Condition
Fünf Jahre, BGB: die Verjährung ist am 31. Dezember 2013 eingetreten
Calculation result
Established
Input parameters
What we are finding
Tag, mit dessen Ablauf die Verjährung des Anspruchs eintritt
Input facts
Tag, an dem der Anspruch entstanden ist (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 1, § 200)
a: atag: 15 March 2010Tag, an dem der Gläubiger von den den Anspruch begründenden Umständen und der Person des Schuldners Kenntnis erlangt hat (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 2) — festgestellte Tatsache, im Fall origin adjudicated
a: atag: 15 March 2010Kein Hemmungstatbestand der §§ 203–208 festgestellt — ausdrückliche Angabe des Falls; das Fehlen einer Angabe ist keine Verneinung
a: ader Schuldner beruft sich auf die Verjährung des Leistungs- oder Nacherfüllungsanspruchs (§ 218 Abs. 1)
a: aInhaber des Anspruchs (Gläubiger)
a: ap: gAnspruchsgegner (Schuldner)
a: ap: sdiese Person des BGB tritt in der vergleichenden Kette als dieses Gesicht auf
p x g g s s dieser Anspruch ist das vergleichende Streitverhältnis
a: ac: causathe claimant brings a claim against the defendant — the contested relation the question is about
causa: causaactor: greus: s
Original data · JSON
{
"args": [
{
"id": "urn:p12:anspruch",
"kind": "entity_ref"
},
{
"kind": "value",
"type": {
"name": "urn:law:std#Date"
},
"value": "2013-12-31"
}
],
"facts": [
{
"args": [
{
"id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
"kind": "const_ref"
},
{
"kind": "value",
"type": {
"name": "urn:law:std#Date"
},
"value": "2010-03-15"
}
],
"negated": false,
"origin": "case_input",
"predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core#anspruch_entstanden_am"
},
{
"args": [
{
"id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
"kind": "const_ref"
},
{
"kind": "value",
"type": {
"name": "urn:law:std#Date"
},
"value": "2010-03-15"
}
],
"negated": false,
"origin": "adjudicated",
"predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#kenntnis_erlangt_am"
},
{
"args": [
{
"id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
"kind": "const_ref"
}
],
"negated": false,
"origin": "case_input",
"predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#keine_hemmung"
},
{
"args": [
{
"id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
"kind": "const_ref"
}
],
"negated": false,
"origin": "case_input",
"predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#schuldner_beruft_sich_auf_verjaehrung"
},
{
"args": [
{
"id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
"kind": "const_ref"
},
{
"id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#g",
"kind": "const_ref"
}
],
"negated": false,
"origin": "case_input",
"predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core#anspruchsinhaber"
},
{
"args": [
{
"id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
"kind": "const_ref"
},
{
"id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#s",
"kind": "const_ref"
}
],
"negated": false,
"origin": "case_input",
"predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core#anspruchsgegner"
},
{
"args": [
{
"id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#g",
"kind": "const_ref"
},
{
"id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
"kind": "entity_ref"
}
],
"negated": false,
"origin": "case_input",
"predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#persona_of"
},
{
"args": [
{
"id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#s",
"kind": "const_ref"
},
{
"id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
"kind": "entity_ref"
}
],
"negated": false,
"origin": "case_input",
"predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#persona_of"
},
{
"args": [
{
"id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
"kind": "const_ref"
},
{
"id": "urn:p12:causa",
"kind": "entity_ref"
}
],
"negated": false,
"origin": "case_input",
"predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#causa_of_anspruch"
},
{
"args": [
{
"id": "urn:p12:causa",
"kind": "entity_ref"
},
{
"id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
"kind": "entity_ref"
},
{
"id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
"kind": "entity_ref"
}
],
"negated": false,
"origin": "case_input",
"predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
}
],
"kind": "truth",
"legalTime": "2016-01-02",
"predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#verjaehrung_eingetreten_am"
}Why this resultApplied rules and conditions
Derivation path11 steps
- 1case fact
Tag, an dem der Anspruch entstanden ist (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 1, § 200)
a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 15 March 2010
- 2rule
Für den Tag der Entstehung des Anspruchs wird der Schluss des Jahres gesucht (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 1)
für diesen Tag wird der Schluss des Jahres gesucht (§ 199 Abs. 1): a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 15 March 2010
para. 199
Identifier
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeGesuchtFuerEntstehung - 3rule
Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 9 — Ende des 9. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages
31 December 2010 = month end of(add calendar period(month start of(15 March 2010), 9 calendar_month))
para. 199
Identifier
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat09 - 4rule
Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): der Kandidat ist der 31. Dezember, wenn sein Monat 31 Tage hat, der folgende Monat 31 Tage und der übernächste höchstens 29 — Dezember, Januar, Februar
Schluss des Jahres, in dem der Tag liegt (§ 199 Abs. 1): der 31. Dezember desselben Jahres: a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 15 March 2010; ultimo: 31 December 2010
para. 199
Identifier
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeIstDezember - 5case fact
Kein Hemmungstatbestand der §§ 203–208 festgestellt — ausdrückliche Angabe des Falls; das Fehlen einer Angabe ist keine Verneinung
a: urn:p12:anspruch
- 6accepted externally
Tag, an dem der Gläubiger von den den Anspruch begründenden Umständen und der Person des Schuldners Kenntnis erlangt hat (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 2) — festgestellte Tatsache, im Fall origin adjudicated
a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 15 March 2010
- accepted externally
- 7rule
Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beginnt mit dem Schluss des Jahres, in dem der Anspruch entstanden ist und der Gläubiger Kenntnis erlangt hat (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 und 2) — Kenntnis nicht nach der Entstehung: Schluss des Entstehungsjahres
Schluss des Jahres, mit dem die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beginnt (§ 199 Abs. 1): a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 31 December 2010
para. 199
Identifier
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#VerjaehrungsbeginnUltimoDerEntstehung - 8rule
Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beträgt drei Jahre (§ 195) — Jahresschritt vom Schluss des Jahres (§ 188 Abs. 2, Politik BGB_FRISTEN_KALENDER)
31 December 2013 = add calendar period(31 December 2010, 3 calendar_year)
para. 195
Identifier
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#RegelmaessigeVerjaehrungsfrist - 9rule
Ohne festgestellte Hemmung endet die Verjährungsfrist mit der regelmäßigen Frist (§§ 195, 199; § 209 greift nicht)
Tag, mit dessen Ablauf die Verjährungsfrist unter Berücksichtigung der Hemmung endet (§ 209): a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 31 December 2013
para. 209
Identifier
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#VerjaehrungsfristEndeOhneHemmung - 10rule
Ohne Hemmung tritt die Verjährung mit dem Ende der Verjährungsfrist ein
Tag, mit dessen Ablauf die Verjährung des Anspruchs eintritt: a: urn:p12:anspruch; tag: 31 December 2013
para. 209
Identifier
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#VerjaehrungOhneHemmung - 11query
Query evaluation
verified by the engine: 8 · case fact: 2 · accepted externally: 1 · Full graph: 33 nodes
Steps of the saved proof from the case facts to the answer. Formulas are shown as written in the norm with bound values substituted; the page recomputes nothing.
