pas applicable dans les cas mentionnés aux articles 2226, 2226-1, 2227, 2233 et 2236, au premier alinéa de l'article 2241 et à l'article 2244. Il ne s'applique pas non plus aux actions relatives à l'état des personnes.
Original data · JSON
JSONRead only
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:d0aa882fc857d081bcada43191910d722446f91fb14fb86b7e7322957b4070c8",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2232",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2232"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2232",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:b1a33bf6d27cec1af359949222bf7220bc63bc536ae53eb79e94833b5d293e0b",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2232\nLe report du point de départ, la suspension ou l'interruption de la prescription ne peut avoir pour effet de porter le délai de la prescription extinctive au-delà de vingt ans à compter du jour de la naissance du droit.\nLe premier alinéa n'est pas applicable dans les cas mentionnés aux articles 2226, 2226-1, 2227, 2233 et 2236, au premier alinéa de l'article 2241 et à l'article 2244. Il ne s'applique pas non plus aux actions relatives à l'état des personnes.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Article 2238

Article 2238 La prescription est suspendue à compter du jour où, après la survenance d'un litige, les parties conviennent de recourir à la médiation ou à la conciliation ou, à défaut d'accord écrit, à compter du jour de la première réunion de médiation ou de conciliation. La prescription est également suspendue à compter de la conclusion d'une convention de procédure participative ou à compter de l'accord du débiteur constaté par l'huissier de justice pour participer à la procédure prévue à l'article L. 125-1 du code des procédures civiles d'exécution. Le délai de prescription recommence à courir, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois, à compter de la date à laquelle soit l'une des parties ou les deux, soit le médiateur ou le conciliateur déclarent que la médiation ou la conciliation est terminée. En cas de convention de procédure participative, le délai de prescription recommence à courir à compter du terme de la convention, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois. En cas d'échec de la procédure prévue au même article, le délai de prescription recommence à courir à compter de la date du refus du débiteur, constaté par l'huissier, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois.
Original data · JSON
JSONRead only
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:85fb1ede52113abd61e7bcfa34017c1229badc1205a9cac686e65c4640912b6f",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2238",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2238"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2238",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:7de68d6ed845bcd95c5ca76851b7d5c42c0b755a0f7a53080cbbcbb127ac61f7",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2238\nLa prescription est suspendue à compter du jour où, après la survenance d'un litige, les parties conviennent de recourir à la médiation ou à la conciliation ou, à défaut d'accord écrit, à compter du jour de la première réunion de médiation ou de conciliation. La prescription est également suspendue à compter de la conclusion d'une convention de procédure participative ou à compter de l'accord du débiteur constaté par l'huissier de justice pour participer à la procédure prévue à l'article L. 125-1 du code des procédures civiles d'exécution.\nLe délai de prescription recommence à courir, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois, à compter de la date à laquelle soit l'une des parties ou les deux, soit le médiateur ou le conciliateur déclarent que la médiation ou la conciliation est terminée. En cas de convention de procédure participative, le délai de prescription recommence à courir à compter du terme de la convention, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois. En cas d'échec de la procédure prévue au même article, le délai de prescription recommence à courir à compter de la date du refus du débiteur, constaté par l'huissier, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Article 2239

Article 2239 La prescription est également suspendue lorsque le juge fait droit à une demande de mesure d'instruction présentée avant tout procès. Le délai de prescription recommence à courir, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois, à compter du jour où la mesure a été exécutée.
Original data · JSON
JSONRead only
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:16731a698eded878eaa02339d6b1fd92b7299d446eab076502a9c24717cfd0cc",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2239",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2239"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2239",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:9e742ac71c8ecd1fe04db3e3bfceb323387b9b856a4882cc1429615d47e89d12",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2239\nLa prescription est également suspendue lorsque le juge fait droit à une demande de mesure d'instruction présentée avant tout procès.\nLe délai de prescription recommence à courir, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois, à compter du jour où la mesure a été exécutée.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Packages in the snapshot

  • de.bgb.core
  • de.bgb.fristen
  • de.bgb.ius_privatum
  • doctrine.ius_privatum
  • fr.code_civil
  • unidroit.picc
  • unidroit.picc_limitation
Technical dataFull response, parameters and checksums
Calculation status
COMPUTED
Full engine response
Fünf Jahre, Code civil: das Rechtsmittel ist ausgeschlossen

Complete machine result · JSON

This block is too large for inline viewing. It is included in full in the document JSON, without truncation.

Download JSON ↓

Execution · JSON

This block is too large for inline viewing. It is included in full in the document JSON, without truncation.

Download JSON ↓

Display metadata

This block is too large for inline viewing. It is included in full in the document JSON, without truncation.

Download JSON ↓

JSON · calculations, sources and exact data

JSONRead only
{
  "acts": [
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:a6813604c35567e7c586d334efbf524d08f3467170c4b732cfb15809cacf4ff4",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core",
      "package": "de.bgb.core"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:998148eaeeed28f1565811474ee7beb7eacc616c5681ed9638edc976512a9884",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
      "package": "de.bgb.fristen"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:86a5a00db16e32187223ceeec6748eb7d42d18b7c370c8b15ac64d2f3f655ff7",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum",
      "package": "de.bgb.ius_privatum"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:7202de5de49a8a9d12837bc19cb7008ba2d1a68dbcc0134e0afccf1440a6d5ed",
      "namespace": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum",
      "package": "doctrine.ius_privatum"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:ad41d027ba92c38ca5eecc1d16097d0bbc8c5a74946fc1a6397c6dadac61158f",
      "namespace": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
      "package": "fr.code_civil"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:719bfd408eed92ad497ba071482354d4ad32b81ef9f41c6654f224416c19e603",
      "namespace": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc",
      "package": "unidroit.picc"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:b311d0d422a1079f71113320bd818236f7b09507c7dd960bdafceb91285497d9",
      "namespace": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "package": "unidroit.picc_limitation"
    }
  ],
  "caseHash": "sha256:1cd2738ae024892e46fd2940deb1436562d2b339b4aef7c72b99c36680f1f4bd",
  "jurisdiction": "Deutschland",
  "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
  "mode": "audit",
  "programHash": "sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e",
  "resultHash": "sha256:e7b66d5baa5e7549686900b9d08e95ca26887f3d7ee53eaf713bbc3700ff2578",
  "timezone": "UTC"
}
evaluation SHA-256
sha256:634f4470f8c92a90a0ff084228d2a8f088f1c16eb8df83ef622972cb380b4b81
Original data · JSON
JSONRead only
{
  "args": [
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:causa",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    }
  ],
  "facts": [
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#creance_exigible_depuis"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2010-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#titulaire_connait_les_faits_le"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2016-01-02"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#action_introduite_le"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#prescription_non_interrompue"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
    }
  ],
  "kind": "truth",
  "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
  "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"
}

Nach dem Code civil ist die Klage verjährt, und das Rechtsmittel ist ausgeschlossen.

Condition

Fünf Jahre, PICC: das Rechtsmittel ist ausgeschlossen

Jurisdiction DeutschlandLaw as of 2016-06-01

Calculation result

Established

Input parameters

What we are finding

the remedy is excluded: by exception, consumption by contest, prescription, or the defendant's immunity

gscausa

Input facts

  • the right belongs to the obligee against the obligor under that contract

    r: rightc: contractobligee: obligeeobligor: obligor
  • the limitation period for the right has expired

    r: right
  • the obligor has asserted the expiration of the limitation period as a defence

    r: right
  • the contracting party appears in the comparative chain as this persona

    px
    obligeeg
    obligors
  • this right is the comparative causa

    r: rightc: causa
  • the claimant brings a claim against the defendant — the contested relation the question is about

    causa: causaactor: greus: s
Original data · JSON
JSONRead only
{
  "args": [
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:causa",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    }
  ],
  "facts": [
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:right",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:contract",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:obligee",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:obligor",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#right_of"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:right",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#limitation_expired"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:right",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#expiration_asserted_as_defence"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:obligee",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#persona_of_party"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:obligor",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#persona_of_party"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:right",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#causa_of_right"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
    }
  ],
  "kind": "truth",
  "legalTime": "2016-06-01",
  "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"
}
Why this resultApplied rules and conditions

Derivation path10 steps

  1. 1

    the obligor has asserted the expiration of the limitation period as a defence

    r: urn:p12:right

    case fact
  2. 2

    this right is the comparative causa

    r: urn:p12:right; c: urn:p12:causa

    case fact
  3. 3

    the limitation period for the right has expired

    r: urn:p12:right

    case fact
  4. 4

    Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence

    the expiration of the limitation period has effect and bars the exercise of the right (article 10.9(2)): r: urn:p12:right

    art. 10_9, art. 10_9

    Identifier
    urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted
    rule
  5. 5

    the contracting party appears in the comparative chain as this persona

    p: urn:p12:obligee; x: urn:p12:persona:g

    case fact
  6. 6

    the contracting party appears in the comparative chain as this persona

    p: urn:p12:obligor; x: urn:p12:persona:s

    case fact
  7. 7

    the claimant brings a claim against the defendant — the contested relation the question is about

    causa: urn:p12:causa; actor: urn:p12:persona:g; reus: urn:p12:persona:s

    case fact
  8. 8

    the right belongs to the obligee against the obligor under that contract

    r: urn:p12:right; c: urn:p12:contract; obligee: urn:p12:obligee; obligor: urn:p12:obligor

    case fact
  9. 9

    Article 10.9(2). Once the obligor has asserted expiry, the barred exercise is a comparative remedium_exclusum

    the remedy is excluded: by exception, consumption by contest, prescription, or the defendant's immunity: actor: urn:p12:persona:g; reus: urn:p12:persona:s; causa: urn:p12:causa

    art. 10_9, art. 10_9

    Identifier
    urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit
    rule
  10. 10

    Query evaluation

    query

verified by the engine: 3 · case fact: 7 · Full graph: 15 nodes

Steps of the saved proof from the case facts to the answer. Formulas are shown as written in the norm with bound values substituted; the page recomputes nothing.

Basis of this answer

Rules on the saved proof path for this answer.

unidroit.picc_limitation
  • Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence

    Identifier
    urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted
  • Article 10.9(2). Once the obligor has asserted expiry, the barred exercise is a comparative remedium_exclusum

    Identifier
    urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit
Other rules in the evaluation1

Applied in the overall evaluation, but not on the proof path for this answer.

unidroit.picc_limitation
  • Article 10.9(1). The expiration of the limitation period does not extinguish the right

    Identifier
    urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight

Proof graph

Proof graph · 4 layer
query_evaluationremedium_exclusumrule_applicationExpiryExcluditrule_applicationExpirationNeedsToBeAssertedassertioncausa_of_rightassertionpersona_of_partyassertionpersona_of_partyassertionpetitioassertionright_ofassertionexpiration_asserted_as_defenceassertionlimitation_expired