Basis of this answer
Rules on the saved proof path for this answer.
de.bgb.fristen
Für den Tag der Entstehung des Anspruchs wird der Schluss des Jahres gesucht (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 1)
Identifier
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeGesuchtFuerEntstehungSchluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): der Kandidat ist der 31. Dezember, wenn sein Monat 31 Tage hat, der folgende Monat 31 Tage und der übernächste höchstens 29 — Dezember, Januar, Februar
Identifier
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeIstDezemberSchluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 9 — Ende des 9. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages
Identifier
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat09Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beträgt drei Jahre (§ 195) — Jahresschritt vom Schluss des Jahres (§ 188 Abs. 2, Politik BGB_FRISTEN_KALENDER)
Identifier
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#RegelmaessigeVerjaehrungsfristOhne Hemmung tritt die Verjährung mit dem Ende der Verjährungsfrist ein
Identifier
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#VerjaehrungOhneHemmungDie regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beginnt mit dem Schluss des Jahres, in dem der Anspruch entstanden ist und der Gläubiger Kenntnis erlangt hat (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 und 2) — Kenntnis nicht nach der Entstehung: Schluss des Entstehungsjahres
Identifier
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#VerjaehrungsbeginnUltimoDerEntstehungOhne festgestellte Hemmung endet die Verjährungsfrist mit der regelmäßigen Frist (§§ 195, 199; § 209 greift nicht)
Identifier
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#VerjaehrungsfristEndeOhneHemmung
Other rules in the evaluation14
Applied in the overall evaluation, but not on the proof path for this answer.
de.bgb.fristen
Für den Tag der Kenntniserlangung wird der Schluss des Jahres gesucht (§ 199 Abs. 1 Nr. 2)
Identifier
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeGesuchtFuerKenntnisSchluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 0 — Ende des 0. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages
Identifier
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat00Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 1 — Ende des 1. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages
Identifier
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat01Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 2 — Ende des 2. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages
Identifier
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat02Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 3 — Ende des 3. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages
Identifier
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat03Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 4 — Ende des 4. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages
Identifier
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat04Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 5 — Ende des 5. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages
Identifier
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat05Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 6 — Ende des 6. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages
Identifier
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat06Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 7 — Ende des 7. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages
Identifier
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat07Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 8 — Ende des 8. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages
Identifier
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat08Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 10 — Ende des 10. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages
Identifier
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat10Schluss des Jahres (§ 199 Abs. 1): Kandidat 11 — Ende des 11. Monats nach dem Monat des Tages
Identifier
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#JahresendeKandidat11Nach Eintritt der Verjährung ist der Schuldner berechtigt, die Leistung zu verweigern (§ 214 Abs. 1)
Identifier
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#Leistungsverweigerungsrecht214
de.bgb.ius_privatum
Nach Eintritt der Verjährung ist der Schuldner berechtigt, die Leistung zu verweigern
Identifier
urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#EinredeExcludit
Issues · 4
- info
EDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31Affected nodes- Article 5.2.3. The conferment of rights in the beneficiary includes the right to invoke a clause in the contract which excludes or limits the liability of the beneficiary
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryMayInvokeClause - Articles 5.2.1 and 5.2.2. The parties may confer a right on a third party who must be identifiable with adequate certainty by the contract
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryRightExists - Article 5.1.4(2). To the extent that an obligation involves a duty of best efforts, that party is bound to make such efforts as would be made by a reasonable person of the same kind
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BestEffortsDutyPerformed - Article 1.9(1). The parties are bound by any usage to which they have agreed
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByAgreedUsage - Article 1.9(1). The parties are bound by practices which they have established between themselves
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByEstablishedPractice - Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage - Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage/unless/0 - Article 5.3.3(1). A party who prevented fulfilment contrary to good faith may not rely on the non-fulfilment of the condition
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnPreventedCondition - Article 5.3.3(2). A party who brought about fulfilment contrary to good faith may not rely on the fulfilment of the condition
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnProcuredCondition - Article 4.3. In applying Articles 4.1 and 4.2, regard shall be had to all the circumstances, including those listed
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CircumstanceToBeRegarded - Article 1.11. Where a party has more than one place of business the relevant one is that which has the closest relationship to the contract and its performance
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ClosestPlaceIsRelevant - Article 4.1(2) (opening words). Where the common intention can be established, the reasonable-persons reading does not apply
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CommonIntentionDisplacesReasonablePersons - Article 1.12(2). The computed last day does not stand where it is a holiday at the place of performance
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ComputedLastDayYieldsToHoliday - Article 4.6. If contract terms supplied by one party are unclear, an interpretation against that party is preferred
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContraProferentem - Article 1.3. A contract validly entered into is binding upon the parties
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContractIsBinding - Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#Cooperate - Article 5.2.4. The promisor may assert against the beneficiary all defences which the promisor could assert against the promisee
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DefencesAgainstBeneficiary - Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective - Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective/unless/0 - Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyOfGoodFaith - Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToCooperate - Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRights - Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRightsBreached - Article 5.1.1. The contractual obligations of the parties may be express
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ExpressIsContractual - Article 5.1.5. In determining the extent to which an obligation involves a duty of best efforts or a duty to achieve a specific result, regard shall be had to the listed factors
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FactorDeterminesKindOfDuty - Article 1.1. The parties are free to enter into a contract and to determine its content
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FreedomOfContract - Article 1.6(2). Issues within the scope of these Principles but not expressly settled by them are as far as possible to be settled in accordance with their underlying general principles
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GapSettledByUnderlyingPrinciples - Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaith - Article 1.7(2). The parties may not exclude or limit the duty of good faith and fair dealing
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaithCannotBeExcluded - Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted - Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted/unless/0 - Article 5.1.2(c). Implied obligations stem from good faith and fair dealing