Proof nodes: 15 · assertion 7, rule_application 3, candidate_closure 2, norm_creation 2, query_evaluation 1

assertion · urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#asserted
attributes
assertion
asserted
conclusion
Arguments
  • Identifier
    right
    Type
    entity_ref
Type
literal
Polarity
positive
Condition
expiration_asserted_as_defence
evidence
—
Identifier
asserted
Type
assertion
Premises
—
sourceAnchors
—
assertion · urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#causa
attributes
assertion
causa
conclusion
Arguments
  • Identifier
    right
    Type
    entity_ref
  • Identifier
    causa
    Type
    entity_ref
Type
literal
Polarity
positive
Condition
causa_of_right
evidence
—
Identifier
causa
Type
assertion
Premises
—
sourceAnchors
—
assertion · urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#expired
attributes
assertion
expired
conclusion
Arguments
  • Identifier
    right
    Type
    entity_ref
Type
literal
Polarity
positive
Condition
limitation_expired
evidence
—
Identifier
expired
Type
assertion
Premises
—
sourceAnchors
—
rule_application · urn:proof:apply:ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight:e72996a2c7c818667c2d5d0c4953a8cd27d6a6e1543f4123a71643aa9d0f1fd7
attributes
—
conclusion
Arguments
  • Identifier
    right
    Type
    entity_ref
Type
literal
Polarity
positive
Condition
right_not_extinguished
evidence
—
Identifier
e72996a2c7c818667c2d5d0c4953a8cd27d6a6e1543f4123a71643aa9d0f1fd7
Type
rule_application
Premises
  • expired
Rule
ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight
sourceAnchors
—
substitution
v0
Identifier
right
Type
entity_ref
rule_application · urn:proof:apply:ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted:b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a
attributes
strength
defeasible
conclusion
Arguments
  • Identifier
    right
    Type
    entity_ref
Type
literal
Polarity
positive
Condition
exercise_barred
evidence
—
Identifier
b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a
Type
rule_application
Premises
  • asserted
  • expired
Rule
ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted
sourceAnchors
—
substitution
v0
Identifier
right
Type
entity_ref
assertion · urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-ee
attributes
assertion
persona-ee
conclusion
Arguments
  • Identifier
    obligee
    Type
    entity_ref
  • Identifier
    g
    Type
    entity_ref
Type
literal
Polarity
positive
Condition
persona_of_party
evidence
—
Identifier
persona-ee
Type
assertion
Premises
—
sourceAnchors
—
assertion · urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-or
attributes
assertion
persona-or
conclusion
Arguments
  • Identifier
    obligor
    Type
    entity_ref
  • Identifier
    s
    Type
    entity_ref
Type
literal
Polarity
positive
Condition
persona_of_party
evidence
—
Identifier
persona-or
Type
assertion
Premises
—
sourceAnchors
—
assertion · urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#petitio
attributes
assertion
petitio
conclusion
Arguments
  • Identifier
    causa
    Type
    entity_ref
  • Identifier
    g
    Type
    entity_ref
  • Identifier
    s
    Type
    entity_ref
Type
literal
Polarity
positive
Condition
petitio
evidence
—
Identifier
petitio
Type
assertion
Premises
—
sourceAnchors
—
assertion · urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#right
attributes
assertion
right
conclusion
Arguments
  • Identifier
    right
    Type
    entity_ref
  • Identifier
    contract
    Type
    entity_ref
  • Identifier
    obligee
    Type
    entity_ref
  • Identifier
    obligor
    Type
    entity_ref
Type
literal
Polarity
positive
Condition
right_of
evidence
—
Identifier
right
Type
assertion
Premises
—
sourceAnchors
—
rule_application · urn:proof:apply:ExpiryExcludit:3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08
attributes
strength
defeasible
conclusion
Arguments
  • Identifier
    g
    Type
    entity_ref
  • Identifier
    s
    Type
    entity_ref
  • Identifier
    causa
    Type
    entity_ref
Type
literal
Polarity
positive
Condition
remedium_exclusum
evidence
—
Identifier
3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08
Type
rule_application
Premises
  • b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a
  • causa
  • persona-ee
  • persona-or
  • petitio
  • right
Rule
ExpiryExcludit
sourceAnchors
—
substitution
v0
Identifier
right
Type
entity_ref
v1
Identifier
contract
Type
entity_ref
v2
Identifier
obligee
Type
entity_ref
v3
Identifier
obligor
Type
entity_ref
v4
Identifier
g
Type
entity_ref
v5
Identifier
s
Type
entity_ref
v6
Identifier
causa
Type
entity_ref
candidate_closure · urn:proof:closure:5c179d0511534ea8f4a0279345ef7a2b1a23bdcc26d6d1612de2857c05a880e8
attributes
allApplicableCandidateIds
  • b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a
conflictKey
{"args":[{"id":"urn:p12:right","kind":"entity_ref"}],"predicate":"urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#exercise_barred"}
evaluationInputSemanticHash
sha256:65ecdb8c6264f3a7a6d29f6d5192ec6abc010262def4a431ab776e2e4c296189
priorityGraphHash
sha256:6b3988214869dbb43cb853d84175aa853fdc4ae24ef2c02a3ad2ff6ee9175009
programSemanticHash
sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e
stratum
0
survivingCandidateIds
  • b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a
conclusion
Arguments
  • Identifier
    right
    Type
    entity_ref
Type
literal
Polarity
positive
Condition
exercise_barred
evidence
—
Identifier
5c179d0511534ea8f4a0279345ef7a2b1a23bdcc26d6d1612de2857c05a880e8
Type
candidate_closure
Premises
  • b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a
sourceAnchors
—
candidate_closure · urn:proof:closure:8638c0c81bea0030247e55a2eb549849cac9d6601dd0c7d8e6f6cd4a9fa342a6
attributes
allApplicableCandidateIds
  • 3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08
conflictKey
{"args":[{"id":"urn:p12:persona:g","kind":"entity_ref"},{"id":"urn:p12:persona:s","kind":"entity_ref"},{"id":"urn:p12:causa","kind":"entity_ref"}],"predicate":"urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"}
evaluationInputSemanticHash
sha256:65ecdb8c6264f3a7a6d29f6d5192ec6abc010262def4a431ab776e2e4c296189
priorityGraphHash
sha256:6b3988214869dbb43cb853d84175aa853fdc4ae24ef2c02a3ad2ff6ee9175009
programSemanticHash
sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e
stratum
1
survivingCandidateIds
  • 3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08
conclusion
Arguments
  • Identifier
    g
    Type
    entity_ref
  • Identifier
    s
    Type
    entity_ref
  • Identifier
    causa
    Type
    entity_ref
Type
literal
Polarity
positive
Condition
remedium_exclusum
evidence
—
Identifier
8638c0c81bea0030247e55a2eb549849cac9d6601dd0c7d8e6f6cd4a9fa342a6
Type
candidate_closure
Premises
  • 3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08
sourceAnchors
—
norm_creation · urn:proof:norm:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:afdfdc38f985ee76be6696fefa043d02eab3f3028a81eda75212e7e7e40626cd
attributes
Rule
ObligorMayAssertExpiration
conclusion
position
ObligorMayAssertExpiration:0
Template
AssertExpiration
evidence
—
Identifier
ObligorMayAssertExpiration:afdfdc38f985ee76be6696fefa043d02eab3f3028a81eda75212e7e7e40626cd
Type
norm_creation
Premises
  • expired
  • right
sourceAnchors
—
norm_creation · urn:proof:effect:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:3c6d86faa190c8fc5b60ef4e0496bd7e10151bc54b4039a0aa3ee195bfa9ddda
attributes
mechanism
power_exercise
power
ObligorMayAssertExpiration:0
conclusion
Arguments
  • Identifier
    right
    Type
    entity_ref
Type
literal
Polarity
positive
Condition
exercise_barred
evidence
—
Identifier
ObligorMayAssertExpiration:3c6d86faa190c8fc5b60ef4e0496bd7e10151bc54b4039a0aa3ee195bfa9ddda
Type
norm_creation
Premises
  • asserted
  • expired
  • ObligorMayAssertExpiration:afdfdc38f985ee76be6696fefa043d02eab3f3028a81eda75212e7e7e40626cd
sourceAnchors
—
query_evaluation · urn:proof:query:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum
attributes
—
conclusion
literal
Arguments
  • Identifier
    g
    Type
    entity_ref
  • Identifier
    s
    Type
    entity_ref
  • Identifier
    causa
    Type
    entity_ref
Type
literal
Polarity
positive
Condition
remedium_exclusum
truthStatus
Established
evidence
—
Identifier
case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum
Type
query_evaluation
Premises
  • 3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08
sourceAnchors
—
Calendar and proof identifiers
Proof reference
case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum
Original reasoning · JSON
JSONRead only
{
  "evaluation": {
    "conflicts": [],
    "issues": [],
    "manifest": {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:fffa79f793fdd68f8845672eeddc65b8fdf4ef6eeeaec06576dbb468caf49482",
      "calendarSnapshot": "",
      "caseHash": "sha256:65ecdb8c6264f3a7a6d29f6d5192ec6abc010262def4a431ab776e2e4c296189",
      "decisionTime": "2016-06-01T12:00:00Z",
      "evidenceSnapshotHash": "sha256:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
      "externalSnapshots": {},
      "id": "urn:manifest:oracle-1",
      "interpretations": [],
      "knowledgeTime": "2016-06-01T12:00:00Z",
      "legalTime": "2016-06-01",
      "lockfileHash": "sha256:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
      "mode": "audit",
      "policies": {},
      "programHash": "sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e",
      "resolvedEditions": {},
      "semanticHash": "sha256:364375d9d043f792e2e9617f027871552318c1e762d06c441b07692a1a57c9e5",
      "semantics": "law.core/0.2.1",
      "theoryHash": "sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e",
      "timezone": "UTC"
    },
    "positions": [
      {
        "createdBy": "urn:proof:norm:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:afdfdc38f985ee76be6696fefa043d02eab3f3028a81eda75212e7e7e40626cd",
        "holder": "urn:p12:obligor",
        "id": "urn:position:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:0",
        "manifest": "urn:manifest:oracle-1",
        "modality": "power",
        "payload": {
          "effect": {
            "after": {
              "args": [
                {
                  "id": "urn:p12:right",
                  "kind": "entity_ref"
                }
              ],
              "kind": "literal",
              "polarity": "positive",
              "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#exercise_barred"
            },
            "kind": "create"
          },
          "exercise": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "function": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#expiration_asserted_as_defence",
            "kind": "call"
          },
          "holder": {
            "id": "urn:p12:obligor",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          },
          "kind": "power",
          "over": {
            "id": "urn:p12:right",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          },
          "validWhen": {
            "formula": {
              "args": [
                {
                  "id": "urn:p12:right",
                  "kind": "entity_ref"
                }
              ],
              "kind": "literal",
              "polarity": "positive",
              "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#limitation_expired"
            },
            "kind": "status",
            "status": "established"
          }
        },
        "proof": "urn:proof:norm:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:afdfdc38f985ee76be6696fefa043d02eab3f3028a81eda75212e7e7e40626cd",
        "status": "ACTIVE",
        "statusHistory": [],
        "template": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration"
      }
    ],
    "proofGraph": {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "attributes": {
            "assertion": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#asserted"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#expiration_asserted_as_defence"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#asserted",
          "kind": "assertion",
          "premises": [],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "assertion": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#causa"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:causa",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#causa_of_right"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#causa",
          "kind": "assertion",
          "premises": [],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "assertion": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#expired"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#limitation_expired"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#expired",
          "kind": "assertion",
          "premises": [],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {},
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#right_not_extinguished"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:apply:ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight:e72996a2c7c818667c2d5d0c4953a8cd27d6a6e1543f4123a71643aa9d0f1fd7",
          "kind": "rule_application",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#expired"
          ],
          "rule": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight",
          "sourceAnchors": [],
          "substitution": {
            "v0": {
              "id": "urn:p12:right",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            }
          }
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "strength": "defeasible"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#exercise_barred"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:apply:ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted:b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a",
          "kind": "rule_application",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#asserted",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#expired"
          ],
          "rule": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted",
          "sourceAnchors": [],
          "substitution": {
            "v0": {
              "id": "urn:p12:right",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            }
          }
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "assertion": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-ee"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:obligee",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#persona_of_party"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-ee",
          "kind": "assertion",
          "premises": [],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "assertion": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-or"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:obligor",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#persona_of_party"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-or",
          "kind": "assertion",
          "premises": [],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "assertion": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#petitio"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:causa",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#petitio",
          "kind": "assertion",
          "premises": [],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "assertion": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#right"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:contract",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:obligee",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:obligor",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#right_of"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#right",
          "kind": "assertion",
          "premises": [],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "strength": "defeasible"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:causa",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:apply:ExpiryExcludit:3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08",
          "kind": "rule_application",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:apply:ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted:b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#causa",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-ee",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-or",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#petitio",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#right"
          ],
          "rule": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit",
          "sourceAnchors": [],
          "substitution": {
            "v0": {
              "id": "urn:p12:right",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            },
            "v1": {
              "id": "urn:p12:contract",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            },
            "v2": {
              "id": "urn:p12:obligee",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            },
            "v3": {
              "id": "urn:p12:obligor",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            },
            "v4": {
              "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            },
            "v5": {
              "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            },
            "v6": {
              "id": "urn:p12:causa",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            }
          }
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "allApplicableCandidateIds": [
              "urn:proof:apply:ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted:b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a"
            ],
            "conflictKey": "{\"args\":[{\"id\":\"urn:p12:right\",\"kind\":\"entity_ref\"}],\"predicate\":\"urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#exercise_barred\"}",
            "evaluationInputSemanticHash": "sha256:65ecdb8c6264f3a7a6d29f6d5192ec6abc010262def4a431ab776e2e4c296189",
            "priorityGraphHash": "sha256:6b3988214869dbb43cb853d84175aa853fdc4ae24ef2c02a3ad2ff6ee9175009",
            "programSemanticHash": "sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e",
            "stratum": 0,
            "survivingCandidateIds": [
              "urn:proof:apply:ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted:b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a"
            ]
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#exercise_barred"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:closure:5c179d0511534ea8f4a0279345ef7a2b1a23bdcc26d6d1612de2857c05a880e8",
          "kind": "candidate_closure",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:apply:ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted:b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a"
          ],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "allApplicableCandidateIds": [
              "urn:proof:apply:ExpiryExcludit:3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08"
            ],
            "conflictKey": "{\"args\":[{\"id\":\"urn:p12:persona:g\",\"kind\":\"entity_ref\"},{\"id\":\"urn:p12:persona:s\",\"kind\":\"entity_ref\"},{\"id\":\"urn:p12:causa\",\"kind\":\"entity_ref\"}],\"predicate\":\"urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum\"}",
            "evaluationInputSemanticHash": "sha256:65ecdb8c6264f3a7a6d29f6d5192ec6abc010262def4a431ab776e2e4c296189",
            "priorityGraphHash": "sha256:6b3988214869dbb43cb853d84175aa853fdc4ae24ef2c02a3ad2ff6ee9175009",
            "programSemanticHash": "sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e",
            "stratum": 1,
            "survivingCandidateIds": [
              "urn:proof:apply:ExpiryExcludit:3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08"
            ]
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:causa",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:closure:8638c0c81bea0030247e55a2eb549849cac9d6601dd0c7d8e6f6cd4a9fa342a6",
          "kind": "candidate_closure",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:apply:ExpiryExcludit:3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08"
          ],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "rule": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "position": "urn:position:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:0",
            "template": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:norm:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:afdfdc38f985ee76be6696fefa043d02eab3f3028a81eda75212e7e7e40626cd",
          "kind": "norm_creation",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#expired",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#right"
          ],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "mechanism": "power_exercise",
            "power": "urn:position:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:0"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#exercise_barred"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:effect:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:3c6d86faa190c8fc5b60ef4e0496bd7e10151bc54b4039a0aa3ee195bfa9ddda",
          "kind": "norm_creation",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#asserted",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#expired",
            "urn:proof:norm:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:afdfdc38f985ee76be6696fefa043d02eab3f3028a81eda75212e7e7e40626cd"
          ],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {},
          "conclusion": {
            "literal": {
              "args": [
                {
                  "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
                  "kind": "entity_ref"
                },
                {
                  "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
                  "kind": "entity_ref"
                },
                {
                  "id": "urn:p12:causa",
                  "kind": "entity_ref"
                }
              ],
              "kind": "literal",
              "polarity": "positive",
              "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"
            },
            "truthStatus": "TRUE_ONLY"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:query:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum",
          "kind": "query_evaluation",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:apply:ExpiryExcludit:3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08"
          ],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        }
      ],
      "proofHash": "sha256:87bde4a2cf01c341a428ac2a56c5a644c865d1dceab100f038f0900696ceeccb",
      "roots": [
        "urn:proof:query:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum"
      ]
    },
    "resultHash": "sha256:7d6420f869f194c56f0e17d6ec83188bea3ec4c0fa3c59ce44fb61219412f696",
    "results": [
      {
        "conflicts": [],
        "evaluationStatus": "COMPUTED",
        "evidence": [],
        "id": "urn:result:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum",
        "judgmentRequests": [],
        "manifest": "urn:manifest:oracle-1",
        "missingInputs": [],
        "normativeStatusSupports": [],
        "proof": "urn:proof:query:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum",
        "query": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum",
        "resultKind": "PROPOSITION",
        "sourceAnchors": [],
        "target": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum",
        "truthStatus": "TRUE_ONLY"
      }
    ],
    "schemaVersion": "law.core.evaluation/0.2"
  },
  "proofRef": "urn:proof:query:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum",
  "rulesApplied": [
    "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight",
    "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted",
    "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit"
  ]
}
SourcesExcerpts: 2