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromGoodFaith - Article 5.1.2(a). Implied obligations stem from the nature and purpose of the contract
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromNatureAndPurpose - Article 5.1.2(b). Implied obligations stem from practices established between the parties and usages
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromPracticesAndUsages - Article 5.1.2(d). Implied obligations stem from reasonableness
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromReasonableness - Article 5.1.1. The contractual obligations of the parties may be implied
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedIsContractual - Article 1.8. A party cannot act inconsistently with an understanding it has caused the other party to have and upon which that other party reasonably has acted in reliance to its detriment
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InconsistentBehaviourBarred - Article 4.2(2) (opening words). Where the intention was known to the other party, the reasonable-person reading does not apply
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#IntentionDisplacesReasonablePerson - Article 4.1(1). A contract shall be interpreted according to the common intention of the parties
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByCommonIntention - Article 4.1(2). If the common intention cannot be established, the contract shall be interpreted according to the meaning reasonable persons of the same kind would give it
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByReasonablePersons - Article 1.4. Nothing in these Principles restricts the application of mandatory rules
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MandatoryRulesUnrestricted - Article 5.1.7(2). Where the price is to be determined by one party and that determination is manifestly unreasonable, a reasonable price shall be substituted notwithstanding any contract term to the contrary
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ManifestlyUnreasonableDeterminationReplaced - Preamble. These Principles may be applied when the parties have agreed that their contract be governed by general principles of law, the lex mercatoria or the like
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyOnChoiceOfGeneralPrinciples - Preamble. These Principles may be applied when the parties have not chosen any law to govern their contract
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyWhereNoLawChosen - Preamble. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement domestic law
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretDomesticLaw - Preamble. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement international uniform law instruments
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretUniformLaw - Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated as otherwise provided in these Principles
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationAsProvided - Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated by agreement
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByAgreement - Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated in accordance with its terms
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByTerms - Article 1.2. Nothing in these Principles requires a contract to be made in or evidenced by a particular form
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoFormRequired - Article 1.10(2)-(3). A notice is effective when it reaches the person to whom it is given
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoticeEffectiveOnReceipt - Article 4.7. In case of discrepancy between equally authoritative versions there is a preference for the interpretation according to the original version
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#OriginalVersionPreferred - Article 1.12(1). Official holidays or non-business days occurring during the period are included in calculating it
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodEndsOn - Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday - Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday/unless/0 - Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PreserveRights - Article 5.1.7(1). Where a contract does not fix the price, the parties are considered to have made reference to the price generally charged in comparable circumstances
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceByMarket - Article 5.1.7(1). If no such price is available, a reasonable price applies
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceReasonableWhereNoMarket - Preamble. These Principles shall be applied when the parties have agreed that their contract be governed by them
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PrinciplesGovernByAgreement - Article 5.1.6. Where the quality of performance is neither fixed by nor determinable from the contract, a party is bound to render a performance of a quality that is reasonable and not less than average in the circumstances
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#QualityWhereNotFixed - Articles 4.4 and 4.5. Terms are to be read in the light of the whole contract and so as to give effect to all of them
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReadingConformsToCanons - Article 5.1.9(1). An obligee may release its right by agreement with the obligor
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReleaseByAgreement - Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone - Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone/unless/0 - Article 5.2.6. The beneficiary may renounce a right conferred on it
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RenunciationEndsBeneficiaryRight - Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract - Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract/unless/0 - Article 5.3.5. On fulfilment of a resolutive condition the rules on restitution apply with appropriate adaptations
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RestitutionOnResolutiveCondition - Article 5.1.4(1). To the extent that an obligation involves a duty to achieve a specific result, that party is bound to achieve that result
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResultDutyPerformed - Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance - Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance/unless/0 - Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant - Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant/unless/0 - Article 4.2(1). Statements and other conduct shall be interpreted according to the party's intention if the other party knew or could not have been unaware of it
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByIntention - Article 4.2(2). If the preceding paragraph is not applicable, statements shall be interpreted according to the meaning a reasonable person would give them
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByReasonablePerson - Article 4.8(1). Where the parties have not agreed with respect to an important term, a term which is appropriate in the circumstances shall be supplied
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SupplyOmittedTerm - Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect - Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect/unless/0 - Article 5.1.8. A contract for an indefinite period may be terminated by either party by giving notice a reasonable time in advance
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#TerminationOfIndefiniteContract - Article 5.1.7(2). A manifestly unreasonable determination does not stand as the applicable price
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#UnreasonableDeterminationDisplaced - Article 5.3.1. A contract or a contractual obligation may be made conditional upon the occurrence of a future uncertain event
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ValidCondition
Details
{ "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_EN", "legalTime": "2016-01-02", "since": null, "state": "not_yet", "status": null } - Article 5.2.3. The conferment of rights in the beneficiary includes the right to invoke a clause in the contract which excludes or limits the liability of the beneficiary
- info
EDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31Affected nodes- Article 5.2.3. The conferment of rights in the beneficiary includes the right to invoke a clause in the contract which excludes or limits the liability of the beneficiary
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BeneficiaryMayInvokeClause - Article 5.1.4(2). To the extent that an obligation involves a duty of best efforts, that party is bound to make such efforts as would be made by a reasonable person of the same kind
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BestEffortsDutyPerformed - Article 1.9(1). The parties are bound by any usage to which they have agreed
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByAgreedUsage - Article 1.9(1). The parties are bound by practices which they have established between themselves
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByEstablishedPractice - Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage - Article 1.9(2). The parties are bound by a usage widely known and regularly observed in the trade concerned, except where its application would be unreasonable