article/10_9

ARTICLE 10.9 (Effects of expiration of limitation period) The expiration of the limitation period does not extinguish the right. (2) For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence. (3) A right may still be relied on as a defence even though the expiration of the limitation period for that right has been asserted.
Original data · JSON
JSONRead only
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:2cce2f0a30e87640ae26f97b896d7242eb290a76d732263621d6f082f40462a6",
  "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_EN",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_ART10_9_EN",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "locator": "article/10_9",
  "package": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:88a854749716a48eb1dce761802f51e9c586a310ee9e0377758d0973b7ecd006",
      "language": "en",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "ARTICLE 10.9\n(Effects of expiration of limitation period)\nThe expiration of the limitation period does not extinguish the right.\n(2) For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must\nassert it as a defence.\n(3) A right may still be relied on as a defence even though the expiration of the\nlimitation period for that right has been asserted."
    }
  ]
}

article/10_9

ARTICLE 10.9 (Effet de l’expiration du délai) 1) L’expiration du délai de prescription n’éteint pas le droit. 2) L’expiration du délai de prescription n’a d’effet que si le débiteur l’invoque comme moyen de défense. 3) Un droit peut toujours être invoqué comme moyen de défense, même si l’expiration du délai de prescription a été soulevée.
Original data · JSON
JSONRead only
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:ce451e46bca3943b449198a0800bf504859f69a2eccaa1cc83372438137069cf",
  "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_FR",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_ART10_9_FR",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "locator": "article/10_9",
  "package": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:234d9a881e76dcd6d82c945bdbc2c3b643e0a5d6f6d9b4c2a2d8d58296ecfdcd",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "ARTICLE 10.9\n(Effet de l’expiration du délai)\n1)\nL’expiration du délai de prescription n’éteint pas le droit.\n2)\nL’expiration du délai de prescription n’a d’effet que si le débiteur l’invoque\ncomme moyen de défense.\n3)\nUn droit peut toujours être invoqué comme moyen de défense, même si\nl’expiration du délai de prescription a été soulevée."
    }
  ]
}

Packages in the snapshot

  • de.bgb.core
  • de.bgb.fristen
  • de.bgb.ius_privatum
  • doctrine.ius_privatum
  • fr.code_civil
  • unidroit.picc
  • unidroit.picc_limitation
Technical dataFull response, parameters and checksums
Calculation status
COMPUTED
Full engine response
Fünf Jahre, PICC: das Rechtsmittel ist ausgeschlossen

Complete machine result · JSON

JSONRead only
{
  "answer": {
    "evaluationStatus": "COMPUTED",
    "kind": "TRUTH",
    "missingInputs": [],
    "truthStatus": "TRUE_ONLY"
  },
  "evaluation": {
    "conflicts": [],
    "issues": [],
    "manifest": {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:fffa79f793fdd68f8845672eeddc65b8fdf4ef6eeeaec06576dbb468caf49482",
      "calendarSnapshot": "",
      "caseHash": "sha256:65ecdb8c6264f3a7a6d29f6d5192ec6abc010262def4a431ab776e2e4c296189",
      "decisionTime": "2016-06-01T12:00:00Z",
      "evidenceSnapshotHash": "sha256:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
      "externalSnapshots": {},
      "id": "urn:manifest:oracle-1",
      "interpretations": [],
      "knowledgeTime": "2016-06-01T12:00:00Z",
      "legalTime": "2016-06-01",
      "lockfileHash": "sha256:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
      "mode": "audit",
      "policies": {},
      "programHash": "sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e",
      "resolvedEditions": {},
      "semanticHash": "sha256:364375d9d043f792e2e9617f027871552318c1e762d06c441b07692a1a57c9e5",
      "semantics": "law.core/0.2.1",
      "theoryHash": "sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e",
      "timezone": "UTC"
    },
    "positions": [
      {
        "createdBy": "urn:proof:norm:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:afdfdc38f985ee76be6696fefa043d02eab3f3028a81eda75212e7e7e40626cd",
        "holder": "urn:p12:obligor",
        "id": "urn:position:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:0",
        "manifest": "urn:manifest:oracle-1",
        "modality": "power",
        "payload": {
          "effect": {
            "after": {
              "args": [
                {
                  "id": "urn:p12:right",
                  "kind": "entity_ref"
                }
              ],
              "kind": "literal",
              "polarity": "positive",
              "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#exercise_barred"
            },
            "kind": "create"
          },
          "exercise": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "function": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#expiration_asserted_as_defence",
            "kind": "call"
          },
          "holder": {
            "id": "urn:p12:obligor",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          },
          "kind": "power",
          "over": {
            "id": "urn:p12:right",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          },
          "validWhen": {
            "formula": {
              "args": [
                {
                  "id": "urn:p12:right",
                  "kind": "entity_ref"
                }
              ],
              "kind": "literal",
              "polarity": "positive",
              "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#limitation_expired"
            },
            "kind": "status",
            "status": "established"
          }
        },
        "proof": "urn:proof:norm:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:afdfdc38f985ee76be6696fefa043d02eab3f3028a81eda75212e7e7e40626cd",
        "status": "ACTIVE",
        "statusHistory": [],
        "template": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration"
      }
    ],
    "proofGraph": {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "attributes": {
            "assertion": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#asserted"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#expiration_asserted_as_defence"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#asserted",
          "kind": "assertion",
          "premises": [],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "assertion": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#causa"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:causa",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#causa_of_right"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#causa",
          "kind": "assertion",
          "premises": [],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "assertion": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#expired"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#limitation_expired"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#expired",
          "kind": "assertion",
          "premises": [],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {},
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#right_not_extinguished"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:apply:ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight:e72996a2c7c818667c2d5d0c4953a8cd27d6a6e1543f4123a71643aa9d0f1fd7",
          "kind": "rule_application",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#expired"
          ],
          "rule": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight",
          "sourceAnchors": [],
          "substitution": {
            "v0": {
              "id": "urn:p12:right",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            }
          }
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "strength": "defeasible"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#exercise_barred"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:apply:ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted:b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a",
          "kind": "rule_application",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#asserted",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#expired"
          ],
          "rule": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted",
          "sourceAnchors": [],
          "substitution": {
            "v0": {
              "id": "urn:p12:right",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            }
          }
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "assertion": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-ee"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:obligee",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#persona_of_party"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-ee",
          "kind": "assertion",
          "premises": [],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "assertion": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-or"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:obligor",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#persona_of_party"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-or",
          "kind": "assertion",
          "premises": [],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "assertion": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#petitio"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:causa",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#petitio",
          "kind": "assertion",
          "premises": [],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "assertion": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#right"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:contract",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:obligee",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:obligor",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#right_of"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#right",
          "kind": "assertion",
          "premises": [],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "strength": "defeasible"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:causa",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:apply:ExpiryExcludit:3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08",
          "kind": "rule_application",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:apply:ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted:b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#causa",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-ee",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-or",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#petitio",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#right"
          ],
          "rule": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit",
          "sourceAnchors": [],
          "substitution": {
            "v0": {
              "id": "urn:p12:right",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            },
            "v1": {
              "id": "urn:p12:contract",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            },
            "v2": {
              "id": "urn:p12:obligee",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            },
            "v3": {
              "id": "urn:p12:obligor",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            },
            "v4": {
              "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            },
            "v5": {
              "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            },
            "v6": {
              "id": "urn:p12:causa",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            }
          }
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "allApplicableCandidateIds": [
              "urn:proof:apply:ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted:b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a"
            ],
            "conflictKey": "{\"args\":[{\"id\":\"urn:p12:right\",\"kind\":\"entity_ref\"}],\"predicate\":\"urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#exercise_barred\"}",
            "evaluationInputSemanticHash": "sha256:65ecdb8c6264f3a7a6d29f6d5192ec6abc010262def4a431ab776e2e4c296189",
            "priorityGraphHash": "sha256:6b3988214869dbb43cb853d84175aa853fdc4ae24ef2c02a3ad2ff6ee9175009",
            "programSemanticHash": "sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e",
            "stratum": 0,
            "survivingCandidateIds": [
              "urn:proof:apply:ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted:b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a"
            ]
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#exercise_barred"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:closure:5c179d0511534ea8f4a0279345ef7a2b1a23bdcc26d6d1612de2857c05a880e8",
          "kind": "candidate_closure",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:apply:ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted:b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a"
          ],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "allApplicableCandidateIds": [
              "urn:proof:apply:ExpiryExcludit:3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08"
            ],
            "conflictKey": "{\"args\":[{\"id\":\"urn:p12:persona:g\",\"kind\":\"entity_ref\"},{\"id\":\"urn:p12:persona:s\",\"kind\":\"entity_ref\"},{\"id\":\"urn:p12:causa\",\"kind\":\"entity_ref\"}],\"predicate\":\"urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum\"}",
            "evaluationInputSemanticHash": "sha256:65ecdb8c6264f3a7a6d29f6d5192ec6abc010262def4a431ab776e2e4c296189",
            "priorityGraphHash": "sha256:6b3988214869dbb43cb853d84175aa853fdc4ae24ef2c02a3ad2ff6ee9175009",
            "programSemanticHash": "sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e",
            "stratum": 1,
            "survivingCandidateIds": [
              "urn:proof:apply:ExpiryExcludit:3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08"
            ]
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              },
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:causa",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:closure:8638c0c81bea0030247e55a2eb549849cac9d6601dd0c7d8e6f6cd4a9fa342a6",
          "kind": "candidate_closure",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:apply:ExpiryExcludit:3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08"
          ],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "rule": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "position": "urn:position:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:0",
            "template": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:norm:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:afdfdc38f985ee76be6696fefa043d02eab3f3028a81eda75212e7e7e40626cd",
          "kind": "norm_creation",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#expired",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#right"
          ],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {
            "mechanism": "power_exercise",
            "power": "urn:position:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:0"
          },
          "conclusion": {
            "args": [
              {
                "id": "urn:p12:right",
                "kind": "entity_ref"
              }
            ],
            "kind": "literal",
            "polarity": "positive",
            "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#exercise_barred"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:effect:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:3c6d86faa190c8fc5b60ef4e0496bd7e10151bc54b4039a0aa3ee195bfa9ddda",
          "kind": "norm_creation",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#asserted",
            "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#expired",
            "urn:proof:norm:urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration:afdfdc38f985ee76be6696fefa043d02eab3f3028a81eda75212e7e7e40626cd"
          ],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        },
        {
          "attributes": {},
          "conclusion": {
            "literal": {
              "args": [
                {
                  "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
                  "kind": "entity_ref"
                },
                {
                  "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
                  "kind": "entity_ref"
                },
                {
                  "id": "urn:p12:causa",
                  "kind": "entity_ref"
                }
              ],
              "kind": "literal",
              "polarity": "positive",
              "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"
            },
            "truthStatus": "TRUE_ONLY"
          },
          "evidence": [],
          "id": "urn:proof:query:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum",
          "kind": "query_evaluation",
          "premises": [
            "urn:proof:apply:ExpiryExcludit:3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08"
          ],
          "sourceAnchors": []
        }
      ],
      "proofHash": "sha256:87bde4a2cf01c341a428ac2a56c5a644c865d1dceab100f038f0900696ceeccb",
      "roots": [
        "urn:proof:query:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum"
      ]
    },
    "resultHash": "sha256:7d6420f869f194c56f0e17d6ec83188bea3ec4c0fa3c59ce44fb61219412f696",
    "results": [
      {
        "conflicts": [],
        "evaluationStatus": "COMPUTED",
        "evidence": [],
        "id": "urn:result:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum",
        "judgmentRequests": [],
        "manifest": "urn:manifest:oracle-1",
        "missingInputs": [],
        "normativeStatusSupports": [],
        "proof": "urn:proof:query:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum",
        "query": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum",
        "resultKind": "PROPOSITION",
        "sourceAnchors": [],
        "target": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum",
        "truthStatus": "TRUE_ONLY"
      }
    ],
    "schemaVersion": "law.core.evaluation/0.2"
  },
  "evaluationStatus": "COMPUTED",
  "issues": [],
  "judgmentRequests": [],
  "proofRef": "urn:proof:query:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum",
  "provenance": {
    "acts": [
      {
        "artifactHash": "sha256:a6813604c35567e7c586d334efbf524d08f3467170c4b732cfb15809cacf4ff4",
        "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core",
        "package": "de.bgb.core"
      },
      {
        "artifactHash": "sha256:998148eaeeed28f1565811474ee7beb7eacc616c5681ed9638edc976512a9884",
        "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
        "package": "de.bgb.fristen"
      },
      {
        "artifactHash": "sha256:86a5a00db16e32187223ceeec6748eb7d42d18b7c370c8b15ac64d2f3f655ff7",
        "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum",
        "package": "de.bgb.ius_privatum"
      },
      {
        "artifactHash": "sha256:7202de5de49a8a9d12837bc19cb7008ba2d1a68dbcc0134e0afccf1440a6d5ed",
        "namespace": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum",
        "package": "doctrine.ius_privatum"
      },
      {
        "artifactHash": "sha256:ad41d027ba92c38ca5eecc1d16097d0bbc8c5a74946fc1a6397c6dadac61158f",
        "namespace": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
        "package": "fr.code_civil"
      },
      {
        "artifactHash": "sha256:719bfd408eed92ad497ba071482354d4ad32b81ef9f41c6654f224416c19e603",
        "namespace": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc",
        "package": "unidroit.picc"
      },
      {
        "artifactHash": "sha256:b311d0d422a1079f71113320bd818236f7b09507c7dd960bdafceb91285497d9",
        "namespace": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
        "package": "unidroit.picc_limitation"
      }
    ],
    "caseHash": "sha256:65ecdb8c6264f3a7a6d29f6d5192ec6abc010262def4a431ab776e2e4c296189",
    "jurisdiction": "Deutschland",
    "legalTime": "2016-06-01",
    "mode": "audit",
    "programHash": "sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e",
    "resultHash": "sha256:7d6420f869f194c56f0e17d6ec83188bea3ec4c0fa3c59ce44fb61219412f696",
    "timezone": "UTC"
  },
  "rulesApplied": [
    "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight",
    "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted",
    "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit"
  ]
}

Execution · JSON

This block is too large for inline viewing. It is included in full in the document JSON, without truncation.