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#BoundByWidelyKnownUsage/unless/0 - Article 5.3.3(1). A party who prevented fulfilment contrary to good faith may not rely on the non-fulfilment of the condition
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnPreventedCondition - Article 5.3.3(2). A party who brought about fulfilment contrary to good faith may not rely on the fulfilment of the condition
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CannotRelyOnProcuredCondition - Article 4.3. In applying Articles 4.1 and 4.2, regard shall be had to all the circumstances, including those listed
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CircumstanceToBeRegarded - Article 1.11. Where a party has more than one place of business the relevant one is that which has the closest relationship to the contract and its performance
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ClosestPlaceIsRelevant - Article 4.1(2) (opening words). Where the common intention can be established, the reasonable-persons reading does not apply
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#CommonIntentionDisplacesReasonablePersons - Article 1.12(2). The computed last day does not stand where it is a holiday at the place of performance
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ComputedLastDayYieldsToHoliday - Article 4.6. If contract terms supplied by one party are unclear, an interpretation against that party is preferred
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContraProferentem - Article 1.3. A contract validly entered into is binding upon the parties
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ContractIsBinding - Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#Cooperate - Article 5.2.4. The promisor may assert against the beneficiary all defences which the promisor could assert against the promisee
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DefencesAgainstBeneficiary - Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective - Article 1.5. The parties may derogate from or vary the effect of any of the provisions, except as otherwise provided
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DerogationEffective/unless/0 - Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyOfGoodFaith - Article 5.1.3. Each party shall co-operate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party's obligations
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToCooperate - Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRights - Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#DutyToPreserveRightsBreached - Article 5.1.1. The contractual obligations of the parties may be express
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ExpressIsContractual - Article 5.1.5. In determining the extent to which an obligation involves a duty of best efforts or a duty to achieve a specific result, regard shall be had to the listed factors
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FactorDeterminesKindOfDuty - Article 1.1. The parties are free to enter into a contract and to determine its content
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#FreedomOfContract - Article 1.6(2). Issues within the scope of these Principles but not expressly settled by them are as far as possible to be settled in accordance with their underlying general principles
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GapSettledByUnderlyingPrinciples - Article 1.7(1). Each party must act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing in international trade
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaith - Article 1.7(2). The parties may not exclude or limit the duty of good faith and fair dealing
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GoodFaithCannotBeExcluded - Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted - Article 5.1.9(2). An offer to release a right gratuitously shall be deemed accepted if the obligor does not reject it without delay
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#GratuitousReleaseDeemedAccepted/unless/0 - Article 5.1.2(c). Implied obligations stem from good faith and fair dealing
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromGoodFaith - Article 5.1.2(a). Implied obligations stem from the nature and purpose of the contract
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromNatureAndPurpose - Article 5.1.2(b). Implied obligations stem from practices established between the parties and usages
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromPracticesAndUsages - Article 5.1.2(d). Implied obligations stem from reasonableness
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedFromReasonableness - Article 5.1.1. The contractual obligations of the parties may be implied
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ImpliedIsContractual - Article 1.8. A party cannot act inconsistently with an understanding it has caused the other party to have and upon which that other party reasonably has acted in reliance to its detriment
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InconsistentBehaviourBarred - Article 4.2(2) (opening words). Where the intention was known to the other party, the reasonable-person reading does not apply
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#IntentionDisplacesReasonablePerson - Article 4.1(1). A contract shall be interpreted according to the common intention of the parties
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByCommonIntention - Article 4.1(2). If the common intention cannot be established, the contract shall be interpreted according to the meaning reasonable persons of the same kind would give it
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#InterpretedByReasonablePersons - Article 1.4. Nothing in these Principles restricts the application of mandatory rules
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MandatoryRulesUnrestricted - Article 5.1.7(2). Where the price is to be determined by one party and that determination is manifestly unreasonable, a reasonable price shall be substituted notwithstanding any contract term to the contrary
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ManifestlyUnreasonableDeterminationReplaced - Preamble. These Principles may be applied when the parties have agreed that their contract be governed by general principles of law, the lex mercatoria or the like
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyOnChoiceOfGeneralPrinciples - Preamble. These Principles may be applied when the parties have not chosen any law to govern their contract
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayApplyWhereNoLawChosen - Preamble. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement domestic law
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretDomesticLaw - Preamble. These Principles may be used to interpret or supplement international uniform law instruments
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#MayInterpretUniformLaw - Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated as otherwise provided in these Principles
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationAsProvided - Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated by agreement
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByAgreement - Article 1.3. The contract can be modified or terminated in accordance with its terms
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ModificationByTerms - Article 1.2. Nothing in these Principles requires a contract to be made in or evidenced by a particular form
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoFormRequired - Article 1.10(2)-(3). A notice is effective when it reaches the person to whom it is given
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#NoticeEffectiveOnReceipt - Article 4.7. In case of discrepancy between equally authoritative versions there is a preference for the interpretation according to the original version
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#OriginalVersionPreferred - Article 1.12(1). Official holidays or non-business days occurring during the period are included in calculating it
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodEndsOn - Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday - Article 1.12(2). If the last day of the period is a holiday or a non-business day at the place of business of the party to perform, the period is extended until the first business day which follows
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PeriodExtendedByHoliday/unless/0 - Article 5.3.4. Pending fulfilment of a condition, a party may not, contrary to good faith, act so as to prejudice the other party's rights in case of fulfilment
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PreserveRights - Article 5.1.7(1). Where a contract does not fix the price, the parties are considered to have made reference to the price generally charged in comparable circumstances
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceByMarket - Article 5.1.7(1). If no such price is available, a reasonable price applies
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PriceReasonableWhereNoMarket - Preamble. These Principles shall be applied when the parties have agreed that their contract be governed by them
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PrinciplesGovernByAgreement - Article 5.1.6. Where the quality of performance is neither fixed by nor determinable from the contract, a party is bound to render a performance of a quality that is reasonable and not less than average in the circumstances