Download JSON ↓

Display metadata

JSONRead only
{
  "schemaVersion": "law.answers.presentation/0.1",
  "source": {
    "requestCanonicalSha256": "sha256:fc2aa17be9f80b15e3bfd4a4ebde4ce2c9f55cc7a91a330fb4f67bc07bb8fb2c"
  },
  "steps": [
    {
      "assertionOrigin": "case_input",
      "conclusion": {
        "args": [
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:right",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          }
        ],
        "kind": "literal",
        "polarity": "positive",
        "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#expiration_asserted_as_defence"
      },
      "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#asserted",
      "kind": "assertion",
      "originStatus": "available",
      "premises": [],
      "trust": "case"
    },
    {
      "assertionOrigin": "case_input",
      "conclusion": {
        "args": [
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:right",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          },
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:causa",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          }
        ],
        "kind": "literal",
        "polarity": "positive",
        "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#causa_of_right"
      },
      "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#causa",
      "kind": "assertion",
      "originStatus": "available",
      "premises": [],
      "trust": "case"
    },
    {
      "assertionOrigin": "case_input",
      "conclusion": {
        "args": [
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:right",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          }
        ],
        "kind": "literal",
        "polarity": "positive",
        "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#limitation_expired"
      },
      "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#expired",
      "kind": "assertion",
      "originStatus": "available",
      "premises": [],
      "trust": "case"
    },
    {
      "conclusion": {
        "args": [
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:right",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          }
        ],
        "kind": "literal",
        "polarity": "positive",
        "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#exercise_barred"
      },
      "head": {
        "args": [
          {
            "kind": "var",
            "var": "v0"
          }
        ],
        "kind": "literal",
        "polarity": "positive",
        "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#exercise_barred"
      },
      "id": "urn:proof:apply:ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted:b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a",
      "kind": "rule_application",
      "originStatus": "available",
      "premises": [
        "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#asserted",
        "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#expired"
      ],
      "rule": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted",
      "sourceAnchors": [
        "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_ART10_9_EN",
        "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_ART10_9_FR"
      ],
      "strength": "defeasible",
      "substitution": {
        "v0": {
          "id": "urn:p12:right",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      },
      "trust": "engine",
      "variables": [
        {
          "id": "v0",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Right"
          }
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "assertionOrigin": "case_input",
      "conclusion": {
        "args": [
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:obligee",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          },
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          }
        ],
        "kind": "literal",
        "polarity": "positive",
        "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#persona_of_party"
      },
      "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-ee",
      "kind": "assertion",
      "originStatus": "available",
      "premises": [],
      "trust": "case"
    },
    {
      "assertionOrigin": "case_input",
      "conclusion": {
        "args": [
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:obligor",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          },
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          }
        ],
        "kind": "literal",
        "polarity": "positive",
        "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#persona_of_party"
      },
      "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-or",
      "kind": "assertion",
      "originStatus": "available",
      "premises": [],
      "trust": "case"
    },
    {
      "assertionOrigin": "case_input",
      "conclusion": {
        "args": [
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:causa",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          },
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          },
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          }
        ],
        "kind": "literal",
        "polarity": "positive",
        "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
      },
      "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#petitio",
      "kind": "assertion",
      "originStatus": "available",
      "premises": [],
      "trust": "case"
    },
    {
      "assertionOrigin": "case_input",
      "conclusion": {
        "args": [
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:right",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          },
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:contract",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          },
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:obligee",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          },
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:obligor",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          }
        ],
        "kind": "literal",
        "polarity": "positive",
        "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#right_of"
      },
      "id": "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#right",
      "kind": "assertion",
      "originStatus": "available",
      "premises": [],
      "trust": "case"
    },
    {
      "conclusion": {
        "args": [
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          },
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          },
          {
            "id": "urn:p12:causa",
            "kind": "entity_ref"
          }
        ],
        "kind": "literal",
        "polarity": "positive",
        "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"
      },
      "head": {
        "args": [
          {
            "kind": "var",
            "var": "v4"
          },
          {
            "kind": "var",
            "var": "v5"
          },
          {
            "kind": "var",
            "var": "v6"
          }
        ],
        "kind": "literal",
        "polarity": "positive",
        "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"
      },
      "id": "urn:proof:apply:ExpiryExcludit:3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08",
      "kind": "rule_application",
      "originStatus": "available",
      "premises": [
        "urn:proof:apply:ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted:b367e7e893c85c58ebe51e67ca78df46a40da1c9148f082ecf8a03a92765e57a",
        "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#causa",
        "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-ee",
        "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#persona-or",
        "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#petitio",
        "urn:proof:assert:urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#right"
      ],
      "rule": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit",
      "sourceAnchors": [
        "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_ART10_9_EN",
        "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_ART10_9_FR"
      ],
      "strength": "defeasible",
      "substitution": {
        "v0": {
          "id": "urn:p12:right",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        "v1": {
          "id": "urn:p12:contract",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        "v2": {
          "id": "urn:p12:obligee",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        "v3": {
          "id": "urn:p12:obligor",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        "v4": {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        "v5": {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        "v6": {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      },
      "trust": "engine",
      "variables": [
        {
          "id": "v0",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Right"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "v1",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Contract"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "v2",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Party"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "v3",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Party"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "v4",
          "type": {
            "name": "doctrine.ius_privatum#Persona"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "v5",
          "type": {
            "name": "doctrine.ius_privatum#Persona"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "v6",
          "type": {
            "name": "doctrine.ius_privatum#Causa"
          }
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "conclusion": {
        "literal": {
          "args": [
            {
              "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            },
            {
              "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            },
            {
              "id": "urn:p12:causa",
              "kind": "entity_ref"
            }
          ],
          "kind": "literal",
          "polarity": "positive",
          "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"
        },
        "truthStatus": "TRUE_ONLY"
      },
      "id": "urn:proof:query:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#case/FuenfJahre_PICC/query/remedium-exclusum",
      "kind": "query_evaluation",
      "originStatus": "available",
      "premises": [
        "urn:proof:apply:ExpiryExcludit:3b19574dcaf9edf53b6704c7ea410af4baf6cbe50330192d5500440d012b1f08"
      ],
      "trust": "engine"
    }
  ],
  "symbols": [
    {
      "id": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#Causa",
      "kind": "type_decl",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "ru-KZ",
          "status": "unofficial",
          "text": "притязание как основание тяжбы: договор, деликт, собственность, наследство — одно спорное отношение между двумя лицами"
        }
      ],
      "name": "Causa",
      "package": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#Persona",
      "kind": "type_decl",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "ru-KZ",
          "status": "unofficial",
          "text": "лицо частного права: истец, ответчик, собственник, должник, кредитор, наследник"
        }
      ],
      "name": "Persona",
      "package": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio",
      "kind": "symbol_decl",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "ru-KZ",
          "status": "unofficial",
          "text": "истец предъявляет к ответчику притязание — спорное отношение, о котором задаётся вопрос"
        }
      ],
      "name": "petitio",
      "package": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum",
      "parameters": [
        {
          "id": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio/arg/causa",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "causa",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#Causa"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio/arg/actor",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "actor",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#Persona"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio/arg/reus",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "reus",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#Persona"
          }
        }
      ],
      "symbolKind": "relation"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum",
      "kind": "symbol_decl",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "ru-KZ",
          "status": "unofficial",
          "text": "средство защиты отнято: возражением, погашением тяжбой, давностью, иммунитетом ответчика"
        }
      ],
      "name": "remedium_exclusum",
      "package": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum",
      "parameters": [
        {
          "id": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum/arg/actor",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "actor",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#Persona"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum/arg/reus",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "reus",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#Persona"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum/arg/causa",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "causa",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#Causa"
          }
        }
      ],
      "symbolKind": "relation"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration",
      "kind": "norm_template",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "en",
          "status": "official",
          "text": "Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence"
        }
      ],
      "package": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight",
      "kind": "rule",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "en",
          "status": "official",
          "text": "Article 10.9(1). The expiration of the limitation period does not extinguish the right"
        }
      ],
      "package": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "strength": "strict"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted",
      "kind": "rule",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "en",
          "status": "official",
          "text": "Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence"
        }
      ],
      "package": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "strength": "defeasible"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit",
      "kind": "rule",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "en",
          "status": "official",
          "text": "Article 10.9(2). Once the obligor has asserted expiry, the barred exercise is a comparative remedium_exclusum"
        }
      ],
      "package": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "strength": "defeasible"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration",
      "kind": "rule",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "en",
          "status": "official",
          "text": "Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence"
        }
      ],
      "package": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "strength": "strict"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Right",
      "kind": "type_decl",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "en",
          "status": "official",
          "text": "Right governed by the Principles"
        }
      ],
      "name": "Right",
      "package": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#causa_of_right",
      "kind": "symbol_decl",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "en",
          "status": "official",
          "text": "this right is the comparative causa"
        }
      ],
      "name": "causa_of_right",
      "package": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "parameters": [
        {
          "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#causa_of_right/arg/r",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "r",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Right"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#causa_of_right/arg/c",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "c",
          "type": {
            "name": "doctrine.ius_privatum#Causa"
          }
        }
      ],
      "symbolKind": "relation"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#exercise_barred",
      "kind": "symbol_decl",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "en",
          "status": "official",
          "text": "the expiration of the limitation period has effect and bars the exercise of the right (article 10.9(2))"
        }
      ],
      "name": "exercise_barred",
      "package": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "parameters": [
        {
          "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#exercise_barred/arg/r",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "r",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Right"
          }
        }
      ],
      "symbolKind": "relation"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#expiration_asserted_as_defence",
      "kind": "symbol_decl",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "en",
          "status": "official",
          "text": "the obligor has asserted the expiration of the limitation period as a defence"
        }
      ],
      "name": "expiration_asserted_as_defence",
      "package": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "parameters": [
        {
          "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#expiration_asserted_as_defence/arg/r",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "r",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Right"
          }
        }
      ],
      "symbolKind": "relation"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#limitation_expired",
      "kind": "symbol_decl",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "en",
          "status": "official",
          "text": "the limitation period for the right has expired"
        }
      ],
      "name": "limitation_expired",
      "package": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "parameters": [
        {
          "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#limitation_expired/arg/r",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "r",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Right"
          }
        }
      ],
      "symbolKind": "relation"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#persona_of_party",
      "kind": "symbol_decl",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "en",
          "status": "official",
          "text": "the contracting party appears in the comparative chain as this persona"
        }
      ],
      "name": "persona_of_party",
      "package": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "parameters": [
        {
          "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#persona_of_party/arg/p",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "p",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Party"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#persona_of_party/arg/x",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "x",
          "type": {
            "name": "doctrine.ius_privatum#Persona"
          }
        }
      ],
      "symbolKind": "relation"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#right_not_extinguished",
      "kind": "symbol_decl",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "en",
          "status": "official",
          "text": "the expiration of the limitation period does not extinguish the right (article 10.9(1))"
        }
      ],
      "name": "right_not_extinguished",
      "package": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "parameters": [
        {
          "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#right_not_extinguished/arg/r",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "r",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Right"
          }
        }
      ],
      "symbolKind": "relation"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#right_of",
      "kind": "symbol_decl",
      "labels": [
        {
          "language": "en",
          "status": "official",
          "text": "the right belongs to the obligee against the obligor under that contract"
        }
      ],
      "name": "right_of",
      "package": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "parameters": [
        {
          "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#right_of/arg/r",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "r",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Right"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#right_of/arg/c",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "c",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Contract"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#right_of/arg/obligee",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "obligee",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Party"
          }
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#right_of/arg/obligor",
          "labels": [],
          "name": "obligor",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#Party"
          }
        }
      ],
      "symbolKind": "relation"
    }
  ]
}

JSON · calculations, sources and exact data

JSONRead only
{
  "acts": [
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:a6813604c35567e7c586d334efbf524d08f3467170c4b732cfb15809cacf4ff4",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core",
      "package": "de.bgb.core"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:998148eaeeed28f1565811474ee7beb7eacc616c5681ed9638edc976512a9884",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
      "package": "de.bgb.fristen"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:86a5a00db16e32187223ceeec6748eb7d42d18b7c370c8b15ac64d2f3f655ff7",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum",
      "package": "de.bgb.ius_privatum"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:7202de5de49a8a9d12837bc19cb7008ba2d1a68dbcc0134e0afccf1440a6d5ed",
      "namespace": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum",
      "package": "doctrine.ius_privatum"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:ad41d027ba92c38ca5eecc1d16097d0bbc8c5a74946fc1a6397c6dadac61158f",
      "namespace": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
      "package": "fr.code_civil"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:719bfd408eed92ad497ba071482354d4ad32b81ef9f41c6654f224416c19e603",
      "namespace": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc",
      "package": "unidroit.picc"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:b311d0d422a1079f71113320bd818236f7b09507c7dd960bdafceb91285497d9",
      "namespace": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "package": "unidroit.picc_limitation"
    }
  ],
  "caseHash": "sha256:65ecdb8c6264f3a7a6d29f6d5192ec6abc010262def4a431ab776e2e4c296189",
  "jurisdiction": "Deutschland",
  "legalTime": "2016-06-01",
  "mode": "audit",
  "programHash": "sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e",
  "resultHash": "sha256:7d6420f869f194c56f0e17d6ec83188bea3ec4c0fa3c59ce44fb61219412f696",
  "timezone": "UTC"
}
evaluation SHA-256
sha256:364f99c2cdf1eaceb1c94636c5bf963ae4cce12a3771b5658761828599ca07a3
Original data · JSON
JSONRead only
{
  "args": [
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:causa",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    }
  ],
  "facts": [
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:right",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:contract",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:obligee",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:obligor",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#right_of"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:right",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#limitation_expired"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:right",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#expiration_asserted_as_defence"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:obligee",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#persona_of_party"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:obligor",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#persona_of_party"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:right",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#causa_of_right"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
    }
  ],
  "kind": "truth",
  "legalTime": "2016-06-01",
  "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#remedium_exclusum"
}

Nach den Prinzipien ist das Rechtsmittel ausgeschlossen, weil die Verjährung geltend gemacht ist.

Condition

Zwei Jahre, Code civil: die Klage ist nicht verjährt

Jurisdiction DeutschlandLaw as of 2016-01-02

Calculation result

Refuted

Input parameters

What we are finding

claim time-barred on this date

causa2 January 2016

Input facts

  • claim enforceable from this date

    causa: causajour: 15 March 2014
  • the right-holder knew the facts permitting the claim on this date

    causa: causajour: 15 March 2014
  • action brought on this date

    causa: causajour: 2 January 2016
  • limitation period neither interrupted nor suspended

    causa: causa
  • the claimant brings a claim against the defendant — the contested relation the question is about

    causa: causaactor: greus: s
Original data · JSON
JSONRead only
{
  "args": [
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:causa",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "kind": "value",
      "type": {
        "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
      },
      "value": "2016-01-02"
    }
  ],
  "facts": [
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2014-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#creance_exigible_depuis"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2014-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#titulaire_connait_les_faits_le"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2016-01-02"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#action_introduite_le"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#prescription_non_interrompue"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
    }
  ],
  "kind": "truth",
  "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
  "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#action_prescrite_le"
}
Why this resultApplied rules and conditions

Derivation path8 steps

  1. 1

    action brought on this date

    causa: urn:p12:causa; jour: 2 January 2016

    case fact
  2. 2

    the right-holder knew the facts permitting the claim on this date

    causa: urn:p12:causa; jour: 15 March 2014

    case fact
  3. 3

    claim enforceable from this date

    causa: urn:p12:causa; jour: 15 March 2014

    case fact
  4. 4

    five years from the date of actual knowledge

    starting point of the five-year period: causa: urn:p12:causa; jour: 15 March 2014

    art. 2224

    Identifier
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#PointDepartConnaissanceReelle
    rule
  5. 5

    limitation period neither interrupted nor suspended

    causa: urn:p12:causa

    case fact
  6. 6

    five-year deadline counted by days

    15 March 2019 = add calendar period(15 March 2014, 5 calendar_year)

    art. 2224, art. 2228, art. 2229

    Identifier
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#EcheanceCinqAns
    rule
  7. 7

    the claim is not time-barred before or on the final day

    not claim time-barred on this date: causa: urn:p12:causa; jour: 2 January 2016

    art. 2219, art. 2229

    Identifier
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#ActionNonPrescriteAvantOuAEcheance
    rule
  8. 8

    Query evaluation

    query

verified by the engine: 4 · case fact: 4 · Full graph: 10 nodes

Steps of the saved proof from the case facts to the answer. Formulas are shown as written in the norm with bound values substituted; the page recomputes nothing.

Basis of this answer

Rules on the saved proof path for this answer.

fr.code_civil
  • the claim is not time-barred before or on the final day

    Identifier
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#ActionNonPrescriteAvantOuAEcheance
  • five-year deadline counted by days

    Identifier
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#EcheanceCinqAns
  • five years from the date of actual knowledge

    Identifier
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#PointDepartConnaissanceReelle
Other rules in the evaluation2

Applied in the overall evaluation, but not on the proof path for this answer.

fr.code_civil
  • Article 2232, paragraph 2. Without an opposable long-stop, the deadline after the floor is the applicable date

    Identifier
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#DateApplicableSansButoirOpposable
  • Without mediation, conciliation or an investigative measure, the period's deadline is not raised

    Identifier
    urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#EcheanceApresPlancherSansMinimale
Issues · 4
Execution issues
  1. infoEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31

    редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_EN на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 81 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)

    Affected nodes
    • Article 5.2.3. The conferment of rights in the beneficiary includes the right to invoke a clause in the contract which excludes or limits the liability of the beneficiary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryMayInvokeClause
    • Articles 5.2.1 and 5.2.2. The parties may confer a right on a third party who must be identifiable with adequate certainty by the contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryRightExists
    • Article 5.1.4(2). To the extent that an obligation involves a duty of best efforts, that party is bound to make such efforts as would be made by a reasonable person of the same kind urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BestEffortsDutyPerformed
    • Article 1.9(1). The parties are bound by any usage to which they have agreed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByAgreedUsage
    • Article 1.9(1). The parties are bound by practices which they have established between themselves urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByEstablishedPractice
    • Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage
    • Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage/unless/0
    • Article 5.3.3(1). A party who prevented fulfilment contrary to good faith may not rely on the non-fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnPreventedCondition
    • Article 5.3.3(2). A party who brought about fulfilment contrary to good faith may not rely on the fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnProcuredCondition
    • Article 4.3. In applying Articles 4.1 and 4.2, regard shall be had to all the circumstances, including those listed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CircumstanceToBeRegarded
    • Article 1.11. Where a party has more than one place of business the relevant one is that which has the closest relationship to the contract and its performance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ClosestPlaceIsRelevant
    • Article 4.1(2) (opening words). Where the common intention can be established, the reasonable-persons reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CommonIntentionDisplacesReasonablePersons
    • Article 1.12(2). The computed last day does not stand where it is a holiday at the place of performance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ComputedLastDayYieldsToHoliday
    • Article 4.6. If contract terms supplied by one party are unclear, an interpretation against that party is preferred urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContraProferentem
    • Article 1.3. A contract validly entered into is binding upon the parties urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContractIsBinding
    • Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#Cooperate
    • Article 5.2.4. The promisor may assert against the beneficiary all defences which the promisor could assert against the promisee urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DefencesAgainstBeneficiary
    • Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective
    • Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective/unless/0
    • Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyOfGoodFaith
    • Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToCooperate
    • Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRights
    • Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRightsBreached
    • Article 5.1.1. The contractual obligations of the parties may be express urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ExpressIsContractual
    • Article 5.1.5. In determining the extent to which an obligation involves a duty of best efforts or a duty to achieve a specific result, regard shall be had to the listed factors urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FactorDeterminesKindOfDuty
    • Article 1.1. The parties are free to enter into a contract and to determine its content urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FreedomOfContract
    • Article 1.6(2). Issues within the scope of these Principles but not expressly settled by them are as far as possible to be settled in accordance with their underlying general principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GapSettledByUnderlyingPrinciples
    • Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaith
    • Article 1.7(2). The parties may not exclude or limit the duty of good faith and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaithCannotBeExcluded
    • Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted
    • Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted/unless/0
    • Article 5.1.2(c). Implied obligations stem from good faith and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromGoodFaith
    • Article 5.1.2(a). Implied obligations stem from the nature and purpose of the contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromNatureAndPurpose
    • Article 5.1.2(b). Implied obligations stem from practices established between the parties and usages urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromPracticesAndUsages
    • Article 5.1.2(d). Implied obligations stem from reasonableness urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromReasonableness
    • Article 5.1.1. The contractual obligations of the parties may be implied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedIsContractual
    • Article 1.8. A party cannot act inconsistently with an understanding it has caused the other party to have and upon which that other party reasonably has acted in reliance to its detriment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InconsistentBehaviourBarred
    • Article 4.2(2) (opening words). Where the intention was known to the other party, the reasonable-person reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#IntentionDisplacesReasonablePerson
    • Article 4.1(1). A contract shall be interpreted according to the common intention of the parties urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByCommonIntention
    • Article 4.1(2). If the common intention cannot be established, the contract shall be interpreted according to the meaning reasonable persons of the same kind would give it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByReasonablePersons
    • Article 1.4. Nothing in these Principles restricts the application of mandatory rules urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MandatoryRulesUnrestricted
    • Article 5.1.7(2). Where the price is to be determined by one party and that determination is manifestly unreasonable, a reasonable price shall be substituted notwithstanding any contract term to the contrary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ManifestlyUnreasonableDeterminationReplaced
    • Preamble. These Principles may be applied when the parties have agreed that their contract be governed by general principles of law, the lex mercatoria or the like urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyOnChoiceOfGeneralPrinciples
    • Preamble. These Principles may be applied when the parties have not chosen any law to govern their contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyWhereNoLawChosen
    • Preamble. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement domestic law urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretDomesticLaw
    • Preamble. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement international uniform law instruments urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretUniformLaw
    • Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated as otherwise provided in these Principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationAsProvided
    • Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated by agreement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByAgreement
    • Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated in accordance with its terms urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByTerms
    • Article 1.2. Nothing in these Principles requires a contract to be made in or evidenced by a particular form urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoFormRequired
    • Article 1.10(2)-(3). A notice is effective when it reaches the person to whom it is given urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoticeEffectiveOnReceipt
    • Article 4.7. In case of discrepancy between equally authoritative versions there is a preference for the interpretation according to the original version urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#OriginalVersionPreferred
    • Article 1.12(1). Official holidays or non-business days occurring during the period are included in calculating it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodEndsOn
    • Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday
    • Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday/unless/0
    • Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PreserveRights
    • Article 5.1.7(1). Where a contract does not fix the price, the parties are considered to have made reference to the price generally charged in comparable circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceByMarket
    • Article 5.1.7(1). If no such price is available, a reasonable price applies urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceReasonableWhereNoMarket
    • Preamble. These Principles shall be applied when the parties have agreed that their contract be governed by them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PrinciplesGovernByAgreement
    • Article 5.1.6. Where the quality of performance is neither fixed by nor determinable from the contract, a party is bound to render a performance of a quality that is reasonable and not less than average in the circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#QualityWhereNotFixed
    • Articles 4.4 and 4.5. Terms are to be read in the light of the whole contract and so as to give effect to all of them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReadingConformsToCanons
    • Article 5.1.9(1). An obligee may release its right by agreement with the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReleaseByAgreement
    • Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone
    • Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone/unless/0
    • Article 5.2.6. The beneficiary may renounce a right conferred on it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RenunciationEndsBeneficiaryRight
    • Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract
    • Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract/unless/0
    • Article 5.3.5. On fulfilment of a resolutive condition the rules on restitution apply with appropriate adaptations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RestitutionOnResolutiveCondition
    • Article 5.1.4(1). To the extent that an obligation involves a duty to achieve a specific result, that party is bound to achieve that result urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResultDutyPerformed
    • Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance
    • Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance/unless/0
    • Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant
    • Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant/unless/0
    • Article 4.2(1). Statements and other conduct shall be interpreted according to the party's intention if the other party knew or could not have been unaware of it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByIntention
    • Article 4.2(2). If the preceding paragraph is not applicable, statements shall be interpreted according to the meaning a reasonable person would give them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByReasonablePerson
    • Article 4.8(1). Where the parties have not agreed with respect to an important term, a term which is appropriate in the circumstances shall be supplied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SupplyOmittedTerm
    • Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect
    • Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect/unless/0
    • Article 5.1.8. A contract for an indefinite period may be terminated by either party by giving notice a reasonable time in advance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#TerminationOfIndefiniteContract
    • Article 5.1.7(2). A manifestly unreasonable determination does not stand as the applicable price urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#UnreasonableDeterminationDisplaced
    • Article 5.3.1. A contract or a contractual obligation may be made conditional upon the occurrence of a future uncertain event urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ValidCondition
    Details
    {
     "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_EN",
     "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
     "since": null,
     "state": "not_yet",
     "status": null
    }
  2. infoEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31

    редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_FR на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 79 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)