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#QualityWhereNotFixed - Article 5.1.9(1). An obligee may release its right by agreement with the obligor
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ReleaseByAgreement - Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone - Article 1.12(3). The relevant time zone is that of the place of business of the party setting the time, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RelevantTimeZone/unless/0 - Article 5.2.6. The beneficiary may renounce a right conferred on it
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RenunciationEndsBeneficiaryRight - Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract - Article 5.3.2(b). The relevant contract or contractual obligation comes to an end upon fulfilment of a resolutive condition
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResolutiveConditionEndsContract/unless/0 - Article 5.3.5. On fulfilment of a resolutive condition the rules on restitution apply with appropriate adaptations
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RestitutionOnResolutiveCondition - Article 5.1.4(1). To the extent that an obligation involves a duty to achieve a specific result, that party is bound to achieve that result
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ResultDutyPerformed - Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance - Article 5.2.5. The parties may modify or revoke the rights conferred until the beneficiary has accepted them or reasonably acted in reliance on them
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#RevocationUntilAcceptance/unless/0 - Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant - Article 1.11. Where a party has a single place of business that place is the relevant one
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SinglePlaceIsRelevant/unless/0 - Article 4.2(1). Statements and other conduct shall be interpreted according to the party's intention if the other party knew or could not have been unaware of it
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByIntention - Article 4.2(2). If the preceding paragraph is not applicable, statements shall be interpreted according to the meaning a reasonable person would give them
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#StatementByReasonablePerson - Article 4.8(1). Where the parties have not agreed with respect to an important term, a term which is appropriate in the circumstances shall be supplied
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SupplyOmittedTerm - Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect - Article 5.3.2(a). The relevant contract or contractual obligation takes effect upon fulfilment of a suspensive condition
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#SuspensiveConditionTakesEffect/unless/0 - Article 5.1.8. A contract for an indefinite period may be terminated by either party by giving notice a reasonable time in advance
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#TerminationOfIndefiniteContract - Article 5.1.7(2). A manifestly unreasonable determination does not stand as the applicable price
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#UnreasonableDeterminationDisplaced - Article 5.3.1. A contract or a contractual obligation may be made conditional upon the occurrence of a future uncertain event
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#ValidCondition
Details
{ "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc#PICC_2016_FR", "legalTime": "2016-01-02", "since": null, "state": "not_yet", "status": null } - Article 5.2.3. The conferment of rights in the beneficiary includes the right to invoke a clause in the contract which excludes or limits the liability of the beneficiary
- info
EDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31Affected nodes- Article 10.4(1). Where the obligor acknowledges the right before the expiration of the general limitation period, a new general limitation period begins on the day after the acknowledgement
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AcknowledgementStartsNewGeneralPeriod - Article 10.6(1). In the absence of provisions determining the exact date of commencement, arbitral proceedings are deemed to commence on the date on which the request reaches the obligor
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ArbitrationCommencesOnRequest - Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration - Article 10.1(2). This Chapter does not govern the time within which a party must give notice or perform any act other than the institution of legal proceedings
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ChapterDoesNotGovernNoticeTime - Article 10.9(1). The expiration of the limitation period does not extinguish the right
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight - Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted - Article 10.9(2). Once the obligor has asserted expiry, the barred exercise is a comparative remedium_exclusum
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit - Article 10.3(a). The parties may not shorten the general limitation period to less than one year
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodFloorOfOneYear - Article 10.2(1). The general limitation period is three years beginning on the day after the day the obligee knows or ought to know the facts as a result of which the right can be exercised
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodOfThreeYears - Article 10.1(1). The exercise of rights governed by the Principles is barred by the expiration of a limitation period according to the rules of this Chapter
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#LimitationGovernsExerciseOfRights - Article 10.3(c). The parties may not extend the maximum limitation period to more than fifteen years
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodCeilingOfFifteenYears - Article 10.4(2). The maximum limitation period does not begin to run again, but may be exceeded by the beginning of a new general limitation period
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodDoesNotRestart - Article 10.3(b). The parties may not shorten the maximum limitation period to less than four years
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodFloorOfFourYears - Article 10.2(2). In any event, the maximum limitation period is ten years beginning on the day after the day the right can be exercised
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodOfTenYears - Article 10.11. Where there has been performance in order to discharge an obligation, there is no right of restitution merely because the limitation period has expired
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#NoRestitutionAfterExpiration - Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration - Article 10.3. The parties may modify the limitation periods
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PartiesMayModifyPeriods - Article 10.9(3). A right may still be relied on as a defence even though the expiration of the limitation period for that right has been asserted
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#RightStillAvailableAsDefence - Article 10.10. The obligee may exercise the right of set-off until the obligor has asserted the expiration of the limitation period
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SetOffUntilExpirationAsserted - Article 10.7. Articles 10.5 and 10.6 apply with appropriate modifications to proceedings whereby the parties request a third person to assist them in reaching an amicable settlement
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByAmicableSettlementProceedings - Article 10.6(1). The running of the limitation period is suspended when the obligee performs an act recognised by the law of the arbitral tribunal as asserting its right
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByArbitralAct - Article 10.5(1)(c). The running of the limitation period is suspended where the obligee has asserted its rights in proceedings for dissolution of the obligor
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByDissolutionClaim - Article 10.8(1). Where the obligee has been prevented by an impediment beyond its control, the general limitation period is suspended so as not to expire before one year after the impediment has ceased to exist
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByImpediment - Article 10.8(2). Where the impediment consists of the incapacity or death of a party, suspension ceases when a representative or successor has been appointed; the additional one-year period applies accordingly
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByIncapacityEndsOnAppointment - Article 10.5(1)(b). The running of the limitation period is suspended where the obligee has asserted its rights in the insolvency proceedings
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByInsolvencyClaim - Article 10.5(1)(a). The running of the limitation period is suspended when the obligee performs an act recognised by the law of the court as asserting its right
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByJudicialAct
Details
{ "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_EN", "legalTime": "2016-01-02", "since": null, "state": "not_yet", "status": null } - Article 10.4(1). Where the obligor acknowledges the right before the expiration of the general limitation period, a new general limitation period begins on the day after the acknowledgement