    Affected nodes
    • Article 5.2.3. The conferment of rights in the beneficiary includes the right to invoke a clause in the contract which excludes or limits the liability of the beneficiary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryMayInvokeClause
    • Article 5.1.4(2). To the extent that an obligation involves a duty of best efforts, that party is bound to make such efforts as would be made by a reasonable person of the same kind urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BestEffortsDutyPerformed
    • Article 1.9(1). The parties are bound by any usage to which they have agreed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByAgreedUsage
    • Article 1.9(1). The parties are bound by practices which they have established between themselves urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByEstablishedPractice
    • Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage
    • Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage/unless/0
    • Article 5.3.3(1). A party who prevented fulfilment contrary to good faith may not rely on the non-fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnPreventedCondition
    • Article 5.3.3(2). A party who brought about fulfilment contrary to good faith may not rely on the fulfilment of the condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnProcuredCondition
    • Article 4.3. In applying Articles 4.1 and 4.2, regard shall be had to all the circumstances, including those listed urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CircumstanceToBeRegarded
    • Article 1.11. Where a party has more than one place of business the relevant one is that which has the closest relationship to the contract and its performance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ClosestPlaceIsRelevant
    • Article 4.1(2) (opening words). Where the common intention can be established, the reasonable-persons reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CommonIntentionDisplacesReasonablePersons
    • Article 1.12(2). The computed last day does not stand where it is a holiday at the place of performance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ComputedLastDayYieldsToHoliday
    • Article 4.6. If contract terms supplied by one party are unclear, an interpretation against that party is preferred urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContraProferentem
    • Article 1.3. A contract validly entered into is binding upon the parties urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContractIsBinding
    • Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#Cooperate
    • Article 5.2.4. The promisor may assert against the beneficiary all defences which the promisor could assert against the promisee urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DefencesAgainstBeneficiary
    • Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective
    • Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective/unless/0
    • Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyOfGoodFaith
    • Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToCooperate
    • Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRights
    • Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRightsBreached
    • Article 5.1.1. The contractual obligations of the parties may be express urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ExpressIsContractual
    • Article 5.1.5. In determining the extent to which an obligation involves a duty of best efforts or a duty to achieve a specific result, regard shall be had to the listed factors urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FactorDeterminesKindOfDuty
    • Article 1.1. The parties are free to enter into a contract and to determine its content urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FreedomOfContract
    • Article 1.6(2). Issues within the scope of these Principles but not expressly settled by them are as far as possible to be settled in accordance with their underlying general principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GapSettledByUnderlyingPrinciples
    • Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaith
    • Article 1.7(2). The parties may not exclude or limit the duty of good faith and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaithCannotBeExcluded
    • Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted
    • Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted/unless/0
    • Article 5.1.2(c). Implied obligations stem from good faith and fair dealing urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromGoodFaith
    • Article 5.1.2(a). Implied obligations stem from the nature and purpose of the contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromNatureAndPurpose
    • Article 5.1.2(b). Implied obligations stem from practices established between the parties and usages urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromPracticesAndUsages
    • Article 5.1.2(d). Implied obligations stem from reasonableness urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromReasonableness
    • Article 5.1.1. The contractual obligations of the parties may be implied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedIsContractual
    • Article 1.8. A party cannot act inconsistently with an understanding it has caused the other party to have and upon which that other party reasonably has acted in reliance to its detriment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InconsistentBehaviourBarred
    • Article 4.2(2) (opening words). Where the intention was known to the other party, the reasonable-person reading does not apply urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#IntentionDisplacesReasonablePerson
    • Article 4.1(1). A contract shall be interpreted according to the common intention of the parties urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByCommonIntention
    • Article 4.1(2). If the common intention cannot be established, the contract shall be interpreted according to the meaning reasonable persons of the same kind would give it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByReasonablePersons
    • Article 1.4. Nothing in these Principles restricts the application of mandatory rules urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MandatoryRulesUnrestricted
    • Article 5.1.7(2). Where the price is to be determined by one party and that determination is manifestly unreasonable, a reasonable price shall be substituted notwithstanding any contract term to the contrary urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ManifestlyUnreasonableDeterminationReplaced
    • Preamble. These Principles may be applied when the parties have agreed that their contract be governed by general principles of law, the lex mercatoria or the like urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyOnChoiceOfGeneralPrinciples
    • Preamble. These Principles may be applied when the parties have not chosen any law to govern their contract urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyWhereNoLawChosen
    • Preamble. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement domestic law urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretDomesticLaw
    • Preamble. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement international uniform law instruments urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretUniformLaw
    • Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated as otherwise provided in these Principles urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationAsProvided
    • Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated by agreement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByAgreement
    • Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated in accordance with its terms urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByTerms
    • Article 1.2. Nothing in these Principles requires a contract to be made in or evidenced by a particular form urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoFormRequired
    • Article 1.10(2)-(3). A notice is effective when it reaches the person to whom it is given urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoticeEffectiveOnReceipt
    • Article 4.7. In case of discrepancy between equally authoritative versions there is a preference for the interpretation according to the original version urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#OriginalVersionPreferred
    • Article 1.12(1). Official holidays or non-business days occurring during the period are included in calculating it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodEndsOn
    • Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday
    • Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday/unless/0
    • Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PreserveRights
    • Article 5.1.7(1). Where a contract does not fix the price, the parties are considered to have made reference to the price generally charged in comparable circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceByMarket
    • Article 5.1.7(1). If no such price is available, a reasonable price applies urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceReasonableWhereNoMarket
    • Preamble. These Principles shall be applied when the parties have agreed that their contract be governed by them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PrinciplesGovernByAgreement
    • Article 5.1.6. Where the quality of performance is neither fixed by nor determinable from the contract, a party is bound to render a performance of a quality that is reasonable and not less than average in the circumstances urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#QualityWhereNotFixed
    • Article 5.1.9(1). An obligee may release its right by agreement with the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReleaseByAgreement
    • Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone
    • Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone/unless/0
    • Article 5.2.6. The beneficiary may renounce a right conferred on it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RenunciationEndsBeneficiaryRight
    • Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract
    • Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract/unless/0
    • Article 5.3.5. On fulfilment of a resolutive condition the rules on restitution apply with appropriate adaptations urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RestitutionOnResolutiveCondition
    • Article 5.1.4(1). To the extent that an obligation involves a duty to achieve a specific result, that party is bound to achieve that result urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResultDutyPerformed
    • Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance
    • Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance/unless/0
    • Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant
    • Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant/unless/0
    • Article 4.2(1). Statements and other conduct shall be interpreted according to the party's intention if the other party knew or could not have been unaware of it urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByIntention
    • Article 4.2(2). If the preceding paragraph is not applicable, statements shall be interpreted according to the meaning a reasonable person would give them urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByReasonablePerson
    • Article 4.8(1). Where the parties have not agreed with respect to an important term, a term which is appropriate in the circumstances shall be supplied urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SupplyOmittedTerm
    • Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect
    • Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect/unless/0
    • Article 5.1.8. A contract for an indefinite period may be terminated by either party by giving notice a reasonable time in advance urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#TerminationOfIndefiniteContract
    • Article 5.1.7(2). A manifestly unreasonable determination does not stand as the applicable price urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#UnreasonableDeterminationDisplaced
    • Article 5.3.1. A contract or a contractual obligation may be made conditional upon the occurrence of a future uncertain event urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ValidCondition
    Details
    {
     "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_FR",
     "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
     "since": null,
     "state": "not_yet",
     "status": null
    }
  3. infoEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31

    редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_EN на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 26 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)

    Affected nodes
    • Article 10.4(1). Where the obligor acknowledges the right before the expiration of the general limitation period, a new general limitation period begins on the day after the acknowledgement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AcknowledgementStartsNewGeneralPeriod
    • Article 10.6(1). In the absence of provisions determining the exact date of commencement, arbitral proceedings are deemed to commence on the date on which the request reaches the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ArbitrationCommencesOnRequest
    • Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration
    • Article 10.1(2). This Chapter does not govern the time within which a party must give notice or perform any act other than the institution of legal proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ChapterDoesNotGovernNoticeTime
    • Article 10.9(1). The expiration of the limitation period does not extinguish the right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight
    • Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted
    • Article 10.9(2). Once the obligor has asserted expiry, the barred exercise is a comparative remedium_exclusum urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit
    • Article 10.3(a). The parties may not shorten the general limitation period to less than one year urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodFloorOfOneYear
    • Article 10.2(1). The general limitation period is three years beginning on the day after the day the obligee knows or ought to know the facts as a result of which the right can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodOfThreeYears
    • Article 10.1(1). The exercise of rights governed by the Principles is barred by the expiration of a limitation period according to the rules of this Chapter urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#LimitationGovernsExerciseOfRights
    • Article 10.3(c). The parties may not extend the maximum limitation period to more than fifteen years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodCeilingOfFifteenYears
    • Article 10.4(2). The maximum limitation period does not begin to run again, but may be exceeded by the beginning of a new general limitation period urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodDoesNotRestart
    • Article 10.3(b). The parties may not shorten the maximum limitation period to less than four years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodFloorOfFourYears
    • Article 10.2(2). In any event, the maximum limitation period is ten years beginning on the day after the day the right can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodOfTenYears
    • Article 10.11. Where there has been performance in order to discharge an obligation, there is no right of restitution merely because the limitation period has expired urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#NoRestitutionAfterExpiration
    • Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration
    • Article 10.3. The parties may modify the limitation periods urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PartiesMayModifyPeriods
    • Article 10.9(3). A right may still be relied on as a defence even though the expiration of the limitation period for that right has been asserted urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#RightStillAvailableAsDefence
    • Article 10.10. The obligee may exercise the right of set-off until the obligor has asserted the expiration of the limitation period urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SetOffUntilExpirationAsserted
    • Article 10.7. Articles 10.5 and 10.6 apply with appropriate modifications to proceedings whereby the parties request a third person to assist them in reaching an amicable settlement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByAmicableSettlementProceedings
    • Article 10.6(1). The running of the limitation period is suspended when the obligee performs an act recognised by the law of the arbitral tribunal as asserting its right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByArbitralAct
    • Article 10.5(1)(c). The running of the limitation period is suspended where the obligee has asserted its rights in proceedings for dissolution of the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByDissolutionClaim
    • Article 10.8(1). Where the obligee has been prevented by an impediment beyond its control, the general limitation period is suspended so as not to expire before one year after the impediment has ceased to exist urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByImpediment
    • Article 10.8(2). Where the impediment consists of the incapacity or death of a party, suspension ceases when a representative or successor has been appointed; the additional one-year period applies accordingly urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByIncapacityEndsOnAppointment
    • Article 10.5(1)(b). The running of the limitation period is suspended where the obligee has asserted its rights in the insolvency proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByInsolvencyClaim
    • Article 10.5(1)(a). The running of the limitation period is suspended when the obligee performs an act recognised by the law of the court as asserting its right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByJudicialAct
    Details
    {
     "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_EN",
     "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
     "since": null,
     "state": "not_yet",
     "status": null
    }
  4. infoEDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31

    редакция urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_FR на дату права 2016-01-02 ещё не введена в действие — 26 узлов не участвуют в вычислении (§92.3/§31, E-0095)

    Affected nodes
    • Article 10.4(1). Where the obligor acknowledges the right before the expiration of the general limitation period, a new general limitation period begins on the day after the acknowledgement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AcknowledgementStartsNewGeneralPeriod
    • Article 10.6(1). In the absence of provisions determining the exact date of commencement, arbitral proceedings are deemed to commence on the date on which the request reaches the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ArbitrationCommencesOnRequest
    • Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration
    • Article 10.1(2). This Chapter does not govern the time within which a party must give notice or perform any act other than the institution of legal proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ChapterDoesNotGovernNoticeTime
    • Article 10.9(1). The expiration of the limitation period does not extinguish the right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight
    • Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted
    • Article 10.9(2). Once the obligor has asserted expiry, the barred exercise is a comparative remedium_exclusum urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit
    • Article 10.3(a). The parties may not shorten the general limitation period to less than one year urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodFloorOfOneYear
    • Article 10.2(1). The general limitation period is three years beginning on the day after the day the obligee knows or ought to know the facts as a result of which the right can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodOfThreeYears
    • Article 10.1(1). The exercise of rights governed by the Principles is barred by the expiration of a limitation period according to the rules of this Chapter urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#LimitationGovernsExerciseOfRights
    • Article 10.3(c). The parties may not extend the maximum limitation period to more than fifteen years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodCeilingOfFifteenYears
    • Article 10.4(2). The maximum limitation period does not begin to run again, but may be exceeded by the beginning of a new general limitation period urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodDoesNotRestart
    • Article 10.3(b). The parties may not shorten the maximum limitation period to less than four years urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodFloorOfFourYears
    • Article 10.2(2). In any event, the maximum limitation period is ten years beginning on the day after the day the right can be exercised urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodOfTenYears
    • Article 10.11. Where there has been performance in order to discharge an obligation, there is no right of restitution merely because the limitation period has expired urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#NoRestitutionAfterExpiration
    • Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration
    • Article 10.3. The parties may modify the limitation periods urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PartiesMayModifyPeriods
    • Article 10.9(3). A right may still be relied on as a defence even though the expiration of the limitation period for that right has been asserted urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#RightStillAvailableAsDefence
    • Article 10.10. The obligee may exercise the right of set-off until the obligor has asserted the expiration of the limitation period urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SetOffUntilExpirationAsserted
    • Article 10.7. Articles 10.5 and 10.6 apply with appropriate modifications to proceedings whereby the parties request a third person to assist them in reaching an amicable settlement urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByAmicableSettlementProceedings
    • Article 10.6(1). The running of the limitation period is suspended when the obligee performs an act recognised by the law of the arbitral tribunal as asserting its right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByArbitralAct
    • Article 10.5(1)(c). The running of the limitation period is suspended where the obligee has asserted its rights in proceedings for dissolution of the obligor urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByDissolutionClaim
    • Article 10.8(1). Where the obligee has been prevented by an impediment beyond its control, the general limitation period is suspended so as not to expire before one year after the impediment has ceased to exist urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByImpediment
    • Article 10.8(2). Where the impediment consists of the incapacity or death of a party, suspension ceases when a representative or successor has been appointed; the additional one-year period applies accordingly urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByIncapacityEndsOnAppointment
    • Article 10.5(1)(b). The running of the limitation period is suspended where the obligee has asserted its rights in the insolvency proceedings urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByInsolvencyClaim
    • Article 10.5(1)(a). The running of the limitation period is suspended when the obligee performs an act recognised by the law of the court as asserting its right urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByJudicialAct
    Details
    {
     "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_FR",
     "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
     "since": null,
     "state": "not_yet",
     "status": null
    }

As recorded by the engine: code, severity and message with §-references; order follows the evaluation document.

Proof graph

Proof graph · 5 layer
query_evaluationaction_prescrite_lerule_applicationActionNonPrescriteAvantOuAEcheancerule_applicationEcheanceCinqAnsassertionaction_introduite_lerule_applicationPointDepartConnaissanceReelleassertionprescription_non_interrompueassertiontitulaire_connait_les_faits_leassertioncreance_exigible_depuis

Proof nodes: 10 · assertion 4, rule_application 5, query_evaluation 1

This block is too large for inline viewing. It is included in full in the document JSON, without truncation.

Download JSON ↓
Calendar and proof identifiers
Proof reference
case/ZweiJahre_CC/query/cc-prescrite
Original reasoning · JSON

This block is too large for inline viewing. It is included in full in the document JSON, without truncation.