- info
EDITION_NOT_APPLICABLE§92.3§31Affected nodes- Article 10.4(1). Where the obligor acknowledges the right before the expiration of the general limitation period, a new general limitation period begins on the day after the acknowledgement
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AcknowledgementStartsNewGeneralPeriod - Article 10.6(1). In the absence of provisions determining the exact date of commencement, arbitral proceedings are deemed to commence on the date on which the request reaches the obligor
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ArbitrationCommencesOnRequest - Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#AssertExpiration - Article 10.1(2). This Chapter does not govern the time within which a party must give notice or perform any act other than the institution of legal proceedings
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ChapterDoesNotGovernNoticeTime - Article 10.9(1). The expiration of the limitation period does not extinguish the right
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationDoesNotExtinguishRight - Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpirationNeedsToBeAsserted - Article 10.9(2). Once the obligor has asserted expiry, the barred exercise is a comparative remedium_exclusum
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ExpiryExcludit - Article 10.3(a). The parties may not shorten the general limitation period to less than one year
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodFloorOfOneYear - Article 10.2(1). The general limitation period is three years beginning on the day after the day the obligee knows or ought to know the facts as a result of which the right can be exercised
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#GeneralPeriodOfThreeYears - Article 10.1(1). The exercise of rights governed by the Principles is barred by the expiration of a limitation period according to the rules of this Chapter
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#LimitationGovernsExerciseOfRights - Article 10.3(c). The parties may not extend the maximum limitation period to more than fifteen years
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodCeilingOfFifteenYears - Article 10.4(2). The maximum limitation period does not begin to run again, but may be exceeded by the beginning of a new general limitation period
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodDoesNotRestart - Article 10.3(b). The parties may not shorten the maximum limitation period to less than four years
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodFloorOfFourYears - Article 10.2(2). In any event, the maximum limitation period is ten years beginning on the day after the day the right can be exercised
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#MaximumPeriodOfTenYears - Article 10.11. Where there has been performance in order to discharge an obligation, there is no right of restitution merely because the limitation period has expired
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#NoRestitutionAfterExpiration - Article 10.9(2). For the expiration of the limitation period to have effect, the obligor must assert it as a defence
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#ObligorMayAssertExpiration - Article 10.3. The parties may modify the limitation periods
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PartiesMayModifyPeriods - Article 10.9(3). A right may still be relied on as a defence even though the expiration of the limitation period for that right has been asserted
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#RightStillAvailableAsDefence - Article 10.10. The obligee may exercise the right of set-off until the obligor has asserted the expiration of the limitation period
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SetOffUntilExpirationAsserted - Article 10.7. Articles 10.5 and 10.6 apply with appropriate modifications to proceedings whereby the parties request a third person to assist them in reaching an amicable settlement
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByAmicableSettlementProceedings - Article 10.6(1). The running of the limitation period is suspended when the obligee performs an act recognised by the law of the arbitral tribunal as asserting its right
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByArbitralAct - Article 10.5(1)(c). The running of the limitation period is suspended where the obligee has asserted its rights in proceedings for dissolution of the obligor
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByDissolutionClaim - Article 10.8(1). Where the obligee has been prevented by an impediment beyond its control, the general limitation period is suspended so as not to expire before one year after the impediment has ceased to exist
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByImpediment - Article 10.8(2). Where the impediment consists of the incapacity or death of a party, suspension ceases when a representative or successor has been appointed; the additional one-year period applies accordingly
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByIncapacityEndsOnAppointment - Article 10.5(1)(b). The running of the limitation period is suspended where the obligee has asserted its rights in the insolvency proceedings
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByInsolvencyClaim - Article 10.5(1)(a). The running of the limitation period is suspended when the obligee performs an act recognised by the law of the court as asserting its right
urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#SuspensionByJudicialAct
Details
{ "edition": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation#PICC_2016_FR", "legalTime": "2016-01-02", "since": null, "state": "not_yet", "status": null } - Article 10.4(1). Where the obligor acknowledges the right before the expiration of the general limitation period, a new general limitation period begins on the day after the acknowledgement
As recorded by the engine: code, severity and message with §-references; order follows the evaluation document.
Proof graph
Proof nodes: 33 · assertion 10, rule_application 21, candidate_closure 1, query_evaluation 1
This block is too large for inline viewing. It is included in full in the document JSON, without truncation.
Download JSON ↓Calendar and proof identifiers
- Proof reference
- case/FuenfJahre_BGB/query/bgb-2013-12-31
Original reasoning · JSON
This block is too large for inline viewing. It is included in full in the document JSON, without truncation.
Download JSON ↓SourcesExcerpts: 4
paragraph/195
§ 195 Regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beträgt drei Jahre.
Original data · JSON
{
"contentHash": "sha256:53e15660089df268ecd95ba8fdcc0d8e73cba45a9e68c5cc802f87a60f03db9b",
"edition": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_KONSOLIDIERT",
"fragmentKind": "article",
"id": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_P195",
"kind": "fragment",
"labels": [
{
"language": "de",
"status": "official",
"text": "§ 195 Regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist"
}
],
"locator": "paragraph/195",
"package": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
"texts": [
{
"contentHash": "sha256:3a37767ed679ef6124cbd5c7272a5a798618598a194829b5a5ad5b10c1cfe898",
"language": "de",
"status": "official",
"text": "§ 195 Regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist\nDie regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beträgt drei Jahre.\n"
}
],
"visibility": "public"
}paragraph/199
§ 199 Beginn der regelmäßigen Verjährungsfrist und Verjährungshöchstfristen (1) Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beginnt, soweit nicht ein anderer Verjährungsbeginn bestimmt ist, mit dem Schluss des Jahres, in dem 1. der Anspruch entstanden ist und 2. der Gläubiger von den den Anspruch begründenden Umständen und der Person des Schuldners Kenntnis erlangt oder ohne grobe Fahrlässigkeit erlangen müsste. (2) Schadensersatzansprüche, die auf der Verletzung des Lebens, des Körpers, der Gesundheit oder der Freiheit beruhen, verjähren ohne Rücksicht auf ihre Entstehung und die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in 30 Jahren von der Begehung der Handlung, der Pflichtverletzung oder dem sonstigen, den Schaden auslösenden Ereignis an. (3) Sonstige Schadensersatzansprüche verjähren 1. ohne Rücksicht auf die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in zehn Jahren von ihrer Entstehung an und 2. ohne Rücksicht auf ihre Entstehung und die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in 30 Jahren von der Begehung der Handlung, der Pflichtverletzung oder dem sonstigen, den Schaden auslösenden Ereignis an. Maßgeblich ist die früher endende Frist. (3a) Ansprüche, die auf einem Erbfall beruhen oder deren Geltendmachung die Kenntnis einer Verfügung von Todes wegen voraussetzt, verjähren ohne Rücksicht auf die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in 30 Jahren von der Entstehung des Anspruchs an. (4) Andere Ansprüche als die nach den Absätzen 2 bis 3a verjähren ohne Rücksicht auf die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in zehn Jahren von ihrer Entstehung an. (5) Geht der Anspruch auf ein Unterlassen, so tritt an die Stelle der Entstehung die Zuwiderhandlung.
Original data · JSON
{
"contentHash": "sha256:dbc2b5bc4ee946d17bb8636b8d724e0168033a99dc35c94f5c6eb2b53f2b838c",
"edition": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_KONSOLIDIERT",
"fragmentKind": "article",
"id": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_P199",
"kind": "fragment",
"labels": [
{
"language": "de",
"status": "official",
"text": "§ 199 Beginn der regelmäßigen Verjährungsfrist und Verjährungshöchstfristen"
}
],
"locator": "paragraph/199",
"package": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
"texts": [
{
"contentHash": "sha256:2916e6a9e86d21f331739cafd8a135c863d9e0bf3087e8a13fb6c60d7f2df4da",
"language": "de",
"status": "official",
"text": "§ 199 Beginn der regelmäßigen Verjährungsfrist und Verjährungshöchstfristen\n(1) Die regelmäßige Verjährungsfrist beginnt, soweit nicht ein anderer Verjährungsbeginn bestimmt ist, mit dem Schluss des Jahres, in dem 1. der Anspruch entstanden ist und\n2. der Gläubiger von den den Anspruch begründenden Umständen und der Person des Schuldners Kenntnis erlangt oder ohne grobe Fahrlässigkeit erlangen müsste.\n(2) Schadensersatzansprüche, die auf der Verletzung des Lebens, des Körpers, der Gesundheit oder der Freiheit beruhen, verjähren ohne Rücksicht auf ihre Entstehung und die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in 30 Jahren von der Begehung der Handlung, der Pflichtverletzung oder dem sonstigen, den Schaden auslösenden Ereignis an.\n(3) Sonstige Schadensersatzansprüche verjähren 1. ohne Rücksicht auf die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in zehn Jahren von ihrer Entstehung an und\n2. ohne Rücksicht auf ihre Entstehung und die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in 30 Jahren von der Begehung der Handlung, der Pflichtverletzung oder dem sonstigen, den Schaden auslösenden Ereignis an.\nMaßgeblich ist die früher endende Frist.\n(3a) Ansprüche, die auf einem Erbfall beruhen oder deren Geltendmachung die Kenntnis einer Verfügung von Todes wegen voraussetzt, verjähren ohne Rücksicht auf die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in 30 Jahren von der Entstehung des Anspruchs an.\n(4) Andere Ansprüche als die nach den Absätzen 2 bis 3a verjähren ohne Rücksicht auf die Kenntnis oder grob fahrlässige Unkenntnis in zehn Jahren von ihrer Entstehung an.\n(5) Geht der Anspruch auf ein Unterlassen, so tritt an die Stelle der Entstehung die Zuwiderhandlung.\n"
}
],
"visibility": "public"
}paragraph/209
§ 209 Wirkung der Hemmung Der Zeitraum, während dessen die Verjährung gehemmt ist, wird in die Verjährungsfrist nicht eingerechnet.
Original data · JSON
{
"contentHash": "sha256:9d3c1967977b0f7d0bb0d9a7d89228d863b64a3cc4a8d54a9f351d8c9205188c",
"edition": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_KONSOLIDIERT",
"fragmentKind": "article",
"id": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_P209",
"kind": "fragment",
"labels": [
{
"language": "de",
"status": "official",
"text": "§ 209 Wirkung der Hemmung"
}
],
"locator": "paragraph/209",
"package": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
"texts": [
{
"contentHash": "sha256:d3a5349ff97577ebae64e94327f4d26341f8d6fbce09a12c6615b96f59d9b9be",
"language": "de",
"status": "official",
"text": "§ 209 Wirkung der Hemmung\nDer Zeitraum, während dessen die Verjährung gehemmt ist, wird in die Verjährungsfrist nicht eingerechnet.\n"
}
],
"visibility": "public"
}paragraph/214
§ 214 Wirkung der Verjährung (1) Nach Eintritt der Verjährung ist der Schuldner berechtigt, die Leistung zu verweigern. (2) Das zur Befriedigung eines verjährten Anspruchs Geleistete kann nicht zurückgefordert werden, auch wenn in Unkenntnis der Verjährung geleistet worden ist. Das Gleiche gilt von einem vertragsmäßigen Anerkenntnis sowie einer Sicherheitsleistung des Schuldners.
Original data · JSON
{
"contentHash": "sha256:12d652436994db82ae2d39189be9bf31cdc979290895389a4620639b3f937994",
"edition": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_KONSOLIDIERT",
"fragmentKind": "article",
"id": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#BGB_P214",
"kind": "fragment",
"labels": [
{
"language": "de",
"status": "official",
"text": "§ 214 Wirkung der Verjährung"
}
],
"locator": "paragraph/214",
"package": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
"texts": [
{
"contentHash": "sha256:1f3cff3f6a0d4efb9796bd6eff87447e953e444a38ba0121caedb177cf59002e",
"language": "de",
"status": "official",
"text": "§ 214 Wirkung der Verjährung\n(1) Nach Eintritt der Verjährung ist der Schuldner berechtigt, die Leistung zu verweigern.\n(2) Das zur Befriedigung eines verjährten Anspruchs Geleistete kann nicht zurückgefordert werden, auch wenn in Unkenntnis der Verjährung geleistet worden ist. Das Gleiche gilt von einem vertragsmäßigen Anerkenntnis sowie einer Sicherheitsleistung des Schuldners.\n"
}
],
"visibility": "public"
}Packages in the snapshot
- de.bgb.core
- de.bgb.fristen
- de.bgb.ius_privatum
- doctrine.ius_privatum
- fr.code_civil
- unidroit.picc
- unidroit.picc_limitation
Technical dataFull response, parameters and checksums
- Calculation status
- COMPUTED
Full engine response
Complete machine result · JSON
This block is too large for inline viewing. It is included in full in the document JSON, without truncation.