Download JSON ↓
SourcesExcerpts: 7

Article 2219

Article 2219 La prescription extinctive est un mode d'extinction d'un droit résultant de l'inaction de son titulaire pendant un certain laps de temps.
Original data · JSON
JSONRead only
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:6df4090af33e5e220e1ccb8dce8f8d00f5f0e141aadbd8f85537aa44bf7a63f7",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2219",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2219"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2219",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:0b7ecca0ee814319db91d174578fb164b2ac80bbd82794ff733b36bd4f55401a",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2219\nLa prescription extinctive est un mode d'extinction d'un droit résultant de l'inaction de son titulaire pendant un certain laps de temps.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Article 2224

Article 2224 Les actions personnelles ou mobilières se prescrivent par cinq ans à compter du jour où le titulaire d'un droit a connu ou aurait dû connaître les faits lui permettant de l'exercer.
Original data · JSON
JSONRead only
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:bdab8bd64c835fd72d22b2500bf46d2189e23899c1a2355f5df83442df6121ab",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2224",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2224"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2224",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:672b74a19b0ebe429181790cbe798f0f53e22cb2eeb8706cded06dbf5a40c629",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2224\nLes actions personnelles ou mobilières se prescrivent par cinq ans à compter du jour où le titulaire d'un droit a connu ou aurait dû connaître les faits lui permettant de l'exercer.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Article 2228

Article 2228 La prescription se compte par jours, et non par heures.
Original data · JSON
JSONRead only
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:a65f1c87050358f486df72292dbb5562439921a55708065026e1560803461b7b",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2228",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2228"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2228",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:dd06365b6b1300407fadd02ddc12c5220fd9139343f3ce91809ff20bf62588a6",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2228\nLa prescription se compte par jours, et non par heures.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Article 2229

Article 2229 Elle est acquise lorsque le dernier jour du terme est accompli.
Original data · JSON
JSONRead only
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:43dd3aa87d9bddf34522d203c9afc34f12ce9f5292aa3748835cbccf72dfcccd",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2229",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2229"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2229",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:28578b7da1445ef66f205effb784bcc5dae77310d748b2ae6ccebd52a8ca3009",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2229\nElle est acquise lorsque le dernier jour du terme est accompli.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Article 2232

Article 2232 Le report du point de départ, la suspension ou l'interruption de la prescription ne peut avoir pour effet de porter le délai de la prescription extinctive au-delà de vingt ans à compter du jour de la naissance du droit. Le premier alinéa n'est pas applicable dans les cas mentionnés aux articles 2226, 2226-1, 2227, 2233 et 2236, au premier alinéa de l'article 2241 et à l'article 2244. Il ne s'applique pas non plus aux actions relatives à l'état des personnes.
Original data · JSON
JSONRead only
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:d0aa882fc857d081bcada43191910d722446f91fb14fb86b7e7322957b4070c8",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2232",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2232"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2232",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:b1a33bf6d27cec1af359949222bf7220bc63bc536ae53eb79e94833b5d293e0b",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2232\nLe report du point de départ, la suspension ou l'interruption de la prescription ne peut avoir pour effet de porter le délai de la prescription extinctive au-delà de vingt ans à compter du jour de la naissance du droit.\nLe premier alinéa n'est pas applicable dans les cas mentionnés aux articles 2226, 2226-1, 2227, 2233 et 2236, au premier alinéa de l'article 2241 et à l'article 2244. Il ne s'applique pas non plus aux actions relatives à l'état des personnes.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Article 2238

Article 2238 La prescription est suspendue à compter du jour où, après la survenance d'un litige, les parties conviennent de recourir à la médiation ou à la conciliation ou, à défaut d'accord écrit, à compter du jour de la première réunion de médiation ou de conciliation. La prescription est également suspendue à compter de la conclusion d'une convention de procédure participative ou à compter de l'accord du débiteur constaté par l'huissier de justice pour participer à la procédure prévue à l'article L. 125-1 du code des procédures civiles d'exécution. Le délai de prescription recommence à courir, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois, à compter de la date à laquelle soit l'une des parties ou les deux, soit le médiateur ou le conciliateur déclarent que la médiation ou la conciliation est terminée. En cas de convention de procédure participative, le délai de prescription recommence à courir à compter du terme de la convention, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois. En cas d'échec de la procédure prévue au même article, le délai de prescription recommence à courir à compter de la date du refus du débiteur, constaté par l'huissier, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois.
Original data · JSON
JSONRead only
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:85fb1ede52113abd61e7bcfa34017c1229badc1205a9cac686e65c4640912b6f",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2238",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2238"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2238",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:7de68d6ed845bcd95c5ca76851b7d5c42c0b755a0f7a53080cbbcbb127ac61f7",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2238\nLa prescription est suspendue à compter du jour où, après la survenance d'un litige, les parties conviennent de recourir à la médiation ou à la conciliation ou, à défaut d'accord écrit, à compter du jour de la première réunion de médiation ou de conciliation. La prescription est également suspendue à compter de la conclusion d'une convention de procédure participative ou à compter de l'accord du débiteur constaté par l'huissier de justice pour participer à la procédure prévue à l'article L. 125-1 du code des procédures civiles d'exécution.\nLe délai de prescription recommence à courir, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois, à compter de la date à laquelle soit l'une des parties ou les deux, soit le médiateur ou le conciliateur déclarent que la médiation ou la conciliation est terminée. En cas de convention de procédure participative, le délai de prescription recommence à courir à compter du terme de la convention, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois. En cas d'échec de la procédure prévue au même article, le délai de prescription recommence à courir à compter de la date du refus du débiteur, constaté par l'huissier, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Article 2239

Article 2239 La prescription est également suspendue lorsque le juge fait droit à une demande de mesure d'instruction présentée avant tout procès. Le délai de prescription recommence à courir, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois, à compter du jour où la mesure a été exécutée.
Original data · JSON
JSONRead only
{
  "contentHash": "sha256:16731a698eded878eaa02339d6b1fd92b7299d446eab076502a9c24717cfd0cc",
  "edition": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_2008",
  "fragmentKind": "article",
  "id": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#CC_POST_ART2239",
  "kind": "fragment",
  "labels": [
    {
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2239"
    }
  ],
  "locator": "article/2239",
  "package": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
  "texts": [
    {
      "contentHash": "sha256:9e742ac71c8ecd1fe04db3e3bfceb323387b9b856a4882cc1429615d47e89d12",
      "language": "fr",
      "status": "official",
      "text": "Article 2239\nLa prescription est également suspendue lorsque le juge fait droit à une demande de mesure d'instruction présentée avant tout procès.\nLe délai de prescription recommence à courir, pour une durée qui ne peut être inférieure à six mois, à compter du jour où la mesure a été exécutée.\n"
    }
  ],
  "visibility": "public"
}

Packages in the snapshot

  • de.bgb.core
  • de.bgb.fristen
  • de.bgb.ius_privatum
  • doctrine.ius_privatum
  • fr.code_civil
  • unidroit.picc
  • unidroit.picc_limitation
Technical dataFull response, parameters and checksums
Calculation status
COMPUTED
Full engine response
Zwei Jahre, Code civil: die Klage ist nicht verjährt

Complete machine result · JSON

This block is too large for inline viewing. It is included in full in the document JSON, without truncation.

Download JSON ↓

Execution · JSON

This block is too large for inline viewing. It is included in full in the document JSON, without truncation.

Download JSON ↓

Display metadata

This block is too large for inline viewing. It is included in full in the document JSON, without truncation.

Download JSON ↓

JSON · calculations, sources and exact data

JSONRead only
{
  "acts": [
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:a6813604c35567e7c586d334efbf524d08f3467170c4b732cfb15809cacf4ff4",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core",
      "package": "de.bgb.core"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:998148eaeeed28f1565811474ee7beb7eacc616c5681ed9638edc976512a9884",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
      "package": "de.bgb.fristen"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:86a5a00db16e32187223ceeec6748eb7d42d18b7c370c8b15ac64d2f3f655ff7",
      "namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum",
      "package": "de.bgb.ius_privatum"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:7202de5de49a8a9d12837bc19cb7008ba2d1a68dbcc0134e0afccf1440a6d5ed",
      "namespace": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum",
      "package": "doctrine.ius_privatum"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:ad41d027ba92c38ca5eecc1d16097d0bbc8c5a74946fc1a6397c6dadac61158f",
      "namespace": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
      "package": "fr.code_civil"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:719bfd408eed92ad497ba071482354d4ad32b81ef9f41c6654f224416c19e603",
      "namespace": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc",
      "package": "unidroit.picc"
    },
    {
      "artifactHash": "sha256:b311d0d422a1079f71113320bd818236f7b09507c7dd960bdafceb91285497d9",
      "namespace": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
      "package": "unidroit.picc_limitation"
    }
  ],
  "caseHash": "sha256:44bf9c77a11b9a491773aa06437c96080852a6c99f75cc4ccda4a8f795f7136d",
  "jurisdiction": "Deutschland",
  "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
  "mode": "audit",
  "programHash": "sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e",
  "resultHash": "sha256:79d9c0afff9713df79f5881d566513daec0a4a1f6e06ab171f810b8ff37a4e50",
  "timezone": "UTC"
}
evaluation SHA-256
sha256:979f29a3c2372b19165a5ab12148f78b5fae75b6d3c81fd38678391bd2d21300
Original data · JSON
JSONRead only
{
  "args": [
    {
      "id": "urn:p12:causa",
      "kind": "entity_ref"
    },
    {
      "kind": "value",
      "type": {
        "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
      },
      "value": "2016-01-02"
    }
  ],
  "facts": [
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2014-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#creance_exigible_depuis"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2014-03-15"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#titulaire_connait_les_faits_le"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "kind": "value",
          "type": {
            "name": "urn:law:std#Date"
          },
          "value": "2016-01-02"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#action_introduite_le"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#prescription_non_interrompue"
    },
    {
      "args": [
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:causa",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        },
        {
          "id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
          "kind": "entity_ref"
        }
      ],
      "negated": false,
      "origin": "case_input",
      "predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
    }
  ],
  "kind": "truth",
  "legalTime": "2016-01-02",
  "predicate": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil#action_prescrite_le"
}

Nach zwei Jahren ist die französische Klage noch nicht verjährt.

How to cite

The snapshot is immutable: the SHA-256 of the downloadable JSON pins it, so no access date is needed.

Citation
“Eine Forderung, entstanden am 15. März 2010, Klage am 2. Januar 2016: ist das Rechtsmittel nach dem BGB, dem Code civil und den UNIDROIT-Prinzipien ausgeschlossen?”. Arxo Lens. https://lens.arxo.io/a/b_53bf8ccac0d621cc2507b1b9b4a53c448203f6b570111d248dba3bf7de49c48a. Snapshot SHA-256: 53bf8ccac0d621cc2507b1b9b4a53c448203f6b570111d248dba3bf7de49c48a.
BibTeX
@misc{arxo-lens-b_53bf8ccac0d6,
  title = {Eine Forderung, entstanden am 15. März 2010, Klage am 2. Januar 2016: ist das Rechtsmittel nach dem BGB, dem Code civil und den UNIDROIT-Prinzipien ausgeschlossen?},
  howpublished = {Arxo Lens},
  url = {https://lens.arxo.io/a/b_53bf8ccac0d621cc2507b1b9b4a53c448203f6b570111d248dba3bf7de49c48a},
  note = {SHA-256 53bf8ccac0d621cc2507b1b9b4a53c448203f6b570111d248dba3bf7de49c48a}
}
Embed code

The card shows the result and links to the full analysis; it sets no cookies.

<iframe src="https://lens.arxo.io/embed/b_53bf8ccac0d621cc2507b1b9b4a53c448203f6b570111d248dba3bf7de49c48a?lang=en" width="100%" height="390" loading="lazy" title="Ein Fall, drei Kodizes — Arxo Lens" style="border:0"></iframe>

Anonymous visit statistics, no cookies.