Download JSON ↓Execution · JSON
This block is too large for inline viewing. It is included in full in the document JSON, without truncation.
Download JSON ↓Display metadata
This block is too large for inline viewing. It is included in full in the document JSON, without truncation.
Download JSON ↓JSON · calculations, sources and exact data
{
"acts": [
{
"artifactHash": "sha256:a6813604c35567e7c586d334efbf524d08f3467170c4b732cfb15809cacf4ff4",
"namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core",
"package": "de.bgb.core"
},
{
"artifactHash": "sha256:998148eaeeed28f1565811474ee7beb7eacc616c5681ed9638edc976512a9884",
"namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen",
"package": "de.bgb.fristen"
},
{
"artifactHash": "sha256:86a5a00db16e32187223ceeec6748eb7d42d18b7c370c8b15ac64d2f3f655ff7",
"namespace": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum",
"package": "de.bgb.ius_privatum"
},
{
"artifactHash": "sha256:7202de5de49a8a9d12837bc19cb7008ba2d1a68dbcc0134e0afccf1440a6d5ed",
"namespace": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum",
"package": "doctrine.ius_privatum"
},
{
"artifactHash": "sha256:ad41d027ba92c38ca5eecc1d16097d0bbc8c5a74946fc1a6397c6dadac61158f",
"namespace": "urn:fr:corpus:clir:code-civil",
"package": "fr.code_civil"
},
{
"artifactHash": "sha256:719bfd408eed92ad497ba071482354d4ad32b81ef9f41c6654f224416c19e603",
"namespace": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc",
"package": "unidroit.picc"
},
{
"artifactHash": "sha256:b311d0d422a1079f71113320bd818236f7b09507c7dd960bdafceb91285497d9",
"namespace": "urn:org:unidroit:clir:picc-limitation",
"package": "unidroit.picc_limitation"
}
],
"caseHash": "sha256:46016aa963d29cfc446a35c6a945630088a81b841001fff20f3772522d11579f",
"jurisdiction": "Deutschland",
"legalTime": "2016-01-02",
"mode": "audit",
"programHash": "sha256:8b984ebe333c1495e70c03829ac9006e05e9040c5a8ceb7d3e995bef1ff4587e",
"resultHash": "sha256:b3bbea0a38c7e961187d2faf46be42d341419cff3cf8fa9f8d6d5820e5728a99",
"timezone": "Europe/Berlin"
}- evaluation SHA-256
- sha256:db2c9aab40d8baf3e7fe3441de35432d2b2b178582562fa1a485b3ed756817bf
Original data · JSON
{
"args": [
{
"id": "urn:p12:anspruch",
"kind": "entity_ref"
},
{
"kind": "value",
"type": {
"name": "urn:law:std#Date"
},
"value": "2013-12-31"
}
],
"facts": [
{
"args": [
{
"id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
"kind": "const_ref"
},
{
"kind": "value",
"type": {
"name": "urn:law:std#Date"
},
"value": "2010-03-15"
}
],
"negated": false,
"origin": "case_input",
"predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core#anspruch_entstanden_am"
},
{
"args": [
{
"id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
"kind": "const_ref"
},
{
"kind": "value",
"type": {
"name": "urn:law:std#Date"
},
"value": "2010-03-15"
}
],
"negated": false,
"origin": "adjudicated",
"predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#kenntnis_erlangt_am"
},
{
"args": [
{
"id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
"kind": "const_ref"
}
],
"negated": false,
"origin": "case_input",
"predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#keine_hemmung"
},
{
"args": [
{
"id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
"kind": "const_ref"
}
],
"negated": false,
"origin": "case_input",
"predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#schuldner_beruft_sich_auf_verjaehrung"
},
{
"args": [
{
"id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
"kind": "const_ref"
},
{
"id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#g",
"kind": "const_ref"
}
],
"negated": false,
"origin": "case_input",
"predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core#anspruchsinhaber"
},
{
"args": [
{
"id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
"kind": "const_ref"
},
{
"id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#s",
"kind": "const_ref"
}
],
"negated": false,
"origin": "case_input",
"predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-core#anspruchsgegner"
},
{
"args": [
{
"id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#g",
"kind": "const_ref"
},
{
"id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
"kind": "entity_ref"
}
],
"negated": false,
"origin": "case_input",
"predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#persona_of"
},
{
"args": [
{
"id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#s",
"kind": "const_ref"
},
{
"id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
"kind": "entity_ref"
}
],
"negated": false,
"origin": "case_input",
"predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#persona_of"
},
{
"args": [
{
"id": "urn:law:examples:de:bgb:ein-fall-drei-kodizes#a",
"kind": "const_ref"
},
{
"id": "urn:p12:causa",
"kind": "entity_ref"
}
],
"negated": false,
"origin": "case_input",
"predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-ius-privatum#causa_of_anspruch"
},
{
"args": [
{
"id": "urn:p12:causa",
"kind": "entity_ref"
},
{
"id": "urn:p12:persona:g",
"kind": "entity_ref"
},
{
"id": "urn:p12:persona:s",
"kind": "entity_ref"
}
],
"negated": false,
"origin": "case_input",
"predicate": "urn:doctrine:clir:ius-privatum#petitio"
}
],
"kind": "truth",
"legalTime": "2016-01-02",
"predicate": "urn:de:corpus:clir:bgb-fristen#verjaehrung_eingetreten_am"
}